Sorry, if I oofended You, I didn't mean to do that.
Also, I have to admit, I have not yet took a look to the newest version,
I'm happy, with my older build, but I saw the lots of letters about the
topic, and I started to have enough, and had to say something...
On the other hand, if nobody does a s
Je Ĵaŭdo 15 Junio 2006 11:56, Gergely Gábor skribis:
> And maybe the gentleman, who contributed the riot bomb, should
> consider re-licenceing his work in GPL, to help the development of
> wormux, not to halt it, with useless conversation.
I contributed the riot bomb under the GPL licence (or whate
Gergely Gábor wrote:
> I unfortnately don't know c++, but in c i know how would I do it.
> weapoms wold be .so files, and I'd use dlopen to acess them. all in
> subdirs, and their other data wold be there. At startup, I'd load them.
> But once I've rad, that dynamic linking is problematic/tricky in
I think this wold be problematic, and integraitoninto some distros (like
Fedora, or Debin) would be problematic, because of licensing problems.
and this wold lead to the need to use two different data packages, dhich
wold not be very comfortable for packagesrs, but would be the only way.
Anyway, pa
Matthieu Fertré a écrit :
All the data we want to use are "free" (as in freedom) but are not
equally licensed. Currently, we have only GPL data. But we should add
Creative Commons data, which is free data. But so, what is the license
of a package which include data under GPL and data under Cre
Feth AREZKI a écrit :
Le Mercredi 14 Juin 2006 17:20, Matthieu Fertré a écrit :
Feth AREZKI a écrit :
It's not for maps but for sound samples !! Sure it is overkill for maps,
but what about sound samples. Of course, we can make 2 different data
package:
-wormux_data_GPL
-wormux_data_CC
But i
Cet été, c'est sur, j'aurais enfin réussi à convaincre mon beauf de me
jouer un petit air de guitare ou de piano. Attendez cet été...
yeKcim
PS : S'il le faut, je reprends ma guitare (j'ai 6 semaines de vacances cet
été, ca me laisseras du temps pour réapprendre (il parait de toute facon
que ca s
On 6/15/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Et si pour clore le sujet je vous disais simplement que je vais essayé dem'occuper des sons cet été, que je les ferais moi meme sous gpl, ca résoud
pas le probleme ?C'est sur, mais je pensais aussi aux musiques de fond-- Zi olive---
_
Et si pour clore le sujet je vous disais simplement que je vais essayé de
m'occuper des sons cet été, que je les ferais moi meme sous gpl, ca résoud
pas le probleme ?
yeKcim
On Jeu 15 juin 2006 08:14, olivier boyer wrote:
> On 6/13/06, Feth AREZKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> Le Mardi 13 J
On 6/13/06, Feth AREZKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le Mardi 13 Juin 2006 14:07, Victor STINNER a écrit :> > It would be annoying for distro integration :'(>> Don't know about that.I guess, making one tarball for the program and several others dedicated to
maps (at least one for GPL compatible, one
Le Mercredi 14 Juin 2006 17:20, Matthieu Fertré a écrit :
> Feth AREZKI a écrit :
>
> It's not for maps but for sound samples !! Sure it is overkill for maps,
> but what about sound samples. Of course, we can make 2 different data
> package:
> -wormux_data_GPL
> -wormux_data_CC
> But it's horrible
Feth AREZKI a écrit :
Le Mardi 13 Juin 2006 14:07, Victor STINNER a écrit :
It would be annoying for distro integration :'(
Don't know about that.
I guess, making one tarball for the program and several others dedicated to
maps (at least one for GPL compatible, one for doubtf
Le Mardi 13 Juin 2006 14:07, Victor STINNER a écrit :
> > It would be annoying for distro integration :'(
>
> Don't know about that.
I guess, making one tarball for the program and several others dedicated to
maps (at least one for GPL compatible, one for doubtful) would sort the
problem out, b
Hi,
>>> http://freesound.iua.upf.edu/samplesViewSingle.php?id=16741
> It should be ok BUT Wormux is not in GPL anymore if you do that!
> Wormux sources are GPL
> Wormux data are GPL+CC Sampling
License problem is a stupid things. License of the sound is like the GPL:
http://creativecommons.org
Hi!
The patch is commited on the svn repository.
I sent the sound as well on the repository, not sure for the licencing, as it
is in Creative Common License.
Wouldn't it be good if we just precise in the authors.xml file the particular
license for this file ?
It should be ok BUT Wormux is
Hi!
The patch is commited on the svn repository.
I sent the sound as well on the repository, not sure for the licencing, as it
is in Creative Common License.
Wouldn't it be good if we just precise in the authors.xml file the particular
license for this file ?
Lodesi
Le Lundi 12 Juin 2006 20:20,
16 matches
Mail list logo
