Hi List,
As a ZFS newbie, I foolishly copied my data set to the root zpool file
system (a large iSCSI SAN array). Thus:
# zpool create -f iscsi c4t19d0 c4t20d0 c4t21d0 c4t22d0 c4t23d0 c4t24d0
# zpool list
NAMESIZEUSED AVAILCAP HEALTH ALTROOT
iscsi
Peter,
I try to change these devices permission to oracle:dba,but the errors
are persistent.I think in ZFS,there is no concept of volumes, at least
in the traditional sense of volume managers,So if trying to use the
RAW device that the zpool command created, maybe it is not what ZFS is
intended
Hello. I'm a nobody.
I use Linux. I have a hard-drive. I want the best / sexiest / what ever
fs for my hard-drive, as it isn't one of those flashy flash drives,
which I presume don't need an fs (???).
I was THRILLED that the ZFS for Linux thread started. And, I was equally
horrified (and suffici
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 17:26 -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> > (the "system" flags on *BSD are tied to securelevel; the closet solaris
> > equivalent would be to define new "set system flag" and "clear system
> > flag" privileges).
>
> There'd have to be a way to drop these privs from L on all ru
Rayson Ho wrote:
On 4/12/07, Chen, Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How to dtrace a who is writing a veritas volume?
May be fuser or lsof is faster to provide the answer??
Rayson
Thanks.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http:/
On 4/13/07, Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I definitely prefer CDDL or BSD license - they just offer more freedom.
+1
The Linux community won't be happy unless they get anything and
everything opensourced. And not only opensourced, it has to be under
GPL. And not only under GPL, t
And then you complain you can't get zfs or nvidia or wifi or ...
drivers, because you want that drivers and you want to force those
companies to give them for you under GPLv2. Some companies try to go
around that problem and there's still no consensus if it's legal or
not - but everyone is happy e
Hello Toby,
Friday, April 13, 2007, 3:06:44 PM, you wrote:
TT> On 13-Apr-07, at 9:51 AM, Al Hopper wrote:
>> On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Toby Thain wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 12-Apr-07, at 11:51 PM, Rich Teer wrote:
>>>
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, Toby Thain wrote:
> Those who promulgate the tag for w
Hello Rich,
Friday, April 13, 2007, 4:39:03 PM, you wrote:
RT> On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Toby Thain wrote:
>> IMHO, this is a faulty conclusion.
RT> And I disagree. So we'll have to agree to disagree.
>> The interesting use case of "contributing", and I think the one that spurred
>> the creation o
Malachi de Ælfweald wrote:
This may be a very stupid question, but
In the current procedure, we have to install onto UFS then convert the
UFS to ZFS...
During install, we can launch a terminal and run ZFS commands...
Would it be possible, doing a fresh install, to use the terminal to
ru
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> I'm happy to inform that the ZFS file system is now part of the FreeBSD
> operating system. ZFS is available in the HEAD branch and will be
> available in FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE as an experimental feature.
Great work, Pawel! This is an important milestone for the
Free
On 13-Apr-07, at 11:53 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Can we please get this licensing debate OFF zfs-discuss.
Ack. :)
--T
The thread has long since lost any relevance to ZFS on Linux or
even ZFS in general. It instead has become yet another debate by
non legally trained people on their
On 13-Apr-07, at 11:43 AM, Toby Thain wrote:
On 13-Apr-07, at 4:22 AM, Dick Davies wrote:
On 13/04/07, Toby Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Those who promulgate the tag for whatever motive - often agencies of
Microsoft - have all foundered on the simple fact that the GPL
applies ONLY to M
On 13-Apr-07, at 11:39 AM, Rich Teer wrote:
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Toby Thain wrote:
IMHO, this is a faulty conclusion.
And I disagree. So we'll have to agree to disagree.
The interesting use case of "contributing", and I think the one
that spurred
the creation of the GPL, is "I use this
Can we please get this licensing debate OFF zfs-discuss.
The thread has long since lost any relevance to ZFS on Linux or even ZFS
in general. It instead has become yet another debate by non legally
trained people on their interpretations of one license over another.
--
Darren J Moffat
_
On 13-Apr-07, at 4:22 AM, Dick Davies wrote:
On 13/04/07, Toby Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Those who promulgate the tag for whatever motive - often agencies of
Microsoft - have all foundered on the simple fact that the GPL
applies ONLY to MY code as licensor (*and modifications thereto*)
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Toby Thain wrote:
> IMHO, this is a faulty conclusion.
And I disagree. So we'll have to agree to disagree.
> The interesting use case of "contributing", and I think the one that spurred
> the creation of the GPL, is "I use this but I need to customise it a bit". In
> this s
Peter Bunclark wrote:
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Lori Alt wrote:
Booting from zfs will not require any changes to OBP.
Existing proms will support it.
Lori
Then presumably not from EFI-labelled disks - is that coming?
Pete.
I'm afraid that I don't know the answer to that. Maybe
someon
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Lori Alt wrote:
>
> Booting from zfs will not require any changes to OBP.
> Existing proms will support it.
>
> Lori
Then presumably not from EFI-labelled disks - is that coming?
Pete.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Dick Davies wrote:
On 13/04/07, Lori Alt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sparc support is in the works. We're waiting on some other development
work going on right now in the area of sparc booting in general
(not specific to zfs booting, although the zfs boot loader
is part of that project). I can
Hello ZFS mailinglist,
We are using ZFS (over ISCSI) on Opensolaris build 57
Today we encountered 2 crashes during a ZFS send/receive operation.
We tried to replicate a snapshot via the built-in send receive zfs
tools.
When we analyzed the resulted crash dump files we found the crash was
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Ignatich wrote:
Bart Smaalders writes:
Abide by the terms of the CDDL and all is well. Basically, all you
have to do is make your changes to CDDL'd files available. What you
do w/ the code you built (load it into MVS, ship a storage appliance,
build a ZFS for Linux) is u
On 13-Apr-07, at 9:51 AM, Al Hopper wrote:
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Toby Thain wrote:
On 12-Apr-07, at 11:51 PM, Rich Teer wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, Toby Thain wrote:
Those who promulgate the tag for whatever motive - often agencies
of Microsoft
- have all foundered on the simple fact that
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Toby Thain wrote:
>
> On 12-Apr-07, at 11:51 PM, Rich Teer wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, Toby Thain wrote:
> >
> >> Those who promulgate the tag for whatever motive - often agencies
> >> of Microsoft
> >> - have all foundered on the simple fact that the GPL applies ONLY
>
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Ignatich wrote:
> Bart Smaalders writes:
>
> > Abide by the terms of the CDDL and all is well. Basically, all you
> > have to do is make your changes to CDDL'd files available. What you
> > do w/ the code you built (load it into MVS, ship a storage appliance,
> > build a ZFS
On 13/04/2007, at 7:27 AM, Lori Alt wrote:
I've attached the README file (as of now) so that anyone
who is interested can get the flavor of what the kit will
contain and how it will be used.
[...]
1. Build or download a full Solaris netinstall image with
bits that are build 62 or later, or
Since the entries under /dev/rdsk (for raw disk partitions) are also
symlinks to /devices/../.. and have been for a very, very long time,
it seems to me that the inability to support them is either a bug or
the result of a misuse of the product.
On 13/04/2007, at 3:30 PM, Simon wrote:
Mar
On 12-Apr-07, at 11:51 PM, Rich Teer wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, Toby Thain wrote:
Those who promulgate the tag for whatever motive - often agencies
of Microsoft
- have all foundered on the simple fact that the GPL applies ONLY
to MY code
as licensor (*and modifications thereto*); it has a
On April 13, 2007 10:48:38 AM +0400 Ignatich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I know Sun opened most if not all ZFS related patents for OpenSolaris
community. So I repeat questions I asked in my first mail:
1. Are those patents limited to CDDL/OpenSolaris code or can by used in
GPL/Linux too?
2. If G
On 13/04/07, Lori Alt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sparc support is in the works. We're waiting on some other development
work going on right now in the area of sparc booting in general
(not specific to zfs booting, although the zfs boot loader
is part of that project). I can't give you a date r
On 13/04/07, Toby Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Those who promulgate the tag for whatever motive - often agencies of
Microsoft - have all foundered on the simple fact that the GPL
applies ONLY to MY code as licensor (*and modifications thereto*); it
has absolutely nothing to say about what yo
31 matches
Mail list logo
