Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (2 WEEKS TO FREEZE, important information in preamble)

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 02:06:05PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > writes: > > > * toolstack-based approach to pvhvm guest kexec (fair) > >also contains hypervisor side change, v6 > > - Vitaly Kuznetsov > > it is already "[PATCH v8 00/11] toolstack-assisted approach to > PVHVM guest kex

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (2 WEEKS TO FREEZE, important information in preamble)

On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 11:51 +0300, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: > On 07/02/2015 11:35 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > > It seems that many people are unable to follow these simple > > instructions. > > The quotes part is obvious (and not that many people have ommited to do > that), but to be honest I haven't

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (2 WEEKS TO FREEZE, important information in preamble)

Hello Ian, Julien, On 07/02/2015 11:35 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 11:17 +0100, Julien Grall wrote: >> As suggested by Wei on the top of his mail [1], can you please CC only >> relevant people and avoid to reply all? > > It seems that many people are unable to follow these sim

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (2 WEEKS TO FREEZE, important information in preamble)

On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 11:17 +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > As suggested by Wei on the top of his mail [1], can you please CC only > relevant people and avoid to reply all? It seems that many people are unable to follow these simple instructions. Wei, perhaps you could stop CCing people who inapprop

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (2 WEEKS TO FREEZE, important information in preamble)

Hi Tiejun, As suggested by Wei on the top of his mail [1], can you please CC only relevant people and avoid to reply all? Many thanks, [1] (Note, please trim your quotes when replying, and also trim the CC list if necessary. You might also consider changing the subject line of your reply to "Sta

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (2 WEEKS TO FREEZE, important information in preamble)

= Prognosis = The states are: none -> fair -> ok -> good -> done none - nothing yet fair - still working on it, patches are prototypes or RFC ok - patches posted, acting on review good - some last minute pieces done - all done, might have bugs * Intel GVT-g (none) requires refactori

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (2 WEEKS TO FREEZE, important information in preamble)

* RMRR fix (fair) RFC posted Wei, I think this should be ok or good based on current status, and also should remove "RFC" here. Thanks Tiejun ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (2 WEEKS TO FREEZE, important information in preamble)

On 26/06/2015 13:16, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: (Note, please trim your quotes when replying, and also trim the CC list if necessary. You might also consider changing the subject line of your reply to "Status of FOO (Was: Xen 4.6 Development Update (X months reminder)") Hi all Hi Wei, === H

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (2 WEEKS TO FREEZE, important information in preamble)

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 12:16:56PM +0100, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: [...] > == Blocker == > > == Hypervisor == [...] > * Xen multiboot2-EFI support (ok) >See http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-01/msg03962.html > http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-01/msg03

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (2 WEEKS TO FREEZE, important information in preamble)

On 26/06/15 12:16, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > == Blocker == The unreversion of ticket locks is, IMO, a blocker to 4.6 The patches are good, and had actually managed to pass the push gate before OSS tripped over an issue exposed by them in netback. ~Andrew

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (2 WEEKS TO FREEZE, important information in preamble)

>>> On 26.06.15 at 13:16, wrote: > * gnttab: improve scalability (good) > - David Vrabel This went in and passed the push gate already. Jan ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (2 WEEKS TO FREEZE, important information in preamble)

writes: > * toolstack-based approach to pvhvm guest kexec (fair) >also contains hypervisor side change, v6 > - Vitaly Kuznetsov it is already "[PATCH v8 00/11] toolstack-assisted approach to PVHVM guest kexec" waiting for reviews and (IMHO) 'ok' (as I think all major concerns were addres

[Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (2 WEEKS TO FREEZE, important information in preamble)

(Note, please trim your quotes when replying, and also trim the CC list if necessary. You might also consider changing the subject line of your reply to "Status of FOO (Was: Xen 4.6 Development Update (X months reminder)") Hi all We are now more than 5 months into 4.6 development window. This is

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (five months reminder, 5 WEEKS TO FREEZE)

>>> On 23.06.15 at 11:45, wrote: > We seem to have gone off list -- not on purpose I think? No, sorry - when I trimmed the Cc list I trimmed it a little too much. Re-added. Jan > On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 10:20 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> On 23.06.15 at 11:16, wrote: >> > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (five months reminder, 5 WEEKS TO FREEZE)

On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 02:53:54PM +0100, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: [...] > * Xen multiboot2-EFI support (ok) >See http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-01/msg03962.html > http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-01/msg03982.html > - Daniel Kiper Last week I alm

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (five months reminder, 5 WEEKS TO FREEZE)

> -Original Message- > > * Intel GVT-g (none) > > requires refactoring ioreq-server, fixing 16-byte MMIO emulation > > and optional PV IOMMU support > >- Yu, Zhang > ioreq-server: still in development. Previously tried to refactor the > ioreq-server to track the IO resources b

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (five months reminder, 5 WEEKS TO FREEZE)

On 6/5/2015 9:53 PM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: (Note, please trim your quotes when replying, and also trim the CC list if necessary. You might also consider changing the subject line of your reply to "Status of (Was: Xen 4.6 Development Update (X months reminder)") Hi all We are now four mo

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (five months reminder, 5 WEEKS TO FREEZE)

> From: Boris Ostrovsky [mailto:boris.ostrov...@oracle.com] > Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 10:28 PM > > On 06/05/2015 09:53 AM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > > > > * VPMU - 'perf' support in Xen (good) > > v21 posted > > Need reviews/final ack. > >- Boris Ostrovsky > > I posted a vers

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (five months reminder, 5 WEEKS TO FREEZE)

On 06/05/2015 09:53 PM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: (Note, please trim your quotes when replying, and also trim the CC list if necessary. You might also consider changing the subject line of your reply to "Status of (Was: Xen 4.6 Development Update (X months reminder)") Hi all We are now four m

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (five months reminder, 5 WEEKS TO FREEZE)

> -Original Message- > From: wei.l...@citrix.com [mailto:wei.l...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 9:54 PM > To: xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org; White, Edmund H; > xumengpa...@gmail.com; dgol...@seas.upenn.edu; lichong...@gmail.com; > jtwea...@hawaii.edu; oleksandr.dmytrys...@glo

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (five months reminder, 5 WEEKS TO FREEZE)

>>> On 05.06.15 at 16:28, wrote: > On 06/05/2015 09:53 AM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: >> >> * VPMU - 'perf' support in Xen (good) >> v21 posted >> Need reviews/final ack. >>- Boris Ostrovsky > > I posted a version last week with very few changes. Besides Jan's review > I think it n

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (five months reminder, 5 WEEKS TO FREEZE)

On 05/06/15 15:28, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > > >> >> == Deferred == >> >> >> * IO-NUMA - hwloc and xl (none) >> Andrew Cooper had an RFC patch for hwloc >> add restrictions as to which devices cannot safely/functionally >> be split apart. >>- Boris Ostrovsky >> > > I don't have any im

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (five months reminder, 5 WEEKS TO FREEZE)

Hi Wei, On 05/06/15 14:53, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > === Hypervisor ARM === > * ARM GICv2 on GICv3 support (none) (fair) > - Julien Grall > - Vijay Kilari I'm the only one working on it... Regards, -- Julien Grall ___ Xen-devel mailing

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (five months reminder, 5 WEEKS TO FREEZE)

On 06/05/2015 09:53 AM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: * VPMU - 'perf' support in Xen (good) v21 posted Need reviews/final ack. - Boris Ostrovsky I posted a version last week with very few changes. Besides Jan's review I think it needs Intel's ACK on a few patches that touched VMX (K

[Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (five months reminder, 5 WEEKS TO FREEZE)

(Note, please trim your quotes when replying, and also trim the CC list if necessary. You might also consider changing the subject line of your reply to "Status of (Was: Xen 4.6 Development Update (X months reminder)") Hi all We are now four months into 4.6 development window. This is an email t

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (four months reminder)

On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 06:01 +0100, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: All, _Please_ take note of this important note: > (Note, please trim your quotes when replying, and also trim the CC list if > necessary. You might also consider changing the subject line of your reply to > "Status of (Was: Xen 4.6 De

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (four months reminder)

Hey Wei, On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 06:01:57AM +0100, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: [...] > * Xen multiboot2-EFI support (fair) I think that it could be ok. >See http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2013-05/msg02281.html Change above link to http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-deve

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (four months reminder)

> -Original Message- > From: wei.l...@citrix.com [mailto:wei.l...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 1:02 PM > To: xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org; White, Edmund H; > xumengpa...@gmail.com; dgol...@seas.upenn.edu; jtwea...@hawaii.edu; > oleksandr.dmytrys...@globallogic.com; cheg...@

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (four months reminder)

On 05/13/2015 01:01 PM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: (Note, please trim your quotes when replying, and also trim the CC list if necessary. You might also consider changing the subject line of your reply to "Status of (Was: Xen 4.6 Development Update (X months reminder)") Hi all We are now four

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (four months reminder)

>> * Clean-up of mem-event subsystem (good) >>v9 posted >> - Tamas K Lengyel Completed and merged. >> * Mem_access for ARM (good) >>v15 posted >> - Tamas K Lengyel Completed and merged. Cheers, Tamas ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-dev

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (four months reminder)

>>> On 5/13/2015 at 01:01 PM, in message , wrote: > (Note, please trim your quotes when replying, and also trim the CC list if > necessary. You might also consider changing the subject line of your reply > to > "Status of (Was: Xen 4.6 Development Update (X months reminder)") > > Hi all

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (four months reminder)

Hi Wei, > > * Improve RTDS scheduler (none) >Change RTDS from quantum driven to event driven The improvement of the RTDS scheduler also includes supporting the functionality of setting and getting per-vcpu parameters. Chong Li has posted the first version of patch at http://lists.xenproject

[Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (four months reminder)

(Note, please trim your quotes when replying, and also trim the CC list if necessary. You might also consider changing the subject line of your reply to "Status of (Was: Xen 4.6 Development Update (X months reminder)") Hi all We are now four months into 4.6 development window. This is an email t

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

Thank you, Wei. On 5/5/2015 5:12 PM, Wei Liu wrote: On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 08:51:56PM +0800, Yu, Zhang wrote: Hi Wei, Thanks for your reply. On 5/4/2015 5:44 PM, Wei Liu wrote: (Thanks for trimming the CC list before hand) On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 02:05:49PM +0800, Yu, Zhang wrote: Hi Wei,

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 08:51:56PM +0800, Yu, Zhang wrote: > Hi Wei, > > Thanks for your reply. > > On 5/4/2015 5:44 PM, Wei Liu wrote: > >(Thanks for trimming the CC list before hand) > > > >On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 02:05:49PM +0800, Yu, Zhang wrote: > >>Hi Wei, > >> > > > >Hello. > > > >> This

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

Hi Wei, Thanks for your reply. On 5/4/2015 5:44 PM, Wei Liu wrote: (Thanks for trimming the CC list before hand) On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 02:05:49PM +0800, Yu, Zhang wrote: Hi Wei, Hello. This is Zhang Yu from Intel graphic virtualization team. Previously in Xen hackathon, Paul and I m

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

Hi Fabio Discussion on a particular bug should be in a separate thread. This thread is mainly for Xen 4.6 release. Wei. ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

(Thanks for trimming the CC list before hand) On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 02:05:49PM +0800, Yu, Zhang wrote: > Hi Wei, > Hello. > This is Zhang Yu from Intel graphic virtualization team. Previously in Xen > hackathon, Paul and I mentioned that there're several patch series for XenGT > that need t

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

Hi Wei, This is Zhang Yu from Intel graphic virtualization team. Previously in Xen hackathon, Paul and I mentioned that there're several patch series for XenGT that need to be tracked on Xen 4.6. Here, I'd like to confirm with you about these patchsets: 1> 16-byte MMIO emulation fix – ow

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

Fabio Fantoni wrote: > 2015-04-30 18:55 GMT+02:00 Jim Fehlig >: > > Fabio Fantoni wrote: > > Il 29/04/2015 18:39, Jim Fehlig ha scritto: > > linux-tyb8:~/ # dmesg | grep -i qxl > [4.901158] [drm] qxl: 16M of VRAM memory size > [4.901159] [drm] q

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-04-30 18:55 GMT+02:00 Jim Fehlig : > Fabio Fantoni wrote: > > Il 29/04/2015 18:39, Jim Fehlig ha scritto: > >> dom0 and domU are both SLES12. Xen is fairly recent xen-unstable plus a > >> few libxl patches. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Jim > >> > > > > But the domU was without qxl driver installe

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

Fabio Fantoni wrote: > Il 29/04/2015 18:39, Jim Fehlig ha scritto: >> dom0 and domU are both SLES12. Xen is fairly recent xen-unstable plus a >> few libxl patches. >> >> Regards, >> Jim >> > > But the domU was without qxl driver installed? No, it was installed: linux-tyb8:~/ # dmesg | grep -i qx

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

Il 29/04/2015 18:39, Jim Fehlig ha scritto: Fabio Fantoni wrote: Il 29/04/2015 02:21, Andrew Cooper ha scritto: On 28/04/15 23:17, Jim Fehlig wrote: Jim Fehlig wrote: wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: Hi all We are now three months into 4.6 development window. This is an email to keep track of all

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

Fabio Fantoni wrote: > Il 29/04/2015 02:21, Andrew Cooper ha scritto: >> On 28/04/15 23:17, Jim Fehlig wrote: >>> Jim Fehlig wrote: wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > Hi all > > We are now three months into 4.6 development window. This is an > email to keep > track of all the pat

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

Il 29/04/2015 12:23, Fabio Fantoni ha scritto: Il 29/04/2015 02:21, Andrew Cooper ha scritto: On 28/04/15 23:17, Jim Fehlig wrote: Jim Fehlig wrote: wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: Hi all We are now three months into 4.6 development window. This is an email to keep track of all the patch series

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

Il 29/04/2015 02:21, Andrew Cooper ha scritto: On 28/04/15 23:17, Jim Fehlig wrote: Jim Fehlig wrote: wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: Hi all We are now three months into 4.6 development window. This is an email to keep track of all the patch series I gathered. It is by no means complete and / or

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

On 28/04/15 23:17, Jim Fehlig wrote: Jim Fehlig wrote: wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: Hi all We are now three months into 4.6 development window. This is an email to keep track of all the patch series I gathered. It is by no means complete and / or acurate. Feel free to reply this email with n

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

Jim Fehlig wrote: > wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> We are now three months into 4.6 development window. This is an email to keep >> track of all the patch series I gathered. It is by no means complete and / or >> acurate. Feel free to reply this email with new projects or correct m

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > Hi all > > We are now three months into 4.6 development window. This is an email to keep > track of all the patch series I gathered. It is by no means complete and / or > acurate. Feel free to reply this email with new projects or correct my > misunderstanding. > [.

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

> On 15 Apr 2015, at 10:18, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >> Should we also ask people to trim the CC list to just those interested >> in the quoted stuff? Or do people think that erring on the side of not >> trimming too many people? >> >> People might also to consider changing the subject, e.g. "Stat

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

>>> On 15.04.15 at 11:11, wrote: > On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 14:52 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 02:48:06PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: >> > >>> On 14.04.15 at 15:35, wrote: >> > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:27 PM, wrote: >> > >> > Tamas (and others not doing so) - please trim your

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 14:52 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 02:48:06PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > > >>> On 14.04.15 at 15:35, wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:27 PM, wrote: > > > > Tamas (and others not doing so) - please trim your quotes in replies. > > > > Wei - could

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 11:37 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:34:45PM +0300, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: > > On 04/14/2015 01:27 PM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > > > * VM event patches (none) > > >Add support for XSETBV vm_events, > > >Support hybernating guests > > >Suppor

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

>>> On 4/14/2015 at 09:33 PM, in message <552d1718.8060...@eu.citrix.com>, >>> George Dunlap wrote: > On 04/14/2015 11:27 AM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > > == Hypervisor == > > > > * Alternate p2m: support multiple copies of host p2m (ok) > > - Ed White > > > > * Improve RTDS sc

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 02:33:23PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 02:28:29PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > > On 14/04/15 11:27, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > > > === Hypervisor X86 === > > > > > > * VT-d Posted-interrupt (PI) (none) > > > - Wu, Feng > > > > V1 posted > > > >

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

> * Regression in PCI passthrough of INTx legacy devices can trigger list > corruption (good) >Sander reported it. Two different types of patches available. > - Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Done. ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

From: Ian Campbell Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 7:56 PM To: Julien Grall Cc: Jaggi, Manish; xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder) On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 13:34 +0100, Julien Grall wrote

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 13:34 +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Manish, > > On 14/04/15 13:25, Jaggi, Manish wrote: > > * ARM PCI passthrough (none) > > - Manish Jaggi > > - Vijay Kilari > > [manish] I have started pushing the patches > > Finding the "[manish]" in the mail was like finding a

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

On 04/14/2015 06:27 AM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: * Display IO topology when PXM data is available (good) v3 posted - Boris Ostrovsky I should have v7 in the next day or so. * VPMU - 'perf' support in Xen (good) v14 posted Need reviews/final ack. - Boris Ostrovsky Ne

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-04-14 9:33 GMT-04:00 George Dunlap : > On 04/14/2015 11:27 AM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > > == Hypervisor == > > > > * Alternate p2m: support multiple copies of host p2m (ok) > > - Ed White > > > > * Improve RTDS scheduler (none) > > - Dagaen Golomb, Meng Xu > > This is a little vag

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 02:48:06PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 14.04.15 at 15:35, wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:27 PM, wrote: > > Tamas (and others not doing so) - please trim your quotes in replies. > > Wei - could you add a sentence saying so near the top of future mails > you

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 02:28:29PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 14/04/15 11:27, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > > === Hypervisor X86 === > > > > * VT-d Posted-interrupt (PI) (none) > > - Wu, Feng > > V1 posted > > > * Intel PML (Page Modification Logging) for Xen (none) > >design doc p

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

On 14/04/15 11:27, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > === Hypervisor X86 === > > * VT-d Posted-interrupt (PI) (none) > - Wu, Feng V1 posted > * Intel PML (Page Modification Logging) for Xen (none) >design doc posted > - Kai Huang V1 posted (good) > > * PVH - AMD hardware support. (fair)

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

>>> On 14.04.15 at 15:35, wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:27 PM, wrote: Tamas (and others not doing so) - please trim your quotes in replies. Wei - could you add a sentence saying so near the top of future mails you send in this regard? Jan ___

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:27 PM, wrote: > Hi all > > We are now three months into 4.6 development window. This is an email to > keep > track of all the patch series I gathered. It is by no means complete and / > or > acurate. Feel free to reply this email with new projects or correct my > misund

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

On 04/14/2015 11:27 AM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > == Hypervisor == > > * Alternate p2m: support multiple copies of host p2m (ok) > - Ed White > > * Improve RTDS scheduler (none) > - Dagaen Golomb, Meng Xu This is a little vague... exactly what kinds of improvements are envisioned her

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

Hi Manish, On 14/04/15 13:25, Jaggi, Manish wrote: > * ARM PCI passthrough (none) > - Manish Jaggi > - Vijay Kilari > [manish] I have started pushing the patches Finding the "[manish]" in the mail was like finding a needle in a haystack. And I knew that you were using this tag... Please

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

; ard.biesheu...@linaro.org; quan...@intel.com; oleksandr.tyshche...@globallogic.com Subject: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder) Hi all We are now three months into 4.6 development window. This is an email to keep track of all the patch series I gathered. It is by no

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:34:45PM +0300, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: > On 04/14/2015 01:27 PM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > > * VM event patches (none) > >Add support for XSETBV vm_events, > >Support hybernating guests > >Support for VMCALL-based vm_events > > - Razvan Cojocaru > > The

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

On 04/14/2015 01:27 PM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > * VM event patches (none) >Add support for XSETBV vm_events, >Support hybernating guests >Support for VMCALL-based vm_events > - Razvan Cojocaru These depend on Tamas' Clean-up of mem-event subsystem series (which hasn't been app

[Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

Hi all We are now three months into 4.6 development window. This is an email to keep track of all the patch series I gathered. It is by no means complete and / or acurate. Feel free to reply this email with new projects or correct my misunderstanding. = Timeline = We are planning on a 9-month re

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

On Monday 16 March 2015 18:18:22 Razvan Cojocaru wrote: > On 03/16/2015 06:00 PM, Lars Kurth wrote: > > > >> On 16 Mar 2015, at 13:01, Mihai Donțu wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:21:56 + wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > >>> We are now two months into 4.6 development window. This is an ema

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

On 03/16/2015 06:00 PM, Lars Kurth wrote: > >> On 16 Mar 2015, at 13:01, Mihai Donțu wrote: >> >> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:21:56 + wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: >>> We are now two months into 4.6 development window. This is an email to keep >>> track of all the patch series I gathered. It is by no

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

> On 16 Mar 2015, at 13:01, Mihai Donțu wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:21:56 + wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: >> We are now two months into 4.6 development window. This is an email to keep >> track of all the patch series I gathered. It is by no means complete and / or >> acurate. Feel free t

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

> On 16 Mar 2015, at 10:43, Wei Liu wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 10:32:41AM +, Ian Campbell wrote: >> >> Wei, perhaps one or more of these could be applied: >> * raise the bar for inclusion in the list for external projects to >>be only the very largest most important ite

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:21:56 + wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > We are now two months into 4.6 development window. This is an email to keep > track of all the patch series I gathered. It is by no means complete and / or > acurate. Feel free to reply this email with new projects or correct my > misu

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 10:32:41AM +, Ian Campbell wrote: > (culling the cc list a lot) > > On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 11:54 +, Jan Beulich wrote: > > >>> On 12.03.15 at 11:21, wrote: > > > == Linux == > > > > Wouldn't it make sense to move external projects down, and have > > our core pieces

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 06:05:15PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 13/03/15 18:02, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > >> * vsyscall in Linux (fair) > >> - Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > > Not done. Still in 'git stash'. > > > >> * Convert tasklet to per-cpu tasklets (fair) > >>RFC posted > >> - K

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

On 13/03/15 18:02, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >> * vsyscall in Linux (fair) >> - Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > Not done. Still in 'git stash'. > >> * Convert tasklet to per-cpu tasklets (fair) >>RFC posted >> - Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > Pff.. I've the patches but would need to post them and >

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 11:54:15AM +, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 12.03.15 at 11:21, wrote: > > == Linux == > > Wouldn't it make sense to move external projects down, and have > our core pieces (hypervisor, tool stack, maybe qemu) be near the > top? > > > * Convert tasklet to per-cpu taskle

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

> * vsyscall in Linux (fair) > - Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Not done. Still in 'git stash'. > * Convert tasklet to per-cpu tasklets (fair) >RFC posted > - Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Pff.. I've the patches but would need to post them and redo them. Too busy right now. Might as well move them t

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

> == Hypervisor == > > * Alternate p2m: support multiple copies of host p2m (ok) > - Ed White > I'm hoping to see some progress on getting this restarted in the next 2 or 3 weeks, with additional Intel resources. Ed ___ Xen-devel mailing list X

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

(culling the cc list a lot) On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 11:54 +, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 12.03.15 at 11:21, wrote: > > == Linux == > > Wouldn't it make sense to move external projects down, and have > our core pieces (hypervisor, tool stack, maybe qemu) be near the > top? When I originally st

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

> * Intel memory bandwidth monitoring for VMs (fair) >v9 posted > - Chao Peng > Wei, this one is already merged. Thanks, Chao ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

On Thu, Mar 12, Daniel Kiper wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:21:56AM +, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > > * Rearrange and cleanup installation destination directories (/var -> > > var/lib/xen) (fair) > > - Daniel Kiper > If Olaf did all work then we can remove this one. What does this m

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

On Thu, Mar 12, Daniel Kiper wrote: > IIRC, 4.3 release (and probably earlier ones) was a mess. Olaf did the > work for 4.5. However, as he pointed out in another email last one is > incorrect. Olaf, are you going to fix it for 4.6? I suppose it is > quite simple. There are still many hardcoded

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

>>> On 3/12/2015 at 06:21 PM, in message , wrote: > Hi all > > We are now two months into 4.6 development window. This is an email to keep > track of all the patch series I gathered. It is by no means complete and / > or > acurate. Feel free to reply this email with new projects or corre

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

2015-03-12 11:39 GMT-04:00 Dario Faggioli : > > On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 15:07 +, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 10:21 +, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > > > > > * Repurpose SEDF Scheduler for Real-time (fair) > > >RFC patch posted (v2) > > > - Joshua Whitehead, Robert VanV

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:21:56AM +, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: [...] > == GRUB2 == > > * GRUB2 multiboot2 (fair) > - Daniel Kiper RFC patches were posted (see: http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-01/msg03982.html). Weeding out bugs found during testing. I am going to pos

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

>-Original Message- >From: wei.l...@citrix.com [mailto:wei.l...@citrix.com] > >* extending mem_access support to PV domain (fair) > RFC v2 > - Aravindh Puthiyaparambil (aravindp) We did some internal reprioritizing and decided to focus on HVM and PVH domains. This can be placed in de

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 03:07:33PM +, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 10:21 +, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: [...] > > * Rearrange and cleanup installation destination directories (/var -> > > var/lib/xen) (fair) > > - Daniel Kiper > > What is this? I've never heard about it

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

All, I expect to have a patch out soon for the RTDS scheduler improvement. Regards, Dagaen Golomb On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Olaf Hering wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > dist/install/var/xen/dump > > which all seems proper and correct to me. > > Except the last

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 15:07 +, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 10:21 +, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > > > * Repurpose SEDF Scheduler for Real-time (fair) > >RFC patch posted (v2) > > - Joshua Whitehead, Robert VanVossen > > This was superceded by the RTDS stuff, wasn't

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

On Thu, Mar 12, Ian Campbell wrote: > dist/install/var/xen/dump > which all seems proper and correct to me. Except the last one, which should be /var/lib/xen/dump or whatever dumpdir the OS/FHS provides. Olaf ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-dev

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

>On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 15:07 +, Ian Campbell wrote: >> On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 10:21 +, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: >> > > * Repurpose SEDF Scheduler for Real-time (fair) >> >RFC patch posted (v2) >> > - Joshua Whitehead, Robert VanVossen >> >> This was superceded by the RTDS stuff,

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 10:21 +, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > * Repurpose SEDF Scheduler for Real-time (fair) >RFC patch posted (v2) > - Joshua Whitehead, Robert VanVossen This was superceded by the RTDS stuff, wasn't it? > === Hypervisor ARM === > > * Add support for Xilinx ZynqMP

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

On 3/12/2015 6:54 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: * amd_ucode cleanups, verify patch size(enhancement) (mostly in master except one patch) Which one? This is in reference to the patches to microcode_amd and it's all 'done' in 4.5 itself. I think when we were tracking this, commit 8b24b07e was not in

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

> > * Clean-up of mem-event subsystem (good) >v5 posted > - Tamas K Lengyel > v7 will be posted today, status is good. > === Hypervisor ARM === > I've posted v13 of the mem_access for ARM series that should be added to this tracker. Status should be good. Thanks, Tamas

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

>>> On 12.03.15 at 11:21, wrote: > == Linux == Wouldn't it make sense to move external projects down, and have our core pieces (hypervisor, tool stack, maybe qemu) be near the top? > * Convert tasklet to per-cpu tasklets (fair) >RFC posted > - Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Is this still a valid

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (two months reminder)

On 03/12/2015 11:34 AM, Fabio Fantoni wrote: > Il 12/03/2015 11:54, George Dunlap ha scritto: >> On 03/12/2015 10:21 AM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: >> >>> * Credit2: introduce per-vcpu hard and soft affinity (fair) >>>- Justin T. Weaver >> The most recent patches looked pretty good -- I'd be

  1   2   >