Hi,
On Dec 17, 2007 4:18 PM, Roch - PAE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The pool holds home directories so small sequential writes to one
> > large file present one of a few interesting use cases.
>
> Can you be more specific here ?
>
> Do you have a body of application that would do small
>
Hi,
On Dec 17, 2007 10:37 AM, Roch - PAE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> dd uses a default block size of 512B. Does this map to your
> expected usage ? When I quickly tested the CPU cost of small
> read from cache, I did see that ZFS was more costly than UFS
> up to a crossover between 8K and 16
Hi,
On Dec 14, 2007 8:24 PM, Richard Elling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank Penczek wrote:
> >
> > The performance is slightly disappointing. Does anyone have
> > a similar setup and can anyone share some figures?
> > Any pointers to possible imp
Hi,
sorry for the lengthy post ...
On Dec 15, 2007 1:56 PM, Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Sequential writing problem with process throttling - there's an open
> bug for it for quite a while. Try to lower txg_time to 1s - should
> help a little bit.
Since setting txg_time to
Hi,
On Dec 14, 2007 7:50 PM, Louwtjie Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> I would have said ... to be expected, since the 280 came with a
> 100Mbit interface. So a 9-12 MB/s peak would be acceptable. You did
> mention a "gigabit switch"... did you install a gigabit HBA ? If
> that's the case
Hi all,
we are using the following setup as file server:
---
# uname -a
SunOS troubadix 5.10 Generic_120011-14 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-280R
# prtconf -D
System Configuration: Sun Microsystems sun4u
Memory size: 2048 Megabytes
System Peripherals (Software Nodes):
SUNW,Sun-Fire-280R (driver n
