On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 8:59 AM, James C. McPherson
wrote:
[...]
> So when I'm
> trying to figure out who I need to yell at because they're
> using more than our acceptable limit (30Gb), I have to run
> "du -s /builds/[zyx]". And that takes time. Lots of time.
[...]
Why not just use quotas?
fpsm
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Linder, Doug
wrote:
>> Another thing that Gmail does that I find infuriating, is that it
>> mucks with the formatting. For some reason it, and to be fair, Outlook
>> as well, seem to think that they know how a message needs to be
>> formatted better than I do.
>
>
Have you looked at 'lsof' or the native BSM auditing features?
Admittedly audit is not really intended for realtime, but lsof
certainly is.
fpsm
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Edward Ned Harvey
wrote:
> When somebody is hammering on the system, I want to be able to detect who's
> doing it, and
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 2:33 AM, Brandon High wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Bob Friesenhahn
> wrote:
>> I think that you may notice that most of the perpetrators are from Gmail.
>> It seems that Gmail is very good at hiding existing text in its user
>> interface so people think noth
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Maurice Volaski
wrote:
>> Are you sure of that? This directly contradicts what David Magda said
>> yesterday.
>
> Yes. Just how is what he said contradictory?
To quote from his message:
> Either the primary node OR the secondary node can have active writes
> to a
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Maurice Volaski
wrote:
>> For Linux, I've been able to achieve what I want with DRBD but I'm
>> hoping I can find a similar solution on Solaris so that I can leverage
>> ZFS. It seems that solution is Sun Availability Suite (AVS)?
>
> AVS is like DRBD, but only to a
Thanks for posting this, but these two sentences seem to contradict each other:
"Employees of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory have ported
Sun's/Oracle's ZFS natively to Linux."
"The ZFS Posix Layer has not been implemented yet, therefore mounting
file systems is not yet possible"
Not to b
I find myself agreeing with Paul on this one. We allow people to
choose between filesystems, volume managers, password encryption
algorithims, profiles, etc. Why not allow them to pick one file
security model, another, or both?
Now, of course, the devil is in the details of implementation. Do we
m
to the man page, the valid values for the mask are 0-7 in 4
places, so 8000 would not be a valid value.
fpsm
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 12:34 PM, ep wrote:
> On 2 March 2010 08:13, Fredrich Maney wrote:
>> I haven't been really closely following this discussion, but I might
>>
I haven't been really closely following this discussion, but I might
have a solution.
A quick glance at 'man chmod(1)' will show that there is an unused bit
in the file mask, namely '7000'. This has been there for quite a long
time. I discovered it in '94 when a student accidentally set it on her
the miniroot of the jumpstart image so that
> it can then install zfs flash archive.
> please read the README notes in these for more specific instructions,
> including instructions on miniroot patching.
>
> Enda
>
> Fredrich Maney wrote:
>>
>> Any idea what the
Any idea what the Patch ID was?
fpsm
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Bob
Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jul 2009, Jerry K wrote:
>
>> It has been a while since this has been discussed, and I am hoping that
>> you can provide an update, or time estimate. As we are several months into
>> Update 7,
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Tim wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Fredrich Maney
> wrote:
>> Ah... an illiterate AND idiotic bigot. Have you even read the manual
>> or *ANY* of the replies to your posts? *YOU* caused the situation that
>> resulted in y
, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Fredrich Maney
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 4:14 PM, D. Eckert wrote:
>> I think you are not reading carefully enough, and I
>> can trace from your reply a typically American
>> arrogant behavior.
>>
>> WE, THE PROUDEST AND infalli
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 4:14 PM, D. Eckert wrote:
> I think you are not reading carefully enough, and I
> can trace from your reply a typically American
> arrogant behavior.
>
> WE, THE PROUDEST AND infallibles on earth DID NEVER MAKE
> a mistake. It is just the stupid user who did not read the
>
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Miles Nordin wrote:
>>>>>> "fm" == Fredrich Maney writes:
>
>fm> changing the default toolset (without notification)
>
> I wouldn't wish for notification all the time and tell people they
> cannot move unle
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Tim wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 3:55 AM, Volker A. Brandt wrote:
[...]
>> > 3)The educated/smart Linux users. They know about the differences
>> > and they are able to decide whether they like to use the Solaris
>> > tools with full Solaris
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:16 PM, Christine Tran
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Christine Tran
> wrote:
>> What is wrong with this?
>>
>> # chmod -R A+user:webservd:add_file/write_data/execute:allow /var/apache
>> chmod: invalid mode: `A+user:webservd:add_file/write_data/execute:allow
It really is sad when you have to start filtering technical mailing
lists to weed out the junk.
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 4:17 PM, JZ wrote:
> Obama just made a good speech.
> I hope you were watching TV...
>
> Best,
> z
> ___
> zfs-discuss mailing list
>
19 matches
Mail list logo
