On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 12:49:29PM -0700, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> > > I was planning to provide CIFS services via Samba. I noticed a posting a
> > > while back from a Sun engineer working on integrating NFSv4/ZFS ACL
> > > support
> > > into Samba, but I'm not sure if that was ever completed and s
msl wrote:
> Hello all,
> There is a way to configure the zpool to "legacy_mount", and have all
> filesystems in that pool mounted automatically?
> I will try explain better:
> - Imagine that i have a zfs pool with "1000" filesystems.
> - I want to "control" the mount/unmount of that pool, so
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Tim Spriggs wrote:
> Still, we are using ZFS but we are re-thinking on how to deploy/manage
> it. Our original model had us exporting/importing pools in order to move
> zone data between machines. We had done the same with UFS on iSCSI
[...]
> When we don't move pools around,
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Mike Gerdts wrote:
> MS-DFS could be helpful here. You could have a virtual samba instance
> that generates MS-DFS redirects to the appropriate spot. At one point in
That's true, although I rather detest Microsoft DFS (they stole the acronym
from DCE/DFS, even though partic
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Andy Lubel wrote:
> Yeah its fun to see IBM compete with its OEM provider Netapp.
Yes, we had both IBM and Netapp out as well. I'm not sure what the point
was... We do have some IBM SAN equipment on site, I suppose if we had gone
with the IBM variant we could have consolidate
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, James F. Hranicky wrote:
> > It just seems rather involved, and relatively inefficient to continuously
> > be mounting/unmounting stuff all the time. One of the applications to be
> > deployed against the filesystem will be web service, I can't really
> > envision a web server
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, eric kustarz wrote:
> > As far as quotas, I was less than impressed with their implementation.
>
> Would you mind going into more details here?
The feature set was fairly extensive, they supported volume quotas for
users or groups, or "qtree" quotas, which similar to the ZFS
On 9/21/07, Christine Tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> patch and install tools can't figure out pools yet. If you have a 1GB
> pool and 10 filesystems on it, du reports each having 1GB, do you have
> 10GB capacity? The tools can't tell. Please check the archives, this
> subject has been extensi
On 9/20/07, Matthew Flanagan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike,
>
> I followed your procedure for cloning zones and it worked
> well up until yesterday when I tried applying the S10U4
> kernel patch 12001-14 and it wouldn't apply because I had
> my zones on zfs :(
Thanks for sharing. That sucks.
grant beattie wrote:
> I don't have any advice, unfortunately, but I do know that in my case
> putting zones on UFS is simply not an option. there must be a way
> considering there is nothing in the documentation to suggest that zones
> on ZFS are not supported.
>
There's a very explicit "Do
eric kustarz wrote:
>
> On Sep 21, 2007, at 3:50 PM, Tim Spriggs wrote:
>
>> m2# zpool create test mirror iscsi_lun1 iscsi_lun2
>> m2# zpool export test
>> m1# zpool import -f test
>> m1# reboot
>> m2# reboot
>
> Since I haven't actually looked into what problem caused your pools to
> become damag
On Sep 21, 2007, at 3:50 PM, Tim Spriggs wrote:
> Paul B. Henson wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Tim Spriggs wrote:
>>
>>
>>> The x4500 is very sweet and the only thing stopping us from
>>> buying two
>>> instead of another shelf is the fact that we have lost pools on
>>> Sol10u3
>>> servers a
Paul B. Henson wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Tim Spriggs wrote:
>
>
>> The x4500 is very sweet and the only thing stopping us from buying two
>> instead of another shelf is the fact that we have lost pools on Sol10u3
>> servers and there is no easy way of making two pools redundant (ie the
>> co
Jonathan Edwards wrote:
> On Sep 21, 2007, at 14:57, eric kustarz wrote:
>
>
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> I gave a talk about ZFS during EuroBSDCon 2007, and because it won
>>> the
>>> the best talk award and some find it funny, here it is:
>>>
>>> http://youtube.com/watch?v=o3TGM0T1CvE
>>>
>>> a bit b
On Sep 21, 2007, at 14:57, eric kustarz wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> I gave a talk about ZFS during EuroBSDCon 2007, and because it won
>> the
>> the best talk award and some find it funny, here it is:
>>
>> http://youtube.com/watch?v=o3TGM0T1CvE
>>
>> a bit better version is here:
>>
>> http:
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Tim Spriggs wrote:
> The x4500 is very sweet and the only thing stopping us from buying two
> instead of another shelf is the fact that we have lost pools on Sol10u3
> servers and there is no easy way of making two pools redundant (ie the
> complexity of clustering.) Simply se
On Sep 21, 2007, at 11:47 AM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I gave a talk about ZFS during EuroBSDCon 2007, and because it won the
> the best talk award and some find it funny, here it is:
>
> http://youtube.com/watch?v=o3TGM0T1CvE
>
> a bit better version is here:
>
> http://p
Mike, Grant,
I reported the zoneadm.1m man page problem to the man page group.
I also added some stronger wording to the ZFS Admin Guide and the
ZFS FAQ about not using ZFS for zone root paths for the Solaris 10
release and that upgrading or patching is not supported for either
Solaris 10 or Sola
On 9/20/07, Paul B. Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Again though, that would imply two different storage locations visible to
> the clients? I'd really rather avoid that. For example, with our current
> Samba implementation, a user can just connect to
> '\\files.csupomona.edu\' to access their
Gino wrote:
>> The x4500 is very sweet and the only thing stopping
>> us from buying two
>> instead of another shelf is the fact that we have
>> lost pools on Sol10u3
>> servers and there is no easy way of making two pools
>> redundant (ie the
>> complexity of clustering.) Simply sending increme
> The x4500 is very sweet and the only thing stopping
> us from buying two
> instead of another shelf is the fact that we have
> lost pools on Sol10u3
> servers and there is no easy way of making two pools
> redundant (ie the
> complexity of clustering.) Simply sending incremental
> snapshots is
Paul B. Henson wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, James F. Hranicky wrote:
>
>> This can be solved using an automounter as well.
>
> Well, I'd say more "kludged around" than "solved" ;), but again unless
> you've used DFS it might not seem that way.
Hey, I liked it :->
> It just seems rather involve
On 9/20/07 7:31 PM, "Paul B. Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Tim Spriggs wrote:
>
>> It's an IBM re-branded NetApp which can which we are using for NFS and
>> iSCSI.
Yeah its fun to see IBM compete with its OEM provider Netapp.
>
> Ah, I see.
>
> Is it comparable s
Hi.
I gave a talk about ZFS during EuroBSDCon 2007, and because it won the
the best talk award and some find it funny, here it is:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=o3TGM0T1CvE
a bit better version is here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/misc/zfs/zfs-man.swf
BTW. Inspired by ZFS demos
Ok I found the problem with 0x06, one disk was missing. But now I got all my
disk and I get 0x05.:
Sep 21 10:25:53 unknown ^Mpanic[cpu0]/thread=ff0001e12c80:
Sep 21 10:25:53 unknown genunix: [ID 603766 kern.notice] assertion failed:
dmu_read(os, smo->smo_object, offset, size, entry_map) == 0
I'm CCing zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org, as this doesn't look like
FreeBSD-specific problem.
It looks there is a problem with block allocation(?) when we are near
quota limit. tank/foo dataset has quota set to 10m:
Without quota:
FreeBSD:
# dd if=/dev/zero of=/tank/test bs=512 coun
Claus Guttesen writes:
> > So the 1 MB files are stored as ~8 x 128K recordsize.
> >
> > Because of
> > 5003563 use smaller "tail block" for last block of object
> >
> > The last block of you file is partially used. It will depend
> > on your filesize distribution by without that in
> So the 1 MB files are stored as ~8 x 128K recordsize.
>
> Because of
> 5003563 use smaller "tail block" for last block of object
>
> The last block of you file is partially used. It will depend
> on your filesize distribution by without that info we can
> only guess that we're wasting an
Claus Guttesen writes:
> > > I have many small - mostly jpg - files where the original file is
> > > approx. 1 MB and the thumbnail generated is approx. 4 KB. The files
> > > are currently on vxfs. I have copied all files from one partition onto
> > > a zfs-ditto. The vxfs-partition occupies 4
29 matches
Mail list logo
