Spencer Shepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jonathan Edwards wrote:
> >
> > On Oct 25, 2006, at 15:38, Roger Ripley wrote:
> >
> > >IBM has contributed code for NFSv4 ACLs under AIX's JFS; hopefully
> > >Sun will not tarry in following their lead for ZFS.
> > >
> > >http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-cvs/2006-September/070855.html
> >
> > I thought this was still in draft:
> > http://ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nfsv4-acl-mapping-05.txt
>
> That I-D describes the Posix/NFSv4 mapping that can be done.
>
> NFSv4 ACLs to/from Samba/NT ACLs are a different story; no interdependency.
VFSv4 ACLs are bitwise identical to WIN-NT ACLs, could you please explain
why there is a difference for Samba?
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
