Op 27-2-2010 13:15, Mertol Ozyoney schreef:
This depends on what you are looking for. Generaly zfs will be more
secure due to checksum feature. Having seen a lot of ntfs / fat drives
going south die to bad sectors i'd not clasify them very secure.
However ntfs and fat can be used nearly on every os.
And also you shouldnt forget the extra capabilities of zfs like
snaphots ...
I'll go with ZFS. Like someone said with 'copies=2' for extra safety.
That should do it I think.
Compression will slow my system down too much, so I'll skip that one.
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | OpenSolaris 2010.03 b131
+ All that's really worth doing is what we do for others (Lewis Carrol)
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
