Hi, Grygorii,
On 12.02.25 13:14, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
Hi
On 12.02.25 11:14, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 02:33:08PM -0800, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Hi Oleksandr,
This morning, we had a discussion among maintainers, and the suggested
approach moving forward is as follow
Hello, everybody!
On 12.02.25 00:33, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Hi Oleksandr,
This morning, we had a discussion among maintainers, and the suggested
approach moving forward is as follows:
Great news!!
- First, it would be helpful to see a sample of the proposed changes
applied to a single
On 11 Feb 2025, at 18:54, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 03:06:08PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 11:19:23AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 11.02.2025 10:10, Luca Fancellu wrote:
>> 3) The size of the patch after applying clang-form
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 01:14:20PM +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 12.02.25 11:14, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 02:33:08PM -0800, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > Hi Oleksandr,
> > >
> > > This morning, we had a discussion among maintainers, and the suggested
> >
Hi
On 12.02.25 11:14, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 02:33:08PM -0800, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Hi Oleksandr,
This morning, we had a discussion among maintainers, and the suggested
approach moving forward is as follows:
- First, it would be helpful to see a sample of the prop
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 02:33:08PM -0800, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Hi Oleksandr,
>
> This morning, we had a discussion among maintainers, and the suggested
> approach moving forward is as follows:
>
> - First, it would be helpful to see a sample of the proposed changes
> applied to a single
Hi Oleksandr,
This morning, we had a discussion among maintainers, and the suggested
approach moving forward is as follows:
- First, it would be helpful to see a sample of the proposed changes
applied to a single source file as an example. If you could provide
such a patch, it would help adva
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 03:06:08PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 11:19:23AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 11.02.2025 10:10, Luca Fancellu wrote:
> > >>> 3) The size of the patch after applying clang-format is huge. Really.
> > >>> Something
> > >>> like 9 MB. Even if e
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 11:19:23AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 11.02.2025 10:10, Luca Fancellu wrote:
> >>> 3) The size of the patch after applying clang-format is huge. Really.
> >>> Something
> >>> like 9 MB. Even if everyone agrees that the approach is good and we can
> >>> proceed
> >>> wi
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:31:41AM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> One question that seems to have been dropped from my previous email:
> would it be feasible to apply the updated style to newly added chunks
> of code only, but not to the (unmodified) surrounding context?
There's a tool that can f
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 11:14:55AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 11.02.2025 10:01, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > Is it possible for clang-format to be applied exclusively to newly
> > added chunks of code, while keeping the surroundings untouched?
>
> I, too, was wondering about this, at least as a
On 11.02.2025 11:26, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 09:49:54AM +, Luca Fancellu wrote:
>> Hi Roger,
>>
>>
>> 5) You name it. I think many people in the community can name their
>> points for
>> and against clang-format.
>
> What are the parts of our co
On 10.02.2025 22:16, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> So, in this attempt, I would suggest the following approach:
> I think that I could start sending patches after the latest .clang-format 21
> for
> some part of Xen, ARM code base for example, using work already done by Luca.
Taking the sugges
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 09:49:54AM +, Luca Fancellu wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
>
> 5) You name it. I think many people in the community can name their
> points for
> and against clang-format.
> >>>
> >>> What are the parts of our coding style that clang-format cannot
> >>> cor
On 11.02.2025 10:10, Luca Fancellu wrote:
>>> 3) The size of the patch after applying clang-format is huge. Really.
>>> Something
>>> like 9 MB. Even if everyone agrees that the approach is good and we can
>>> proceed
>>> with it, it is highly unlikely anyone will be able to review it. Considerin
On 11.02.2025 10:01, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> Is it possible for clang-format to be applied exclusively to newly
> added chunks of code, while keeping the surroundings untouched?
I, too, was wondering about this, at least as a data point. However,
especially for files that aren't in a single style
Hi Roger,
5) You name it. I think many people in the community can name their points
for
and against clang-format.
>>>
>>> What are the parts of our coding style that clang-format cannot
>>> correctly represent? Could you make a list of what would need to
>>> change in Xen
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 09:10:38AM +, Luca Fancellu wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> >>
> >> 3) The size of the patch after applying clang-format is huge. Really.
> >> Something
> >> like 9 MB. Even if everyone agrees that the approach is good and we can
> >> proceed
> >> with it, it is highly unlike
Hi Roger,
>>
>> 3) The size of the patch after applying clang-format is huge. Really.
>> Something
>> like 9 MB. Even if everyone agrees that the approach is good and we can
>> proceed
>> with it, it is highly unlikely anyone will be able to review it. Considering
>> that new patches are being
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 11:16:09PM +0200, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> Hello, everybody!
>
> What is the rationale behind introducing a tool to help with coding style
> verification? I will partially quote Viktor Mitin here [2]:
>
> "The Xen Project has a coding standard in place, but like ma
Thanks Oleksandr for the summary. Adding a few maintainers in CC
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> Hello, everybody!
>
> What is the rationale behind introducing a tool to help with coding style
> verification? I will partially quote Viktor Mitin here [2]:
>
> "The Xen Projec
Hello, everybody!
What is the rationale behind introducing a tool to help with coding style
verification? I will partially quote Viktor Mitin here [2]:
"The Xen Project has a coding standard in place, but like many projects, the
standard is only enforced through peer review. Such mistakes slip t
22 matches
Mail list logo
