Hello, why i'm not in xfce 4.10 Lithuanian translators credits? in all
other applications i can see myself, but in main xfce 4.10 list i can't
see myself.
___
Xfce-i18n mailing list
Xfce-i18n@xfce.org
https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-i18n
On 2012-03-26 09:00, gymka wrote:
Hello, why i'm not in xfce 4.10 Lithuanian translators credits? in
all
other applications i can see myself, but in main xfce 4.10 list i
can't
see myself.
Well your name shows up in the translators dump.
http://git.xfce.org/xfce/libxfce4ui/tree/xfce4-about/t
2012.03.26 12:11, Nick Schermer rašė:
> On 2012-03-26 09:00, gymka wrote:
>> Hello, why i'm not in xfce 4.10 Lithuanian translators credits? in all
>> other applications i can see myself, but in main xfce 4.10 list i can't
>> see myself.
>
> Well your name shows up in the translators dump.
>
> ht
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Nick Schermer wrote:
> Well your name shows up in the translators dump.
>
> http://git.xfce.org/xfce/libxfce4ui/tree/xfce4-about/translators.h#n374
Hello,
Sorry to derail this, but what determines if you're in the main?
I can see myself in the dump with False t
Obviously only the language coordinators are part of this list, which makes
sense to me. Otherwise it would be really messy with all the names of all
the people who contributed.
I personally don't care at all if I am part of this list or not.
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Alex Nordlund wrote:
2012.03.26 13:04, Johannes Lips rašė:
> Obviously only the language coordinators are part of this list, which makes
> sense to me. Otherwise it would be really messy with all the names of all
> the people who contributed.
> I personally don't care at all if I am part of this list or not.
>
> On Mo
2012.03.26 12:20, gymka rašė:
> 2012.03.26 12:11, Nick Schermer rašė:
>> On 2012-03-26 09:00, gymka wrote:
>>> Hello, why i'm not in xfce 4.10 Lithuanian translators credits? in all
>>> other applications i can see myself, but in main xfce 4.10 list i can't
>>> see myself.
>>
>> Well your name show
On 2012-03-26 12:21, gymka wrote:
2012.03.26 13:04, Johannes Lips rašė:
Obviously only the language coordinators are part of this list,
which makes
sense to me. Otherwise it would be really messy with all the names
of all
the people who contributed.
I personally don't care at all if I am part
2012.03.26 13:45, Nick Schermer rašė:
> On 2012-03-26 12:21, gymka wrote:
>> 2012.03.26 13:04, Johannes Lips rašė:
>>> Obviously only the language coordinators are part of this list, which
>>> makes
>>> sense to me. Otherwise it would be really messy with all the names of
>>> all
>>> the people who
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 13:45, Nick Schermer wrote:
>
> TRUE or FALSE is used to print coordinators italic in the list. I'll look if
> I can filter the list by translators who submitted something in the last 6
> months.
I am interested in such a feature. Xfce translator credits should only
list T
But nonetheless those people might have been contributing some amount of
translations. Even those were in the past we could still use them in
various places. So I don't think removing people just because they didn't
translate anything in the last 6 months is a good approach.
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:04:35 +0100
Johannes Lips wrote:
> Obviously only the language coordinators are part of this list, which
> makes sense to me. Otherwise it would be really messy with all the
> names of all the people who contributed.
> I personally don't care at all if I am part of this lis
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:54:01 +0300
gymka wrote:
> 2012.03.26 13:45, Nick Schermer rašė:
> > On 2012-03-26 12:21, gymka wrote:
> >> 2012.03.26 13:04, Johannes Lips rašė:
> >>> Obviously only the language coordinators are part of this list,
> >>> which makes
> >>> sense to me. Otherwise it would be
On 03/26/2012 07:33 AM, Johannes Lips wrote:
> But nonetheless those people might have been contributing some amount of
> translations. Even those were in the past we could still use them in
> various places. So I don't think removing people just because they
> didn't translate anything in the last
On 2012-03-26 15:17, Og Maciel wrote:
On 03/26/2012 07:33 AM, Johannes Lips wrote:
But nonetheless those people might have been contributing some
amount of
translations. Even those were in the past we could still use them in
various places. So I don't think removing people just because they
did
2012.03.26 17:12, Nick Schermer rašė:
> I guess I can check for that too. So what is a decent amount of
> submissions someone needs to make? 25?
i doubt that is possible to count work with script/mathematically... you
can translate whole application with 2000 strings and you can change 1
string in
16 matches
Mail list logo
