Krenz von Leiberman wrote:
> Does ZFS support pooled, mirrored, and raidz storage with
> SATA-port-multipliers (http://www.serialata.org/portmultiplier.asp)?
> Thanks.
>
ZFS supports block devices. You'll need port multiplier support in the
OS before ZFS can use it.
-- richard
Sounds like you are having this problem:
http://malsserver.blogspot.com/2008/11/zfs-auto-snapshot-and-thus-time-slider.html
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Victor Hooi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> heya,
>
> I'm using OpenSolaris 2008.11 (101a), and trying to use the time-slider
> functionality
heya,
I'm using OpenSolaris 2008.11 (101a), and trying to use the time-slider
functionality.
The SUNWgnoem-time-slider and SUNWzfs-auto-snapshot packages enabled, and I've
enabled time-slider via System, Administration, Time-Slider Setup.
However, the auto-snapshot services appear to go into m
CR 6409327 SI: Support for SiI3726 and SiI4726 storage processors /
port multipliers
Status: 4-Defer
--
Andrew
mike wrote:
I think you'll need to get device support first. Last I checked there
was still no device support for PMPs, sadly.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Krenz von Leiber
I think you'll need to get device support first. Last I checked there
was still no device support for PMPs, sadly.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Krenz von Leiberman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does ZFS support pooled, mirrored, and raidz storage with
> SATA-port-multipliers (http://www.serial
Does ZFS support pooled, mirrored, and raidz storage with SATA-port-multipliers
(http://www.serialata.org/portmultiplier.asp)?
Thanks.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.open
> "t" == Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
t> PSARC 2007/567 zpool failmode property
I think this is in s10u6, so it's been in stable solaris for
twenty-one days.
It's not in the release I tested, so it's worth trying again on a
newer release. I tried on snv_83a, and instead of getting
> "t" == Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
t> I gave you a the PSARC.
test it.
t> Which is why I told him not to do it, and that his chances
t> were slim...
his chances are zero.
pgp8S8MQKP3kP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
zfs
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Miles Nordin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "t" == Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> t> Uhh, yes. There's more than one post here describing how to
> t> set what the system does when the pool is in a faulted
> t> state/you lose a drive. Wait,
> "t" == Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
t> Uhh, yes. There's more than one post here describing how to
t> set what the system does when the pool is in a faulted
t> state/you lose a drive. Wait, panic, proceed.
(a) search for it, try it, then report your results. Don't coun
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Miles Nordin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "t" == Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> t> Pretty sure ALL of the above are settings that can be changed.
>
> nope. But feel free to be more specific. Or repeat the test
> yourself---it only takes like fifte
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Miles Nordin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "t" == Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> t> Pretty sure ALL of the above are settings that can be changed.
>
> nope. But feel free to be more specific. Or repeat the test
> yourself---it only takes like fifte
> "t" == Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
t> Pretty sure ALL of the above are settings that can be changed.
nope. But feel free to be more specific. Or repeat the test
yourself---it only takes like fifteen minutes. It'd take five if not
for the rebooting.
t> Not to mention that
I always love answering my on questions
http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Best_Practices_Guide
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/
On Fri 21/11/08 08:43 , Krenz von Leiberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:
> I have a computer that contains 8 1TB drives. I have 3 USB drives that are
> 750MB. So that's a total of 11 drives. Can I install solaris or opensolaris
> on the first harddrive and mirror it on the second harddrive? Can I th
On 11/20/08 12:52, Danilo Poccia wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering is there is a performance gain for an OLTP-like workload
> in putting the ZFS Intent Log (ZIL) on "traditional" HDDs.
>
It's probably always best to benchmark it yourself, but my
experience has shown that it's better to only ha
On Thu, November 20, 2008 14:43, Krenz von Leiberman wrote:
> I have a computer that contains 8 1TB drives. I have 3 USB drives that are
> 750MB. So that's a total of 11 drives. Can I install solaris or
> opensolaris on the first harddrive and mirror it on the second harddrive?
> Can I then use the
Hi,
I was wondering is there is a performance gain for an OLTP-like workload
in putting the ZFS Intent Log (ZIL) on "traditional" HDDs.
Moreover, I'd like to have a "rough" idea of relative performances for
an OLTP workload with the same storage (e.g. an external storage with 12
x 300GB 15Krpm
I have a computer that contains 8 1TB drives. I have 3 USB drives that are
750MB. So that's a total of 11 drives. Can I install solaris or opensolaris on
the first harddrive and mirror it on the second harddrive? Can I then use the 9
remaining drives as a RAID-Z2? Will there be a problem with u
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Miles Nordin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "t" == Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> a fourth 500gb disk and add
> >> it to the pool as the second vdev, what happens when that
> >> fourth disk has a hardware failure?
>
> t> If you set cop
> "t" == Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> a fourth 500gb disk and add
>> it to the pool as the second vdev, what happens when that
>> fourth disk has a hardware failure?
t> If you set copies=2, and get lucky enough
t> that copies of every block on the standalone ar
I was asked a few interesting questions by a fellow co-worker regarding ZFS and
after much google-bombing, still can't find answers. I've seen several people
try to ask these questions, but only to have been answered indirectly.
If I have a pool that consists of a raidz-1 w/ three 500gb disks an
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 9:54 AM, Kam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was asked a few interesting questions by a fellow co-worker regarding ZFS
> and after much google-bombing, still can't find answers. I've seen several
> people try to ask these questions, but only to have been answered
> indirectl
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 4:41 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >If you need to install bootblocks, it doesn't matter when you do it.
> >
> >But I found the answers I want, I think what I need to do is:
> >
> >
> > zpool attach export disk#0 disk#1
> >
> >(this makes the single pool into a m
Thanks for replying. I was asking because maybe someone implemente it could be
as a stand-alone software no in the repository.
And I know that it could mean reading and rewriting all data, but I'm
installing a personal NAS, so waiting even a week can be understable.
Thanks again for the reply.
>There is any change about this? Any developer tried it?
"It won't work unless someone implements it".
In the case of a RAIDZ, it means reading and rewriting all data.
The only thing you can do is add a new raidz to the pool.
So you start with
NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM
There is any change about this? Any developer tried it?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you try ? :
> echo nfs_allow_preepoch_time/W1 | adb -wk
if this also happens on a local ZFS filesysten, then his problem is
a time stamp past 2038
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>If you need to install bootblocks, it doesn't matter when you do it.
>
>But I found the answers I want, I think what I need to do is:
>
>
> zpool attach export disk#0 disk#1
>
>(this makes the single pool into a mirror)
>
>And if resilvering is done, I can use:
>
> zpool replace expor
29 matches
Mail list logo
