> The x4500 is very sweet and the only thing stopping > us from buying two > instead of another shelf is the fact that we have > lost pools on Sol10u3 > servers and there is no easy way of making two pools > redundant (ie the > complexity of clustering.) Simply sending incremental > snapshots is not a > viable option. > > The pools we lost were pools on iSCSI (in a mirrored > config) and they > were mostly lost on zpool import/export. The lack of > a recovery > mechanism really limits how much faith we can put > into our data on ZFS. > It's safe as long as the pool is safe... but we've > lost multiple pools.
Hello Tim, did you try SNV60+ or S10U4 ? Gino This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
