Op 24-7-2011 16:51 schreef Orvar Korvar:
I dont get it. I created users with
System -> Administration -> Users and Groups
meny.
I thought every user will get his own ZFS filesystem? But when I do
# zfs list
I can not see a zfs listing for each user. I only see this:
rpool/export
Op 16-5-2011 22:55 schreef Freddie Cash:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Brandon High wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
Running ZFSv28 on 64-bit FreeBSD 8-STABLE.
I'd suggest trying to import the pool into snv_151a (Solaris 11
Express), which is the reference and d
On 29-11-2010 14:35, rwali...@washdcmail.com wrote:
I haven't done this on Solaris 11 Express, but this worked on
OpenSolaris 2009-06:
prtvtoc /dev/rdsk/c5t0d0s0 | fmthard -s - /dev/rdsk/c5t1d0s0
Where the first disk is the current root and the second one is the new mirror.
It works om solari
OK, I've got a proble I can't solve by myself. I've installed solaris 11
using just one drive.
Now I want to create a mirror by attached a second one tot the rpool.
However, the first one has NO partition 9 but the second one does. This
way the sizes differ if I create a partiotion 0 (needed bec
On 23-9-2010 16:34, Frank Middleton wrote:
For home use, used Suns are available at ridiculously low prices and
they seem to be much better engineered than your typical PC. Memory
failures are much more likely than winning the pick 6 lotto...
And about what SUN systems are you thinking for
On 23-9-2010 10:25, casper@sun.com wrote:
I'm using ZFS on a system w/o ECC; it works (it's an Atom 230).
I'm using ZFS on a non-ECC machine for years now without any issues.
Never had errors. Plus, like others said, other OS'ses have the same
problems and also run quite well. If not, yo
On 14-8-2010 15:56, Constantine wrote:
Hi.
I've got the ZFS filesystem (opensolaris 2009.06), witch, as i can see, was
automatically rollbacked by OS to the lastest snapshot after the power failure.
There is a trouble - snapshot is too old, and ,consequently, there is a
questions -- Can I b
On 14-8-2010 14:58, Russ Price wrote:
6. Abandon ZFS completely and go back to LVM/MD-RAID. I ran it for
years before switching to ZFS, and it works - but it's a bitter pill
to swallow after drinking the ZFS Kool-Aid.
Nice summary. ;-)
I switched to FreeBSD for the moment and it works very wel
On 13-8-2010 22:43, Gary Mills wrote:
If this information is correct,
http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=133043
further development of ZFS will take place behind closed doors.
Opensolaris will become the internal development version of Solaris
with no public distributions.
I want to transfer a lot of ZFS data from an old OpenSolaris ZFS mirror
(v22) to a new FreeBSD-8.1 ZFs mirror (v14).
If I boot off the OpenSolaris boot CD and import both mirrors will the
copying from v22 ZFS to v14 ZFS be harmless?
I'm not sure if this is teh right mailinglist for this question.
If I create a ZFS mirrored zpool on FreeBSD (zfs v14) will I be able
to boot off an OpenSolaris-b131 CD and copy my data off (another) ZFS
mirror created by OpenSolaris (ZFS v22)? A simple question, but my data
is precious, so I ask beforehand. ;-)
_
On 1-8-2010 19:57, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
I've kind of given up on that. This is a home "production" server;
it's got all my photos on it.
The uncertainty around OpenSolaris made me drop it. I'm very sorry to
say, because I loved the system. I do not want to worry all the time
though, so
On 19-7-2010 12:27, Anil Gulecha wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
Upcoming Ubuntu 10.10 will use BTRFS as a default.
Though there was some discussion around this, I don't think the above
is a given. The ubuntu devs would look at the status of the project,
and dec
On 28-6-2010 12:13, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
*sweat*
These systems are all running for years nowand I considered them safe...
Have I been at risk all this time?!
They're still running, are they not? So, stop sweating.
But you're right about the changed patching service from Oracle.
It sucks
enough they have a tendency to become true, even
if they are not.
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | OpenSolaris 2010.xx b134
+ All that's really worth doing is what we do for others (Lewis Carrol)
___
zfs-discuss ma
don't you set the canmount=noauto option in the zfs dataset.
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | OpenSolaris 2010.03 b134
+ All that's really worth doing is what we do for others (Lewis Carrol)
___
zfs-discuss m
I have some ZFS datasets that are shared through CIFS/NFS. So I created
them with sharenfs/sharesmb options.
I have full access from windows (through cifs) to the datasets, however,
all files and directories are created with (UNIX) permisions of
(--)/(d--). So, although I can access th
ining...
Or would it be called 2010.04 ? ;-)
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | OpenSolaris 2010.03 b134
+ All that's really worth doing is what we do for others (Lewis Carrol)
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
z
the story ...
+1
Carefully constructed ACL's should -never- be destroyed by an
(unwanted/unexpected) chmod. Extra aclmode properties should not be so
hard to implement.
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | OpenSolaris 2010.03 b131
+ All that's really wort
I want zfs on a single drive so I use copies=2 for -some- extra safety.
But I wonder if dedup=on could mean something in this case too? That way
the same blocks would never be written more than twice. Or would that
harm the reliability of the drive and should I just use copies=2?
--
Dick
ly on every os.
And also you shouldnt forget the extra capabilities of zfs like
snaphots ...
I'll go with ZFS. Like someone said with 'copies=2' for extra safety.
That should do it I think.
Compression will slow my system down too much, so I'll skip that one.
--
Dick Ho
ubt.. I've
read that zfs on a single drive is not safe enough, or that at least
fat32/ntfs are safer. What is true?
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | OpenSolaris 2010.03 b131
+ All that's really worth doing is what we do for
Op 7-2-2010 19:33, Ian Collins schreef:
dick hoogendijk wrote:
I want to move the rpool/www zfs filesystem to zone midgard.
Is this possible and how is this done?
Search for "Zones" in the zfs man page.
OK, it seems to be a simple question. It was not to me, but I'll fol
guess it will no longer be accessible from the GZ then. That would be
good, because I want to seperate my webserver from my global zone.
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | OpenSolaris 2010.03 b131
+ All that's really worth doing is what we do for others (Lewis C
nd mount it on /usr/perl5/mumble ? Or is this too simple a thought?
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Op 30-1-2010 20:53, Mark schreef:
I have a 1U server that supports 2 SATA drives in the chassis. I have 2 750 GB
SATA drives. When I install opensolaris, I assume it will want to use all or
part of one of those drives for the install. That leaves me with the remaining
part of disk 1, and all o
Op 28-1-2010 17:35, Cindy Swearingen schreef:
Thomas,
Excellent and much better suggestion... :-)
You can use beadm to specify another root pool by using the -p option.
The beadm operation will set the bootfs pool property and update the
GRUB entry.
It turns out not to be excellent at all. Be
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 08:44 -0700, Cindy Swearingen wrote:
> Or, if possible, connect another larger disk and attach it to the original
> root
> disk or even replace the smaller root pool disk with the larger disk.
I go for that one. But since it's a smoewhat older system I only have
IDE and SAT
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 12:34 -0700, Lori Alt wrote:
> But those could be copied by send/recv from the larger disk (current
> root pool) to the smaller disk (intended new root pool). You won't be
> attaching anything until you can boot off the smaller disk and then it
> won't matter what's on the
Op 28-1-2010 17:35, Cindy Swearingen schreef:
Thomas,
Excellent and much better suggestion... :-)
You can use beadm to specify another root pool by using the -p option.
The beadm operation will set the bootfs pool property and update the
GRUB entry.
Dick, you will need to update the BIOS to bo
Op 28-1-2010 17:35, Cindy Swearingen schreef:
Thomas,
Excellent and much better suggestion... :-)
You can use beadm to specify another root pool by using the -p option.
The beadm operation will set the bootfs pool property and update the
GRUB entry.
Dick, you will need to update the BIOS to bo
Op 28-1-2010 16:52, Thomas Maier-Komor schreef:
have you considered creating an alternate boot environment on the
smaller disk, rebooting into this new boot environment, and then
attaching the larger disk after destroy the old boot environment?
beadm might do this job for you...
What a gre
ttach a
> disk that is an equivalent size, but not exactly the same geometry.
> Which OpenSolaris release is this?
b131
And this only works if the difference is realy (REALLY) small. :)
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE
+http://nagual.n
cannot attach c5d0s0 to c4d0s0: device is too small
So I guess I installed OpenSolaris onto the smallest disk. Now I cannot
create a mirrored root, because the device is smaller.
What is the best way to correct this except starting all over with two
disks of the same size (which I don't have)?
Do
Can I send a zfs send stream (ZFS pool version 22 ; ZFS filesystem
version 4) to a zfs receive stream on Solaris 10 (ZFS pool version 15 ;
ZFS filesystem version 4)?
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS 10u7 5/09 | OpenSolaris 2010.03 b131
+ All that's r
On Sat, 2010-01-16 at 07:24 -0500, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> Personally, I use "zfs send | zfs receive" to an external disk. Initially a
> full image, and later incrementals.
Do these incrementals go into the same filesystem that received the
original zfs stream?
__
unted? And do they use memory if not mounted (in df -h).
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS 10u7 5/09 | OpenSolaris 2010.02 b129
+ All that's really worth doing is what we do for others (Lewis Carrol)
___
zfs-
I just noticed that my zpool is still running v10 and my zfs filesystems
are on v3. This is on solaris 10U3. Before upgrading the zpool and ZFS
versions I'd like to know the supported versions by solaris 10 update.7
I'd rather not make my zpools unaccessable ;)
On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 09:08 -0800, Richard Elling wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2009, at 12:53 AM, dick hoogendijk wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 00:22 +, Moritz Willers wrote:
> >
> >> The host identity had - of course - changed with the new motherboard
> >> a
On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 00:22 +, Moritz Willers wrote:
> The host identity had - of course - changed with the new motherboard
> and it no longer recognised the zpool as its own. 'zpool import -f
> rpool' to take ownership, reboot and it all worked no problem (which
> was amazing in itself as
On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 09:22 -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> You can also stream into a gzip or lzop wrapper in order to obtain the
> benefit of incremental CRCs and some compression as well.
Can you give an example command line for this option please?
___
OpenSolaris-b128a has zfs version 22 w/ deduplication.
Do I need to update older pools to take advantage of this dedup or can I
just create a new zfs filesystem with this option?
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS 10u7 5/09 | OpenSolaris 2010.02 b128a
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 10:00 -0500, Kyle McDonald wrote:
> To each their own.
[cut the rest of your reply]
In general: I stand corrected. I was rude.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/
glidic anthony wrote:
> I have a solution with use zfs set sharenfs=rw,nosuid zpool but i prefer
> use the sharemgr command.
Then you prefere wrong. ZFS filesystems are not shared this way.
Read up on ZFS and NFS.
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE
+http://nagual.nl/ | SunO
from the /etc/lu directory. You'll notice that
with lustatus the BE is gone.
Remove the ZFS datasets and snapshots for the BE you just deleted.
I've done this hack in the past quite some times and it always worked fine.
It's not supported by SUN though.
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP
new iso.
It might be that I can't read but does OP not state he is booting off
Solaris 10 update 8 DVD?
What can be newer than that one? If the miniroot really only supports
ZFS v10 then this is indeed not good (unworkable/unusable/..)
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
Mark Horstman wrote:
I don't see anything wrong with my /etc/vfstab. Until I get this resolved, I'm
afraid to patch and use the new BE.
It's the vfstab file in the newly created ABE that is "wrongly" written to.
Try to mount this new ABE and check out for your
On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 18:12 +0200, Sander Smeenk wrote:
> Well, thats what i would expect too. It seems strange that you can't
> edit or remove singular files from snapshots [...]
That would make the snapshot not a snapshot anymore. There would be
differences..
__
On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 08:11 -0700, Philip Brown wrote:
> same problem here on sun x2100 amd64
It's a bootblock issue. If you really want to get back to u6 you have to
"installgrub /boot/grub/stage1 /boot/grub/stage2" from th update 6 image
so mount it (with lumount or easier, with zfs mount) and m
Any known issues for the new ZFS on solaris 10 update 8?
Or is it still wiser to wait doing a zpool upgrade? Because older ABE's
can no longer be accessed then.
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS 10u8 10/09 | OpenSolaris 2010.02 b123
+ All that
Any known issues for the new ZFS on solaris 10 update 8?
Or is it still wiser to wait doing a zpool upgrade? Because older ABE's
can no longer be accessed then.
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS 10u8 10/09 | OpenSolaris 2010.02 b123
+ All that
/10u8/zoneRoot/common-10u8': legacy mountpoint
> use mount(1M) to mount this filesystem
That's how LU scr*&s things up.
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS 10u8 10/09 | OpenSolaris 2010.02 b123
+ All that's really worth d
one. This behaviour is also related
to errors with zones btw. The fact that lines in vfstab are created is
neglected in reactions so far. I think that is weird.
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS 10u8 10/09 | OpenSolaris 2010.02 b123
+ All that's real
Every ZFS filesystem uses system memory, but is this also true for
-NOT- mounted filesystems (with the canmount=noauto option set)?
Second question: would it make much difference to have 12 or 22 ZFS
filesystems? What's the memory footprint of a ZFS filesystem
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/
Bruno Sousa wrote:
Action: Restore the file in question if possible. Otherwise restore the
entire pool from backup.
:<0x0>
:<0x15>
Hmm, and what file(s) would this be?
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS 10u7 5/09 | OpenSol
Are there any known issues involving VirtualBox using shared folders
from a ZFS filesystem?
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS 10u7 5/09 | OpenSolaris 2010.02 b123
+ All that's really worth doing is what we do for others (Lewis C
ke that
> sudo zfs-fuse
> sudo zpool create hazz0 /dev/sda1
> sudo zpool destroy hazz0
> sudo reboot
> Now opensolaris is not booting everything is vanished
> Is there anyhow to restore everything?
Any idea about the meaning of the verb DESTROY ?
--
Dick Hoogendijk -
where it is. You can set the bios to boot from it if the
first disk fails, but you may not *swap* them.
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS 10u7 5/09 | OpenSolaris 2010.02 b123
+ All that's really worth doing is what we do for others (Lewis Carrol)
On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 07:38:43 PDT
Hamed wrote:
> Please help me. I really need help. I did a stupid thing i know.
Afaik help does not exist in this case other than making a full
backup / restore. There is no return to former zfs versions possible.
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D24
rpool/ROOT/b...@0902 | zfs recv -vF
# tank
What I'd like to see confirmed is that the incremental backup is
received in the -same- filesystem as the originally backup up one
("tank")
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS 10u7 5/09 | OpenSolari
Lori Alt wrote:
On 09/04/09 10:17, dick hoogendijk wrote:
Lori Alt wrote:
The -u option to zfs recv (which was just added to support flash
archive installs, but it's useful for other reasons too) suppresses
all mounts of the received file systems. So you can mount them
yourself afterwa
I cannot give this "canmount=noauto" to the zfs receive
command.
# zfs send -Rv rp...@0909 | zfs receive -Fdu backup/snaps
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS 10u7 5/09 | OpenSolaris 2010.02 B121
+ All that&#
y difficult, because "canmount" is NOT recursive!
And I don't want to set it manualy on all those backup up FS's.
I wonder how other people overcome this mountpoint issue.
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS 10u7 5/09 | OpenS
ange this will make it into U8?
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS 10u7 5/09 | OpenSolaris 2010.02 B121
+ All that's really worth doing is what we do for others (Lewis Carrol)
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-disc
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 13:06:35 -0500 (CDT)
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> Nothing prevents validating the self-verifying archive file via this
> "zfs recv -vn " technique.
Does this verify the ZFS format/integrity of the stream?
Or is the only way to do that to zfs recv the stream int
. In other words how can I be sure of the validity of the received
file in the next command line:
# zfs send -Rv rp...@090902 > /backup/snaps/rpool.090902
I only want to know how to check the integrity of the received file.
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual
m the solaris dox I udnerstand I have to do this line:
# zfs send -Rv rp...@0908 | zfs receive -Fd backup/server/rp...@0908
I'm not quite sure about the -Fd option of "receive"
Is this correct?
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS 10u7 5/09 | Op
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:36:13 +0100
Darren J Moffat wrote:
> Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > dick hoogendijk wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 22:05:15 -0400
> >> Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> >>
> >>>> zfs send -Rv rp...@0908 > /net/rem
backup/FS) into it or can I use your example
like: zfs send rp...@0908 | zfs receive -Fd bac...@0908
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS 10u7 5/09 | OpenSolaris 2009.06 rel
+ All that's really worth doing is what
this matter. I
learned a lot and will change the procedure to a send/recv. The
receiving system is on the exact same level of ZFS, so that's fine.
I -DO- think however that the advice in the mentioned link should be
rewrote to this procedure or at least it should be clearly mentioned as
a
a zfs send to a
file somewhere? "ZFS Root Pool Recovery" from the ZFS Troubleshooting
Guide clearly mentions the creation of a -file- :
http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Troubleshooting_Guide#ZFS_Root_Pool_Recovery
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http:/
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 13:15:37 +0200
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
> dick hoogendijk wrote:
>
> > FULL backup to a file
> > zfs snapshot -r rp...@0908
> > zfs send -Rv rp...@0908 > /net/remote/rpool/snaps/rpool.0908
> >
> &g
he two?
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS 10u7 5/09 | OpenSolaris 2009.06 rel
+ All that's really worth doing is what we do for others (Lewis Carrol)
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolar
Probably a very easy question for ZFS experts. I have an external USB
drive running 24/7 but would like to turn it off once in a while.
It is on ZFS.
Is it enough to umount it and tunr off the drive or do I have to
*export* the zfs filesystem first and later import it again?
--
Dick Hoogendijk
I've a new MB (tyhe same as before butthis one works..) and I want to
change the way my SATA drives were connected. I had a ZFS boot mirror
conncted to SATA3 and 4 and I wat those drives to be on SATA1 and 2 now.
Question: will ZFS see this and boot the system OK or will I have to
take some pr
running a scrub often have problems after shutting down
during the scrub. I have learned to HALT the scrub before going
offline.
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS 10u7 5/09 | OpenSolaris 2009.06 rel
+ All that's really worth doing is what we do for
t;zfs
snapshot rpool/export/home/dick", but what is the exact syntax for the
same snapshot using this other method?
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS 10u7 5/09 | OpenSolaris 2009.06 rel
+ All that's really worth doing i
n you explain to me why the above would
be better (nice to have) then "zfs create whate...@now?"
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS 10u7 5/09 | OpenSolaris 2009.06 rel
+ All that's really worth doing is w
ting to occur, so I diabled volfs.
I then did a "rmformat" to learn the device name, followed by a "zpool
create archive /dev/rdsk/devicename
All running nicely. Thanks for the advice.
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS 10u7 05/09 | OpenSolari
What is the best way to attach an USB harddisk to Solaris 10u7?
I know some program is running to auto detect such a device (have
forgotten the name, because I do almost all work on OSOL (hal).
do I use "that program" or disable it an manualy attach the drive to
the system?
--
Dick
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:26:06 -0600
Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
> I would suggest you open a bug on this.
> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/
Done. Bugzilla – Bug 10294 Submitted
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS 10u7 05/09 | OpenSolaris 2010.02 B118
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 12:14:03 -0400
Oscar del Rio wrote:
> dick hoogendijk wrote:
>
> > r...@westmark:/# share
> > -...@store/snaps /store/snaps sec=sys,rw=arwen,root=arwen ""
> >
> > arwen# zfs send -Rv rp...@0906
> > arwen# > /net/we
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 21:58:48 + (UTC)
Marc Bevand wrote:
> dick hoogendijk nagual.nl> writes:
> >
> > I live in Holland and it is not easy to find motherboards that (a)
> > truly support ECC ram and (b) are (Open)Solaris compatible.
>
> Virtually all motherboa
in the syntax the way ZFS uses sharenfs?
Or have I misread the manual of share_nfs?
What can be wrong is the line "zfs set sharenfs='rw=arwen,root=arwen'
store/snaps"
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | nevada / OpenSolaris 2010.02 B118
+ All t
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 19:36:52 +0200
dick hoogendijk wrote:
> Thank you for your support 'till now. One final question:..
Alas, it's not a final qustion. It still does not work. I have no idea
what else I could have forgotten. This is what I have on arwen (local)
and westmark
e machine the /store/snaps has uid:gid root:root
The backup being OK is important so I appreciate your help.
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | nevada / OpenSolaris 2010.02 B118
+ All that's really worth doing is what we do for others (Lewis Carrol)
___
s: [quote] "My question is: is there any technical
reason, in ZFS's design, that makes it particularly important for ZFS
to require ECC RAM?"
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | nevada / OpenSolaris 2010.02 B118
+ All that's really worth doi
land and it is not easy to find motherboards that (a)
truly support ECC ram and (b) are (Open)Solaris compatible.
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | nevada / OpenSolaris 2010.02 B118
+ All that's really worth doing is what we do for o
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:55:02 +0200
dick hoogendijk wrote:
> [share to local system]
> westmark# zfs set sharenfs=on store/snaps
I left out the options and changed the /store/snaps directory
permissions to 777. Now the snapshot can be send from the host but it
gets u:g permssion
e at my error(s)?
arwen# zfs send -Rv rp...@0906
arwen# > /net/192.168.11.22/store/snaps/rpool.0906
zsh: permission denied: /net/192.168.11.22/store/snaps/rpool.0906
arwen#
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | nevada / OpenSolaris 2010.02 B118
+ All that
days. My guess is ZFS should work quite reliably on that hardware.
(i.e. non ECC memory should work fine!) / mirroring is a -must- !
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | nevada / OpenSolaris 2010.02 B118
+ All that's really worth
with unknown support for any of the above products?
Running this kind of setup absolutely can give you NO garanties at all.
Virtualisation, OSOL/zfs on WinXP. It's nice to play with and see it
"working" but would I TRUST precious data to it? No way!
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key:
ing on Solaris 10 bugs today.
Blunt.
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | nevada / OpenSolaris 2009.06 release
+ All that's really worth doing is what we do for others (Lewis Carrol)
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
the same last week ;-)
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | nevada / OpenSolaris 2009.06 release
+ All that's really worth doing is what we do for others (Lewis Carrol)
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@openso
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:42:23 +0100
Matt Harrison wrote:
> She's now desperate to get it back as she's realised there some
> important work stuff hidden away in there.
Without snapshots you're lost.
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ |
L- versions of
auto-snapshot are used SOME where ;-) That way they keep running and
time-slider is happy. I have not gone into it deeply, but somehow
services stopped running if not needed and you get those dependency
missing messages ;-/
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagua
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:38:18 -0500
Harry Putnam wrote:
> How to turn off the timeslider snapshots on certain file systems?
http://wikis.sun.com/display/OpenSolarisInfo/How+to+Manage+the+Automatic+ZFS+Snapshot+Service
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | nev
l message was:
On Sun, 21 Jun 2009 06:35:50 PDT
Simon Breden wrote:
> If anyone can throw some light on these topics, I would be pleased to
> hear from you. Thanks a lot.
I follow this thread with much interest.
Curious to see what'll come out of it.
Does the change occur again?
On Sun, 21 Jun 2009 06:35:50 PDT
Simon Breden wrote:
> If anyone can throw some light on these topics, I would be pleased to
> hear from you. Thanks a lot.
I follow this thread with much interest.
Curious to see what'll come out of it.
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2
ch a thing, there would be a rash of
> requests saying:
>
> a) I just destroyed my pool with -really_dead - how can I get my data
> back??!
> b) I was able to recover my data from -really_dead - can we have
> -ultra-nuke please?
Following your logic there shouldn't have existe
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
