Re: [zfs-discuss] Disk IDs and DD

2011-08-10 Thread Lanky Doodle
Thanks Andrew, Fajar. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] Disk IDs and DD

2011-08-10 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Lanky Doodle wrote: > Can you elaborate on the dd command LaoTsao? Is the 's' you refer to a > parameter of the command or the slice of a disk - none of my 'data' disks > have been 'configured' yet. I wanted to ID them before adding them to pools. For starters,

Re: [zfs-discuss] Disk IDs and DD

2011-08-10 Thread Andrew Gabriel
Lanky Doodle wrote: Oh no I am not bothered at all about the target ID numbering. I just wondered if there was a problem in the way it was enumerating the disks. Can you elaborate on the dd command LaoTsao? Is the 's' you refer to a parameter of the command or the slice of a disk - none of my

Re: [zfs-discuss] Disk IDs and DD

2011-08-10 Thread Lanky Doodle
Oh no I am not bothered at all about the target ID numbering. I just wondered if there was a problem in the way it was enumerating the disks. Can you elaborate on the dd command LaoTsao? Is the 's' you refer to a parameter of the command or the slice of a disk - none of my 'data' disks have bee

Re: [zfs-discuss] Disk IDs and DD

2011-08-09 Thread Brandon High
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Paul Kraus wrote: >    Nothing to worry about here. Controller IDs (c) are assigned > based on the order the kernel probes the hardware. On the SPARC > systems you can usually change this in the firmware (OBP), but they > really don't _mean_ anything (other than the

Re: [zfs-discuss] Disk IDs and DD

2011-08-09 Thread Paul Kraus
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Lanky Doodle wrote: > Is there any reason (and anything to worry about) if disk target IDs don't > start at 0 > (zero). For some reason mine are like this (3 controllers - 1 onboard and 2 > PCIe); > > AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS: >       0. c8t0d0 >          /pci@

Re: [zfs-discuss] Disk IDs and DD

2011-08-09 Thread LaoTsao
nothing to worry about as for dd you need s? in addition to c8t0d0 Sent from my iPad Hung-Sheng Tsao ( LaoTsao) Ph.D On Aug 9, 2011, at 4:51, Lanky Doodle wrote: > Hiya, > > Is there any reason (and anything to worry about) if disk target IDs don't > start at 0 (zero). For some reason mine ar

[zfs-discuss] Disk IDs and DD

2011-08-09 Thread Lanky Doodle
Hiya, Is there any reason (and anything to worry about) if disk target IDs don't start at 0 (zero). For some reason mine are like this (3 controllers - 1 onboard and 2 PCIe); AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS: 0. c8t0d0 /pci@0,0/pci10de,cb84@5/disk@0,0 1. c8t1d0 /pci