Hello Matthew,
Friday, March 23, 2007, 2:49:03 AM, you wrote:
MA> Robert Milkowski wrote:
>> MA> Ah -- I think that may help explain things. It may be that your file
>> MA> has some runs of zeros in it, which are represented as holes in
>> MA> d100-copy1/m1, but as blocks of zeros in the d100/
> > > Consider a server [with] three drives, A, B, and C, in which A and B are
> > > mirrored and
> > > C is not. Pull out A, B, and C, and re-insert them as A, C, and B. If
> > > B is slow to come up for some reason, ZFS will see "C" in place of
> > > "B", and happily reformat it into a mirror of
> > Consider a server [with] three drives, A, B, and C, in which A and B are
> > mirrored and
> > C is not. Pull out A, B, and C, and re-insert them as A, C, and B. If
> > B is slow to come up for some reason, ZFS will see "C" in place of
> > "B", and happily reformat it into a mirror of "A". (Or
Viktor Turskyi wrote:
Thank you very much for the consultation. The information was very
useful.
You're welcome!
And I have one more questions about ZFS file attributes. I have found
such information "2^56 — Number of attributes of a file in ZFS" but i
cant found any information mechanism of
Robert Milkowski wrote:
MA> Ah -- I think that may help explain things. It may be that your file
MA> has some runs of zeros in it, which are represented as holes in
MA> d100-copy1/m1, but as blocks of zeros in the d100/m1. It begs the
MA> question, what is this file and how did you create the
John-Paul Drawneek wrote:
got a 12 disk system - all 18gb
2 mirror for boot, now what to do with the rest?
The storage is to be used for user space, web stuff and to store anything else
(dump for data).
I could do 5 mirrors, but thats a wasting quite a bit of space.
Was thinking about raidz2,
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 01:34:15PM -0600, Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
>
> >>There is one big difference which you see here. ZFS always honors the
> >>users umask, and that is why the file was created with 644 permission
> >>rather than 664 as UFS did. ZFS has to always apply the users umask
> >>b
Matt B wrote:
Is this something that should work? The assumption is that there is a dedicated
raw SWAP slice and after install /tmp (which will be on /) will be unmounted
and mounted to zpool/tmp (just like zpool/home)
Thoughts on this?
you are aware that /tmp by default resides in memory th
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 12:11:38PM +1200, Nicholas Lee wrote:
> On 3/23/07, John-Paul Drawneek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Can i do to Raidz2 over 5 and a Raidz2 over 4 with a spare for them all?
> >or two Raidz2 over 4 with 2 spare?
>
>
> This is a question I was planning to ask as well.
>
On 3/23/07, John-Paul Drawneek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can i do to Raidz2 over 5 and a Raidz2 over 4 with a spare for them all?
or two Raidz2 over 4 with 2 spare?
This is a question I was planning to ask as well.
Does zfs allow a hot spare to be allocated to multiple pools or as a system
Is this something that should work? The assumption is that there is a dedicated
raw SWAP slice and after install /tmp (which will be on /) will be unmounted
and mounted to zpool/tmp (just like zpool/home)
Thoughts on this?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Jim Mauro wrote:
All righty...I set c_max to 512MB, c to 512MB, and p to 256MB...
> arc::print -tad
{
...
c02e29e8 uint64_t size = 0t299008
c02e29f0 uint64_t p = 0t16588228608
c02e29f8 uint64_t c = 0t33176457216
c02e2a00 uint64_t c_min = 0t10703
I have read the links - good read
So would i have two pools?
Can i do to Raidz2 over 5 and a Raidz2 over 4 with a spare for them all?
or two Raidz2 over 4 with 2 spare?
Just trying to get the most storage out of it.
But the setup you suggested sounds good
This message posted from opensolari
On 3/23/07, John-Paul Drawneek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've got the same consideration at the moment.
Should i do 9 disk raidz2 with a spare, or could i do two raidz2 to get a
bit of performance?
Only done tests with striped mirrors which seems to give it a boost, so is
it worth it with a r
Hello Matthew,
Friday, March 23, 2007, 12:01:12 AM, you wrote:
MA> Robert Milkowski wrote:
>> What's the last line about?
MA> Ah -- I think that may help explain things. It may be that your file
MA> has some runs of zeros in it, which are represented as holes in
MA> d100-copy1/m1, but as bloc
Robert Milkowski wrote:
What's the last line about?
Ah -- I think that may help explain things. It may be that your file
has some runs of zeros in it, which are represented as holes in
d100-copy1/m1, but as blocks of zeros in the d100/m1. It begs the
question, what is this file and how did
Hello Matthew,
Thursday, March 22, 2007, 8:07:14 PM, you wrote:
MA> Robert Milkowski wrote:
>> While lsize is the same for both files asize is smaller fr the second
>> one. Why is it? When is is possible? Both file systems have
>> compression turned off and default recordsize. Diff claims both f
On 3/22/07, Mark Shellenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please explain how. I've been trying to make this work for months with
> no success.
>
> The business requirement is that all files in a directory hierarchy be
> created
> mode 660 - read and write by owner and primary group. How do I d
Please explain how. I've been trying to make this work for months with
no success.
The business requirement is that all files in a directory hierarchy be
created
mode 660 - read and write by owner and primary group. How do I do
this?
# zfs set aclmode=passthrough
# mkdir dir.test
# chmo
On 3/22/07, Mark Shellenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow, that's a big show stopper! If I tell the users, that after the
> transition they have to toggle their umask before/after writing to
> certain directories or need to do a chmod, I'm sure they wanna hang me
> right on the next tree and
got a 12 disk system - all 18gb
2 mirror for boot, now what to do with the rest?
The storage is to be used for user space, web stuff and to store anything else
(dump for data).
I could do 5 mirrors, but thats a wasting quite a bit of space.
Was thinking about raidz2, as its almost as reliable a
Does anyone have a 6140 expansion shelf that they can hook directly to
a host? Just wondering if this configuration works. Previously I
though the expansion connector was proprietary but now I see it's
just fibre channel.
I tried this before with a 3511 and it "kind of" worked but ultimately
ha
There is one big difference which you see here. ZFS always honors the
users umask, and that is why the file was created with 644 permission
rather than 664 as UFS did. ZFS has to always apply the users umask
because of POSIX.
Wow, that's a big show stopper! If I tell the users, that afte
Robert Milkowski wrote:
While lsize is the same for both files asize is smaller fr the second
one. Why is it? When is is possible? Both file systems have
compression turned off and default recordsize. Diff claims both files
to be the same.
Metadata (eg, "DMU dnode", and indirect blocks for "Z
Special note: Here's a question I get a lot:
Q: Why did you miss (or miss us) last time?
A: This is a misconception that stems from the variability of the forums I
cover each (semi-monthly) period. The set is not static; rather, it's
based primarily on traffic volume. To illustrate, this pe
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 03:35:41PM -0400, Jim Mauro wrote:
>
> http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/03/20/lost.data.ap/index.html
I worked (briefly, left right after this, no point working there) at a place
that
lost the hdd in it's main server. (small company).
"That's ok! We have backups!"
Guy had be
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 08:45:47AM -0600, Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
Hi Mark,
> Jens Elkner wrote:
> >cp -P -r -p /dir /pool1/zfsdir
> ># cp: Insufficient memory to save acl entry
> I will open a bug on that.
Also opened a case: #37814372
> I can't reproduce your simple test.
Ehm
Hello Matthew,
Wednesday, March 14, 2007, 9:00:28 AM, you wrote:
MA> Robert Milkowski wrote:
>> Hello zfs-discuss,
>>
>> Subject says it all.
>>
>>
>> I first checked - no IO activity at all to the pool named thumper-2.
>> So I started replacing one drive with 'zpool replace thumper-2 c7t7d0
Hi.
System is snv_56 x86 32bit
bash-3.00# zpool status solaris
pool: solaris
state: ONLINE
scrub: scrub stopped with 0 errors on Thu Mar 22 16:25:23 2007
config:
NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM
solaris ONLINE 0 0 0
c0t1d0ONLINE 0
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 11:57:42PM -0700, Matt B wrote:
>
> Literally, someone should be able to make $7/hr with a stack of drives
> and the ability to just look or listen to a server to determin which
> drive needs to be replaced.
>
> This means ZFS will need to be able to control the HDD Status
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 09:26:35PM -0700, Anton B. Rang wrote:
> A couple of questions/comments --
>
> Why is the REMOVED state not persistent? It seems that, if ZFS knows
> that an administrator pulled a disk deliberately, that's still useful
> information after a reboot. Changing the state to FA
Jens Elkner wrote:
Hi,
2) On zfs
- e.g. as root do:
cp -P -r -p /dir /pool1/zfsdir
# cp: Insufficient memory to save acl entry
I will open a bug on that.
cp -r -p /dir /pool1/zfsdir
# cp: Insufficient memory to save acl entry
find dir | cpio -pu
Thank you very much for the consultation. The information was very useful.
And I have one more questions about ZFS file attributes. I have found such
information "2^56 — Number of attributes of a file in ZFS" but i cant found any
information mechanism of creating such attributes. The situation
Here are some raw data during my tests.
This tests consisted in timing mount/umount time for ufs and zfs
We are not dowing mount/umount using the "[zfs] mount -a" because it
is a serialized mount/umount.
instead we do mount/umount in parallel, using the shell script below
For UFS, we've created
34 matches
Mail list logo
