I used to... but moved to Mac so don't anymore. I can't remember the
nature of the difficulties, though, it's been a while.
K
>>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:13 AM, in message
<4ec3d301.2050...@gmail.com>,
Alessandro Ceschini wrote:
> Hi everybody
>
> So, no one here has got problems with TeXWork
Hi Taylor
OK, you're right, it's a combo: fake fontspec errors in XeLaTeX and the
breakdown of go-to functions in TeXWorks, are they related? I don't
know. I cannot discern which one is to be blamed, for I typeset stuff in
XeTeX through TeXWorks, I don't know how to use raw XeTeX nor do I use
Alessandro Ceschini wrote:
Hi everybody
So, no one here has got problems with TeXWorks? Or am I the only user of
it around?
Subject line was : "Re: [XeTeX] Wacky behavior of XeLaTeX in TeXLive
2011" -- is the problem with TeXworks, or with XeLaTeX ?
Phi
Hi everybody
So, no one here has got problems with TeXWorks? Or am I the only user of
it around?
Greetings
--
/Alessandro Ceschini/
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Hi Peter,
On 08/11/2011, at 9:50 AM, Peter Dyballa wrote:
>
> Am 07.11.2011 um 23:31 schrieb Ross Moore:
>
>> (and apologies to Mojca if I've just mis-represented him)
>
> Ross,
>
> do you mean Mojca with "him"? (I'm confident she is still a woman. In which
> case a "her" would be appropriat
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 23:31, Ross Moore wrote:
>
But Ubuntu probably just took the released version and not the branch
with fixes. Also, unless I'm mistaken, I'm not aware of official TL
distribution shipping patched binaries either and I don't exactly
understand why since the
Am 07.11.2011 um 23:31 schrieb Ross Moore:
> (and apologies to Mojca if I've just mis-represented him)
Ross,
do you mean Mojca with "him"? (I'm confident she is still a woman. In which
case a "her" would be appropriate. But I also wonder why Mail chose this
signature…)
--
Greetings
Pete
Hi Alessandro,
On 07/11/2011, at 10:14 PM, Alessandro Ceschini wrote:
> Hi
>
> To Mojca:
> No, the version I'm running is NOT the one bundled with Ubuntu 11.10 (that's
> TL 2009), I just downloaded a dvd of TL 2011 and installed it manually via
> tl-install. Installation is complete (every pac
To Peter:
Hi
Those warnings appear with practically every stuff that involves Unicode
or Opentype issues, from polytonic Greek to ligatures, to localized
glyphs, everything revolving around fontspec with whichever font, gives
me such warnings.
Greetings
--
/Alessandro Ceschini/
Am 07.11.2011 um 13:54 schrieb Alessandro Ceschini:
> That too is new for me, it's a fake error since Greek letters are correctly
> displayed and Tinos DOES contain Greek letters. So, what's wrong with
> fontspec?
The existence of (some) Greek letters does not preclude the font's support for
Hi everybody
Chadra, I took a look at your log file and you get this:
LaTeX Font Warning: Font shape `EU1/LiberationSerif(0)/m/sl' undefined
(Font) using `EU1/LiberationSerif(0)/m/n' instead on input line 44
But no fontspec error related to Greek, actually the output is positive:
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 08:48, Alessandro Ceschini
wrote:
> Why should fontspec try to load a crappy slanted shape in the first place?
Slanted =/= crappy. You have have optically adjusted obliques for sans
serif typefaces. You can even have slanted serif fonts. Computer
Modern had a set of them. I
On Monday 07 November 2011 06:24 PM, Alessandro Ceschini wrote:
To Chandra
The reality is I just don't subscribe to the mailing list in order to
avoid getting my box flooded with issues I don't bother with, I just
answer by clicking on the address at tug.org/pipemail/xetex etc... I
understand th
Am 07.11.2011 um 12:50 schrieb Alessandro Ceschini:
> I uploaded a minimal working example
Slanted text font can be made like this with fontspec:
\newfontface\slanted[RawFeature={slant=0.194}]{Lucida Bright}
\DeclareRobustCommand{\textsl}[1]{{\slanted #1}}
--
Greetings
Pete
"Klingons d
I can't help with the original problem, but I would like to comment on a
question that came up as an aside:
Quoting Alessandro Ceschini (alessandroceschini...@gmail.com):
> Why should fontspec try to load a crappy slanted shape in the first
> place? I just don't understand why! Slanted shapes are
2011/11/7 Alessandro Ceschini :
> Hi guys,
> Why should fontspec try to load a crappy slanted shape in the first place? I
At my computer Liberation Serif Italic (and Bold Italic) is found and used.
> just don't understand why! Slanted shapes are a last-resort stuff, not
> first-choice. So why loa
Hi guys,
Why should fontspec try to load a crappy slanted shape in the first
place? I just don't understand why! Slanted shapes are a last-resort
stuff, not first-choice. So why loading a slanted shape when the italic
is available?
I will take a look at your output files, but the real issues is
Hi,
my Liberation Serif (from CentOS 5) contains italic but not greek. I
processed the file by TL 2009, 2010, 2011, the results are at
http://hroch486.icpf.cas.cz/stripped-down/
2011/11/7 Alessandro Ceschini :
> Hi
>
> To Vafa:
> Wait, there exists a Liberation Serif Italic, just look in your
> \
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Alessandro Ceschini <
alessandroceschini...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> To Vafa:
> Wait, there exists a Liberation Serif Italic, just look in your
> \usr\share\fonts directory, it's not normal to get such an error, and no, I
> didn't get it back in TexLive 2010.
>
Hi
To Vafa:
Wait, there exists a Liberation Serif Italic, just look in your
\usr\share\fonts directory, it's not normal to get such an error, and
no, I didn't get it back in TexLive 2010.
Have you also noticed something like this in your output console?
***
I uploaded a minimal working example, it's a stripped down version of a
> book, text removed apart from a stub using greek text (Unicode
> capabilities), the prologue is intact, the default font is Tinos, a freely
> downloadable font, but if you want you can substitute it with
> LiberationSerif or
Hi
To Vafa:
I uploaded a minimal working example, it's a stripped down version of a
book, text removed apart from a stub using greek text (Unicode
capabilities), the prologue is intact, the default font is Tinos, a
freely downloadable font, but if you want you can substitute it with
Liberatio
On Nov 7, 2011, at 5:28 AM, Vafa Khalighi wrote:
>>
>> So, are you suggesting I should downgrade to TL 2010? Previously I was
>> using just that version, without any apparent problem, all started when I
>> upgraded to TL 2011 (but after a fresh install, so no remnants of TL 2010
>> on my hard di
>
> So, are you suggesting I should downgrade to TL 2010? Previously I was
> using just that version, without any apparent problem, all started when I
> upgraded to TL 2011 (but after a fresh install, so no remnants of TL 2010
> on my hard disk).
>
>
I do not think there has been major changes in X
Hi
To Mojca:
No, the version I'm running is NOT the one bundled with Ubuntu 11.10
(that's TL 2009), I just downloaded a dvd of TL 2011 and installed it
manually via tl-install. Installation is complete (every package), and
nothing of the TL 2009 package bundled with Ubuntu is installed. I
che
Hi Mojca,
On 07/11/2011, at 8:40 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> But Ubuntu probably just took the released version and not the branch
> with fixes. Also, unless I'm mistaken, I'm not aware of official TL
> distribution shipping patched binaries either and I don't exactly
> understand why since the m
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 16:01, Alessandro Ceschini wrote:
> Le 31/10/2011 19:47, Alessandro Ceschini a écrit :
>
> Hi
>
> My problem is kind of complicated:
>
> 1. After processing a XeLaTeX source file the yellow lines the
> cross-reference between pdf and source file and vice versa is completely
>
Hmm, according to that ticket on the texwork site, someone else has
the same problem, so it doesn't seem to be something unique to your
set up. I'm surprised that it's SyncTeX that's the culprit, since the
project page hasn't been updated since 2008, unless it's moved.
Unfortunately, I can't help
To Andy:
Hi
No, I only have TL2011 and nothing of the bundled version (2009) is
installed, and no, there's no duplicate of the font, actually this
happens with every font, it's a bit weird for every font to be
duplicated. The directories are the standard ones: \usr\share\fonts and
~\.fonts\
I don't use Ubuntu, but if you have both TL2010 and 2011, I'd check
the directories that are in fontconfig (or run fc-cache -v and see
which directories it's looking in). It may be that fontspec is
complaining because it finds duplicate sets of fonts between the two
installations. Your PDFs would b
Le 31/10/2011 19:47, Alessandro Ceschini a écrit :
Hi
My problem is kind of complicated:
1. After processing a XeLaTeX source file the yellow lines the
cross-reference between pdf and source file and vice versa is
completely broken.
2. This happens after I updated to Ubuntu 11.10, TexLive 201
Hi
My problem is kind of complicated:
1. After processing a XeLaTeX source file the yellow lines the
cross-reference between pdf and source file and vice versa is completely
broken.
2. This happens after I updated to Ubuntu 11.10, TexLive 2011 and
texWorks 0.5, previously I was using Ubuntu 1
32 matches
Mail list logo
