On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
>
>
> I had and have redundant storage, it has *NEVER* automatically fixed it.
> You're the first person I've heard that has had it automatically fix it.
Well, here comes another person - I have ZFS automatically fixing
corrupted data on a number
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Johan Eliasson
wrote:
> I recently created a raidz of four 2TB-disks and moved a bunch of movies onto
> them.
> And then I noticed that I've somehow lost a full TB of space. Why?
zpool reports space usage on disks, without taking into account RAIDZ overhead.
zfs r
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 6:32 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> I'm confused. I have compression enabled on a ZFS filesystem, which
> contains for all intents and purposes, just a single 20G file, and I see ...
>
> # ls -lh somefile
>
> -rw--- 1 root root 20G Aug 13 17:41 somefile
>
2010/4/29 Thommy M. Malmström :
> What operating system does it run?
Nexenta I believe.
--
Regards,
Cyril
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:01 AM, Victor Latushkin
wrote:
>
> On Apr 13, 2010, at 9:52 PM, Cyril Plisko wrote:
>
>> Hello !
>>
>> I've had a laptop that crashed a number of times during last 24 hours
>> with this stack:
>>
>> panic[
Hello !
I've had a laptop that crashed a number of times during last 24 hours
with this stack:
panic[cpu0]/thread=ff0007ab0c60:
assertion failed: ddt_object_update(ddt, ntype, nclass, dde, tx) == 0,
file: ../../common/fs/zfs/ddt.c, line: 968
ff0007ab09a0 genunix:assfail+7e ()
ff0007
...how can i remove the driver from my environment.
beadm create newbe
beadm mount newbe /newbe
pkg -R /newbe uninstall aac
beadm umount newbe
beadm activate newbe
reboot
A bit long, but you ultimately gives you fully recoverable setup in
case something goes south.
>
> Thanks in advance,
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Bruno Sousa wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Currently i'm evaluating a system with an Adaptec 52445 Raid HBA, and
> the driver supplied by Opensolaris doesn't support JBOD drives.
> I'm running snv_134 but when i try to do uninstall the SUNWacc driver i
> have the followin
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Matt Cowger writes:
>
>> zfs list | grep '@'
>>
>> zpool/f...@1154758 324G - 461G -
>> zpool/f...@1208482 6.94G - 338G -
>> zpool/f...@daily.netbackup 1.0
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Yariv Graf wrote:
> Hi,
> Thanks for the reply.
> I can arrange the lost SSD buy I already formatted it.
> Second, even the external HDD is for instance /dev/rdsk/c16t0d0, when I try
> to debug using zdb
> It shows me another “path”:
> path='/dev/dsk/c11t0d0s0'
>
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Max Levine wrote:
> Veritas has this feature called fast mirror resync where they have a
> DRL on each side of the mirror and, detaching/re-attaching a mirror
> causes only the changed bits to be re-synced. Is anything similar
> planned for ZFS?
ZFS has that feat
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Matthew Hollick wrote:
>
> Is the intent to move away from iscsitgt?
Yes. [1]
> Can I change some configuration somewhere to specify which iscsi target
> service to use?
No. In fact the cited ARC case obsoletes the shareiscsi property altogether.
[1] http://
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I installed another OpenSolaris (snv_129) in VirtualBox 3.1.0 on Windows
> because snv_130 doesn't boot anymore after installation of VirtualBox guest
> additions. Older builds before snv_129 were running fine too. I like some
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Chris Scerbo
wrote:
> Cool thx, sounds like exactly what I'm looking for.
>
> I did a bit of reading on the subject and to my understanding I should...
> Create a volume of a size as large as I could possibly need. So, siding on
> the optimistic, "zfs create -s -
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Stacy Maydew wrote:
> I'm trying to see if zfs dedupe is effective on our datasets, but I'm having
> a hard time figuring out how to measure the space saved.
>
> When I sent one backup set to the filesystem, the usage reported by "zfs
> list" and "zfs get used "
>> I've set dedup to what I believe are the least resource-intensive
>> settings - "checksum=fletcher4" on the pool, & "dedup=on" rather than
>
> I believe checksum=fletcher4 is acceptable in dedup=verify mode only.
> What you're doing is seemingly deduplication with weak checksum w/o
> verificatio
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Darren J Moffat
wrote:
> Steven Sim wrote:
>>
>> Hello;
>>
>> How do we dedup existing data?
>
> Currently by running a zfs send | zfs recv.
>
>> Will a ZFS send to an output file in a temporary staging area in the same
>> pool and a subsequent reconstruct (zfs rec
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Andrey Kuzmin
wrote:
>
> Right, but 'verify' seems to be 'extreme safety' and thus rather rare
> use case.
Hmm, dunno. I wouldn't set anything, but scratch file system to
dedup=on. Anything of even slight significance is set to dedup=verify.
> Saving cycles lost
>>
>> BTW, are there any implications of having dedup=on on rpool/dump ? I
>> know that the compression is turned off explicitly for rpool/dump.
>
> It will be ignored because when you write to the dump ZVOL it doesn't go
> through the normal ZIO pipeline so the deduplication code is never run in
>
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:37 AM, James Lever wrote:
>
> On 10/12/2009, at 5:36 AM, Adam Leventhal wrote:
>
>> The dedup property applies to all writes so the settings for the pool of
>> origin don't matter, just those on the destination pool.
>
> Just a quick related question I’ve not seen answe
>>> I think I'm observing the same (with changeset 10936) ...
>>
>> # mkfile 2g /var/tmp/tank.img
>> # zpool create tank /var/tmp/tank.img
>> # zfs set dedup=on tank
>> # zfs create tank/foobar
>
> This has to do with the fact that dedup space accounting is charged to all
> filesystems, reg
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Nils Goroll wrote:
> Now to the more general question: If all datasets of a pool contained the
> same data and got de-duped, the sums of their "used" space still seems to be
> limited by the "locical" pool size, as we've seen in examples given by
> Jürgen and other
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Jeremy Kitchen
wrote:
>
> forgive my ignorance, but what's the advantage of this new dedup over the
> existing compression option? Wouldn't full-filesystem compression naturally
> de-dupe?
No, the compression works on the block level. If there are two
identical bl
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Alex Lam S.L. wrote:
> Terrific! Can't wait to read the man pages / blogs about how to use it...
Alex,
you may wish to check PSARC 2009/571 materials [1] for a sneak preview :)
[1] http://arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2009/571/
>
> Alex.
>
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Paul Archer wrote:
> OK, so this may be a little off-topic, but here goes:
> The reason I switched to OpenSolaris was primarily to take advantage of
> ZFS's features when storing my digital imaging collection.
>
> I switched from a pretty stock Linux setup, but it
Hello !
There is an interesting performance comparison of three popular
operating systems [1], I thought it could be of interest for people
hanging on this list.
These guys used their tool FlexTk as a benchmark engine, which is not
a benchmark tool per se, but still provides an interesting data.
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Cyril Plisko
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Henrik Johansson wrote:
>> Hello everybody,
>> The KCA ZFS keynote by Jeff and Bill seems to be available online now:
>> http://blogs.sun.com/video/entry/kernel_conference_australia_2
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Henrik Johansson wrote:
> Hello everybody,
> The KCA ZFS keynote by Jeff and Bill seems to be available online now:
> http://blogs.sun.com/video/entry/kernel_conference_australia_2009_jeff
> It should probably be mentioned here, i might have missed it.
Funny voic
2009/9/17 Brandon High :
> 2009/9/11 "C. Bergström" :
>> Can we make a FAQ on this somewhere?
>>
>> 1) There is some legal bla bla between Sun and green-bytes that's tying up
>> the IP around dedup... (someone knock some sense into green-bytes please)
>> 2) there's an acquisition that's got all sor
Jorgen,
> As the developer of software that exports data/shares like that of NFS and
> Samba. (HTTP/UPnP export, written in C) I am curious if the libzfs API is
> flexible enough for me to create my own file-system attributes, similar to
> that of "sharenfs" and obtain this information in my soft
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:31 AM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
>> Chris Murray wrote:
>>> Accidentally posted the below earlier against ZFS Code, rather than ZFS
>>> Discuss.
>>>
>>> My ESXi box now uses ZFS filesystems which have been shared over NFS.
>>> Spotted something odd this afternoon - a filesys
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Darren J
Moffat wrote:
> russell aspinwall wrote:
>>
>> Are tools necessary to ensure that deleted ZFS pools can not be recovered
>> or that deleted filesystems are really deleted?
>
> dd if=/dev/zero over the disks, or use format(1M) analyze -> purge.
>
> For just
>
> It is unfortunately a very difficult problem, and will take some time to
> solve even with the application of all possible resources (including the
> majority of my time). We are updating CR 4852783 at least once a month with
> progress reports.
Matt,
should these progress reports be visible
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:46 AM, roland wrote:
> Hello !
>
> How can i export a filesystem /export1 so that sub-filesystems within that
> filesystems will be available and usable on the client side without
> additional "mount/share effort" ?
>
> this is possible with linux nfsd and i wonder how
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Darren J
Moffat wrote:
> Roman V Shaposhnik wrote:
>>
>> On the read-only front: wouldn't it be cool to *not* run zfs sends
>> explicitly but have:
>> .zfs/send/
>> .zfs/sendr/-
>> give you the same data automagically?
>> On the read-write front: wouldn't it
Richard,
> Also, we now know the market value for dedupe intellectual property: $2.1
> Billion.
> Even though there may be open source, that does not mean there are not IP
> barriers. $2.1 Billion attracts a lot of lawyers :-(
Indeed, good point.
--
Regards,
Cyril
_
Hello James,
> Hi Cyril,
> I don't work with Jeff and Bill, and I cannot speak for them
> about this.
>
> What I can say, however, is that "open source" does not always
> equate to requiring "open development".
Indeed. However willingness to openly develop opensource project or
lack of that of is
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Andre van Eyssen wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jul 2009, Cyril Plisko wrote:
>
>> There is an ongoing speculations of what/when/how deduplication will
>> be in ZFS and I am curious: what is the reason to keep the thing
>> secret ? I always thought
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 7:06 AM, James C.
McPherson wrote:
> Anil wrote:
>>
>> When it comes out, how will it work?
>>
>> Does it work at the pool level or a zfs file system level? If I
>> create a zpool called 'zones' and then I create several zones
>> underneath that, could I expect to see a lot
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Norbert wrote:
> Does anyone have the code/script to change the GUID of a ZFS pool?
I did such tool for my client around a year ago and that client agreed
to release the code.
However, the API I've used is has been changed and not available
anymore. So you cannot co
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:01 PM, George Wilson wrote:
> Cyril Plisko wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Richard Elling
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> assertion failures are bugs.
>>>
>>
>> Yup, I know that.
>>
>&
oped, may be wrongly, to hear something
more concrete... Tough luck, I guess...
> -- richard
>
> Cyril Plisko wrote:
>>
>> Hello !
>>
>> I have a machine that started to panic on boot (see panic message
>> below). It think it panics when it imports the pool (5 x 2
Hello !
I have a machine that started to panic on boot (see panic message
below). It think it panics when it imports the pool (5 x 2 mirror).
Are there any ways to recover from that ?
Some history info: that machine was upgraded a couple of days ago from
snv78 to snv110. This morning zpool was up
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Nicolas Williams
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 02:16:53PM -0600, Wes Felter wrote:
>> T10 UNMAP/thin provisioning support in zvols
>
> That's probably simple enough, and sufficiently valuable too.
I evaluated such feature implementation in ZFS (at large, not on
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Johan Hartzenberg wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Johan Hartzenberg
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I have this situation working and use my "shared" pool between Linux and
>> Solaris. Note: The shared pool needs to reside on a whole physical disk or
>> on a pri
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Jianhua Yang wrote:
> I'm newbie in ZFS, and have question:
>
> how to convert ZFS formated disk back to tradistional Sun disk ?
format -e
will let you choose between two types of label - EFI and SMI.
ZFS uses EFI when you give the whole disk to it. SMI is a tra
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Cyril Plisko wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Orvar Korvar
> wrote:
>> I have a ZFS raid and wonder if it is possible to move the ZFS raid around
>> from SATA port to another? Ive heard that someone assembled the SATA
>> connect
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Orvar Korvar
wrote:
> I have a ZFS raid and wonder if it is possible to move the ZFS raid around
> from SATA port to another? Ive heard that someone assembled the SATA
> connections differently and the ZFS raid wouldnt work.
>
> Say that I have 8 SATA port contro
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 10:10 AM, iman habibi wrote:
> Hello All
> i want to add second disk to existing rpool with one disk.
> but when i run this command it returns this error,,why?
That's because your c0t8d0 disk has EFI label. with EFI label the
largest partiotion you can create is slightly s
>
> The following versions are supported:
>
> VER DESCRIPTION
> ---
> 1 Initial ZFS version
> 2 Ditto blocks (replicated metadata)
> 3 Hot spares and double parity RAID-Z
> 4 zpool history
> 5 Compression using the gzip algor
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Turanga Leela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been playing with liveupgrade for the first time. (See
> http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=315231). I've at least
> got a workaround for that issue.
>
> One strange thing i've noticed, however, is
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 7:24 PM, Hernan Freschi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask. I'm having a little
> trouble deleting old solaris installs:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]# lustatus
> Boot Environment Is Active ActiveCanCopy
> Name
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 12:24 AM, Vincent Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does it seem feasible/reasonable to enable compression on ZFS root disks
> during JumpStart?
Absolutely. I did it (compression=on) on all my machines - ranged from
laptop to servers. Beware, though, that on oldish CPU it c
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 6:06 AM, Erik Trimble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just one more things on this:
>
> Run with a 64-bit processor. Don't even think of using a 32-bit one -
> there are known issues with ZFS not quite properly using 32-bit only
> structures. That is, ZFS is really 64-bit clea
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Lori Alt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cyril Plisko wrote:
>
> The main problem is that this configuration of datasets didn't work:
>
> /ROOT/mounpoint=/
> /ROOT//zones mountpoint=/zones
> /ROOT//zones/zonero
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Lori Alt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mike wrote:
>
> On 8/26/08, Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> that's very interesting ! Can you share more info on what these
> bugs/issues are ? Since it is LU re
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 2:33 AM, Lori Alt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> More or less. There are a number of bugs in LU
> support of zfs that we've just fixed in the final builds
> of the S10 Update 6 release, which we'll forward-port
> to Nevada as soon as we catch our breath. Most but
> not all a
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Peter Pickford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How difficult would it be to write some code to change the GUID of a pool?
Not too difficult - I did it some time ago for a customer, who wanted it badly.
I guess you are trying to import pools cloned by the storag
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 7:54 AM, Vincent Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Umm, you do realise that changing swap size on a live
>> system has been
>> doab for years? "swap -a" is your friend.
>
> The swap -a not work so great on a single-disk system without a free
> partition. Many times it was n
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 2:58 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bill Sommerfeld writes:
>>>
>>> 2. How can I do it ? (I think I can run "zfs set compression=on
>>> rpool/ROOT/snv_90" in the other window, right after the installation
>>> begins, but I would like less hacky way.)
>>
>> what I did was t
Hi !
As, probably, many of us I am playing with snv_90 and ZFS root. During
the installation I didn't see any possibility to set the properties of
the datasets. In particular compression.
I see that default installation leaves the compression property
untouched for all the created datasets, with r
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Jeff Bonwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh, and here's the source code, for the curious:
>
[snipped]
>
> label_write(fd, offsetof(vdev_label_t, vl_uberblock),
> 1ULL << UBERBLOCK_SHIFT, ub);
>
> label_write(fd, offsetof(vdev_label_t,
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Cyril,
>
> Friday, March 21, 2008, 7:41:37 PM, you wrote:
>
>
> CP> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 8:53 PM, Mark A. Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> It's more than a handy feature. You either have to
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Sachin Palav
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks everybody for the replyies.. appreciate all your help.
>
> Here is my understanding from all of the above:
> 1. The Configuration of ZFS is on all ZFS disk , so incase of the disk
> failure there is less chances to
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Torrey McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm with you on the multipathing bit but that can easily be
> sed/grep/awked to something different. However, I still think the
> ability to dump the current config is beneficial. zpool history shows
> you what was do
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 8:53 PM, Mark A. Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It's more than a handy feature. You either have to write down all
> the ZFS configuration you do, or keep a separate log of it in order
> to restore a backed up ZFS system to a bare metal replacement today.
>
> With
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Torrey McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> eric kustarz wrote:
> > So even with the above, if you add a vdev, slog, or l2arc later on,
> > that can be lost via the history being a ring buffer. There's a RFE
> > for essentially taking your current 'zpool status'
uot;zpool history" will keep forever the
zpool command that created the pool initially. And it can be easily
copy/pasted somewhere else in order to be used as is or as a template
for a similar configuration.
>
> -- mark
>
>
>
> Cyril Plisko wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20,
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 7:52 PM, Sachin Palav
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Friends
>
> Can someone please let me know how I can backup the ZFS configuration which
> is stored on the operating system.
The configuration of the ZFS pool is stored in the pool itself. That
means that the pool i
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Bob Friesenhahn
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Mertol Ozyoney wrote:
>
> > Hi Bob;
> >
> > When you have some spare time can you prepare a simple benchmark report in
> > PDF that I can share with my customers to demonstrate the performance of
On Jan 14, 2008 7:02 PM, Scott Laird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have an Asus P5K WS motherboard with a cheap Core 2 Duo CPU (E2140,
> $70 or so) and one of the cheap SuperMicro 8-port PCI-X SATA cards.
I went for Celeron 420 (around $35) - with ZFS compression turned on
it runs with ~ 80% idl
:(
> -neel
>
>
> Cyril Plisko wrote:
> > Hi !
> >
> > I played recently with Gigabyte i-RAM card (which is basically an SSD)
> > as a log device for a ZFS pool. However, when I tried to remove it - I need
> > to give the card back - it refused to do so. It looks lik
Hi !
I played recently with Gigabyte i-RAM card (which is basically an SSD)
as a log device for a ZFS pool. However, when I tried to remove it - I need
to give the card back - it refused to do so. It looks like I am hitting
6574286 removing a slog doesn't work [1]
Is there any workaround ? I rea
Hey !
I just spotted that Intel' upcoming box "Helena Island"[0]
With its 64bit capable Celeron 420 should be very good
material for building ZFS box for home usage.
[0] http://mswhs.com/2007/10/05/more-info-intel-entry-storage-system-ss4200-e/
--
Regards,
Cyril
___
[Hit wrong reply button...]
On 9/28/07, Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm looking for a rackmount chassis for an x86 ZFS fileserver I wan to build
> for my organization.
>
> Requirements:
>
> Hot-swap SATA disk support
> Minimum of 4-disk SATA support (would prefer 6+)
> Hot-swap power supply
Hi,
I just came across this box [0] (McKay Creek). Seems to be exceptional
building material for ZFS based NAS/iSCSI unit. I especially liked the
two extra system disks hidden inside the box !
Any one have an experience with these ?
[0] http://www.intel.com/design/servers/storage/ssr212mc2
--
Jeffrey,
it would be interesting to see your zpool layout info as well.
It can significantly influence the results obtained in the benchmarks.
On 8/30/07, Jeffrey W. Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a lot of people whispering "zfs" in my virtual ear these days,
> and at the same time I
On 7/16/07, tayo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> Can one increase (or decrease ) a ZFS file system like the Veritas one
> (vxresize)?
> What is the command line syntax please ?
> ..you can just make up an example ..
>
> for example in veritas :
> "/etc/vx/bin/vxresize -x -F vxfs -g DG1 vol
On 7/13/07, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mario Goebbels wrote:
> >> While the original reason for this was swap, I have a sneaky suspicion
> >> that others may wish for this as well, or perhaps something else.
> >> Thoughts? (database folks, jump in :-)
> >
> > Lower overhead stora
Neil,
many thanks for publishing this doc - it is exactly
what I was looking for !
On 7/9/07, Neil Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Er with attachment this time.
>
>
> > So I've attached the accepted proposal. There was (as expected) not
> > much discussion of this case as it was considered a
On 7/7/07, Neil Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cyril,
>
> I wrote this case and implemented the project. My problem was
> that I didn't know what policy (if any) Sun has about publishing
> ARC cases, and a mail log with a gazillion email addresses.
>
> I did receive an answer to this this in t
Hello,
This is a third request to open the materials of the PSARC case
2007/171 ZFS Separate Intent Log
I am not sure why two previous requests were completely ignored
(even when seconded by another community member).
In any case that is absolutely unaccepted practice.
On 6/30/07, Cyril Plisko
On 6/30/07, roland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
some other funny benchmark numbers:
i wondered how performance/compressratio of lzjb,lzo and gzip would compare if
we have optimal compressible datastream.
since zfs handles repeating zero`s quite efficiently (i.e. allocating no space)
i tried wri
Hello !
I am adding zfs-discuss as it directly relevant to this community.
On 6/23/07, Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
can the materials of the above be open for the community ?
--
Regards,
Cyril
--
Regards,
On 5/29/07, Krzys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello folks, I have a question. Currently I have zfs pool (mirror) on two
internal disks... I wanted to connect that server to SAN, then add more storage
to this pool (double the space) then start using it. Then what I wanted to do is
just take out the
On 5/24/07, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Adam Leventhal wrote:
> Right now -- as I'm sure you have noticed -- we use the dataset name for
> the alias. To let users explicitly set the alias we could add a new property
> as you suggest or allow other options for the existing shareiscs
Hi !
I was in the middle of very long and boring transatlantic flight and
played with zfs and gzip compression on my laptop. And I just
thought that it may be quite useful for your shell to be able to
autocomplete the arguments to the zfs/zpool command.
So I quickly hacked together a script which
On 5/3/07, Ian Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The system has 8MB of RAM and a was using 'cp -r' to copy the directory.
Hm, that would be a record breaking system. Did you mean 8 GB ?
--
Regards,
Cyril
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-disc
On 4/25/07, shay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Those are the result of my preformance test :
Conclutions :
1. the dual HBA qla2342 is not a parallel at all. so it is better to use 2
single HBAs then one dual HBA.
That would surprise me. Can it be that you are saturating the PCI slot
you 2342
Hi,
I am having problem booting from the zfs filesystem with compression
set to gzip.
I netinstalled machine and switched the compression to gzip during
early installation
stages. After the installation I am getting straight to the GRUB
prompt instead of
the normal menu. The attempt to manually e
On 4/14/07, Krzys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, I certainly agree. but what I wanted to do is remove those big files
completly from my system, so I would make sure its gone from each snap. I
certainly do understand the design of zfs file system and I was just wondering
if what I wanted is possi
On 4/5/07, Jakob Praher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi all,
Hi Jacob,
I am new to solaris.
I am creating a zfs filestore which should boot via rootfs.
The version of the system is: SunOS store1 5.10 Generic_118855-33 i86pc
i386 i86pc.
Now I have seen that there is a new rootfs support for so
On 3/28/07, Richard Elling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Cyril Plisko wrote:
> First of all I'd like to congratulate the ZFS boot team with the
> integration of their work into ON. Great job ! I am sure there
> are plenty of people waiting anxiously for this putback.
>
>
First of all I'd like to congratulate the ZFS boot team with the
integration of their work into ON. Great job ! I am sure there
are plenty of people waiting anxiously for this putback.
I'd also like to suggest that the material referenced by HEADS UP
message [1] be made available to non-SWAN folk
On 3/23/07, Ionescu Mircea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
Our Solaris 10 machine need to be reinstalled.
Inside we have 2 HDDs in striping ZFS with 4 filesystems.
After Solaris is installed how can I "mount" or recover the 4 filesystems
without losing the existing data?
Check "zfs import
On 11/2/06, Rick McNeal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> That's how the shareiscsi property works today.
>
> So, why manipulating LUN is impossible via zfs ???
>
A ZVOL is a single LU, so there's nothing to manipulate. Could you give
me an example of what you think should/could be changed?
I
On 11/2/06, Rick McNeal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
The administration of FC devices for the target mode needs some serious
thinking so that we don't end up with a real nightmare on our hands.
As you point out the FC world doesn't separate the port address from the
target name. Therefore each
On 11/1/06, Adam Leventhal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 09:25:26PM +0200, Cyril Plisko wrote:
> On 11/1/06, Adam Leventhal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >What properties are you specifically interested in modifying?
> >>
> >> L
On 11/1/06, Adam Leventhal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >What properties are you specifically interested in modifying?
>
> LUN for example. How would I configure LUN via zfs command ?
You can't. Forgive my ignorance about how iSCSI is deployed, but why would
you want/need to change the LUN?
We
On 11/1/06, Dick Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 01/11/06, Dick Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And we'll be able to use sparse zvols
> for this too (can't think why we couldn't, but it'd be dead handy)?
Thinking about this, we won't be able to (without some changes) -
I think a target
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
