ry rusty admin. like
me found it very easy.
Note: There may be
patches for the 500GB SATA disks I don'y know, fortunatly that's not
what I've sold - Phew!!
TTFN
Trevor
Trevor Pretty wrote:
Karl
Don't you just use stmsboot?
http://docs.sun.
A disks I don'y know, fortunatly
that's not what I've sold - Phew!!
TTFN
Trevor
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org]
On Behalf Of Trevor Pretty [trevor_pre...@eagle.co.nz]
Sent: Monday, 30 November 2009 2:48 p
s the customer progresses.
>Interesting blog:
>http://blog.backblaze.com/2009/09/01/petabytes-on-a-budget-how-to-build-cheap-cloud-storage/
>
--
Trevor Pretty
| Technical Account Manager
|
T: +64 9 639 0652 |
M: +64 21 666 161
Eagle Technology Group Ltd.
Gate D, Alexandra P
Karl
Don't you just use stmsboot?
http://docs.sun.com/source/820-3223-14/SASMultipath.html#50511899_pgfId-1046940
Bruno
Next week I'm playing with a M3000 and a J4200 in the local NZ
distributor's lab. I had planned to just use the latest version of
S10, but if I get the time I might play
backups
on-line for quite some time.
Discuss :-)
--
Trevor Pretty
| Technical Account Manager
|
T: +64 9 639 0652 |
M: +64 21 666 161
Eagle Technology Group Ltd.
Gate D, Alexandra Park, Greenlane West, Epsom
Private Bag 93211, Parnell, Auckland
www.eagle.co.nz
This email is confidential
Len Zaifman wrote:
Under these circumstances what advantage would a 7310 cluster over 2 X4540s backing each other up and splitting the load?
FISH! My wife could drive a
7310 :-)
www.eagle.co.nz
This email is confidential and may be legally
privileged. If received in error plea
Thanks old friend
I was surprised to read in the S10 zfs man page that there was the
option sharesmb=on.
I though I had missed the CIFs server making S10 whilst I was not
looking, but I was quickly coming to the conclusion that the CIFs stuff
was just not there, despite being tantalised by t
rited from pool-0/local/trevors_stuff
7000# cd /var/ak/shares/web/export/tlp/.zfs
7000# ls shares/
trevors_stuff_tlp
It also has sharemgr which seems to be missing in S10.
Trevor Pretty wrote:
Team
I'm missing something? First off I normally play around with
OpenSolaris & it's b
Tim Cook wrote:
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Trevor
Pretty <trevor_pre...@eagle.co.nz>
wrote:
Team
I'm missing something? First off I normally play around with
OpenSolaris & it's been a while since I played with Solaris 10.
I'm doing all this v
Team
I'm missing something? First off I normally play around with
OpenSolaris & it's been a while since I played with Solaris 10.
I'm doing all this via VirtualBox (Vista host) and I've set-up the
network (I believe) as I can ping, ssh and telnet from Vista into the
S10 virtual machine 192.
Excuse me for mentioning it but why not just use the format command?
format(1M)
analyze
Run read, write, compare tests, and data
purge. The data purge
function implements the National Computer Security Center Guide to
Understanding Data Remnance (NCSC-TG-025 version 2) Overwriting
Kim
You've been able to spin down drives since about Solaris 8.
http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/features/articles/disk_power_saving.jsp
Jim Klimov wrote:
Hello all.
Like many others, I've come close to making a home NAS server based on
ZFS and OpenSolaris. While this is not an enterpr
Ramin
I don't know but..
Is the error not from mount and it's /export/home that can't be
created?
"mount '/export/home': failed to create mountpoint."
Have you tried mounting 'rpool/export' somewhere else, ike .mnt?
Ramin Moazeni wrote:
Hello
A customer recently had a power outag
Miha
If you do want multi-reader,
multi-writer block access (and not use iSCSI) then QFS is what you
want.
http://www.sun.com/storage/management_software/data_management/qfs/features.xml
You can use ZFS pools are lumps of disk under SAM-QFS:-
https://blogs.communication.utexas.edu/groups/te
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Orvar Korvar wrote:
I was under the impression that you can create a new zfs dataset and turn on the dedup functionality, and copy your data to it. Or am I wrong?
you don't even have to create a new dataset just do:
# zfs set dedup=on
But l
What "root user" would that be then? "root" is just a role by default
in OpenSolaris.
Now sit down the next bit will come as a shock.
Go to Systems -> Administration -> User and Groups
Select a user and click the properties button that un-greys
You can give the user profiles a
Bruno Sousa wrote:
Hi,
I can agree that the software is the one that really has the added
value, but to my opinion allowing a stack like Fishworks to run outside
the Sun Unified Storage would lead to lower price per unit(Fishwork
license) but maybe increase revenue. Why an increase
Paul
Being a script hacker like you the only kludge I can think of.
A script that does something like
ls > /tmp/foo
sleep
ls /tmp/foo.new
diff /tmp/foo /tmp/foo.new >
/tmp/files_that_have_changed
mv /tmp/foo.new /tmp/foo
Or you might be able to knock something up with bart nd zfs snapshots
have a look at this thread:-
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/2009-September/032349.html
we discussed this a while back.
SHOUJIN WANG wrote:
Hi there,
What I am tring to do is: Build a NAS storage server based on the following hardware architecture:
Server-->SAS HBA--->
No it concerns the difference between reads and writes.
The write performance may be being over stated!
Ross Walker wrote:
But this is concerning reads not writes.
-Ross
On Oct 20, 2009, at 4:43 PM, Trevor Pretty <trevor_pre...@eagle.co.nz>
Richard Elling wrote:
I think where we stand today, the higher-level systems questions of
redundancy tend to work against builtin cards like the F20. These
sorts of cards have been available in one form or another for more
than 20 years, and yet they still have limited market share -- no
Gary
Where you measuring the Linux NFS write performance? It's well know
that Linux can use NFS in a very "unsafe" mode and report the write
complete when it is not all the way to safe storage. This is often
reported as Solaris has slow NFS write performance. This link does not
mention NFS v4
un are missing a great opportunity not offering a reasonable
upgrade path from an X**** to an S7000.
Trevor Pretty
| Technical Account Manager
|
T: +64 9 639 0652 |
M: +64 21 666 161
Eagle Technology Group Ltd.
Gate D, Alexandra Park, Greenlane West, Epsom
Private Bag 93211, Parnell, Auckland
Sorry: Pointless and a waste of time until we get some detail!
http://fsbench.filesystems.org/papers/cheating.pdf
Cyril Plisko wrote:
Hello !
There is an interesting performance comparison of three popular
operating systems [1], I thought it could be of interest for people
hang
Cindy
How does the SS7000 do it?
Today I demoed pulling a disk and the spare just automatically became
part of the pool. After it was re-silvered I then pulled three more
(latest Q3 version with triple RAID-Z). I then plugged all the drives
back in (different slots) and everything was back t
OOPS just spotted you said
you don't want a FS for each sub-dir :-)
Trevor Pretty wrote:
Edward
If you look at the man page:-
snapshot
A read-only version of a file system or volume at a given
point
in time. It is specified as filesys...@name or vol...
Edward
If you look at the man page:-
snapshot
A read-only version of a file system or volume at a given point
in time. It is specified as filesys...@name or vol...@name.
I think you've taken volume
snapshots. I believe you need to make file system snapshots and each
users/use
It think James said there was audio problems and that's why it took so
long to get published.
Cyril Plisko wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Henrik Johansson wrote:
Hello everybody,
The KCA ZFS keynote by Jeff and Bill seems to be available online now:
http://blogs.sun.co
David
That depends on the hardware layout. If you don't know and you say the
data is still somewhere else
You could.
Pull a disk out and see what happens to the pool the one you pulled
will be highlighted as the pool looses all it's replicas (clear
"should" fix when you plug it back in.)
Ray
Use this link it's worth it's weight in gold. The goolge search engine
is so much better than what's available at doc.sun.com
http://www.google.com/custom?hl=en&client=google-coop&cof=S%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.sun.com%3BCX%3ASun%2520Documentation%3BL%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Flogos.sun.com%2Ftry%2Fimg%2F
David
The disk is broken! Unlike
other file systems which would silently loose your data ZFS has decide
that this particular disk has "persistent errors"
action: Replace the faulted device, or use 'zpool clear' to mark the device repaired.
^^
It's clear you are
unsuccessful at repairing
Or just "try and buy" the machines from Sun for ZERO DOLLARS!!!
Like Erik said..
"Both the Thor and 7110 are available for Try-and-Buy. Get them and test them against your workload - it's the only way to be sure (to paraphrase Ripley)."
Marc Bevand wrote:
Richard Connamacher in
Ron
That should work it's no real different to SVM.
BTW: I did you mean?
mirrored root on c1t0d0s0/c2t0d0s0
mirrored app on c1t1d0s0/c2t1d0s0
RaidZ accross c1t0d0s7/c1t1d0s7/c2t0d0s7/c2t1d0s7
I would then make slices 0 and 7 the same on all disks using fmthard
(BTW:I would not use 7, I wou
Dick
I'm 99$ sure I use to do this when I had OpenSolaris as my base OS to
an XP guest (no NFS client - Bob) for my $HOME
Now I use Vista as my base OS because I now work in an MS environment,
so sorry can't check. You having problems?
BTW: Thank goodness for VirtualBox when I want to do rea
in any raidz
$ pfexec zpool replace rtank c5d0 raidz c3t6d0 c3t7d0 c3t8d0 c3t9d0 c3t10d0 c3t11d0
too many arguments
$ zpool upgrade -v
This system is currently running ZFS pool version 18.
Is what I am trying to do possible? If so what am I doing wrong? Thanks.
--
Trevor
Pretty |
Tech
Oracle use Linux :-(
But on the positive note have a look at this:- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rmrxN3GWHpM
It's Ed Zander talking to Larry and asking some great questions.
29:45 Ed asks what parts of Sun are you going to keep - all of it!
45:00 Larry's rant on Cloud Computing
Of course I meant 2009.06 :-)
Trevor Pretty wrote:
BTW
Reading your bug.
I assumed you meant?
zfs set mountpoint=/home/pool tank
ln -s /dev/null /home/pool
I then tried on OpenSolaris 2008.11
r...@norton:~# zfs set mountpoint=
r...@norton:~# zfs set mountpoint
/pool
rm: cannot remove `/home/pool': No such file or directory
r...@norton:~# ln -s /dev/null /home/pool
r...@norton:~# zpool import -f tank
cannot mount 'tank': Not a directory
r...@norton:~#
So looks fixed to me.
Trevor Pretty wrote:
Jeremy
You sure?
http://bugs.
Jeremy
You sure?
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do%3Bjsessionid=32d28f683e21e4b5c35832c2e707?bug_id=6883885
BTW: I only found this by hunting for one of my bugs 6428437
and changing the URL!
I think the searching is broken - but using bugster has always been a
black art even when
http://blogs.sun.com/bonwick/entry/128_bit_storage_are_you
Trevor Pretty wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZFS
Shu Wu wrote:
Hi pals, I'm now looking into zfs source and have been
puzzled about 128-bit. It's announced that ZFS is an 128-bit file
system. But what do
27;zp_size' (in 'struct
znode_phys'), the file size in bytes, is defined as uint64_t. So I
guess 128-bit may be the bit width of the zpool pointer, but where is
it defined?
Regards,
Wu Shu
--
Trevor
Pretty |
Technical Account Manager
|
+64
9 639 0652 |
+64
21 666 161
Eagle
Hi!
Does anyone know out-of-the-head whether tmpfs supports ACLs - and if
"yes" - which type(s) of ACLs (e.g. NFSv4/ZFS, old POSIX draft ACLs
etc.) are supported by tmpfs ?
----
Bye,
Roland
--
Trevor
Pretty |
Technical Account Manager
|
+64
9 639 0652 |
+64
21 66
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Trevor
Pretty |
Technical Account Manager
|
+64
9 639 0652 |
+64
21 666 161
Eagle
Technology Group Ltd.
Gate
D, Alexandra Park, Greenlane West, Epsom
Private Bag 93211,
Parn
Cork
To answer your question just use tar for everything. It's about the
best we've got. :-(
When the disk turns into a doorstop re-install OpenSolaris/Solaris and
then tar back all your data. I keep a complete list of EVER change I
make on any OS (including the Redmond one) so I can re-creat
Just Curious
The 7110 I've on loan has an old zpool. I *assume* because it's been
upgraded and it gives me the ability to downgrade. Anybody know if I
delete the old version of Amber Road whether the pool would then
upgrade (I don't want to do it as I want to show the up/downgrade
feature)
laris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Trevor
Pretty | +64
9 639 0652 |
+64
21 666 161
Eagle
Technology Group Ltd.
Gate
D, Alexandra Park, Greenlane West, Epsom
Private Bag 93211,
Parnell, Auckland
www.eagle.co.nz
This email is confidential and may be legally
privileged. If received in error
you to see this data? :-
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/reports.cgi (Old Charts is interesting)
Trevor
Trevor Pretty wrote:
Dave
Yep that's an RFE. (Request For Enchantment) that's how things are
reported to engineers to fix things inside Sun. If it's an honest to
goodness CR =
Paul
You need to exclude all the file system that are not the "OS"
My S10 Virtual machine is not booted but you can put all the "excluded"
file systems in a file and use -f from memory.
You use to have to do this if there was a DVD in the drive otherwise
/cdrom got copied to the new boot
Dave
Yep that's an RFE. (Request For Enchantment) that's how things are
reported to engineers to fix things inside Sun. If it's an honest to
goodness CR = bug (However it normally need a real support paying
customer to have a problem to go from RFE to CR) the "responsible
engineer" evaluates
Jeff old mate I assume you used format -e?
Have you tried swapping the label back to SMI and then back to EFI?
Trevor
Jeff Victor wrote:
I am trying to mirror an existing zpool on OpenSolaris 2009.06. I think
I need to delete two alternate cylinders...
The existing disk in the pool (c
Lets not forget despite the fact us lunatic fringe use OpenSolaris on
anything we can get our hands on. Sun Microsystems use Solaris to run
mission critical environments and adding disk in "chunks" like you have
to do in ZFS to a commercial organisation is no big deal. The data is
worth far mo
Try send/receive to the same host (ssh localhost). I used this when
trying send/receive as it removes ssh between hosts "problems"
The on disk format of ZFS has changed there is something about it in
the man pages from memory so I don't think you can go S10 ->
OpenSolaris without doing an up
h /backup_pool/sapdata1
echo ""
echo "Notice the backup is not compressed!"
echo ""
press_return
do_command ls -alR /backup_pool/sapdata1 | more
Brian wrote:
Thank you, Ill definitely implement a script to scrub the system, and have the system email me if there is a pr
ssion?
--
======
Trevor PrettyMob: +64 21 666 161
Systems Engineer & OS Ambassador DDI: +64 9 976 6802
Sun Microsystems (NZ) Ltd. Fax: +64 9 976 6877
Level 5, 10 Viaduct Harbour Ave,
PO Box 5766, Auckland, Ne
I've a non-mirrored zfs file systems which shows the status below. I saw
the thread in the archives about working this out but it looks like ZFS
messages have changed. How do I find out what file(s) this is?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:] uname -a
SunOS nevada 5.11 snv_38 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10
[EMAI
55 matches
Mail list logo
