On July 31, 2006 11:32:15 PM -0400 Torrey McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You're comparing apples to a crate of apples. A more useful comparison would be
something along
the lines a single R0 LUN on a 3510 with controller to a single 3510-JBOD with
ZFS across all the
drives.
I think the
On 7/31/06, Dale Ghent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 31, 2006, at 8:07 PM, eric kustarz wrote:
>
> The 2.6.x Linux client is much nicer... one thing fixed was the
> client doing too many commits (which translates to fsyncs on the
> server). I would still recommend the Solaris client but i'm
Torrey,
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 8:32 PM
>
> You might want to check the specs of the the 3510. In some
> configs you
> only get 2 ports. However, in others you can get 8.
Really? 8 active Fibre Channel por
Luke Lonergan wrote:
Torrey,
On 7/28/06 10:11 AM, "Torrey McMahon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That said a 3510 with a raid controller is going to blow the door, drive
brackets, and skin off a JBOD in raw performance.
I'm pretty certain this is not the case.
If you need sequential ba
Grant,
Expect patches late September or so. Once available I'll post the patch
information.
Thanks,
George
grant beattie wrote:
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 11:51:09AM -0400, George Wilson wrote:
We have putback a significant number of fixes and features from
OpenSolaris into what will become S
I try to address it myself first.
I think most of File Systems need this Autodefrag function as the file
data is distributed at different unconsecutive blocks after the file
systems has been used for a long time.
Though ZFS is based on Transaction and Copy-On-Write, some modifications
to an ex
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 11:51:09AM -0400, George Wilson wrote:
> We have putback a significant number of fixes and features from
> OpenSolaris into what will become Solaris 10 11/06. For reference here's
> the list:
George,
this is great! any idea when these will be available as patches for
s1
For those within Sun (particularly the SPA experts), this core is
available at:
/net/mdb.eng/cores/eschrock/christophe_kalt/*.0
- Eric
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 04:04:43PM -0400, Christophe Kalt wrote:
> On Jul 31, Bill Moore wrote:
> | Interesting. When you do the import, try doing this:
> |
>
On Jul 31, 2006, at 8:07 PM, eric kustarz wrote:
The 2.6.x Linux client is much nicer... one thing fixed was the
client doing too many commits (which translates to fsyncs on the
server). I would still recommend the Solaris client but i'm sure
that's no surprise. But if you'r'e stuck on
On 7/31/06, Bev Crair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
However, note the limitations on usage: 4 'user-data file systems'...
B.
And last I looked it was x86-only.
Mike
--
Mike Gerdts
http://mgerdts.blogspot.com/
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss
Rich Teer wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Dale Ghent wrote:
So what does this exercise leave me thinking? Is Linux 2.4.x really screwed up
in NFS-land? This Solaris NFS replaces a Linux-based NFS server that the
Linux has had, uhhmmm (struggling to be nice), iffy NFS for ages.
The 2.
On Jul 31, 2006, at 7:30 PM, Rich Teer wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Dale Ghent wrote:
So what does this exercise leave me thinking? Is Linux 2.4.x
really screwed up
in NFS-land? This Solaris NFS replaces a Linux-based NFS server
that the
Linux has had, uhhmmm (struggling to be nice), iffy
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Dale Ghent wrote:
> So what does this exercise leave me thinking? Is Linux 2.4.x really screwed up
> in NFS-land? This Solaris NFS replaces a Linux-based NFS server that the
Linux has had, uhhmmm (struggling to be nice), iffy NFS for ages.
--
Rich Teer, SCNA, SCSA, OpenSola
On Jul 31, 2006, at 2:17 PM, Jan Schaumann wrote:
Hello all,
After setting up a Solaris 10 machine with ZFS as the new NFS server,
I'm stumped by some serious performance problems. Here are the
(admittedly long) details (also noted at
http://www.netmeister.org/blog/):
The machine in question
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 06:08:04PM -0400, Jan Schaumann wrote:
> # echo '::offsetof vdev_t vdev_nowritecache' | mdb -k
> offsetof (vdev_t, vdev_nowritecache) = 0x4c0
Ok, then try this:
echo '::spa -v' | mdb -k | awk '/dev.dsk/{print $1"+4c0/W1"}' | mdb -kw
--Bill
___
Bill Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm. It should have printed something like this:
>
> 857a0a60 vdev_nowritecache = 0 (B_FALSE)
>
> I think there might be a problem with the CTF data (debugging info)
> in U2. First, check /etc/release and make sure it says something like
> "
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 03:59:23PM -0400, Jan Schaumann wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion. However, I'm not sure if the above pipeline
> is correct:
>
> 2# !! | awk '/dev.dsk/{print $1"::print -a vdev_t vdev_nowritecache"}'
> 857a0580::print -a vdev_t vdev_nowritecache
> 3# !! | mdb -k
>
On Jul 31, Bill Moore wrote:
| Interesting. When you do the import, try doing this:
|
| zpool import -o ro yourpool
|
| And see if that fares any better. If it works, could you send the
| output of "zpool status -v"? Also, how big is the pool in question?
Same panic.
It's a 250GB drive, s
Bill Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To test this theory, run this command on your NFS server (as root):
>
> echo '::spa -v' | mdb -k | \
> awk '/dev.dsk/{print $1"::print -a vdev_t vdev_nowritecache"}' | \
> mdb -k | awk '{print $1"/W1"}' | mdb -kw
Thanks for the suggestio
However, note the limitations on usage: 4 'user-data file systems'...
B.
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Richard,
Monday, July 31, 2006, 6:29:03 PM, you wrote:
RE> Malahat Qureshi wrote:
Is any one have a comparison between zfs vs. vxfs, I'm working on
a presentation for m
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Richard,
Monday, July 31, 2006, 6:29:03 PM, you wrote:
RE> Malahat Qureshi wrote:
Is any one have a comparison between zfs vs. vxfs, I'm working on
a presentation for my management on this ---
RE> In management speak, this is easy. VxFS >> $0. ZFS priceless.
Hello Richard,
Monday, July 31, 2006, 6:29:03 PM, you wrote:
RE> Malahat Qureshi wrote:
>> Is any one have a comparison between zfs vs. vxfs, I'm working on
>> a presentation for my management on this ---
RE> In management speak, this is easy. VxFS >> $0. ZFS priceless. :-)
Well, it's free
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 02:17:00PM -0400, Jan Schaumann wrote:
> Is there anybody here who's using ZFS on Apple XRaids and serving them
> via NFS? Does anybody have any other ideas what I could do to solve
> this? (I have, in the mean time, converted the XRaid to plain old UFS,
> and performance
On Jul 30, 2006, at 23:44, Malahat Qureshi wrote:
Is any one have a comparison between zfs vs. vxfs, I'm working on a
presentation for my management on this ---
That can be a tough question to answer depending on what you're
looking for .. you could take the feature comparison approach like
Interesting. When you do the import, try doing this:
zpool import -o ro yourpool
And see if that fares any better. If it works, could you send the
output of "zpool status -v"? Also, how big is the pool in question?
Either access to the machine, or a way to copy the crash dump would be
usef
Hello all,
After setting up a Solaris 10 machine with ZFS as the new NFS server,
I'm stumped by some serious performance problems. Here are the
(admittedly long) details (also noted at
http://www.netmeister.org/blog/):
The machine in question is a dual-amd64 box with 2GB RAM and two
broadcom gig
I forgot to highlight that RAIDZ2 (a.k.a RAID-6) is also in this wad:
6417978 double parity RAID-Z a.k.a. RAID6
Thanks,
George
George Wilson wrote:
We have putback a significant number of fixes and features from
OpenSolaris into what will become Solaris 10 11/06. For reference here's
the list
Rainer,
This will hopefully go into build 06 of s10u3. It's on my list... :-)
Thanks,
George
Rainer Orth wrote:
George Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
We have putback a significant number of fixes and features from
OpenSolaris into what will become Solaris 10 11/06. For reference here's
On Jul 31, 2006, at 11:52 AM, Malahat Qureshi wrote:cute ):- but I need a techy answer becase unfortunately my mgmt is technical ):- On Jul 31, 2006, at 11:29 AM, Richard Elling wrote:Malahat Qureshi wrote: Is any one have a comparison between zfs vs. vxfs, I'm working on a presentation for my mana
George Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We have putback a significant number of fixes and features from
> OpenSolaris into what will become Solaris 10 11/06. For reference here's
> the list:
That's great news, thanks.
> Bug Fixes:
I notice this one
6405330 swap on zvol isn't added during
Mark & James Thas a Lot, James your link help me to complete the proces -- thanks again -- On Jul 31, 2006, at 7:22 AM, Mark Danico wrote:Malahat,For the boot drive you'll want to read the product notes document also since there are some specialinstructions that may need to be followed.http://www.s
Malahat Qureshi wrote:
Is any one have a comparison between zfs vs. vxfs, I'm working on
a presentation for my management on this ---
In management speak, this is easy. VxFS >> $0. ZFS priceless. :-)
-- richard
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-di
Feeling a bit brave (i guess), i upgraded one of our systems
to Solaris 10/u2 (from u1), and moved quite a bit of data to
zfs. This was 4 days ago. Found the system in a reboot loop
this morning.
Eventually got the system to boot (by wiping
/etc/zfs/zpool.cache), but one of the pools causes the
We have putback a significant number of fixes and features from
OpenSolaris into what will become Solaris 10 11/06. For reference here's
the list:
Features:
PSARC 2006/223 ZFS Hot Spares
6405966 Hot Spare support in ZFS
PSARC 2006/303 ZFS Clone Promotion
6276916 support for "clone swap"
PSARC 2
Malahat,
For the boot drive you'll want to read the product notes document also
since there are some special
instructions that may need to be followed.
http://www.sun.com/products-n-solutions/hardware/docs/Servers/coolthreads/t2000/index.html
That document also covers some patches that are req
Hi all,
A simple question: does ZFS need Autodefrag like other File Systems?
Regards,
Adam
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
36 matches
Mail list logo
