Paul B. Henson wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, James F. Hranicky wrote:
> 
>> This can be solved using an automounter as well.
> 
> Well, I'd say more "kludged around" than "solved" ;), but again unless
> you've used DFS it might not seem that way.

Hey, I liked it :->

> It just seems rather involved, and relatively inefficient to continuously
> be mounting/unmounting stuff all the time. One of the applications to be
> deployed against the filesystem will be web service, I can't really
> envision a web server with tens of thousands of NFS mounts coming and
> going, seems like a lot of overhead.

Well, that's why ZFS wouldn't work for us :-( .

> I might need to pursue a similar route though if I can't get one large
> system to house everything in one place.
> 
>> Samba can be configured to map homes drives to /nfs/home/%u . Let samba use
>> the automounter setup and it's just as transparent on the CIFS side.
> 
> I'm planning to use NFSv4 with strong authentication and authorization
> through, and intended to run Samba directly on the file server itself
> accessing storage locally. I'm not sure that Samba would be able to acquire
> local Kerberos credentials and switch between them for the users, without
> that access via NFSv4 isn't very doable.

Makes sense -- in that case you would be looking at multiple SMB
servers, though.

Jim

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to