Richard Elling wrote:

I think where we stand today, the higher-level systems questions of
redundancy tend to work against builtin cards like the F20. These
sorts of cards have been available in one form or another for more
than 20 years, and yet they still have limited market share -- not
because they are fast, but because the other limitations carry more
weight. If the stars align and redundancy above the block layer gets
more popular, then we might see this sort of functionality implemented
directly on the mobo... at which point we can revisit the notion of file
system. Previous efforts to do this (eg Virident) haven't demonstrated
stellar market movement.
  -- richard
  
Richard

You mean presto-serve :-) Putting data on a local NVRAM in the sever layer, was a bad idea 20 years ago for a lot of applications. The reasons haven't changed in all those years!

For those who may not have been around in the "good old days" when 1 to 16 MB of NVRAM on an s-bus card was a good idea - or not http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/801-7289/6i1jv4t2s?a=view

Trevor
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
  


www.eagle.co.nz 

This email is confidential and may be legally privileged. If received in error please destroy and immediately notify us.

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to