I've just installed 2008.05 on a 500 gig disk... Install went fine...
I attached an identically partitioned and labeled disk as soon as the
rpool was created during the installation.:
zpool attach rpool c5t0d0s0 c6t0d0s0
Resilver completed right away... and everything seemed to work fine.
Bo
ok cc'ing the zfs discuss was probably a mistake.
However I don't like the way you troll me and single out point 4, while the
other 3 points are directly related to Xen.
point 1, I can't set migrate a xen domU from a linux dom0 because it is
impossible to keep the previous network configuration
I had a similar problem on a quad core amd box with 8 gig of ram...
The performance was nice for a few minutes but then the system will
crawl to a halt.
The problem was that the areca SATA drivers can't do DMA when the dom0
memory wasn't at 3 gig or lower.
On 04/11/2007, at 3:49 PM, Martin
It wasn't there yesterday.
They just put it back in the Mac OS X Section of the ADC Download section
(http://developer.apple.com free registration)
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
h
TECTED] On Behalf Of Peter
> Woodman
> Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 8:14 AM
> To: Kugutsumen
> Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Mac OS X 10.5.0 Leopard ships with a
> readonly
> ZFS
>
> it would seem that the reason that it's been pulled
# zfs list
ZFS Readonly implemntation is loaded!
To download the full ZFS read/write kext with all functionality enabled,
please go to http://developer.apple.com
no datasets available
Unfortunately, I can't find it on ADC yet and it seems that it was removed by
Apple:
"Another turn in the Apple
u move /var to a separate partition, make sure you keep /var/run directory
in your zfs root.
Tested on b75a and b75a xVm should also work with b70, etc.
kugutsumen
You can find a patch for Tim's script here:
http://www.kugutsumen.com/showthread.php?t=1740
This message posted
my post got truncated on the web jive interface on opensolaris.org
You can find it here http://www.kugutsumen.com/showthread.php?t=1701
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.open
# I booted the gentoo partition
emerge xen-sources
cd /usr/src/linux-2.6.20-xen-r6
mount /boot
make && make install && make modules install
tar Ccp / linux-2.6.20-xen-r6-x64.tar.gz /boot/*2.6.20-xen-r6* /lib/
modules/*2.6.20-xen-r6*
# I transfered my xen domU kernel to a safe place.
# Now we ca
I finally managed to have a small zfsroot on a 1 gig disk... with /usr, /var,
/export/home on a secondary pool.
If you follow the zfs boot manual install instruction or use the
'zfs-actual-root-install.sh' script, make sure of the following:
1/ Do not create your zfs boot root right after your
Outside of xen ( it was running in a dom0),the zfs root creation executed
flawlessly.
and it seems that these dma error are caused by xen related isssue :(.
There is an old thread talking about DMA issues on machine with lots of ram
(8gig here.)
Reposting to the Xen mailing list.
This mess
Updated to latest firmware 1.43-70417 ...
same problem..
WARNING: arcmsr0: dma map got 'no resources'
WARNING: arcmsr0: dma allocate fail
WARNING: arcmsr0: dma allocate fail free scsi hba pkt
WARNING: arcmsr0: dma map got 'no resources'
WARNING: arcmsr0: dma allocate fail
WARNING: a
T
Just as I create a ZFS pool and copy the root partition to it the
performance seems to be really good then suddenly the system hangs all my
sesssions and displays on the console:
Oct 10 00:23:28 sunrise arcmsr: WARNING: arcmsr0: dma map got 'no resources'
Oct 10 00:23:28 sunrise arcmsr: WAR
on, Oct 08, 2007 at 07:26:39AM +0700, Kugutsumen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Given two disk c1t0d0 (DISK A) and c1t1d0 (DISK B)...
>>
>> 1/ Standard install on DISK A.
>> 2/ zfs boot install on DISK B.
>> 3/ I change the boot order and my zfs boot works fine.
>
at 7:48 AM, Kugutsumen wrote:
> Did some googling, I guess the culprit is the bootpath in /boot/
> solaris/bootenv.rc
>
> setprop bootpath '/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/pci1000,[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL
> PROTECTED],0:a'
>
> I have to touch /reconfigure and reboot. I hope it works.
Did some googling, I guess the culprit is the bootpath in /boot/
solaris/bootenv.rc
setprop bootpath '/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/pci1000,[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL
PROTECTED],0:a'
I have to touch /reconfigure and reboot. I hope it works.
On 08/10/2007, at 7:26 AM, Kugutsumen wrote:
>
Hi,
Given two disk c1t0d0 (DISK A) and c1t1d0 (DISK B)...
1/ Standard install on DISK A.
2/ zfs boot install on DISK B.
3/ I change the boot order and my zfs boot works fine.
4/ I install grub on the mbr of DISK B
5/ I disconnect and replace DISK A with DISK B
6/ Reboot, get the grub menu selec
>>
>> The question of why to have different storage pools has still not
>> been
>> satisfactorily addressed. Methinks people are still confusing
>> pools and
>> data sets.
>>
>
> Is it possible to create a pool called rootpool made up for example
> of mirror c1t0d0 c2t0d0
> then add 4 disks
Same here, if zfs boot support raidz then my problems will be solved.
On 05/10/2007, at 11:27 PM, Rob Logan wrote:
>> I'm not surprised that having /usr in a separate pool failed.
>
> while this is discouraging, (I have several b62 machines with
> root mirrored and /usr on raidz) if booting from
esn't.
I guess I'll have to track down all these broken dependencies myself
or wait until 8 gig flashdisk are stocked again.
On 05/10/2007, at 10:52 PM, Lori Alt wrote:
> Kugutsumen wrote:
>> Thanks, this is really strange.
>> In your particular case you have /usr on
Thanks, this is really strange.
In your particular case you have /usr on the same pool as your rootfs
and I guess that's why it is working for you.
Alll my attempts with b64, b70 and b73 failed if /usr is on a
separate pool.
On 05/10/2007, at 4:10 PM, Andre Wenas wrote:
> Hi Ku
not access files
that are compressed.
Regards,
K.
On 05/10/2007, at 5:55 AM, Andre Wenas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Using bootroot I can do seperate /usr filesystem since b64. I can
> also do snapshot, clone and compression.
>
> Rgds,
> Andre W.
>
> Kugutsumen wrote:
>
ck root partition: NO
* can use compression on root partition: NO
* No backward compatibility with zfs mountroot.
Why did we completely drop support for the old mountroot approach
which is so much more flexible?
Kugutsumen
___
zfs-discuss mai
Postgres assumes that the OS takes care of caching:
"PLEASE NOTE. PostgreSQL counts a lot on the OS to cache data files
and hence does not bother with duplicating its file caching effort.
The shared buffers parameter assumes that OS is going to cache a lot
of files and hence it is generally
Thanks, you're my hero... Should I bfu to the latest bits to fix this
problem or do I also need to install b72?
On 01/10/2007, at 8:22 PM, Jürgen Keil wrote:
>> I would like confirm that Solaris Express Developer Edition 09/07
>> b70, you can't have /usr on a separate zfs filesystem because of
On 01/10/2007, at 7:46 PM, James C. McPherson wrote:
> Kugutsumen wrote:
>> I would like confirm that Solaris Express Developer Edition 09/07
>> b70, you can't have /usr on a separate zfs filesystem because of
>> broken dependencies.
>> 1/ Part of the probl
f the system on
separate raidz2 pool.
Kugutsumen
P.S. Registration on the opensolaris forum seems to be broken... it
keeps asking me for e-mail confirmation but when I click the link it
says the token is invalid.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@
On 30/09/2007, at 7:45 AM, Kugutsumen wrote:
> Thanks Jürgen,
>
> I was hit by 6423745 (see below) but the main problem is that /sbin/
> zpool is linked to /usr/lib/libdiskmgt.so.1 and since /usr was on
> my datapool, it failed systematically.
>
> I don't th
Thanks Jürgen,
I was hit by 6423745 (see below) but the main problem is that /sbin/
zpool is linked to /usr/lib/libdiskmgt.so.1 and since /usr was on my
datapool, it failed systematically.
I don't think it makes sense that an executable in /sbin be linked to
a lib in /usr/lib. The only binar
aken out in build 62... great backward compatibility here!
On 28/09/2007, at 6:17 PM, Kugutsumen wrote:
>
> Using build 70, I followed the zfsboot instructions at http://
> www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/boot/zfsboot-manual/ to the
> letter.
>
> I tried first with a
-B zfs-bootfs=rootpool/21' is loaded
grub> boot
Any idea what I am doing wrong?
Thanks and regards
Kugutsumen
This is everything I did:
# root is about 350 megs ... so it should fit nicely on our flash disk.
# let's make separate partition for /, /var, /opt, /usr and /expor
and no space for more disk... and I don't
feel like repartitioning to accommodate a mirror for /root.
Lori, what do you suggest I should do?
I could just keep all of root minus /usr, /var, etc.. on the usb
thumb drive? and mount the rest from the raidz2 pool... Is that the
only clean way to do it?
Regards,
Kugutsumen
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
32 matches
Mail list logo
