On 4/13/07, Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I definitely prefer CDDL or BSD license - they just offer more freedom.
+1 The Linux community won't be happy unless they get anything and everything opensourced. And not only opensourced, it has to be under GPL. And not only under GPL, they want it to be version 2. They don't respect other projects. They just don't get it and they won't. To them, Microsoft = evil. Every line of code in the world has to be under GPL so that Microsoft won't be able to use it. To me, I just don't care who uses the code - Microsoft can use ZFS (and other components in Solaris or FreeBSD), it just need to respect CDDL or BSD license. But don't ask people to change the license to GPL!! Also, the *BSD projects wanted to get a journaling FS. Linux has a few - but then did anyone in the Linux community do anything to get a journaling *BSD a journaling filesystem?? Rayson
-- Best regards, Robert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://milek.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
_______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
