Rich Teer wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Dale Ghent wrote:
So what does this exercise leave me thinking? Is Linux 2.4.x really screwed up
in NFS-land? This Solaris NFS replaces a Linux-based NFS server that the
Linux has had, uhhmmm (struggling to be nice), iffy NFS for ages.
The 2.6.x Linux client is much nicer... one thing fixed was the client
doing too many commits (which translates to fsyncs on the server). I
would still recommend the Solaris client but i'm sure that's no
surprise. But if you'r'e stuck on Linux, upgrade to the latest stable
2.6.x and i'd be curious if it was better.
eric
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
