Re: [yocto] meta-toradex: How to generate uImage* files ?

2016-09-22 Thread Mark
re-image-minimal > > bitbake -c cleanall core-image-minimal > > bitbake core-image-minimal > > > Everything fails. > > > Is there a way to get things working again or should generate everythingh > from scratch again ? > > > > Z. > > -- >

Re: [yocto] sysroot for use with GDB

2012-12-05 Thread Mark Hatle
On 12/5/12 6:38 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Hello, nobody here who could help out? In message <20121203124234.6327b200...@gemini.denx.de> I wrote: according to the documentation [1] the right way to debug applications on the target is to load the target library information in GDB using

Re: [yocto] Need for offline binary configuration

2012-12-05 Thread Mark Hatle
al rootfs generation working and figured out before we spend too much time on this. However, if this is a high priority for you, it may make sense to start working on configuration. This is something that is definitely needed, and I don't believe anyone is actively working on. --M

Re: [yocto] Need for offline binary configuration

2012-12-05 Thread Mark Hatle
ike Key=Value, or Key:\nValue, etc.. XML-like -- Highly formatted configuration files like apache. --Mark 2) A generic configuration model do_createconfig generates configuration information with presentation information included (like kconfig) and OCT reads this config information and provides a

Re: [yocto] Difference of toolchain recipes

2012-12-06 Thread Mark Hatle
ian - This is the compiler included with the SDK to build on the SDK machine creating software for the target. This is an 'nativesdk' package. Is there any document for those description? Not that I know of.. It's one of those things that you kind of need to know in or

Re: [yocto] Difference of toolchain recipes

2012-12-12 Thread Mark Hatle
YP documentation be unnecessary or helpful? I think it would. The set of compiler/toolchain elements we have is definitely confusing to someone new. --Mark Scott -Original Message- From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto- boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Mark Hatle Sent

Re: [yocto] adding package management

2012-12-12 Thread Mark Hatle
edded Systems. --Mark Ross ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] adding package management

2012-12-12 Thread Mark Hatle
nce and they have removed everything that helped in a cross-compiled environment after the split. is there an eta for smart in the mainstream core? Hopefully the next version of the integration patches should be sent up today. We're really trying to get the code in by next week. --Mark On

Re: [yocto] What is GMAE?

2012-12-14 Thread Mark Hatle
w in 1.3) to build an SDK based on the contents of any arbitrary image.. the meta-toolchain-gmae is simply not necessary. bitbake -c populate_sdk --Mark Ross ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctop

Re: [yocto] What is GMAE?

2012-12-14 Thread Mark Hatle
On 12/14/12 4:12 PM, Tim Bird wrote: On 12/14/2012 12:45 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: On 12/14/12 1:46 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: On 14 December 2012 19:43, Tim Bird wrote: "If you need GMAE, you should use the bitbake meta-toolchain-gmae command. The resulting installation script when run

Re: [yocto] What is GMAE?

2012-12-14 Thread Mark Hatle
On 12/14/12 3:57 PM, Brian Hutchinson wrote: On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Zhang, Jessica wrote: Actually I talked with Richard regarding retiring the toolchain targets (meta-toolchain and meta-toolchain-gmae) as Mark mentioned that now we can build a toolchain matching the >image. A

Re: [yocto] IMHO, cross-compile/toolchain examples should use non-x86 arches

2012-12-17 Thread Mark Hatle
(I may be slightly wrong on this item, as people have told me in the past there are command line parts to the ADT but the ADT itself is -not- the SDK.) --Mark Regards, Sean Liming Owner Annabooks Tel: 714-970-7523 / Cell: 858-774-3176 -Original Message- From: yocto-boun...@yoctop

Re: [yocto] where should "bitbake -c populate_sdk ..." be documented?

2013-01-02 Thread Mark Hatle
o generate the SDK that can be used by the ADT tooling. Since the goal of the populate_sdk task (when used with an image) is the same as the stand-a-lone SDK recipes. --Mark rday ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctop

Re: [yocto] Fix prelink build with automake-1.13

2013-01-03 Thread Mark Hatle
elink as well. Seems like if it's applicable there they may want it as well.. --Mark - ML ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] Fix prelink build with automake-1.13

2013-01-03 Thread Mark Hatle
On 1/3/13 10:00 AM, Mark Hatle wrote: On 1/3/13 1:52 AM, Marko Lindqvist wrote: [PATCH] fix build with automake-1.13. Long obsolete AM_CONFIG_HEADER is completely removed from automake-1.13, which errors out upon seeing it. configure.in -> configure.ac rename is not strictly necessary yet,

Re: [yocto] configuration management on remote target

2013-01-03 Thread Mark Hatle
On 1/3/13 5:43 PM, Ilya Dmitrichenko wrote: Hi, As my day job mostly involves configuring servers using puppet configuration management system, I had been thinking of what sort of tool would be best to use on an embedded devices where on some occasions one would want to update a couple of config

Re: [yocto] Bitbake and task offloading onto multiple cloud-based servers

2013-01-04 Thread Mark Hatle
ellent research project. (Hey and if it makes things able to be built for more people, faster, and cheaper great! If not, we'd have a more informed response to questions like this.) --Mark Cheers, Alex ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yo

Re: [yocto] are separate -sdk image targets necessary Was: Build external module against Yocto kernel

2013-01-23 Thread Mark Hatle
to the build of an -sdk image". But if we look at this email from Mark Hatle: http://www.mail-archive.com/yocto@yoctoproject.org/msg10636.html I get the impression that Mark is saying: "now that '-c populate_sdk' is available, there no longer is any need for separate -sdk image

Re: [yocto] TUNE_PKGARCH for Microblaze

2013-03-26 Thread Mark Hatle
uld come up with. The TUNE_FEATURES adds the ability for the compiler and other packages to dynamically switch based on whatever the developer has configured. It can be used for blacklisting code, changing optimizations, etc. --Mark Regards Sipke On Mar 20, 2013, at 4:44 PM, Khem Raj &

Re: [yocto] Building "restricted" source code

2013-03-26 Thread Mark Hatle
ource and builds it [if the user has access to the source], or will pull the binaries from a specific location and simply install/package them. This is actually the more common approach. (To seed that location, you can extract the items from your restricted build -- or build it o

Re: [yocto] Shared DL_DIR with other users

2013-03-26 Thread Mark Hatle
/path/ \n \ http://.*/.* file://path/ \n \ https://.*/.* file://path/ \n \ " --Mark Cheers, Paul ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] Compliance program questions

2013-04-25 Thread Mark Hatle
fic version of Yocto. What happens when a new Yocto version is released? Should we go through the registration process again? Yes. The registration process will have to be repeated. --Mark thanks a lot! nicolas [1] https://www.yoctoproject.org/ecosystem/yocto-project-comp

Re: [yocto] Finding/Generating Rootfs Package List

2013-04-25 Thread Mark Hatle
You can use the license manifest to give you this information. See: build/tmp/deploy/licenses/--/... There is a license.manifest and package.manifest. The license.manifest includes package version. --Mark On 4/25/13 9:10 AM, Jon Szymaniak wrote: Hi all, I generally like to keep a little

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] libsemanage: drop flag: -Wno-unused-but-set-variable

2013-05-02 Thread Mark Hatle
Oh and I should fix the _git version of libselinux too. You can selectively add the patch to the SRC_URI only in the class-native case. SRC_URI_append_class-native = " " I believe that will work as expected. --Mark // Randy Signed-off-by: Randy MacLeod --- ...se

Re: [yocto] SRPMs

2013-05-07 Thread Mark Hatle
to work standalone. To build software for the YP, you really need to use the build environment -- or an SDK. --Mark Thanks, Travis ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.y

[yocto] [RFC] eglibc / glibc and option-groups being deprecated?

2013-06-18 Thread Mark Hatle
tion-groups is needed, or the feature will be deprecated and eventually removed. The last part of the thread it was suggested that in eglibc 2.19 it would be deprecated, and then removed in 2.20. --Mark ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https

Re: [yocto] Bitbake requires Python 2.7.3

2013-06-28 Thread Mark Hatle
filed a bug for Fedora, so FC 18 and FC 19 will be fixed if they're not already.) Someone on the OE-Core list said they would file a bug on Arch Linux. --Mark Ross ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoprojec

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] OpenEmbedded eV membership drive

2011-05-03 Thread Mark Hatle
going up for election at the same time. --Mark On 5/3/11 3:05 PM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > 2011/5/3 Philip Balister > > [...] > >> >> People ask me why they should join the eV. Besides being a good way to show >> your support for the OpenEmbedded project, the Tech

Re: [yocto] Agenda: Yocto Technical Team (Tuesday, June 21, 2011 8:00 AM-9:00 AM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada))

2011-06-28 Thread Mark Hatle
Yes. It seems like some mailers lost the dial-in info. Toll-Free 1-877-561-6828 (US) Toll 1-972-995- Participant Code 49611427 --Mark On 6/28/11 10:08 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:16:47PM +, Liu, Song wrote: >> All, >> >> In order to

Re: [yocto] Getting pseudo from yocto/poky toolchain working with my build

2011-06-28 Thread Mark Hatle
On 6/28/11 5:50 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 18:29 +0100, O'donoghue, Bryan wrote: >> ASSUME_PROVIDED += "m4-native tcl-native gettext-native libtool-native >> quilt-native autoconf-native automake-native perl-native >> sqlite3-native tar-replacement-native pseudo-native" > >

Re: [yocto] Getting pseudo from yocto/poky toolchain working with my build

2011-06-29 Thread Mark Hatle
=${STAGING_DIR_TARGET}${exec_prefix} Simply checking for the existance of ${STAGING_DIR_TARGET}${include_prefix}/sqlite3.h and only passing --with-sqlite= should be enough. (it will fall back to the host otherwise.. and if the host version is not sufficient it will error.) --Mark > > Bryan &g

Re: [yocto] RPM multilib package installation issue

2011-09-02 Thread Mark Hatle
On 9/2/11 2:33 AM, Xu, Dongxiao wrote: > Hi Mark and Richard, > > I am trying to setup a RPM multilib system that, it is a qemux86-64 base > image with MULTILIB_IMAGE_INSTALL = "lib32-connman-gnome". With several > fixes, the build can pass. > > However in run ti

Re: [yocto] RPM multilib package installation issue

2011-09-02 Thread Mark Hatle
On 9/2/11 10:40 AM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: > On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Mark Hatle wrote: >>> However in run time testing I met a problem that, for those libraries whose >>> base/multilib versions packages will be both built out (like libgtk, it has >

Re: [yocto] RPM multilib package installation issue

2011-09-02 Thread Mark Hatle
On 9/2/11 11:24 AM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: > On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Mark Hatle wrote: >> The normal OE approach is to resolve all items by run-time dependencies. >> That >> is why a lot more is built then installed. >> >> So if you want a sy

Re: [yocto] RPM multilib package installation issue

2011-09-02 Thread Mark Hatle
On 9/2/11 1:36 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: > On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: >> For everything I see, that should work. >> >> In classes/image.bbclass, RDEPENDS is augmented by the contents of >> IMAGE_INSTALL, LINGUAS_INSTALL,

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/2] More fixes for bug 1428

2011-09-09 Thread Mark Hatle
th grub2 >> and there is no good reason not to do this, I'd be in favour of doing >> this now rather than explain why its a mess... >> > > I haven't tried the 32-bit BSPs with grub2 - been focused on other > things until this incomplete fix for 1428 seems to ha

Re: [yocto] tcf-agent fail to run on imx28evk

2011-09-15 Thread Mark Hatle
83a783a95b8bab52cb38ed785 There was a printf issue that was causing things using threading, specifically thread local storage, to not always prelink properly. ARM seemed to have components that were randomly affected. --Mark > > Thanks, > > -- Dexuan > > > >

Re: [yocto] about symbol link of library

2011-10-13 Thread Mark Hatle
od way to find these problems.) I'd also suggest we add a sanity check for this condition, so it will be easier for people to identify in the future. --Mark > after checked the rpm, the libx.so is located in libx-dev, but not in > libx. > > what is the right way to resolv

Re: [yocto] Proposed roadmap and design for Hob improvement

2011-10-25 Thread Mark Hatle
o populate both the sysroot and the package set for the image generation step. To me what is a bigger deal is to break up the image generation into an external step.. so I can simply start with a set of packages and build them. (since sysroots and similar are not needed in this situation

[yocto] prelink-cross project sync update

2011-10-26 Thread Mark Hatle
e "master" branch, and the cross version is in the "cross_prelink" branch. --Mark ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] building and using yocto 1.1

2011-10-28 Thread Mark Hatle
What machine are you using (amount of ram, disk space, and cpu cores)? What configuration did you set for parallel builds? I can build 1.1 on an 8 core i7 system w/ 8 GB of ram, set with parallel settings of 8 thread and 8 parallel make jobs, in about 100 minutes (or less). --Mark On 10/28/11

Re: [yocto] building and using yocto 1.1

2011-10-28 Thread Mark Hatle
ted, and any identified bugs are fixed quickly. Enable parallel builds and your performance will be significantly better. If you have hyperthreading enabled, and setup a 4/4 parallel build. I would expect about a 4-5 hour build time. (May be faster) --Mark > thanks, > xianghua > > &

Re: [yocto] root paths in packages

2011-10-31 Thread Mark Hatle
tely needed. There are some cases where embedded paths simply refer to the place on the disk a source file or similar came from during the build. Depending on where these references are, they may be considered safe and acceptable. However, in most places something like this would be considered an

Re: [yocto] what's the proper value for BB_NUMBER_THREADS?

2011-10-31 Thread Mark Hatle
et latency, and of course processor speed/cores all affect the optimal setting. But we do need a consistent rule of thumb.. I myself usually use x2 for both THREADS and MAKE. --Mark ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

[yocto] Announcement: pseudo 1.2 released

2011-11-02 Thread Mark Hatle
/pseudo-1.2.tar.bz2 The included ChangeLog.txt (http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/pseudo/tree/ChangeLog.txt?h=PSEUDO_1_2) Contains a full list of changes. --Mark ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org

Re: [yocto] libtool can't read a la files

2011-11-03 Thread Mark Hatle
the library located within the sysroot directory. The version of rpm(4) which you are attempting to compile does not understand this syntax. Either the issue is located within the libtool command itself, or within one of the makefile fragments. The version of libtool shipped with Yocto understands the &q

Re: [yocto] do all recipes really need LIC_FILES_CHKSUM?

2011-11-07 Thread Mark Hatle
's at least one counter-example, > meta-demoapps/recipes-graphics/pong-clock/pong-clock_1.0.bb: Bug in the example.. it should be fixed. --Mark > = > > DESCRIPTION = "A clock combined with a game of pong" > LICENSE = "GPLv2+" > DEPENDS = "virtua

Re: [yocto] do all recipes really need LIC_FILES_CHKSUM?

2011-11-07 Thread Mark Hatle
On 11/7/11 10:24 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, Mark Hatle wrote: > >> On 11/7/11 10:01 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: >>> >>> current poky ref manual seems pretty adamant about need for >>> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM: >>> >>> &quo

[yocto] Mailing list etiquette question...

2011-11-10 Thread Mark Hatle
I was wondering if this or any other Yocto controlled mailing list allows job postings? I don't see anything forbidding it at this point -- but I'm not sure I want to start a trend unless there is some consensus. --Mark ___ yocto mailing

Re: [yocto] rpm dependency errors

2011-11-15 Thread Mark Hatle
and see if you can figure out what might be wrong. If you get to the point of investigating objdump or elfutils-objdump -- be sure to run it against the versions from the package and not the work directory. (It is possible something is getting mangled at package time.) --Mark >

Re: [yocto] rpm dependency errors

2011-11-16 Thread Mark Hatle
the packages, and if they have the corresponding sonames that the dependent packages are looking for. If you post your layer somewhere, I can attempt to reproduce the problem. --Mark -- Michael ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://li

Re: [yocto] /usr/bin/env dependencies

2011-11-16 Thread Mark Hatle
ure and removed "/usr", then each of those packages have flaws in them and are not respecting the revised "bindir" information -- otherwise you are simply missing functionality in either busybox or coreutils. --Mark -- Best regards, Mike Tsukerman jabber: miketsu

Re: [yocto] applying the Yocto Project to Automotive interests

2011-11-16 Thread Mark Hatle
I'm a bit out of date with the current work however. --Mark /t */Tracey M. Erway/* */The Yocto Project* - /**/www.yoctoproject.org/* Intel Corporation 503 . 264 . 6435 Effective VM to Email Service 503 . 709 . 1221 Cell / Blackberry ___ yo

Re: [yocto] Yocto usability questions

2011-11-16 Thread Mark Hatle
On 11/16/11 4:07 PM, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote: Mark Hatle said: Yocto is a cross-compiled build environment. This is a departure to a lot of the Moblin/MeeGo work that has occurred in the past. The advantages are you can use any commodity PC to target any (supported) architecture

Re: [yocto] Adding line to ld.so.conf

2011-11-21 Thread Mark Hatle
o make it easier -- and your application relocatable on the target. But in short you hard-code at compile time the location of your libraries based on the location of your executables. --Mark Regards, Marc ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yocto

Re: [yocto] Adding line to ld.so.conf

2011-12-02 Thread Mark Hatle
ystem. I've got many systems where ld.so.conf simply doesn't exist, nor do I want it to. See my previous reply on a better was to resolve the issue using rpath and/or proper soname handling inside of the libraries. --Mark -- Michael __

[yocto] prelink-cross project update

2011-12-15 Thread Mark Hatle
A new version of the prelink-cross has been pushed to the repository. There are no upstream changes to the main prelink component, all changes are specific to the cross functionality. Below is the Changelog: 2011-12-08 Mark Hatle * rtld/rtld.c: Fix an issue where missing objects

Re: [yocto] Poky-Build error

2011-12-20 Thread Mark Hatle
On 12/20/11 2:33 AM, Navani Kamal Srivastava wrote: Hi, We are facing the problem when we are compiling poky-bernard5.0 –( bitbake –v –b poky-image-eb.bb ) Log data follows: | /home/prashanth/yocto/poky-bernard-5.0/build/tmp/work/mx35pdk-poky-linux-gnueabi/poky-image-eb-1.0-r0/temp/run.do_r

Re: [yocto] building Yocto on Fedora 14 vs. Ubuntu 11.10

2012-01-05 Thread Mark Hatle
he bitbake wrapper (scripts/bitbake), there is a check to see if the host version of tar is greater then 1.23. If it is not, then tar is added to the early set of tasks. This likely is the cause of the different task sets you see. --Mark ___ yocto ma

Re: [yocto] Can't build util-linux

2012-01-05 Thread Mark Hatle
I'm getting the same error. There is a workaround: Add the following to your local.conf WARN_QA = "ldflags useless-rpaths rpaths" A new QA check went in, and it appears to be missing part of the merge. (WARN_QA is normally defined as: WARN_QA ?= "ldflags useless-rpaths rpaths unsafe-reference

Re: [yocto] Trying to compile mono on target for machine crownbay

2012-01-05 Thread Mark Hatle
ols class usually does it. --Mark the filesystem does have a /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.la and it seems to be valid I am not sure why there is a leading '=' in the path. Needless to say - mono builds fine on ubuntu, so it is unlikely (not impossible) to be a mono build issue. Has anyone seen a

Re: [yocto] [Announcement] Cedartrail BSP available.

2012-01-11 Thread Mark Hatle
your own kernel. The time limited kernel is for evaluation purposes to see if this is what you want, before you build it yourself. --Mark Jim A On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Flanagan, Elizabeth mailto:elizabeth.flana...@intel.com>> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

Re: [yocto] i486sx machine porting from oe-classic

2012-01-20 Thread Mark Hatle
a32/arch-ia32.inc # Extra tune features TUNEVALID[i486] = "Enable i486 specific processor optimizations" TUNE_CCARGS += "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "i486", "-march=i486", "", d)}" # Extra tune sel

Re: [yocto] Do we have core-image-lsb-core/c++?

2012-02-02 Thread Mark Hatle
here are a lot of little things that will likely fail the test harness.) The image "core-image-lsb", is intended to have all of the LSB components in it, including the C++ items. There is now LSB recognized "subset" of images for validation.. it'

Re: [yocto] needed site is down???

2012-02-02 Thread Mark Hatle
ro/poky.conf has the settings. All of the upstream packages should be mirrored there. If they are not, then please let us know and we'll work on resolving any missing files. --Mark JIm A ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https

[yocto] prelink-cross project update

2012-02-02 Thread Mark Hatle
s for contributing the ARM TLS fix. There were no upstream changes to the main prelink component, all changes are specific to the cross functionality. Below is the Changelog, since the last update: 2011-12-21 Mark Hatle * src/arch-x86_64.c: Add support for x32 ABI 2012-02-02 Mark

Re: [yocto] prelink-cross project update

2012-02-03 Thread Mark Hatle
On 2/3/12 1:01 AM, Khem Raj wrote: Hi Mark Good work. Could you also forward this to oe-core ml ? After I've vetted everything with the integration into oe-core, I will send this out as part of the review request. --Mark Thx -K On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Mark Hatle wrote:

Re: [yocto] pseudo interaction issue

2012-02-17 Thread Mark Hatle
We're looking into this issue. You should never get the "pseudo: You must set the PSEUDO_PREFIX environment variable to run pseudo." message. This means something appears to have avoided the wrappers. I'll let you know once we figure out something. --Mark On 2/17/12 9:

Re: [yocto] Minutes: Yocto Project Technical Team Meeting - Tuesday, March 13, 2012 8:00 AM-9:00 AM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada).

2012-03-13 Thread Mark Hatle
On 3/13/12 1:54 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Liu, Song wrote: * Opens - 10 min - Mark: Reusing sstate cache, missing a testcase: found a bug in 1.1, found a new bug in 1.2, try to use the st cache, the compiler will try to use compiler from previous

Re: [yocto] which yocto doc explains bitbake assignment variations?

2012-03-29 Thread Mark Hatle
" Append with spaces: variable += "value" Prepend with spaces: variable =+ "value" Append without spaces: variable .= "value" Prepend without spaces: variable =. "value" Append "late" evaluation: variable_append = "value"

Re: [yocto] Moving angstrom under the yocto banner

2012-03-30 Thread Mark Hatle
layers depending on responsibilities, work flow and project requirements. What I personally would like to see is Angstrom being one or more layers that define a new distribution that can be added to Poky (or oe-core...) --Mark regards, Koen ___ yocto mailin

Re: [yocto] Moving angstrom under the yocto banner

2012-03-30 Thread Mark Hatle
On 3/30/12 2:33 PM, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 30 mrt. 2012, om 12:26 heeft Mark Hatle het volgende geschreven: On 3/30/12 1:44 PM, Koen Kooi wrote: Hi, RP said I should raise this on the yocto lists, so here it is: The Angstrom core team would like to move angstrom under the yocto banner so we

Re: [yocto] 1.2_M2 build fails for syslinux_4.03.bb for Romley BSP

2012-04-09 Thread Mark Hatle
bugzilla.yoctoproject.org system -- or if you can't do that for some reason, let me know and I'll file it. --Mark | make[1]: *** [syslxcom.o] Error 1 | make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs | In file included from ../libinstaller/linuxioctl.h:22:0, | from sysl

Re: [yocto] Yocto Project 1.2 Beta testing instructions

2012-04-10 Thread Mark Hatle
missing rpm packages in ubuntu ? You don't need to install rpm on the host system, we build rpm-native for that. Mark, any clues what could be going wrong here? I've never seen any problem like this before. Below is some analysis and a question at the very end... There are only

Re: [yocto] Yocto Project 1.2 Beta testing instructions

2012-04-10 Thread Mark Hatle
://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org) if you are not able to do so, let me know and I will file it. --Mark Thanks Boon pin -Original Message- From: Mark Hatle [mailto:mark.ha...@windriver.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 1:22 AM To: Paul Eggleton Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org; Liu, Song; Khor, Boon Pin Subject

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] Fix QA Issue reported by running bitbake

2013-07-31 Thread Mark Hatle
EMPTY entries and other version sync have been done. --Mark --- recipes-security/tasks/task-core-selinux.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/recipes-security/tasks/task-core-selinux.bb b/recipes-security/tasks/task-core-selinux.bb index 05f8dfc..dda9c50 100644

Re: [yocto] [meta-selinux][PATCH] Fix QA Issue reported by running bitbake

2013-08-01 Thread Mark Hatle
On 7/31/13 10:05 AM, Mark Hatle wrote: On 7/27/13 10:44 AM, Pier Luigi Fiorini wrote: Fix the following error: Variable ALLOW_EMPTY is set as not being package specific, please fix this. I thought this had already been done. I'll be going over the meta-selinux sometime this week and

Re: [yocto] meta-selinux make ALLOW_EMPTY package specific

2013-08-01 Thread Mark Hatle
dated the dylan, but as you indicated it should be needed there as well. I should have the Dylan version ready and pushed within a few hours. --Mark Regards - Philip On 06/10/2013 08:54 PM, Philip Tricca wrote: Hello again, Again a quick patch to get meta-selinux dylan branch building with oe-c

Re: [yocto] [meta-selinux][PATCH 1/1] policycoreutils: fix genhomedircon construction

2013-08-01 Thread Mark Hatle
On 8/1/13 12:25 PM, Joe Slater wrote: CQID: 418197 Reference /usr/sbin instead of the directory into which the script is installed on the host. This patch and the related audit patch have been applied to both master and dylan branches. Thanks! --Mark Signed-off-by: Joe Slater

Re: [yocto] Package specific version dependencies

2013-08-06 Thread Mark Hatle
ion dependency items are not evaluated by bitbake, it only pays attention to the package name when determining build dependencies. You would also need to specify (in your distribution or local .conf file) a PREFERRED_VERSION_dep = "ver" to ensure the right version is built. --Mark

Re: [yocto] Sending mail from embedded device

2013-08-06 Thread Mark Hatle
ould produce a binary called "sendmail" that is capable of simply sending email (and conforming to LSB requirements.) --Mark ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] Sending mail from embedded device

2013-08-06 Thread Mark Hatle
On 8/6/13 10:00 AM, Jack Mitchell wrote: On 06/08/13 15:50, Mark Hatle wrote: On 8/6/13 9:41 AM, Jack Mitchell wrote: On 06/08/13 15:31, Gary Thomas wrote: My embedded device needs to send out email. I've looked around a bit and I don't see any recipes for a mail sender, e.g. s

Re: [yocto] My stuff is missing from rootfs

2013-08-15 Thread Mark Hatle
cleared by a recipe. (Note you should modify IMAGE_INSTALL, which is transformed by the system into PACKAGE_INSTALL... modifying PACKAGE_INSTALL can lead to problems.) --Mark ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoprojec

Re: [yocto] My stuff is missing from rootfs

2013-08-16 Thread Mark Hatle
On 8/15/13 7:20 PM, Paul D. DeRocco wrote: From: Mark Hatle A simple way to diagnose if your package is even in the install list is to do bitbake -e , then scan the output for "PACKAGE_INSTALL". If your package is not listed there, then something has either cleared your configurat

[yocto] [meta-selinux] Updated meta-selinux -- master-next

2013-09-19 Thread Mark Hatle
n expert on how this should be configured, so I'm looking for help/patches from others. If you know of any other additional patches that should be applied, or are able to help with the refpolicies, please let me know! Thanks! --Mark ___ yoct

Re: [yocto] Happy Birthday, Yocto Project

2013-11-15 Thread Mark Hatle
On 11/15/13, 1:54 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: On 11/14/13, 9:58 PM, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote: Hm, a day that will live in infamy indeed On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 3:09 AM, Philip Balister wrote: On 11/14/2013 08:22 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote: Happy

Re: [yocto] Happy Birthday, Yocto Project

2013-11-15 Thread Mark Hatle
On 11/14/13, 9:58 PM, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote: Hm, a day that will live in infamy indeed On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 3:09 AM, Philip Balister wrote: On 11/14/2013 08:22 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote: Happy birthday, Yocto Project! what's a birthday

Re: [yocto] [meta-selinux][PATCH] policycoreutils: Patch Makefile to get load_policy symlink right.

2014-01-10 Thread Mark Hatle
On 1/9/14, 5:26 PM, fl...@twobit.us wrote: From: Philip Tricca Setting DESTDIR in the policycoreutils do_install creates a bad symlink for load_policy. This patch fixes up the Makefile to create the symlink relative to DESTDIR. Merged to 'master-next'. Note, I updated the patch to include a

Re: [yocto] [meta-selinux][PATCH 00/10] selinux userspace: uprev packages to release 20131030

2014-01-10 Thread Mark Hatle
On 1/8/14, 7:38 PM, wenzong@windriver.com wrote: merged to master-next From: Wenzong Fan Changes: 1) Uprev selinux packages to release 20131030; 2) Fix build dependency to libsemanage; 3) Fix QA issues to policycoreutils; 4) Update LIC_FILES_CHKSUM for selinux packagegroups. Some Tests:

Re: [yocto] [meta-selinux][PATCH 0/1] refpolicy: fix real path for udevd

2014-01-10 Thread Mark Hatle
merged to master-next On 1/8/14, 8:54 PM, wenzong@windriver.com wrote: From: Wenzong Fan In Yocto the real path for udevd is /lib/udev/udevd, this patch fixes the init issues like: udevd[87]: setfilecon /dev/vcsa2 failed: Operation not permitted udevd[89]: setfilecon /dev/fb0 fa

[yocto] [meta-selinux] master & dora updated

2014-01-13 Thread Mark Hatle
master and dora branches have been updated. If anyone finds any issues, please let Pascal and I know. Thanks! --Mark ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] Smart - "Illegal instruction"

2014-01-24 Thread Mark Hatle
o my guess is that last two items is the issue. If you copy the genericx86 BSP and modify the configuration to use the tune-x86_64.inc instead, that may fix your issue. --Mark Ross ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctop

Re: [yocto] Remote management of embedded devices

2014-03-07 Thread Mark O'Donovan
using it only for accessing our web-interface but they also support ssh. Regards, Mark On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Bryan Evenson wrote: > Alex, > > > -Original Message- > > From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto- > > boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Beh

Re: [yocto] Remote management of embedded devices

2014-03-08 Thread Mark O'Donovan
It is open-source. I've just looked through the license file, the main point seems to be that is is free for non-commercial purposes. It claims to be based on the sleepycat license. See here for the source code and license file: http://hg.yaler.org/yaler/src/ Regards, Mark On Fri,

[yocto] [meta-selinux][PATCH] audit: Fix lack of a default audit.rules

2014-04-04 Thread Mark Hatle
that the version in the rules.d should be copied into /etc/audit. Do this and correct the systemd services file to use the same file. Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle --- recipes-security/audit/audit/auditd.service | 2 +- recipes-security/audit/audit_2.3.2.bb | 5 + 2 files changed, 6 inser

Re: [yocto] Question about rebuilding RPM package index for updated RPMs when bitbake completes

2014-04-21 Thread Mark Hatle
e target I just do: smart update smart upgrade -y --Mark Thanks, Alex -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] Question about rebuilding RPM package index for updated RPMs when bitbake completes

2014-04-22 Thread Mark Hatle
On 4/22/14, 1:50 AM, Alex J Lennon wrote: On 22/04/2014 02:36, Mark Hatle wrote: On 4/20/14, 7:15 AM, Alex J Lennon wrote: Hi, I'm trying to put in place a development workflow using the PR server, RPM package feeds and smart update/install on a target. I see that when I modify and re

Re: [yocto] Installation order question with RPM backend

2012-04-11 Thread Mark Hatle
On 4/11/12 10:14 AM, Xu, Dongxiao wrote: Hi Mark, I met a strange issue while using RPM to generate the rootfs. In the installation list, if we have 2 RPM packages, say A.rpm and B.rpm. package A RDEPENDS on package B. While installing the two packages? Does RPM ensures to install B first and

Re: [yocto] Installation order question with RPM backend

2012-04-11 Thread Mark Hatle
On 4/11/12 10:37 AM, Xu, Dongxiao wrote: On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 10:25 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: On 4/11/12 10:14 AM, Xu, Dongxiao wrote: Hi Mark, I met a strange issue while using RPM to generate the rootfs. In the installation list, if we have 2 RPM packages, say A.rpm and B.rpm. package A

Re: [yocto] Installation order question with RPM backend

2012-04-11 Thread Mark Hatle
On 4/11/12 10:51 AM, Xu, Dongxiao wrote: On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 10:45 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: On 4/11/12 10:37 AM, Xu, Dongxiao wrote: On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 10:25 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: On 4/11/12 10:14 AM, Xu, Dongxiao wrote: Hi Mark, I met a strange issue while using RPM to generate the

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >