Peter Boros wrote:
> I perform a snapshot and a zfs send on a filesystem with a recordsize
> of 16k, and redirect the output to a plain file. Later, I use cat
> sentfs | zfs receive otherpool/filesystem. In this case the new
> filesystem's recordsize will be the default 128k again. The other
Mike,
Indeed an interesting result :) !
This is a known problem with VirtualBox :)
They have fixed it in the latest release
-- snip --
#1639: Solaris Virtual box guest keeps getting its time reset after resuming VM
from suspend
+
Brian Hechinger wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 04:35:30PM +1200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> We can only hope that ZFS boot will consign this never ending layout
>> argument to the dust of history.
>>
>
> The layout of disks and filesystems will always be a personal preference
> and will n
This is good for a chuckle.
# zpool status
pool: rpool
state: ONLINE
status: One or more devices is currently being resilvered. The pool will
continue to function, possibly in a degraded state.
action: Wait for the resilver to complete.
scrub: resilver in progress for 3074457345614885
# zpool export zfs
cannot open 'zfs': no such pool
any command other than zpool import will give "connot open 'zfs': no such pool"
I can't seem to find any useful information on this type of error.
Did anyone have this kind of problem ?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
Is it possible to give access to the snapshots of a global zone (through
lofs perhaps?) into a zone? I recall that
you can't just delegate a snapshot dataset into a zone yet, but was
wondering if there is some lofs magic I can do?
Thanks
___
zfs-discu
On 23-Jun-08, at 6:59 PM, Miles Nordin wrote:
>> ... A proper
> DBMS (anything except MySQL)
Perhaps you mean MyISAM. MySQL's InnoDB engine offers ACID.
--Toby
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/m
Peter Tribble wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Dave Miner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Keith Bierman wrote:
>>> A lot of developers use VMs of one sort or another these days, and
>>> few of them use jumpstart (especially when the entire point of the
>>> exercise is to get their feet wet o
and the tar file ...
This message posted from opensolaris.org
zfs-auto-snapshot-0.10_atjobs.tar.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Hi Tim (Foster),
hi all,
first of all: Tim, thank you very much for your very useful auto-snapshot
script.
I believe this really is what every ZFS user needs.
As a laptop user, I wanted to make sure that I get snapshots taken even if my
machine is down every night, so I added at scheduling suppo
Problem solved.
I did a zfs mount followed by a zfs unmount, and then the zone booted fine.
Thanks to William from the zones-discuss and Mark Musante, both from Sun.
The more i work with zfs, the more confidence i get in it.
justin
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Dave Miner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Keith Bierman wrote:
>> A lot of developers use VMs of one sort or another these days, and
>> few of them use jumpstart (especially when the entire point of the
>> exercise is to get their feet wet on new platforms, or new ver
Hello,
1st off, I am using ZFS under FreeBSD 7.0. Forgive me if this is the
wrong place (I do plan to post to FreeBSD as well, but this seems to be
more of a ZFS related question).
I am using a 3ware 9690SA-8E and two IBM EXP3000 chasis. One issue is the
3ware card isn't hard setting the en
Keith Bierman wrote:
> On Jun 24, 2008, at 11:01 AM, Dave Miner wrote:
>
>> I doubt we'd have interest in providing more configurability in the
>> interactive installer. As Richard sort of points out subsequently,
>> most
>> people wouldn't know what to do here, anyway, and the ones who do
>> u
On 6/23/08 7:45 PM, "Richard Elling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the ability to have different policies for file systems
> is pure goodness -- though you pay for it on the backup/
> restore side.
And another reason why Automated Data Migration is the way to go. "Backup"
and "replication
IBM's website says that Solaris 10u1 has them built in, Shouldn't that
mean they are in sNV too?
I'm booting off the network and off DVD, and just before the installer
starts I get a message about 'no disks found.'
Format does the same thing.
What driver module should be used for the ServeRAID
On Jun 24, 2008, at 11:01 AM, Dave Miner wrote:
> I doubt we'd have interest in providing more configurability in the
> interactive installer. As Richard sort of points out subsequently,
> most
> people wouldn't know what to do here, anyway, and the ones who do
> usually use automated provisio
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 09:41 -0700, Richard Elling wrote:
> IMHO, you can make dump optional, with no dump being default.
> Before Sommerfeld pounces on me (again :-))
actually, in the case of virtual machines, doing the dump *in* the
virtual machine into preallocated virtual disk blocks is silly.
I have a similar problem -- my OS is borked-up-beyond-bootable (my bad, and I'm
not used to doing snapshots for rollback yet) and I'm going to need to
reinstall... but before I do that I wanted to double check and make sure that
I would still be able to access my storage zpools (raidz on separ
Lori Alt wrote:
>
>
> Mike Gerdts wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Lori Alt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> The Caiman team can make their own decision here, but we
>>> decided to be more hard-nosed about disk space requirements in the
>>> legacy install. If the pool is too small
jan damborsky wrote:
> Hi Lori,
>
>
> Lori Alt wrote:
>
>> The Caiman team can make their own decision here, but we
>> decided to be more hard-nosed about disk space requirements in the
>> legacy install. If the pool is too small to accommodate the recommended
>> swap and dump zvols, then maybe th
Mike Gerdts wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Lori Alt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Caiman team can make their own decision here, but we
decided to be more hard-nosed about disk space requirements in the
legacy install. If the pool is too small to accommodate the recommended
swap
# zoneadm list -cp
0:global:running:/
-:anzan:installed:/zones/anzan
That of any help?
justin
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/z
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Justin Vassallo wrote:
> # zfs list
> NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
> external 449G 427G 27.4K /external
> external/backup447G 427G 374G /external/backup
> # zoneadm -z anzan boot
> could not verify fs /backup: could not a
jan damborsky wrote:
Hi Lori,
Lori Alt wrote:
Richard Elling wrote:
Hi Jan, comments below...
jan damborsky wrote:
Hi folks,
I am member of Solaris Install team and I am currently working
on making Slim installer compliant with ZFS boot design specification:
http://ope
I scrubbed the pool and it completed with no errors.
I then cleared the pool and re-attached the new disk to the faulted mirror.
This time, resilvering started nicely and the pool is now ONLINE and
displaying no errors.
So that's done.
However, the fs is still unusable by the zone:
# zfs list
N
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Lori Alt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Caiman team can make their own decision here, but we
> decided to be more hard-nosed about disk space requirements in the
> legacy install. If the pool is too small to accommodate the recommended
> swap and dump zvols, the
Hi Richard,
thank you very much for your comments.
Please see my response in line.
Jan
Richard Elling wrote:
> Hi Jan, comments below...
>
> jan damborsky wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I am member of Solaris Install team and I am currently working
>> on making Slim installer compliant with ZFS boot
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Richard Elling wrote:
> A side question though, my friends who run Windows,
> Linux, or OSX don't seem to have this bias towards isolating
> /var. Is this a purely Solaris phenomenon? If so, how do we
> fix it?
In addition to the other answers given, I think another reason
Hi Lori,
Lori Alt wrote:
> Richard Elling wrote:
>> Hi Jan, comments below...
>>
>> jan damborsky wrote:
>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> I am member of Solaris Install team and I am currently working
>>> on making Slim installer compliant with ZFS boot design specification:
>>>
>>> http://opensolaris
It would seem that the ZFS Web UI lacks a few requisite classes to support the
updates ZFS features in snv_b89+.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/lis
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 7:24 AM, Gary Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:25:09PM -0500, Mike Gerdts wrote:
>>
>> Really it boils down to lots of file systems to hold the OS adds
>> administrative complexity and rarely saves more work than it creates.
>
> Some of us want t
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 04:35:30PM +1200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 8:06 PM, Brian Hechinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >wrote:
> >>This is not a purely Solaris phenomenon, this is a UNIX phenomenon.
> >>People who run Linux or OSX (I can't speak for Windows users) tend to
Hi Everyone,
I perform a snapshot and a zfs send on a filesystem with a recordsize
of 16k, and redirect the output to a plain file. Later, I use cat
sentfs | zfs receive otherpool/filesystem. In this case the new
filesystem's recordsize will be the default 128k again. The other
filesystem
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:25:09PM -0500, Mike Gerdts wrote:
>
> Really it boils down to lots of file systems to hold the OS adds
> administrative complexity and rarely saves more work than it creates.
Some of us want to use different mount options on /var than on /.
That's why they need to be di
Samba's integration with ZFS wasn't that great last time I tested. I had all
kinds of permission problems, mainly with inheritance. Windows deals with deny
entries very differently to Unix and I kept finding my test accounts were
denied access to new files & folders.
Also, while I'm no Samba
Darren Reed wrote:
> So I spent some time thinking about different directions you could build
> on this in the future, for example:
> 1) controlling the size of the ARC/L2ARC by controlling the cache size
> 2) specifying different backing storage for primary/secondary cache
> 3) having more than tw
Richard Elling wrote:
> Hacked non-COW zvol? Since COW occurs at the DMU layer,
> below ZPL or ZVol, I don't see how to bypass it. AFAIK,
> the trick to using ZVols for swap was to just fix some bugs
> in ZFS and rewrite the pertinent parts of the installer(s).
Swap just uses a normal ZVOL, whi
38 matches
Mail list logo
