Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (2 WEEKS TO FREEZE, important information in preamble)

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 02:06:05PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > writes: > > > * toolstack-based approach to pvhvm guest kexec (fair) > >also contains hypervisor side change, v6 > > - Vitaly Kuznetsov > > it is already "[PATCH v8 00/11] toolstack-assisted approach to > PVHVM guest kex

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (2 WEEKS TO FREEZE, important information in preamble)

On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 11:51 +0300, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: > On 07/02/2015 11:35 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > > It seems that many people are unable to follow these simple > > instructions. > > The quotes part is obvious (and not that many people have ommited to do > that), but to be honest I haven't

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (2 WEEKS TO FREEZE, important information in preamble)

Hello Ian, Julien, On 07/02/2015 11:35 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 11:17 +0100, Julien Grall wrote: >> As suggested by Wei on the top of his mail [1], can you please CC only >> relevant people and avoid to reply all? > > It seems that many people are unable to follow these sim

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (2 WEEKS TO FREEZE, important information in preamble)

On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 11:17 +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > As suggested by Wei on the top of his mail [1], can you please CC only > relevant people and avoid to reply all? It seems that many people are unable to follow these simple instructions. Wei, perhaps you could stop CCing people who inapprop

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (2 WEEKS TO FREEZE, important information in preamble)

Hi Tiejun, As suggested by Wei on the top of his mail [1], can you please CC only relevant people and avoid to reply all? Many thanks, [1] (Note, please trim your quotes when replying, and also trim the CC list if necessary. You might also consider changing the subject line of your reply to "Sta

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (2 WEEKS TO FREEZE, important information in preamble)

= Prognosis = The states are: none -> fair -> ok -> good -> done none - nothing yet fair - still working on it, patches are prototypes or RFC ok - patches posted, acting on review good - some last minute pieces done - all done, might have bugs * Intel GVT-g (none) requires refactori

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (2 WEEKS TO FREEZE, important information in preamble)

* RMRR fix (fair) RFC posted Wei, I think this should be ok or good based on current status, and also should remove "RFC" here. Thanks Tiejun ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (2 WEEKS TO FREEZE, important information in preamble)

On 26/06/2015 13:16, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: (Note, please trim your quotes when replying, and also trim the CC list if necessary. You might also consider changing the subject line of your reply to "Status of FOO (Was: Xen 4.6 Development Update (X months reminder)") Hi all Hi Wei, === H

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (2 WEEKS TO FREEZE, important information in preamble)

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 12:16:56PM +0100, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: [...] > == Blocker == > > == Hypervisor == [...] > * Xen multiboot2-EFI support (ok) >See http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-01/msg03962.html > http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-01/msg03

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (2 WEEKS TO FREEZE, important information in preamble)

On 26/06/15 12:16, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > == Blocker == The unreversion of ticket locks is, IMO, a blocker to 4.6 The patches are good, and had actually managed to pass the push gate before OSS tripped over an issue exposed by them in netback. ~Andrew

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (2 WEEKS TO FREEZE, important information in preamble)

>>> On 26.06.15 at 13:16, wrote: > * gnttab: improve scalability (good) > - David Vrabel This went in and passed the push gate already. Jan ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (2 WEEKS TO FREEZE, important information in preamble)

writes: > * toolstack-based approach to pvhvm guest kexec (fair) >also contains hypervisor side change, v6 > - Vitaly Kuznetsov it is already "[PATCH v8 00/11] toolstack-assisted approach to PVHVM guest kexec" waiting for reviews and (IMHO) 'ok' (as I think all major concerns were addres

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (five months reminder, 5 WEEKS TO FREEZE)

>>> On 23.06.15 at 11:45, wrote: > We seem to have gone off list -- not on purpose I think? No, sorry - when I trimmed the Cc list I trimmed it a little too much. Re-added. Jan > On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 10:20 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> On 23.06.15 at 11:16, wrote: >> > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (five months reminder, 5 WEEKS TO FREEZE)

On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 02:53:54PM +0100, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: [...] > * Xen multiboot2-EFI support (ok) >See http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-01/msg03962.html > http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-01/msg03982.html > - Daniel Kiper Last week I alm

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (five months reminder, 5 WEEKS TO FREEZE)

> -Original Message- > > * Intel GVT-g (none) > > requires refactoring ioreq-server, fixing 16-byte MMIO emulation > > and optional PV IOMMU support > >- Yu, Zhang > ioreq-server: still in development. Previously tried to refactor the > ioreq-server to track the IO resources b

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (five months reminder, 5 WEEKS TO FREEZE)

On 6/5/2015 9:53 PM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: (Note, please trim your quotes when replying, and also trim the CC list if necessary. You might also consider changing the subject line of your reply to "Status of (Was: Xen 4.6 Development Update (X months reminder)") Hi all We are now four mo

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (five months reminder, 5 WEEKS TO FREEZE)

> From: Boris Ostrovsky [mailto:boris.ostrov...@oracle.com] > Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 10:28 PM > > On 06/05/2015 09:53 AM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > > > > * VPMU - 'perf' support in Xen (good) > > v21 posted > > Need reviews/final ack. > >- Boris Ostrovsky > > I posted a vers

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (five months reminder, 5 WEEKS TO FREEZE)

On 06/05/2015 09:53 PM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: (Note, please trim your quotes when replying, and also trim the CC list if necessary. You might also consider changing the subject line of your reply to "Status of (Was: Xen 4.6 Development Update (X months reminder)") Hi all We are now four m

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (five months reminder, 5 WEEKS TO FREEZE)

> -Original Message- > From: wei.l...@citrix.com [mailto:wei.l...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 9:54 PM > To: xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org; White, Edmund H; > xumengpa...@gmail.com; dgol...@seas.upenn.edu; lichong...@gmail.com; > jtwea...@hawaii.edu; oleksandr.dmytrys...@glo

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (five months reminder, 5 WEEKS TO FREEZE)

>>> On 05.06.15 at 16:28, wrote: > On 06/05/2015 09:53 AM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: >> >> * VPMU - 'perf' support in Xen (good) >> v21 posted >> Need reviews/final ack. >>- Boris Ostrovsky > > I posted a version last week with very few changes. Besides Jan's review > I think it n

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (five months reminder, 5 WEEKS TO FREEZE)

On 05/06/15 15:28, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > > >> >> == Deferred == >> >> >> * IO-NUMA - hwloc and xl (none) >> Andrew Cooper had an RFC patch for hwloc >> add restrictions as to which devices cannot safely/functionally >> be split apart. >>- Boris Ostrovsky >> > > I don't have any im

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (five months reminder, 5 WEEKS TO FREEZE)

Hi Wei, On 05/06/15 14:53, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > === Hypervisor ARM === > * ARM GICv2 on GICv3 support (none) (fair) > - Julien Grall > - Vijay Kilari I'm the only one working on it... Regards, -- Julien Grall ___ Xen-devel mailing

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (five months reminder, 5 WEEKS TO FREEZE)

On 06/05/2015 09:53 AM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: * VPMU - 'perf' support in Xen (good) v21 posted Need reviews/final ack. - Boris Ostrovsky I posted a version last week with very few changes. Besides Jan's review I think it needs Intel's ACK on a few patches that touched VMX (K

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (four months reminder)

On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 06:01 +0100, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: All, _Please_ take note of this important note: > (Note, please trim your quotes when replying, and also trim the CC list if > necessary. You might also consider changing the subject line of your reply to > "Status of (Was: Xen 4.6 De

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (four months reminder)

Hey Wei, On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 06:01:57AM +0100, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: [...] > * Xen multiboot2-EFI support (fair) I think that it could be ok. >See http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2013-05/msg02281.html Change above link to http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-deve

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (four months reminder)

> -Original Message- > From: wei.l...@citrix.com [mailto:wei.l...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 1:02 PM > To: xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org; White, Edmund H; > xumengpa...@gmail.com; dgol...@seas.upenn.edu; jtwea...@hawaii.edu; > oleksandr.dmytrys...@globallogic.com; cheg...@

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (four months reminder)

On 05/13/2015 01:01 PM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: (Note, please trim your quotes when replying, and also trim the CC list if necessary. You might also consider changing the subject line of your reply to "Status of (Was: Xen 4.6 Development Update (X months reminder)") Hi all We are now four

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (four months reminder)

>> * Clean-up of mem-event subsystem (good) >>v9 posted >> - Tamas K Lengyel Completed and merged. >> * Mem_access for ARM (good) >>v15 posted >> - Tamas K Lengyel Completed and merged. Cheers, Tamas ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-dev

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (four months reminder)

>>> On 5/13/2015 at 01:01 PM, in message , wrote: > (Note, please trim your quotes when replying, and also trim the CC list if > necessary. You might also consider changing the subject line of your reply > to > "Status of (Was: Xen 4.6 Development Update (X months reminder)") > > Hi all

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (four months reminder)

Hi Wei, > > * Improve RTDS scheduler (none) >Change RTDS from quantum driven to event driven The improvement of the RTDS scheduler also includes supporting the functionality of setting and getting per-vcpu parameters. Chong Li has posted the first version of patch at http://lists.xenproject

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

Thank you, Wei. On 5/5/2015 5:12 PM, Wei Liu wrote: On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 08:51:56PM +0800, Yu, Zhang wrote: Hi Wei, Thanks for your reply. On 5/4/2015 5:44 PM, Wei Liu wrote: (Thanks for trimming the CC list before hand) On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 02:05:49PM +0800, Yu, Zhang wrote: Hi Wei,

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 08:51:56PM +0800, Yu, Zhang wrote: > Hi Wei, > > Thanks for your reply. > > On 5/4/2015 5:44 PM, Wei Liu wrote: > >(Thanks for trimming the CC list before hand) > > > >On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 02:05:49PM +0800, Yu, Zhang wrote: > >>Hi Wei, > >> > > > >Hello. > > > >> This

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

Hi Wei, Thanks for your reply. On 5/4/2015 5:44 PM, Wei Liu wrote: (Thanks for trimming the CC list before hand) On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 02:05:49PM +0800, Yu, Zhang wrote: Hi Wei, Hello. This is Zhang Yu from Intel graphic virtualization team. Previously in Xen hackathon, Paul and I m

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

Hi Fabio Discussion on a particular bug should be in a separate thread. This thread is mainly for Xen 4.6 release. Wei. ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

(Thanks for trimming the CC list before hand) On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 02:05:49PM +0800, Yu, Zhang wrote: > Hi Wei, > Hello. > This is Zhang Yu from Intel graphic virtualization team. Previously in Xen > hackathon, Paul and I mentioned that there're several patch series for XenGT > that need t

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

Hi Wei, This is Zhang Yu from Intel graphic virtualization team. Previously in Xen hackathon, Paul and I mentioned that there're several patch series for XenGT that need to be tracked on Xen 4.6. Here, I'd like to confirm with you about these patchsets: 1> 16-byte MMIO emulation fix – ow

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

Fabio Fantoni wrote: > 2015-04-30 18:55 GMT+02:00 Jim Fehlig >: > > Fabio Fantoni wrote: > > Il 29/04/2015 18:39, Jim Fehlig ha scritto: > > linux-tyb8:~/ # dmesg | grep -i qxl > [4.901158] [drm] qxl: 16M of VRAM memory size > [4.901159] [drm] q

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-04-30 18:55 GMT+02:00 Jim Fehlig : > Fabio Fantoni wrote: > > Il 29/04/2015 18:39, Jim Fehlig ha scritto: > >> dom0 and domU are both SLES12. Xen is fairly recent xen-unstable plus a > >> few libxl patches. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Jim > >> > > > > But the domU was without qxl driver installe

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

Fabio Fantoni wrote: > Il 29/04/2015 18:39, Jim Fehlig ha scritto: >> dom0 and domU are both SLES12. Xen is fairly recent xen-unstable plus a >> few libxl patches. >> >> Regards, >> Jim >> > > But the domU was without qxl driver installed? No, it was installed: linux-tyb8:~/ # dmesg | grep -i qx

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

Il 29/04/2015 18:39, Jim Fehlig ha scritto: Fabio Fantoni wrote: Il 29/04/2015 02:21, Andrew Cooper ha scritto: On 28/04/15 23:17, Jim Fehlig wrote: Jim Fehlig wrote: wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: Hi all We are now three months into 4.6 development window. This is an email to keep track of all

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

Fabio Fantoni wrote: > Il 29/04/2015 02:21, Andrew Cooper ha scritto: >> On 28/04/15 23:17, Jim Fehlig wrote: >>> Jim Fehlig wrote: wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > Hi all > > We are now three months into 4.6 development window. This is an > email to keep > track of all the pat

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

Il 29/04/2015 12:23, Fabio Fantoni ha scritto: Il 29/04/2015 02:21, Andrew Cooper ha scritto: On 28/04/15 23:17, Jim Fehlig wrote: Jim Fehlig wrote: wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: Hi all We are now three months into 4.6 development window. This is an email to keep track of all the patch series

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

Il 29/04/2015 02:21, Andrew Cooper ha scritto: On 28/04/15 23:17, Jim Fehlig wrote: Jim Fehlig wrote: wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: Hi all We are now three months into 4.6 development window. This is an email to keep track of all the patch series I gathered. It is by no means complete and / or

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

On 28/04/15 23:17, Jim Fehlig wrote: Jim Fehlig wrote: wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: Hi all We are now three months into 4.6 development window. This is an email to keep track of all the patch series I gathered. It is by no means complete and / or acurate. Feel free to reply this email with n

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

Jim Fehlig wrote: > wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> We are now three months into 4.6 development window. This is an email to keep >> track of all the patch series I gathered. It is by no means complete and / or >> acurate. Feel free to reply this email with new projects or correct m

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > Hi all > > We are now three months into 4.6 development window. This is an email to keep > track of all the patch series I gathered. It is by no means complete and / or > acurate. Feel free to reply this email with new projects or correct my > misunderstanding. > [.

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

> On 15 Apr 2015, at 10:18, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >> Should we also ask people to trim the CC list to just those interested >> in the quoted stuff? Or do people think that erring on the side of not >> trimming too many people? >> >> People might also to consider changing the subject, e.g. "Stat

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

>>> On 15.04.15 at 11:11, wrote: > On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 14:52 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 02:48:06PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: >> > >>> On 14.04.15 at 15:35, wrote: >> > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:27 PM, wrote: >> > >> > Tamas (and others not doing so) - please trim your

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 14:52 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 02:48:06PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > > >>> On 14.04.15 at 15:35, wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:27 PM, wrote: > > > > Tamas (and others not doing so) - please trim your quotes in replies. > > > > Wei - could

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 11:37 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:34:45PM +0300, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: > > On 04/14/2015 01:27 PM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > > > * VM event patches (none) > > >Add support for XSETBV vm_events, > > >Support hybernating guests > > >Suppor

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

>>> On 4/14/2015 at 09:33 PM, in message <552d1718.8060...@eu.citrix.com>, >>> George Dunlap wrote: > On 04/14/2015 11:27 AM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > > == Hypervisor == > > > > * Alternate p2m: support multiple copies of host p2m (ok) > > - Ed White > > > > * Improve RTDS sc

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 02:33:23PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 02:28:29PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > > On 14/04/15 11:27, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > > > === Hypervisor X86 === > > > > > > * VT-d Posted-interrupt (PI) (none) > > > - Wu, Feng > > > > V1 posted > > > >

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

> * Regression in PCI passthrough of INTx legacy devices can trigger list > corruption (good) >Sander reported it. Two different types of patches available. > - Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Done. ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

From: Ian Campbell Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 7:56 PM To: Julien Grall Cc: Jaggi, Manish; xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder) On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 13:34 +0100, Julien Grall wrote

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 13:34 +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Manish, > > On 14/04/15 13:25, Jaggi, Manish wrote: > > * ARM PCI passthrough (none) > > - Manish Jaggi > > - Vijay Kilari > > [manish] I have started pushing the patches > > Finding the "[manish]" in the mail was like finding a

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

On 04/14/2015 06:27 AM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: * Display IO topology when PXM data is available (good) v3 posted - Boris Ostrovsky I should have v7 in the next day or so. * VPMU - 'perf' support in Xen (good) v14 posted Need reviews/final ack. - Boris Ostrovsky Ne

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-04-14 9:33 GMT-04:00 George Dunlap : > On 04/14/2015 11:27 AM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > > == Hypervisor == > > > > * Alternate p2m: support multiple copies of host p2m (ok) > > - Ed White > > > > * Improve RTDS scheduler (none) > > - Dagaen Golomb, Meng Xu > > This is a little vag

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 02:48:06PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 14.04.15 at 15:35, wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:27 PM, wrote: > > Tamas (and others not doing so) - please trim your quotes in replies. > > Wei - could you add a sentence saying so near the top of future mails > you

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 02:28:29PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 14/04/15 11:27, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > > === Hypervisor X86 === > > > > * VT-d Posted-interrupt (PI) (none) > > - Wu, Feng > > V1 posted > > > * Intel PML (Page Modification Logging) for Xen (none) > >design doc p

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

On 14/04/15 11:27, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > === Hypervisor X86 === > > * VT-d Posted-interrupt (PI) (none) > - Wu, Feng V1 posted > * Intel PML (Page Modification Logging) for Xen (none) >design doc posted > - Kai Huang V1 posted (good) > > * PVH - AMD hardware support. (fair)

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

>>> On 14.04.15 at 15:35, wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:27 PM, wrote: Tamas (and others not doing so) - please trim your quotes in replies. Wei - could you add a sentence saying so near the top of future mails you send in this regard? Jan ___

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:27 PM, wrote: > Hi all > > We are now three months into 4.6 development window. This is an email to > keep > track of all the patch series I gathered. It is by no means complete and / > or > acurate. Feel free to reply this email with new projects or correct my > misund

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

On 04/14/2015 11:27 AM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > == Hypervisor == > > * Alternate p2m: support multiple copies of host p2m (ok) > - Ed White > > * Improve RTDS scheduler (none) > - Dagaen Golomb, Meng Xu This is a little vague... exactly what kinds of improvements are envisioned her

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

Hi Manish, On 14/04/15 13:25, Jaggi, Manish wrote: > * ARM PCI passthrough (none) > - Manish Jaggi > - Vijay Kilari > [manish] I have started pushing the patches Finding the "[manish]" in the mail was like finding a needle in a haystack. And I knew that you were using this tag... Please

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

From: xen-devel-boun...@lists.xen.org on behalf of wei.l...@citrix.com Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 3:57 PM To: xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org; edmund.h.wh...@intel.com; xumengpa...@gmail.com; dgol...@seas.upenn.edu; jtwea...@hawaii.edu; oleksandr.dmytrys...@

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:34:45PM +0300, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: > On 04/14/2015 01:27 PM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > > * VM event patches (none) > >Add support for XSETBV vm_events, > >Support hybernating guests > >Support for VMCALL-based vm_events > > - Razvan Cojocaru > > The

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

On 04/14/2015 01:27 PM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > * VM event patches (none) >Add support for XSETBV vm_events, >Support hybernating guests >Support for VMCALL-based vm_events > - Razvan Cojocaru These depend on Tamas' Clean-up of mem-event subsystem series (which hasn't been app

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

On Monday 16 March 2015 18:18:22 Razvan Cojocaru wrote: > On 03/16/2015 06:00 PM, Lars Kurth wrote: > > > >> On 16 Mar 2015, at 13:01, Mihai Donțu wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:21:56 + wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > >>> We are now two months into 4.6 development window. This is an ema

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

On 03/16/2015 06:00 PM, Lars Kurth wrote: > >> On 16 Mar 2015, at 13:01, Mihai Donțu wrote: >> >> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:21:56 + wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: >>> We are now two months into 4.6 development window. This is an email to keep >>> track of all the patch series I gathered. It is by no

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

> On 16 Mar 2015, at 13:01, Mihai Donțu wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:21:56 + wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: >> We are now two months into 4.6 development window. This is an email to keep >> track of all the patch series I gathered. It is by no means complete and / or >> acurate. Feel free t

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

> On 16 Mar 2015, at 10:43, Wei Liu wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 10:32:41AM +, Ian Campbell wrote: >> >> Wei, perhaps one or more of these could be applied: >> * raise the bar for inclusion in the list for external projects to >>be only the very largest most important ite

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:21:56 + wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > We are now two months into 4.6 development window. This is an email to keep > track of all the patch series I gathered. It is by no means complete and / or > acurate. Feel free to reply this email with new projects or correct my > misu

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 10:32:41AM +, Ian Campbell wrote: > (culling the cc list a lot) > > On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 11:54 +, Jan Beulich wrote: > > >>> On 12.03.15 at 11:21, wrote: > > > == Linux == > > > > Wouldn't it make sense to move external projects down, and have > > our core pieces

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 06:05:15PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 13/03/15 18:02, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > >> * vsyscall in Linux (fair) > >> - Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > > Not done. Still in 'git stash'. > > > >> * Convert tasklet to per-cpu tasklets (fair) > >>RFC posted > >> - K

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

On 13/03/15 18:02, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >> * vsyscall in Linux (fair) >> - Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > Not done. Still in 'git stash'. > >> * Convert tasklet to per-cpu tasklets (fair) >>RFC posted >> - Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > Pff.. I've the patches but would need to post them and >

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 11:54:15AM +, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 12.03.15 at 11:21, wrote: > > == Linux == > > Wouldn't it make sense to move external projects down, and have > our core pieces (hypervisor, tool stack, maybe qemu) be near the > top? > > > * Convert tasklet to per-cpu taskle

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

> * vsyscall in Linux (fair) > - Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Not done. Still in 'git stash'. > * Convert tasklet to per-cpu tasklets (fair) >RFC posted > - Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Pff.. I've the patches but would need to post them and redo them. Too busy right now. Might as well move them t

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

> == Hypervisor == > > * Alternate p2m: support multiple copies of host p2m (ok) > - Ed White > I'm hoping to see some progress on getting this restarted in the next 2 or 3 weeks, with additional Intel resources. Ed ___ Xen-devel mailing list X

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

(culling the cc list a lot) On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 11:54 +, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 12.03.15 at 11:21, wrote: > > == Linux == > > Wouldn't it make sense to move external projects down, and have > our core pieces (hypervisor, tool stack, maybe qemu) be near the > top? When I originally st

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

> * Intel memory bandwidth monitoring for VMs (fair) >v9 posted > - Chao Peng > Wei, this one is already merged. Thanks, Chao ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

On Thu, Mar 12, Daniel Kiper wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:21:56AM +, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > > * Rearrange and cleanup installation destination directories (/var -> > > var/lib/xen) (fair) > > - Daniel Kiper > If Olaf did all work then we can remove this one. What does this m

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

On Thu, Mar 12, Daniel Kiper wrote: > IIRC, 4.3 release (and probably earlier ones) was a mess. Olaf did the > work for 4.5. However, as he pointed out in another email last one is > incorrect. Olaf, are you going to fix it for 4.6? I suppose it is > quite simple. There are still many hardcoded

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

>>> On 3/12/2015 at 06:21 PM, in message , wrote: > Hi all > > We are now two months into 4.6 development window. This is an email to keep > track of all the patch series I gathered. It is by no means complete and / > or > acurate. Feel free to reply this email with new projects or corre

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

2015-03-12 11:39 GMT-04:00 Dario Faggioli : > > On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 15:07 +, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 10:21 +, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > > > > > * Repurpose SEDF Scheduler for Real-time (fair) > > >RFC patch posted (v2) > > > - Joshua Whitehead, Robert VanV

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:21:56AM +, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: [...] > == GRUB2 == > > * GRUB2 multiboot2 (fair) > - Daniel Kiper RFC patches were posted (see: http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-01/msg03982.html). Weeding out bugs found during testing. I am going to pos

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

>-Original Message- >From: wei.l...@citrix.com [mailto:wei.l...@citrix.com] > >* extending mem_access support to PV domain (fair) > RFC v2 > - Aravindh Puthiyaparambil (aravindp) We did some internal reprioritizing and decided to focus on HVM and PVH domains. This can be placed in de

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 03:07:33PM +, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 10:21 +, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: [...] > > * Rearrange and cleanup installation destination directories (/var -> > > var/lib/xen) (fair) > > - Daniel Kiper > > What is this? I've never heard about it

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

All, I expect to have a patch out soon for the RTDS scheduler improvement. Regards, Dagaen Golomb On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Olaf Hering wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > dist/install/var/xen/dump > > which all seems proper and correct to me. > > Except the last

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 15:07 +, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 10:21 +, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > > > * Repurpose SEDF Scheduler for Real-time (fair) > >RFC patch posted (v2) > > - Joshua Whitehead, Robert VanVossen > > This was superceded by the RTDS stuff, wasn't

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

On Thu, Mar 12, Ian Campbell wrote: > dist/install/var/xen/dump > which all seems proper and correct to me. Except the last one, which should be /var/lib/xen/dump or whatever dumpdir the OS/FHS provides. Olaf ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-dev

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

>On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 15:07 +, Ian Campbell wrote: >> On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 10:21 +, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: >> > > * Repurpose SEDF Scheduler for Real-time (fair) >> >RFC patch posted (v2) >> > - Joshua Whitehead, Robert VanVossen >> >> This was superceded by the RTDS stuff,

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 10:21 +, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > * Repurpose SEDF Scheduler for Real-time (fair) >RFC patch posted (v2) > - Joshua Whitehead, Robert VanVossen This was superceded by the RTDS stuff, wasn't it? > === Hypervisor ARM === > > * Add support for Xilinx ZynqMP

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

On 3/12/2015 6:54 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: * amd_ucode cleanups, verify patch size(enhancement) (mostly in master except one patch) Which one? This is in reference to the patches to microcode_amd and it's all 'done' in 4.5 itself. I think when we were tracking this, commit 8b24b07e was not in

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

> > * Clean-up of mem-event subsystem (good) >v5 posted > - Tamas K Lengyel > v7 will be posted today, status is good. > === Hypervisor ARM === > I've posted v13 of the mem_access for ARM series that should be added to this tracker. Status should be good. Thanks, Tamas

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

>>> On 12.03.15 at 11:21, wrote: > == Linux == Wouldn't it make sense to move external projects down, and have our core pieces (hypervisor, tool stack, maybe qemu) be near the top? > * Convert tasklet to per-cpu tasklets (fair) >RFC posted > - Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Is this still a valid

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

On 03/12/2015 11:34 AM, Fabio Fantoni wrote: > Il 12/03/2015 11:54, George Dunlap ha scritto: >> On 03/12/2015 10:21 AM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: >> >>> * Credit2: introduce per-vcpu hard and soft affinity (fair) >>>- Justin T. Weaver >> The most recent patches looked pretty good -- I'd be

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

Il 12/03/2015 11:54, George Dunlap ha scritto: On 03/12/2015 10:21 AM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: * Credit2: introduce per-vcpu hard and soft affinity (fair) - Justin T. Weaver The most recent patches looked pretty good -- I'd be very surprised if these didn't make it in by July. I'd cha

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 10:54 +, George Dunlap wrote: > On 03/12/2015 10:21 AM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > > > * Credit2: introduce per-vcpu hard and soft affinity (fair) > > - Justin T. Weaver > > The most recent patches looked pretty good -- I'd be very surprised if > these didn't make

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

On 03/12/2015 10:21 AM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > * Credit2: introduce per-vcpu hard and soft affinity (fair) > - Justin T. Weaver The most recent patches looked pretty good -- I'd be very surprised if these didn't make it in by July. I'd change this to "good". > * Default to credit2 (n

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update

I didn't receive the original message, so I can't reply to it directly. > Hi all > > We are now one month into 4.6 development window. This is an email to keep > track of all the patch series I gathered. It is by no means complete and / or > acurate. Feel free to reply this email with new project

  1   2   >