Re: [zfs-discuss] create raidz with 1 disk offline

> [most people don't seem to know Solaris has ramdisk devices] That is because only a select few are able to unravel the enigma wrapped in a clue that is solaris :) -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@ope

Re: [zfs-discuss] working closed blob driver

Miles Nordin wrote: >> "jcm" == James C McPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> "t" == Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [snip argument over definitions] > jm> > http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/uts/common/io/mega_sas > > so, this means there _i

Re: [zfs-discuss] create raidz with 1 disk offline

Brandon High schrieb: > 1. Create a sparse file on an existing filesystem. The size should be > the same as your disks. > 2. Create the raidz with 4 of the drives and the sparse file. > 3. Export the zpool. > 4. Delete the sparse file > 5. Import the zpool. It should come up as degraded, since one

Re: [zfs-discuss] SIL3124 stability?

Joerg Schilling wrote: [ ... ] > I bought this two days ago > > http://www.kmelektronik.de/main_site/prod_detail/detail.php?ArtNr=4425&Shop=0 > > and as the only information I could found in the web was to flash the card > BIOS, > I did not realize that there is a jumper After i opened th

[zfs-discuss] SIL3114 Re: SIL3124 stability?

Joerg Schilling wrote: [ ... ] > I bought this two days ago > > http://www.kmelektronik.de/main_site/prod_detail/detail.php?ArtNr=4425&Shop=0 This has a SIL3114. I bought it some month ago. > and as the only information I could found in the web was to flash the card > BIOS, You need a bios *

Re: [zfs-discuss] Unable to use zfs send/receive from NexentaStor 1.0.6 to Solaris 10 Update 5 x86

Dedhi Sujatmiko wrote: > Dedhi Sujatmiko wrote: > >> When I do the replication : >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/ssh# zfs send data/work/[EMAIL PROTECTED]|ssh >> 192.168.3.13 zfs >> recv data/work/[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> cannot receive: invalid backup stream >> > > I just realized that the ZFS vers

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS poor performance on Areca 1231ML

> "jl" == Jonathan Loran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: jl> the single drive speed is in line with the raidz2 vdev, reviewing the OP UFS single drive: 50MB/s write 70MB/s read ZFS 1-drive: 42MB/s write 43MB/s read raidz2 11-drive: 40MB/s write 40MB/s read

Re: [zfs-discuss] working closed blob driver

> "jcm" == James C McPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "t" == Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: jcm> find out from Miles why mega_sas is "new and unproven" jcm> given that it's been in NV since build 88. This has degenerated to an argument over definition, so if you like I can r

Re: [zfs-discuss] Unable to use zfs send/receive from NexentaStor 1.0.6 to Solaris 10 Update 5 x86

Dedhi Sujatmiko wrote: > When I do the replication : > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/ssh# zfs send data/work/[EMAIL PROTECTED]|ssh > 192.168.3.13 zfs > recv data/work/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > cannot receive: invalid backup stream I just realized that the ZFS version being used in Solaris 10 U5 and NexentaSto

Re: [zfs-discuss] create raidz with 1 disk offline

Tomas Ögren wrote: > On 27 September, 2008 - Brandon High sent me these 1,0K bytes: > > >> On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Marcus Sundman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> So, is it possible to create a 5 * 1 TB raidz with 4 disks (i.e., with >>> one disk offline)? In that case I could use

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs resilvering

Johan Hartzenberg wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Richard Elling > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > Mikael Kjerrman wrote: > > define a lot :-) > > > > We are doing about 7-8M per second which I don't think is a lot > but perhaps it is eno

[zfs-discuss] zpool(1) reports free space, but zfs(1) disagrees

Greetings! Been using solaris (SXCE) as a home server for a few months now - works really well. However something weird came to my attention lately - I think not all the available disk space is actually made available in my system. The following command output will show what I mean: bash-3.2#

Re: [zfs-discuss] Unable to use zfs send/receive from NexentaStor 1.0.6 to Solaris 10 Update 5 x86

Tomas Ögren wrote: > This "Sourcing ..." is probably messing up. > > Try 'ssh 192.168.3.13 pwd', that should _only_ echo the directory, > nothing else, or it will probably mess up the stream. > > Make sure it only echoes stuff when it's an interactive login. Thanks for sharing the idea. However tha

Re: [zfs-discuss] Unable to use zfs send/receive from NexentaStor 1.0.6 to Solaris 10 Update 5 x86

On 28 September, 2008 - Dedhi Sujatmiko sent me these 2,3K bytes: > Dear all, ... > When I do the replication : > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/ssh# zfs send data/work/[EMAIL PROTECTED]|ssh > 192.168.3.13 zfs > recv data/work/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > cannot receive: invalid backup stream > > No-login SSH is

[zfs-discuss] Unable to use zfs send/receive from NexentaStor 1.0.6 to Solaris 10 Update 5 x86

Dear all, I've trying to replicate some ZFS folder from NexentaStor 1.0.6 to Solaris 10 Update 5 x86 using Nexenta's Auto-sync. However it does not work. Here I do some test by directly using the root shell of Nexenta for simplification (instead of using the NMS GUI to do that). Nexenta host : go

Re: [zfs-discuss] create raidz with 1 disk offline

On 27 September, 2008 - Brandon High sent me these 1,0K bytes: > On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Marcus Sundman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So, is it possible to create a 5 * 1 TB raidz with 4 disks (i.e., with > > one disk offline)? In that case I could use one of the 1 TB disks as > > The o