On 2024/12/10 19:25, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 10:54:43AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 10.12.2024 08:57, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
>>> On 2024/12/10 15:17, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 10.12.2024 08:07, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
> On 2024/12/9 21:59, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 02.
On 11.12.2024 03:04, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
> This patch is preparation for making stack protector
> configurable. First step is to remove -fno-stack-protector flag from
> EMBEDDED_EXTRA_CFLAGS so separate components (Hypervisor in this case)
> can enable/disable this feature by themselves.
>
>
On 11.12.2024 03:04, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
> Both GCC and Clang support -fstack-protector feature, which add stack
> canaries to functions where stack corruption is possible. This series
> makes possible to use this feature in Xen. I tested this on ARM64 and
> it is working as intended. Tested b
Kalle Valo writes:
> Easwar Hariharan writes:
>
>> Commit b35108a51cf7 ("jiffies: Define secs_to_jiffies()") introduced
>> secs_to_jiffies(). As the value here is a multiple of 1000, use
>> secs_to_jiffies() instead of msecs_to_jiffies to avoid the multiplication.
>>
>> This is converted using s
On 10.12.24 17:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 10.12.2024 16:52, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 09.12.24 18:04, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 06.12.2024 14:02, Juergen Gross wrote:
--- a/xen/common/domain.c
+++ b/xen/common/domain.c
@@ -192,6 +192,54 @@ static void domain_changed_state(const struct domain *d)
On 11.12.2024 00:58, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> In recognition of their outstanding work and years of service to the Xen
> Community, please join me in welcoming Anthony, Michal, and Roger as
> Committers and REST Maintainers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini
Acked-by: Jan Beulich
albeit
Easwar Hariharan writes:
> Commit b35108a51cf7 ("jiffies: Define secs_to_jiffies()") introduced
> secs_to_jiffies(). As the value here is a multiple of 1000, use
> secs_to_jiffies() instead of msecs_to_jiffies to avoid the multiplication.
>
> This is converted using scripts/coccinelle/misc/secs_t
On 10.12.2024 23:46, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> On 2024-12-05 23:42, Denis Mukhin via B4 Relay wrote:
>> From: Denis Mukhin
>>
>> Enable console focus for domains w/ virtual NS8250.
>>
>> Code change allows to capture the output from the guest OS now and send it to
>> the physical console device.
>>
>
On 10.12.2024 23:46, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> On 2024-12-05 23:42, Denis Mukhin via B4 Relay wrote:
>> From: Denis Mukhin
>>
>> Enable console focus for domains w/ virtual NS8250.
>>
>> Code change allows to capture the output from the guest OS now and send it to
>> the physical console device.
>>
>
On 10.12.2024 23:11, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> On 2024-12-05 23:41, Denis Mukhin via B4 Relay wrote:
>> From: Denis Mukhin
>>
>> console_owner_domid() is introduced to obtain the "console owner" domain ID.
>>
>> The call is used in NS8250 emulator to identify the case when physical xen
>> console foc
On 06.12.2024 05:41, Denis Mukhin via B4 Relay wrote:
> --- a/xen/drivers/char/console.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/char/console.c
> @@ -554,6 +554,22 @@ static void console_find_owner(void)
> console_set_owner(DOMID_XEN);
> }
>
> +static void console_init_owner(void)
> +{
> +domid_t domid
On 06.12.2024 05:41, Denis Mukhin via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Denis Mukhin
>
> console_owner_domid() is introduced to obtain the "console owner" domain ID.
>
> The call is used in NS8250 emulator to identify the case when physical xen
> console focus is owned by the domain w/ NS8250 emulator, in
Le 10/12/2024 à 23:02, Easwar Hariharan a écrit :
Commit b35108a51cf7 ("jiffies: Define secs_to_jiffies()") introduced
secs_to_jiffies(). As the value here is a multiple of 1000, use
secs_to_jiffies() instead of msecs_to_jiffies to avoid the multiplication.
This is converted using scripts/coc
Le 10/12/2024 à 23:02, Easwar Hariharan a écrit :
Commit b35108a51cf7 ("jiffies: Define secs_to_jiffies()") introduced
secs_to_jiffies(). As the value here is a multiple of 1000, use
secs_to_jiffies() instead of msecs_to_jiffies to avoid the multiplication.
This is converted using scripts/coc
> On 11 Dec 2024, at 00:58, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>
> In recognition of their outstanding work and years of service to the Xen
> Community, please join me in welcoming Anthony, Michal, and Roger as
> Committers and REST Maintainers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini
Acked-by: Bertra
On 12/10/2024 2:02 PM, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
> This is a series that follows up on my previous series to introduce
> secs_to_jiffies() and convert a few initial users.[1] In the review for
> that series, Anna-Maria requested converting other users with
> Coccinelle. [2] This is part 1 that conver
On 2024/12/10 19:30, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 02:09:56PM +0800, Jiqian Chen wrote:
>> Some devices, like discrete GPU of amd, support resizable bar
>> capability, but vpci of Xen doesn't support this feature, so
>> they fail to resize bars and then cause probing failure.
>>
On 2024/12/10 19:25, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 10:54:43AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 10.12.2024 08:57, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
>>> On 2024/12/10 15:17, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 10.12.2024 08:07, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
> On 2024/12/9 21:59, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 02.
On 2024/12/10 19:00, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 02:59:31PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 02.12.2024 07:09, Jiqian Chen wrote:
>>> +static int cf_check init_rebar(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>> +{
>>> +uint32_t ctrl;
>>> +unsigned int rebar_offset, nbars;
>>> +
>>> +re
On 2024/12/10 17:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 10.12.2024 08:57, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
>> On 2024/12/10 15:17, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 10.12.2024 08:07, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
On 2024/12/9 21:59, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 02.12.2024 07:09, Jiqian Chen wrote:
>> @@ -541,6 +542,16 @@
>> #
> More confusingly still, they did send one standalone patch for
> an Ethernet driver:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241210-converge-secs-to-jiffies-v3-20-59479891e...@linux.microsoft.com/
> And yet another Ethernet driver (drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/)
> is converted in this
On 11/26/24 05:09, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.11.2024 19:20, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
Hyperlaunch domain builder will be the consolidated boot time domain building
logic framework. Introduces the config option to enable this domain builder to
and turn on the ability to load the domain configuration
On 11/25/24 12:55, Jason Andryuk wrote:
On 2024-11-23 13:20, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
Hyperlaunch domain builder will be the consolidated boot time domain
building
logic framework. Introduces the config option to enable this domain
builder to
and turn on the ability to load the domain configurati
On 11/26/24 05:05, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 26.11.2024 11:03, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.11.2024 19:20, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
--- a/xen/common/Kconfig
+++ b/xen/common/Kconfig
@@ -53,8 +53,12 @@ config HAS_ALTERNATIVE
config HAS_COMPAT
bool
+config LIB_DEVICE_TREE
+bool
Nit: Ind
On 11/26/24 05:03, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.11.2024 19:20, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
--- a/xen/common/Kconfig
+++ b/xen/common/Kconfig
@@ -53,8 +53,12 @@ config HAS_ALTERNATIVE
config HAS_COMPAT
bool
+config LIB_DEVICE_TREE
+bool
Nit: Indentation is wrong here and ...
config
On 11/25/24 10:42, Jason Andryuk wrote:
On 2024-11-23 13:20, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
Currently the inclusion of libfdt is controlled by the
CONFIG_HAS_DEVICE_TREE
kconfig flag. This flag also changes behvaior in a few places, such as
boot
behavior
ack.
module processing for XSM. To support
On 12/2/24 04:49, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.11.2024 19:20, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/dom0_build.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/dom0_build.c
@@ -644,9 +644,11 @@ static bool __init check_and_adjust_load_address(
}
static int __init pvh_load_kernel(
-struct domain *d, stru
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 18:50:40 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Very unlikely, and any such conflict will be trivial.
> >
> > Agreed, mainly I don't understand why we'd make an exception
> > and take the patchset via a special tree.
>
> It saves work for everyone?
>
> The patches are super-sim
On 11/25/24 10:36, Jason Andryuk wrote:
On 2024-11-23 13:20, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
Add a container for the "cooked" command line for a domain. This
provides for
the backing memory to be directly associated with the domain being
constructed.
This is done in anticipation that the domain construc
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 18:41:29 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 18:31:30 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > I'll just grab everything and see if anyone complains ;)
> > >
> > > I may, if this leads to a conflict :(
> >
> > Very unlikely, and any such conflict will be trivial.
rstand why we'd make an exception
and take the patchset via a special tree.
> > Easwar, please break this up per subsystem.
>
> The series is already one-patch-per-changed-file.
More confusingly still, they did send one standalone patch for
an Ethernet driver:
https://lore.
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 17:35:48 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:36:04 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > I have the same question as before: How do you expect these to land?
> > > Do you now have a maintainer who will take all of them?
> > > Or do you want individual maintainers t
Both GCC and Clang support -fstack-protector feature, which add stack
canaries to functions where stack corruption is possible. This patch
makes general preparations to enable this feature on different
supported architectures:
- Added CONFIG_HAS_STACK_PROTECTOR option so each architecture
can
Both GCC and Clang support -fstack-protector feature, which add stack
canaries to functions where stack corruption is possible. This series
makes possible to use this feature in Xen. I tested this on ARM64 and
it is working as intended. Tested both with GCC and Clang.
It is hard to enable this fea
Enable previously added CONFIG_STACK_PROTECTOR feature for ARM
platform. We initialize stack protector in two stages: from head.S
using boot_stack_chk_guard_setup_early() function and from start_xen()
using boot_stack_chk_guard_setup(). This ensures that all C code from
the very beginning can use
This patch is preparation for making stack protector
configurable. First step is to remove -fno-stack-protector flag from
EMBEDDED_EXTRA_CFLAGS so separate components (Hypervisor in this case)
can enable/disable this feature by themselves.
Signed-off-by: Volodymyr Babchuk
---
Changes in v3:
-
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:36:04 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote:
> > I have the same question as before: How do you expect these to land?
> > Do you now have a maintainer who will take all of them?
> > Or do you want individual maintainers to take the ones applicable to them?
>
> I'll just grab everythin
On 12/10/2024 4:35 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 22:02:31 + Easwar Hariharan
> wrote:
>
>> This is a series that follows up on my previous series to introduce
>> secs_to_jiffies() and convert a few initial users.
>
> Thanks, I added this to mm.git. I suppressed the usual a
Hi Yuichi,
Welcome onboard! It is great to have you as part of our community, and
we are looking forward to working together to enhance Xen in automotive.
Cheers,
Stefano
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024, YUICHI KUSAKABE (日下部 雄一) wrote:
> Hello All
>
>
>
> We are happy to be able to join the member of
On 12/9/24 03:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 04.12.2024 17:45, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
On 11/27/24 05:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 15.11.2024 14:12, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
init_dom0_cpuid_policy(d);
if ( alloc_dom0_vcpu0(d) == NULL )
-panic("Error creating d%uv0\n", domid);
+
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 22:02:31 + Easwar Hariharan
wrote:
> This is a series that follows up on my previous series to introduce
> secs_to_jiffies() and convert a few initial users.
Thanks, I added this to mm.git. I suppressed the usual added-to-mm
emails because s many cc's!
I'd ask rele
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024, Alessandro Zucchelli wrote:
> Rename all instances of ECLAIR MISRA C:2012 service identifiers,
> identified by the prefix MC3R1, to use the prefix MC3A2, which
> refers to MISRA C:2012 Amendment 2 guidelines.
>
> This update is motivated by the need to upgrade ECLAIR GitLab ru
On 10/12/2024 11:58 pm, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> In recognition of their outstanding work and years of service to the Xen
> Community, please join me in welcoming Anthony, Michal, and Roger as
> Committers and REST Maintainers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini
Acked-by: Andrew Cooper
In recognition of their outstanding work and years of service to the Xen
Community, please join me in welcoming Anthony, Michal, and Roger as
Committers and REST Maintainers.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 026aa25a53..34ad49bc39 100644
--- a/MAINTA
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:14:22 -0800 Jeff Johnson
wrote:
> On 12/10/2024 2:02 PM, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
> > This is a series that follows up on my previous series to introduce
> > secs_to_jiffies() and convert a few initial users.[1] In the review for
> > that series, Anna-Maria requested conver
On 2024-12-05 23:42, Denis Mukhin via B4 Relay wrote:
From: Denis Mukhin
Enable console focus for domains w/ virtual NS8250.
Code change allows to capture the output from the guest OS now and send it to
the physical console device.
Signed-off-by: Denis Mukhin
---
xen/drivers/char/console.c
On 2024-12-05 23:41, Denis Mukhin via B4 Relay wrote:
From: Denis Mukhin
console_init_owner() is introduced for selecting the boot-time console owner.
Signed-off-by: Denis Mukhin
Reviewed-by: Jason Andryuk
On 2024-12-05 23:41, Denis Mukhin via B4 Relay wrote:
From: Denis Mukhin
console_owner_domid() is introduced to obtain the "console owner" domain ID.
The call is used in NS8250 emulator to identify the case when physical xen
console focus is owned by the domain w/ NS8250 emulator, in which cas
None of the higher order definitions are used anymore, so remove
definitions for minutes, hours, and days timeouts. Convert the seconds
denominated timeouts to secs_to_jiffies()
Signed-off-by: Easwar Hariharan
---
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c | 21 -
1 file changed
Commit b35108a51cf7 ("jiffies: Define secs_to_jiffies()") introduced
secs_to_jiffies(). As the value here is a multiple of 1000, use
secs_to_jiffies() instead of msecs_to_jiffies to avoid the multiplication.
This is converted using scripts/coccinelle/misc/secs_to_jiffies.cocci with
the following C
Commit b35108a51cf7 ("jiffies: Define secs_to_jiffies()") introduced
secs_to_jiffies(). As the value here is a multiple of 1000, use
secs_to_jiffies() instead of msecs_to_jiffies to avoid the multiplication.
This is converted using scripts/coccinelle/misc/secs_to_jiffies.cocci with
the following C
Commit b35108a51cf7 ("jiffies: Define secs_to_jiffies()") introduced
secs_to_jiffies(). As the value here is a multiple of 1000, use
secs_to_jiffies() instead of msecs_to_jiffies to avoid the multiplication.
This is converted using scripts/coccinelle/misc/secs_to_jiffies.cocci with
the following C
Commit b35108a51cf7 ("jiffies: Define secs_to_jiffies()") introduced
secs_to_jiffies(). As the value here is a multiple of 1000, use
secs_to_jiffies() instead of msecs_to_jiffies to avoid the multiplication.
This is converted using scripts/coccinelle/misc/secs_to_jiffies.cocci with
the following C
Commit b35108a51cf7 ("jiffies: Define secs_to_jiffies()") introduced
secs_to_jiffies(). As the value here is a multiple of 1000, use
secs_to_jiffies() instead of msecs_to_jiffies to avoid the multiplication.
This is converted using scripts/coccinelle/misc/secs_to_jiffies.cocci with
the following C
Commit b35108a51cf7 ("jiffies: Define secs_to_jiffies()") introduced
secs_to_jiffies(). As the value here is a multiple of 1000, use
secs_to_jiffies() instead of msecs_to_jiffies to avoid the multiplication.
This is converted using scripts/coccinelle/misc/secs_to_jiffies.cocci with
the following C
This script finds and suggests conversions of timeout patterns that
result in seconds-denominated timeouts to use the new secs_to_jiffies()
API in include/linux/jiffies.h for better readability.
Suggested-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen
Signed-off-by: Easwar Hariharan
---
scripts/coccinelle/misc/secs_to
Commit b35108a51cf7 ("jiffies: Define secs_to_jiffies()") introduced
secs_to_jiffies(). As the value here is a multiple of 1000, use
secs_to_jiffies() instead of msecs_to_jiffies to avoid the multiplication.
This is converted using scripts/coccinelle/misc/secs_to_jiffies.cocci with
the following C
Commit b35108a51cf7 ("jiffies: Define secs_to_jiffies()") introduced
secs_to_jiffies(). As the value here is a multiple of 1000, use
secs_to_jiffies() instead of msecs_to_jiffies to avoid the multiplication.
This is converted using scripts/coccinelle/misc/secs_to_jiffies.cocci with
the following C
Commit b35108a51cf7 ("jiffies: Define secs_to_jiffies()") introduced
secs_to_jiffies(). As the value here is a multiple of 1000, use
secs_to_jiffies() instead of msecs_to_jiffies to avoid the multiplication.
This is converted using scripts/coccinelle/misc/secs_to_jiffies.cocci with
the following C
Commit b35108a51cf7 ("jiffies: Define secs_to_jiffies()") introduced
secs_to_jiffies(). As the value here is a multiple of 1000, use
secs_to_jiffies() instead of msecs_to_jiffies to avoid the multiplication.
This is converted using scripts/coccinelle/misc/secs_to_jiffies.cocci with
the following C
Commit b35108a51cf7 ("jiffies: Define secs_to_jiffies()") introduced
secs_to_jiffies(). As the value here is a multiple of 1000, use
secs_to_jiffies() instead of msecs_to_jiffies to avoid the multiplication.
This is converted using scripts/coccinelle/misc/secs_to_jiffies.cocci with
the following C
Commit b35108a51cf7 ("jiffies: Define secs_to_jiffies()") introduced
secs_to_jiffies(). As the value here is a multiple of 1000, use
secs_to_jiffies() instead of msecs_to_jiffies to avoid the multiplication.
This is converted using scripts/coccinelle/misc/secs_to_jiffies.cocci with
the following C
-20241210
- Fix typo'ed timeout in net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c (Stephen
Rothwell)
- Use Coccinelle operation modes for Coccinelle script (Markus Elfring)
- Remove redundant comments in arch/arm/mach-pxa/sharpsl_pm.c
(Christophe Leroy)
- Remove excess line breaks (Heiko Carstens, Chris
Commit b35108a51cf7 ("jiffies: Define secs_to_jiffies()") introduced
secs_to_jiffies(). As the value here is a multiple of 1000, use
secs_to_jiffies() instead of msecs_to_jiffies to avoid the multiplication.
This is converted using scripts/coccinelle/misc/secs_to_jiffies.cocci with
the following C
Commit b35108a51cf7 ("jiffies: Define secs_to_jiffies()") introduced
secs_to_jiffies(). As the values here are a multiple of 1000, use
secs_to_jiffies() instead of msecs_to_jiffies to avoid the multiplication.
This is converted using scripts/coccinelle/misc/secs_to_jiffies.cocci with
the following
Commit b35108a51cf7 ("jiffies: Define secs_to_jiffies()") introduced
secs_to_jiffies(). As the value here is a multiple of 1000, use
secs_to_jiffies() instead of msecs_to_jiffies to avoid the multiplication.
This is converted using scripts/coccinelle/misc/secs_to_jiffies.cocci with
the following C
Commit b35108a51cf7 ("jiffies: Define secs_to_jiffies()") introduced
secs_to_jiffies(). As the value here is a multiple of 1000, use
secs_to_jiffies() instead of msecs_to_jiffies to avoid the multiplication.
This is converted using scripts/coccinelle/misc/secs_to_jiffies.cocci with
the following C
Commit b35108a51cf7 ("jiffies: Define secs_to_jiffies()") introduced
secs_to_jiffies(). As the value here is a multiple of 1000, use
secs_to_jiffies() instead of msecs_to_jiffies to avoid the multiplication.
This is converted using scripts/coccinelle/misc/secs_to_jiffies.cocci with
the following C
On 12/10/24 11:37, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 11:25:44AM -0500, Stewart Hildebrand wrote:
>> Currently, if bar->type is anything other than VPCI_BAR_MEM32, the
>> memory type bits get set to PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64 in the returned
>> value. This leads to the wrong memory
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 4:14 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 10.12.2024 16:12, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> > On Tue Dec 10, 2024 at 2:34 PM GMT, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 10.12.2024 15:25, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> >>> On Mon Dec 9, 2024 at 3:13 PM GMT, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Fields of anonymous
Currently, if bar->type is anything other than VPCI_BAR_MEM32, the
memory type bits get set to PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64 in the returned
value. This leads to the wrong memory type for, e.g. VPCI_BAR_EMPTY.
Only set PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64 when the bar type is
VPCI_BAR_MEM64_LO.
Fixes: 8c5b
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 11:25:44AM -0500, Stewart Hildebrand wrote:
> Currently, if bar->type is anything other than VPCI_BAR_MEM32, the
> memory type bits get set to PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64 in the returned
> value. This leads to the wrong memory type for, e.g. VPCI_BAR_EMPTY.
> Only set PCI_B
On 10.12.2024 17:25, Stewart Hildebrand wrote:
> Currently, if bar->type is anything other than VPCI_BAR_MEM32, the
> memory type bits get set to PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64 in the returned
> value. This leads to the wrong memory type for, e.g. VPCI_BAR_EMPTY.
> Only set PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_
On 10.12.2024 16:52, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 09.12.24 18:04, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 06.12.2024 14:02, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/common/domain.c
>>> +++ b/xen/common/domain.c
>>> @@ -192,6 +192,54 @@ static void domain_changed_state(const struct domain
>>> *d)
>>> spin_unlock(&dom_
On 10.12.2024 16:12, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> On Tue Dec 10, 2024 at 2:34 PM GMT, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 10.12.2024 15:25, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
>>> On Mon Dec 9, 2024 at 3:13 PM GMT, Jan Beulich wrote:
Fields of anonymous structs/unions may not be part of an initializer for
rather
On 10.12.2024 16:20, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
> On 12/9/24 4:00 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 27.11.2024 13:50, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
>>> relocate_fdt() relocates FDT to Xen heap instead of using early mapping
>>> as it is expected that discard_initial_modules() ( is supposed to call
>>> in the fut
On 09.12.24 18:04, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 06.12.2024 14:02, Juergen Gross wrote:
--- a/xen/common/domain.c
+++ b/xen/common/domain.c
@@ -192,6 +192,54 @@ static void domain_changed_state(const struct domain *d)
spin_unlock(&dom_state_changed_lock);
}
+static void set_domain_state_info(
On 09.12.24 17:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 06.12.2024 14:02, Juergen Gross wrote:
Add a bitmap with one bit per possible domid indicating the respective
domain has changed its state (created, deleted, dying, crashed,
shutdown).
Registering the VIRQ_DOM_EXC event will result in setting the bits fo
On 12/10/24 3:56 PM, Jason Andryuk wrote:
The xl subcommands are generic, but only built when
LIBXL_HAVE_NO_SUSPEND_RESUME is false. Currently that is only x86, so
list them there.
Signed-off-by: Jason Andryuk
LGTM: Reviewed-by: Oleksii Kurochko
Thanks.
~ Oleksii
---
v2:
Nest under "On
On 12/10/24 1:39 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 10.12.2024 13:19, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
On 12/9/24 3:38 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 27.11.2024 13:50, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
--- a/xen/arch/riscv/Kconfig
+++ b/xen/arch/riscv/Kconfig
@@ -14,6 +14,9 @@ config ARCH_DEFCONFIG
string
defau
> On 10 Dec 2024, at 10:10, Michal Orzel wrote:
>
> At the moment, find_unallocated_memory() is only used to retrieve free
> memory ranges for direct mapped domains in order to find extended
> regions. It is not generic as it makes assumptions as for the place at
> which it's being called (doma
On 12/9/24 4:57 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 09.12.2024 16:56, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 27.11.2024 13:50, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
Relocate FDT to Xen heap instead of using early mapping as it is
expected that discard_initial_modules() ( is supposed to call in
the future ) discards the FDT boot modul
On 12/9/24 4:00 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 27.11.2024 13:50, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
relocate_fdt() relocates FDT to Xen heap instead of using early mapping
as it is expected that discard_initial_modules() ( is supposed to call
in the future ) discards the FDT boot module and remove_early_mappin
On Tue Dec 10, 2024 at 2:34 PM GMT, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 10.12.2024 15:25, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> > On Mon Dec 9, 2024 at 3:13 PM GMT, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> Fields of anonymous structs/unions may not be part of an initializer for
> >> rather old gcc.
> >
> > Can you add the specific versi
On 10.12.2024 15:45, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 10:38 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 22.11.2024 10:33, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
>>> switch ( magic )
>>> {
>>> case MULTIBOOT_BOOTLOADER_MAGIC:
>>> -return mbi_reloc(in, &ctx);
>>> +res = mbi_reloc(in,
On 06.12.2024 05:41, Denis Mukhin via B4 Relay wrote:
> --- a/xen/drivers/char/console.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/char/console.c
> @@ -463,82 +463,100 @@ static void cf_check dump_console_ring_key(unsigned
> char key)
>
> /*
> * CTRL- changes input direction, rotating among Xen, Dom0,
> - * and th
On 10.12.2024 15:48, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 2:44 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 10.12.2024 15:35, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 10:32 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
On 22.11.2024 10:33, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/inc
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 10:38 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 22.11.2024 10:33, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > Initialise multiboot_ptr and pvh_start_info_pa from C code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio
> > ---
> > xen/arch/x86/boot/build32.lds.S | 3 +++
> > xen/arch/x86/boot/head.S
The xl subcommands are generic, but only built when
LIBXL_HAVE_NO_SUSPEND_RESUME is false. Currently that is only x86, so
list them there.
Signed-off-by: Jason Andryuk
---
v2:
Nest under "On X86"
Expand commit message
---
CHANGELOG.md | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/CHANGE
On 06.12.2024 05:41, Denis Mukhin via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Denis Mukhin
>
> The code now inspects d->is_console flag to decide whether the console focus
> should move to the domain w/ console after administrator presses .
>
> Console owner domain switch logic updated accordingly.
>
> Signed-
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 2:44 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 10.12.2024 15:35, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 10:32 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>
> >> On 22.11.2024 10:33, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> >>> This allows to include other headers and avoid duplicated declarations.
> >>>
> >>
On 10.12.2024 15:35, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 10:32 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>> On 22.11.2024 10:33, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
>>> This allows to include other headers and avoid duplicated declarations.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio
>>
>> Again it's left unclear what
On 10.12.2024 15:29, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 10:14 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>> On 22.11.2024 10:33, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
>>> Not all headers can be used by 32 bit boot code.
>>> Allows to override some headers, we don't want to mess up with
>>> main headers as most of th
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 10:32 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 22.11.2024 10:33, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > This allows to include other headers and avoid duplicated declarations.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio
>
> Again it's left unclear what the purpose / goal is.
>
Reduce duplication avoi
On 10.12.2024 15:25, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> On Mon Dec 9, 2024 at 3:13 PM GMT, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Fields of anonymous structs/unions may not be part of an initializer for
>> rather old gcc.
>
> Can you add the specific version for tracking purposes?
It's all the same as before, and I reall
On 06.12.2024 05:41, Denis Mukhin via B4 Relay wrote:
> --- a/xen/drivers/char/consoled.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/char/consoled.c
> @@ -43,13 +43,13 @@ struct xencons_interface *consoled_get_ring_addr(void)
> static char buf[BUF_SZ + 1];
>
> /* Receives characters from a domain's PV console */
> -v
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 10:14 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 22.11.2024 10:33, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > Not all headers can be used by 32 bit boot code.
> > Allows to override some headers, we don't want to mess up with
> > main headers as most of the code is only 64 bit so the easy stuff should
>
On 06.12.2024 05:41, Denis Mukhin via B4 Relay wrote:
> Introduce new printk() variant for convenient printouts which skip '(XEN)'
> prefix on xen console. This is needed for the case when physical console is
> owned by a domain w/ in-hypervisor UART emulation enabled.
Imo it should still be guest
On Mon Dec 9, 2024 at 3:13 PM GMT, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Fields of anonymous structs/unions may not be part of an initializer for
> rather old gcc.
Can you add the specific version for tracking purposes?
>
> Fixes: 49a068471d77 ("x86/fpu: Rework fpu_setup_fpu() uses to split it in
> two")
> Signe
On 06.12.2024 05:41, Denis Mukhin via B4 Relay wrote:
> Preparation for the follow on change to switch console_owner to
> domid_t address space.
As with the earlier change - it's one thing to (plan to) change the
number space, and another to go from input only to general console.
Jan
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
