The dips are gone. I've run simple copy operations via CIFS for two days and
the problem hasn't appeared anymore.
I'll try to find out what caused it though, thanks for trying to help me.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mail
Alright, I've made the benchmarks and there isn't a difference worth mentioning
except that i only get about 30MB/s (to my Mac, which has an SSD as system
disk). I've also tried copying to a ram disk with slightly better results.
Well, now that I've restarted the server I probably won't see the
> > From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org
> [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Marcus
> Wilhelmsson
> >
> > I have a problem with my zfs system, it's getting
> slower and slower
> > over time. When the OpenSolaris mach
tion on what to do?
I've tried some tuning by setting the following variables in /etc/system:
set zfs:zfs_txg_timeout = 1
set zfs:zfs_vdev_max_pending = 1
But it doesn't seem to make any difference.
Regards
/Marcus Wilhelmsson, Kalmar, Sweden
Message was edited by: tanngens
--
This
ld be my personal wishlist. I hope the presentation will be
made public after the event. ;-)
Thanks,
Marcus
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Eric Sproul wrote:
> Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>> An obvious item to cover is the new Flash Archive support as well as the
>> changes to Liv
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 08:41:13PM -0800, Frank Cusack wrote:
> On January 30, 2009 2:26:36 PM -0800 Marcus Reid
> wrote:
> >I am investigating using ZFS as a possible replacement for SVM for
> >root disk mirroring.
>
> I am doing the exact same thing. I just updated to
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 08:41:13PM -0800, Frank Cusack wrote:
> On January 30, 2009 2:26:36 PM -0800 Marcus Reid
> wrote:
>
> But what is probably best,
>
> 3) when it comes time to make your backup system act as the failed system,
> first boot it from the network or from c
%l4-7: 0183ec00 0180c000
skipping system dump - no dump device configured
rebooting...
Resetting ...
Is there a way to work through this?
Thanks,
Marcus
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
z
Ian Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marcus Sundman wrote:
> > Are these I/O errors written to stdout or stderr or where?
>
> Yes, stderr.
OK, good, thanks.
> You will not be able top open the file.
What?! Even if there are errors I want to still be able to read
Ian Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marcus Sundman wrote:
> > I couldn't see anything there describing either how to verify the
> > checksums of individual files or why that would be impossible.
>
> If you can read the file, the checksum is OK. If it were n
"Scott Laird" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Marcus Sundman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > I don't want to scrub several TiB of data just to verify a 2 MiB
> > file. I want to verify just the data of that file. (Well, I
"Johan Hartzenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Marcus Sundman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Richard Elling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Marcus Sundman wrote:
> > > > How can I verify the checksum
Richard Elling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marcus Sundman wrote:
> > How can I verify the checksums for a specific file?
>
> ZFS doesn't checksum files.
AFAIK ZFS checksums all data, including the contents of files.
> So a file does not have a checksum to verify.
How can I verify the checksums for a specific file?
- Marcus
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
"James C. McPherson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marcus Sundman wrote:
> > [...]
> blinder:jmcp $ for dev in `awk -F'"' '/sd/ {print
> $2}' /etc/path_to_inst`; do prtconf -v /devices/$dev|egrep -i
> "id1|dev.dsk.*s2" ; done
>
"James C. McPherson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marcus Sundman wrote:
> > I couldn't figure out which controller got which numbers so I had
> > to disconnect drives one by one
>
> I'm interested in what you did to figure out your drive
> lo
A Darren Dunham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 03:19:49AM +0300, Marcus Sundman wrote:
> > I've used format's "volname" command to give labels to my drives
> > according to their physical location. I did quite a lot of work
> >
p.
> Cannot label disk while its partitions are in use as described.
> format>
I get the same error message even if the device is offline (i.e.,
"zpool offline ").
Am I doing something wrong, or is format just giving me the finger for
no reason?
Cheers,
Marcus
"Brandon High" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Marcus Sundman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > So, is it possible to create a 5 * 1 TB raidz with 4 disks (i.e.,
> > with one disk offline)?
>
> [...]
> 1. Create a spars
opy the 1 TB of data from the 5th disk
to the new raidz and finally add the 5th disk to the raidz.)
Cheers,
Marcus
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
but I can't find the answers so I
ask here.)
- Marcus
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
ux box (I don't have X on any (Open)Solaris) and
press the Ä-key on my keyboard it says "keycode 48" and "keysym 0xe4",
and then "XLookupString gives 2 bytes: (c3 a4) "ä"". Thus at least
XLookupString seems to
the disks) on a 3rd, larger, disk?
- Marcus
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Bart Smaalders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marcus Sundman wrote:
> > Bart Smaalders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> UTF8 is the answer here. If you care about anything more than
> >> simple ascii and you work in more than a single locale/encoding,
&g
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
> Marcus Sundman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
> > > [...] ISO-8859-1 (the low 8 bits of UNOICODE) [...]
> >
> > Unicode is not an encoding, but you probably mean "the l
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
> [...] ISO-8859-1 (the low 8 bits of UNOICODE) [...]
Unicode is not an encoding, but you probably mean "the low 8 bits of
UCS-2" or "the first 256 codepoints in Unicode" or somesuch.
Regards,
Marcus
the NFS client can create two files named "a" and "A", but
> the CIFS client can only see one of those.
Not necessarily. There could be some (nonstandard) way of accessing
such duplicates (e.g., by having the CIFS daemon append "[dup-N]" or
somesuch to
Bart Smaalders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marcus Sundman wrote:
> > Bart Smaalders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> I'm unable to find more info about this. E.g., what does "reject
> >>> file names" mean in practice? E.g., if a pro
d care about that. Isn't that the job of the
CIFS daemon? As a matter of fact I don't see why the OS would need to
know how to decode any filename-bytes to text. However, I firmly
believe that user applications should have that opportunity. If the
encoding of filenames is not known (expl
replace them with ?s or somesuch? Or should it automatically convert the
filename from the active locale's fs-encoding (LC_CTYPE?) to UTF-8?
- Marcus
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
"Wee Yeh Tan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 10:42 PM, Marcus Sundman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Marcus Sundman wrote:
> > > > Nicolas Williams <[EMAIL
Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marcus Sundman wrote:
> > Nicolas Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 05:54:29AM +0200, Marcus Sundman wrote:
> >>> Nathan Kroenert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>&
E.g., do tar and similar
programs convert utf8-incompatible filenames to utf8 upon extraction if
my locale (or wherever the fs encoding is taken from) is set to use
utf-8? If they don't, then what happens with archives containing
utf8-incompatible filenames?
- Marcus
Nicolas Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 05:54:29AM +0200, Marcus Sundman wrote:
> > Nathan Kroenert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Are you indicating that the filesystem know's or should know what
> > > an applicat
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marcus Sundman wrote:
> > Are path-names text or raw data in zfs? I.e., is it possible to know
> > what the name of a file/dir/whatever is, or do I have to make more
> > or less wild guesses what encoding is u
Nathan Kroenert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you indicating that the filesystem know's or should know what an
> application is doing??
Maybe "snapshot file whenever a write-filedescriptor is closed" or
somesuch?
- Marcus
Are path-names text or raw data in zfs? I.e., is it possible to know
what the name of a file/dir/whatever is, or do I have to make more or
less wild guesses what encoding is used where?
- Marcus
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
ment grokking.
Can't be, because the '[E]' wasn't part of the command line arguments
(it was in a subdirectory).
- Marcus
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
s the heatsink it's attached to is
way too small for the general air flow in the case).
Regards,
Marcus
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Marcus Sundman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard Elling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It may be less expensive to purchase a new motherboard with 6 SATA
> > ports on it.
>
> Sure, but which one? I've been trying to find one for many, many
> mo
Richard Elling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marcus Sundman wrote:
> > Kava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Can anyone recommend a cheap (but reliable) SATA PCI or PCIX card?
> >>
> >
> > Why would you get a PCI-X card for
Let's say I have two 300 GB drives and one 500 GB drive. Can I put a
RAID-Z on the three drives and a separate partition on the last 200 GB
of the 500 GB drive?
- Marcus
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
, if someone is aware of some cheap (but reliable) SATA PCI-E
card then I'd be very interested.
- Marcus
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
/07. However, there seems to have been new
MCP55 (all nf570 are mcp55-based) drivers released since then:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6296435
Has anyone tested the "new" mcp55 drivers with the sata ports on an
44 matches
Mail list logo
