[Wormux-dev] Cluster bomb fix

2008-02-09 Par sujet RCL
Hello, sorry for spamming the list again, but since I have no svn commit access (my bad... got lost with multiple ssh keys), that's the only way to commit patches for me for now :) Here's a small patch that makes cluster bomb useful. For me, everything it did before is slightly larger "bang", wit

Re: [Wormux-dev] Strange initialization in RandomSync

2008-02-09 Par sujet RCL
On Feb 9, 2008 7:09 PM, Sandra et Yannig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le Saturday 09 February 2008 13:13:00 Kurosu, vous avez écrit : > > Hi, > > > > in RandomSync::Init(), a first seed is set, then if the computer is a > > server, another one is generated and sent to the clients. > > > > Network

Re: [Wormux-dev] Strange initialization in RandomSync

2008-02-09 Par sujet Sandra et Yannig
Le Saturday 09 February 2008 13:13:00 Kurosu, vous avez écrit : > Hi, > > in RandomSync::Init(), a first seed is set, then if the computer is a > server, another one is generated and sent to the clients. > > Network works, so there's probably more to it than just this. Could some > senior (or knowl

Re: [Wormux-dev] Precaching

2008-02-09 Par sujet Kurosu
This commit broke wormux, causing it to segfault every time here. The cause is a combination of my rewriting RCL's original version and the fact that some samples don't have a file. It seems to be fine with SDL functions to use NULL samples, though. Fixed by r4033. yeKcim a écrit : > Done. > > A

[Wormux-dev] Strange initialization in RandomSync

2008-02-09 Par sujet Kurosu
Hi, in RandomSync::Init(), a first seed is set, then if the computer is a server, another one is generated and sent to the clients. Network works, so there's probably more to it than just this. Could some senior (or knowledgeable) wormux developper explain me why (and possibly add a comment in th