have tried with and without CDATA tags, but can't get the behavior I want
regardless of what I do!
http://schemas.microsoft.com/wix/2006/wi";>
...
...
Installed AND NOT
UPGRADINGPRODUCTCODE AND
(ARPINSTALLLOCATION >< $(var.ProductName))
...
The installation works beautif
Unless I'm totally off base, the line provided does persist
ARPINSTALLLOCATION in the unistall environment (it's being explicitly set
after CostFinalize regardless of whether this is an initial installation,
repair, an update, or a removal.) Am I mistaken?
As for CUSTOMDIR, I didn't provide thos
proceed. If I go back to
the SetupType dialog, it's fine, it's always just the first time in a
particular installation session, almost like it's having to go away and
determine something.
Any ideas anyone?
Thanks,
Mark.
---
proceed. If I go back to
the SetupType dialog, it's fine, it's always just the first time in a
particular installation session, almost like it's having to go away and
determine something.
Any ideas anyone?
Thanks,
Mark.
---
Bob Arnson wrote:
> Mark Parker wrote:
>> Yes, WiX v3.0.5217.
>>
>
> Use the RTM version of WiX: 3.0.5419.0.
>
Just tried again with 3.0.5419.0, with no change in the results. Any
other suggestions?
--
out, it builds fine (but doesn't register
the snapin, of course), and if I leave the AssemblyApplication attribute
out, I get an error about strong names (which is expected, it's not
strong-named, but I don't want it to go in the GAC)
Simon Dahlbacka wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:37 PM, Mark wrote:
>
>> I'm (still) trying to install a SnapIn using WiX and PSExtension. I'm
>> (still) getting the same error, however, which doesn't make any sense to
>> me, and I believe it'
Or will Penn press on with final preparations for the total destruction
of Convention Hall? The task force has released two draft documents:
Historic Preservation Task Force Analysis and Recommendations (pdf) and
Preservation Practices in Comparable Cities (pdf).
Since its opening in 1930, Con
l?id=1009886>
http://www.sybase.com/detail?id=1009886 (method 2)
Thanks,
Mark
(re-posted using the proper sender)
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http:/
Thanks. It looks like their DNS server is down.
Cheers!
.Mark
-Original Message-
From: Philippe Gorley [mailto:gorley.phili...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 1:23 PM
To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Does anyone know why the website is down
And/or when it will be back up?
--
Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more!
Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies
and advance your career. Get an incredib
Ok, this one is particularly annoying.
I have 3 configurations for my solution - Debug, UAT, and Release.
Debug compiles fine and I suspect Release will too. However, UAT, which is
Debug with different endpoints, etc., does not compile. The problem is that the
WIX projects are all set to Debug/
I'm not sure why, but I had to unload the installer projects and explicitly add
the build configurations I needed.
Cheers!
.Mark
-Original Message-
From: Mark Risen [mailto:mri...@realtyim.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 3:18 PM
To: 'wix-users@lists.sourceforge.ne
I remember using this feature from the past. I would have an .msi that is
version 1 and another being version 2. I install version 1 on my machine and
then I am able to right click the version 2 .msi and select "uninstall" and
have it succeed.
Does anyone know how to do this? It's quite conveni
ll need to find out how to
update that within TFS.
Cheers!
.Mark
-Original Message-
From: Blair Murri [mailto:os...@live.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 10:43 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Uninstall previous version with n
Using the following command 'msiexec /i SampleUpgrade.msi REINSTALL=ALL
REINSTALLMODE=vomus' for minor upgrade causes the following rule not to be
obeyed
FILEEXISTS
Is there any way I can do the minor upgrade and have this condition to be
respected so that my services does not get
If you download an msi file and choose to run the file (rather than save it),
Internet Explorer will add a number to the filename in brackets (such as[1] or
[2] etc...). Windows Installer saves this filename in the registry and expects
the same filename if you run an upgrade/repair or uninstall
If you download an msi file and choose to run the file (rather than save it),
Internet Explorer will add a number to the filename in brackets (such as[1] or
[2] etc...). Windows Installer saves this filename in the registry and expects
the same filename if you run an upgrade/repair or uninstall
would mean I'm
including it in my installer twice. I'd like to avoid that.
Thanks,
Mark Tempel
Sr. Software Engineer
Shavlik Technologies LLC.
--
What You Don't Know About Data Connectivity CAN Hurt You
This
How do I detect uninstall or minor upgrade or first time install. I looked at
the values in the table in the following article
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/320921/how-to-add-a-wix-custom-action-that-happens-only-on-uninstall-via-msi
and I don't think they are correct! Are they? Why do I n
ve to live for the product).
I was hoping someone here know how to get this file out of the cab and into
a temp directory from a custom action.
Thanks for the suggestion though.
--mark
Mark Tempel
Sr Software Engineer
Shavlik Technologies LLC.
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Wilson, Phil wrote:
&g
Hello,
Can anyone suggest what is the best way of get WIX to install a MOF
file for a WMI provider that we’re developing? Currently it looks like
we'll need a custom action to call mofcomp but that seems a bit icky if
there is a better way.
Thanks,
ill
only offered VS 2005 integration.
I haven't worked with Windows Server 2008 much and I haven't
seen this installer error before. Is this a Wix compatibility issue or an OS
issue?
Thanks
Mark
t in there.
I know this is an ignorant question, but what's the relation between
Tallow and light?
Thanks
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Rob Mensching [mailto:r...@robmensching.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2011 1:03 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML tools
s are (unavailable). I'm not
prompted for upgrade nor does VS appear to do them.
It 2.0 => 3.5 just too big a jump for automated upgrade?
Thanks
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Rob Mensching [mailto:r...@robmensching.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2011 1:03 PM
To: General discussio
"1" off, it says it's required.
Warnings are better than errors, but I'm trying to understand what's driving
them.
Thanks
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Pally Sandher [mailto:pally.sand...@iesve.com]
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 7:00 AM
To: General discussion f
n* the msi are instead peer
directories to it in MyProduct\bin\Release\.
Seems like there's some 2.0/3.5 incompatibility speed bump I haven't
internalized yet...
Any tips?
Thanks
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Mark Modrall [mailto:mmodr...@mzinga.com]
Sent: Monday, Jul
sion and the root Directory Id="TARGETDIR" instead of
INSTALLDIR.
I've found some 3.5 sample projects, and the biggest difference I can
see is a lot more use of DirectoryRef and ComponentRef in .
Does anyone see if I'm doing something obviously wrong in a 3.5 sen
to the machine.
To run things that need more serious access, I take it I should have an
attribute Impersonate="no"?
Thanks
mark
-Original Message-
From: Bob Arnson [mailto:b...@joyofsetup.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 10:33 AM
To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re
ode is done, it sets that registry flag to show
it's been done. As I said a lot that stuff just used to slide by in Windows
Server 2003 when running as an administrator...
Thanks
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Bob Arnson [mailto:b...@joyofsetup.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 11
ing devenv.exe on the
command line instead?
Thanks
Mark
Compile:
C:\Program Files (x86)\Windows Installer XML v3.5\bin\candle.exe
-d"DevEnvDir=*Undefined if not building from within Visual Studio*"
-dSolutionDir=C:\svn\trunk\Installation\Wix\ -dSolutionExt=.sln
-dSolutionFileName=Al
result the outputs are not the same.
It does work if I use devenv.exe from the command line so I guess I'll stick
with that...
Thanks
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Tobias S [mailto:tobias.s1...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 11:37 AM
To: General discussion for Windows Instal
that extra directory declaration? Obviously there's
something I'm missing.
Thanks
Mark
Included in
http://www.prospero.com"; InstallerVe
;t help on Windows 32.
Thanks,
Mark.
--
uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model
configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and
the tools developers use with it.
Surely that only sets the variable at compile time?
Mark.
--
On 10/08/2011 08:17, maksim.vazhe...@emc.com wrote:
> You can simply use [SystemFolder] for 32-bit package and [System64Folder] for
> 64-bit package.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Id="
he box or
something?
Thanks
Mark
--
Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system,
user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take
the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and t
Am I doing something obviously wrong?
Thanks
mark
--
uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model
configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and
all system
services.
I'm an admin on the box so the latter portion of the message doesn't seem to
apply, but it didn't seem to like either of the alternatives...
Thanks
mark
-Original Message-
From: Michael Osmond [mailto:mosm...@baytech.com.au]
Sent: Monday, August 22,
ing Wix 3.5.
So now I can tell the people who want this fixed that they'll need to take the
newer Wix and I can stop pestering people here for debugging help on the Dead
Sea Scrolls :)
Thanks
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Mark Modrall [mailto:mmodr...@mzinga.com]
Sent: Tuesday, Au
ke things should be okay, so what am I missing?
Thanks
Mark
--
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraud
ask whether the wixproj's remembered enough
state to make a good differentiation between build and rebuild?
Just asking because our Wix project is taking 20 minutes to run rebuild and if
it could take a good stab as build it might reduce the build
rs.
I mean, it *looks* like PTCoreModule is declaring the same language and version
as all the Dependencies, but the errors are coming anyway.
That's what i don't get...
Thanks
Mark
From: Rob Mensching [r...@robmensching.com]
Sent: Saturday, Sept
Thanks Bob and Ed...
Actually installing the msi on a machine, I see that the merge module did, in
fact, get into the package. It's there post install and nothing would run
without it.
That's among the things that puzzles me about the warning.
T
etting the warning.
Thanks
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Bob Arnson [mailto:b...@joyofsetup.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2011 3:21 PM
To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Dependency warnings I don't quite get...
On 24-Sep-11 15:06, Mark Modrall wrote:
Thanks Bill...
I just checked the man page for the Dependency element
(http://wix.sourceforge.net/manual-wix3/wix_xsd_dependency.htm) and I don't see
a GUID attribute on the node. Is it just missing from the documentation?
Mark
-Original Message-
From: bpackard [mailto:bill
D'oh... The html encoding of your example threw me... I get it now. Guid
goes *in* the RequiredId...
Thanks
mark
-Original Message-
From: bpackard [mailto:bill.pack...@kepware.com]
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 9:45 AM
To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [WiX-
Thanks Bill, adding the guide to the dependency id seems to have done the trick!
Mark
-Original Message-
From: bpackard [mailto:bill.pack...@kepware.com]
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 9:45 AM
To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Dependency warnings I don&#
n was FDR's last Fireside chat?"
shouldn't be "Depends... what day is it today?"
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Painter [mailto:chr...@iswix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 10:59 AM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.; General dis
ny guesses why some directories would seem to work and others not?
Seems like I should just live with the warnings until I figure out how to do it
right...
Thanks
mark
--
All the data continuously generated in your I
I re-read some of the posts I found on Google, and in them they say to move the
custom action to "before CostFinalize" where I had before CostInitialize.
I made the change, and it worked. Not clear why it seemed to work partially
when done before CostInitialize, though.
T
our little utility
using WMI instead of running it manually on the spot.
So again, anyone have any clue why running the msi locally with TARGETDIR set
in a custom action would result in the directories being placed in the wrong
spots? And why running the same msi through WMI would put them in t
Thanks for the response... I tried replacing my type 51 with
After CostFinalize, but now I get an error "The folder path '?' contains an
invalid character" when I run the installer locally.
Not sure where the ? is coming from...
Mark
-Original Message--
Nope... The actual path is just as vanilla as the example below. Straight
7-bit ascii...
Thanks
mark
-Original Message-
From: Peter Shirtcliffe [mailto:pshirtcli...@sdl.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 10:24 AM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject
aling with ICE48 warning
Could it be the file's encoding ? Declared as UTF-8 but written in something
else maybe ?
-Original Message-----
From: Mark Modrall [mailto:mmodr...@mzinga.com]
Sent: 04 October 2011 15:17
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re:
51 approach Before
CostFinalize, now some saying type 35 after.
I'm wondering if just avoiding the specific case of TARGETDIR would push one
way or the other?
Thanks
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Peter Shirtcliffe [mailto:pshirtcli...@sdl.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 11:
tFinalize appeared to do the
trick. Things got installed where I expected when running the msi locally.
Thanks
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Peter Shirtcliffe [mailto:pshirtcli...@sdl.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 12:10 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Su
e else.
A lot of the binary modules had a inside the
module's , so all those INSTALLDIRs are
differentiated by the guid...
Thanks
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Peter Shirtcliffe [mailto:pshirtcli...@sdl.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 4:38 AM
To: General discussion for Wi
this package will not install on
the W2K8 server?
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Mark Capaldi
--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
contains a definitive record of customers, application
X or in the underlying Windows
Installer?
The way it is we don't feel that customers would know how to use the UI
unless we spelled it out for them in help text, and we obviously are not
anxious to do that either. I'd appreciate any feedback anyone might
have. Thank you!
Mark
In short: when I install my newer msi package over an older existing install,
the old files are deleted but are not replaced with their newer versions. I
end up with all "overlapping files" gone, and only newly-added files remain.
For example:
Old WXS:
New WXS:
advice on if/when/how I should transition to a
single-File-per-Component strategy?
Thanks, Mark.
From: Blair
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Sent: Mon, February 22, 2010 6:30:28 PM
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] missing install files
The
icy_9_0_Microsoft_VC90_CRT_x86.msm'. This action is
likely colliding with an action in the database that is being created.
The colliding action may have been authored in the database or merged in
from another merge module. If this is a standard action, it is likely
co
must use a custom
account created by the installer.
Any thoughts?
Thanks!
Mark.
--
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune ap
Windows XP and
Windows 7 just fine.
Thanks,
Mark.
--
On 28/03/2010 14:23, Mark Simonetti wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm getting an error 1923 when trying to install a service. It works
> fine if a use the "NT AUTHORITY/NETWORK SERVICE" username, but I'm
> trying to use
s manager) and 3.5.1602 (the most recent
build).
Can anyone offer any help?
--
Mark Sironi
--
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tun
ayers of recursive MSBuild calls somewhere.
--
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Sironi, Mark
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 4:15 PM
To: 'wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net'
Subjec
Manager, but none of the methods I found with Google appeared to
work. None of the supposed pre-defined variables existed, and I couldn't put a
group in a 2.0 wix project. Are there any preprocessor
variables in 2.0 that will tell you what configuration you&#x
I noticed that it's legal to have and as a
child of any of the sequences... Can you put InstallFiles and InstallFinalize
in one sequence (say the AdminExecuteSequence) and run InstallUtil from
another? And which order do the Sequences get run in?
Thanks
Mark
-Original Me
Another thing I just noticed... In Wix 2.0, doesn't seem to work
on env variables...
I have things like
When I ran the Wix project when $(env.TheBuildFolder) was defined, it still
went to the else...
Is there a way to really test for env variable definitions?
Thanks
(both .net and unmanaged). Their unmanaged dll didn't depend on
msvcr71 (though I forget which rev the x64 build was on).
Same thing with the Oracle drivers (and the .Net wrapper).
Thanks
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Wilson, Phil [mailto:phil.wil...@invensys.com]
Sent: Tuesday, Apri
Hi all,
First time caller, long time listener.
I am migrating a merge module from Wix 2.0 to 3.5. I used the WixCop to perform
the migration. Unfortunately I keep striking the "The language of this
installation package is not supported by your system". The merge module
contains some is localis
t run until the other dependency is
installed) or
b) Is there any way to make the msi conditional (i.e. either Sql Server
*or* SqlExpress are there)?
Thanks
Mark
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What wi
vide translations of the
counter names, but PerformanceCounter seems to be limited to a single
language (that's not actually a problem for me, but it seems to be
missing from the model).
Am I just misunderstanding how it's
I have a problem with the shortcuts generated by our current Wix setup -
when a user right-clicks the desktop icon and pins it to the taskbar,
that taskbar icon is lost when they upgrade to the next version. I
presume it's because the old shortcut is invalidated and a new one
replaces it, rendering
Alan,
Instead of using your "ConfigDir" try using "CommonAppDataFolder" - this is a
known Windows Installer property.
Regards,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Alan Y. Balkany [mailto:alank...@yahoo.com]
Sent: 11 June 2013 23:16
To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
The answer is here:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11687870/wix-installer-always-changes-apppool-to-enable-32bit-app
Mark Itzcovitz
VISTA Technology Consultant
Publishing Technology plc
T: +44 1865 397849
mark.itzcov...@publishingtechnology.com
www.publishingtechnology.com
Publishing
make all the entries
in both since the msil code could run in either circumstance...
Thanks
Mark
--
The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the
Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm
after next reboot or something?
Thanks
Mark
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by
Make an app they can't live without
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
__
PS - it only seems to do it when the LEGACY_APPDATA is not set (i.e.
the registry search fails).
Thanks,
Mark.
--
On 17/09/2010 10:36, Mark wrote:
>Hi all,
> I've made a copy of the wixui_mondo.wxs file to customize. I've changed
> the SetupType dialog to goto on
Hi Pally,
Thanks for your response.
It hasn't made any difference though :-(
Nothing extra appears in the log between the first click and the second
click..
Mark.
On 17/09/2010 12:53, Pally Sandher wrote:
> Try changing your conditions to
> (LEGACY_APPDATA) AND (WixUI_
fails (i.e. the registy value is not set), and it only does it on the
SetupTypeDlg - I have the same check in CusomizeDlg.
Mark.
On 17/09/2010 16:29, Pally Sandher wrote:
> I didn't expect that to help much to be honest. WiXUI_InstallMode isn't
> being set until you click the bu
No I was not dismissing your advice at all, just trying to understand
the problem more fully. I've changed it now as per your advice and now
it seems to work.
Thanks for your help.
Mark.
On 20/09/2010 10:55, Pally Sandher wrote:
> > From WiXUI_Mondo.wxs
>
>
ar ago
with postgres 8.3, but I think using a slightly earlier version of the
WiX toolset, and I do not remember getting this problem.
Does anyone have any ideas about what might be causing this?
Thanks,
Mark.
--
(via
the checkboxes) the component installation status does not change. Is
their a way I can make this work or will I have to have them as
"features" instead?
Thanks,
Mark.
--
Start uncovering the many adv
is what I have:
INSTALLDESKTOPSHORTCUT
And in the feature:
..
..
I must be missing something.
Thanks,
Mark.
--
On 23/09/2010 12:19, Pally Sandher wrote:
> Set Transitive="yes" on those Components ->
> http://wix.sourceforge.net/manual-wix3/wix_xsd_c
this from searching around.
Can anyone help?
Thanks,
Mark.
--
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud comput
Okay thanks :-)
Mark.
On 26/09/2010 15:53, Bruce Cran wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:22:26 +0100
> Mark Simonetti wrote:
>
>> I've just upgraded to Visual Studio 2010 from 2008, so installed WiX
>> 3.5 instead of WiX 3.0.
>> When I try and build my custom act
be removed if the application is uninstalled keeping it clean.
Thanks,
Mark.
--
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
Spend
Still get the same problem here too. Not sure that there's a solution
at the minute.
Anyone got any ideas on this?
Thanks,
Mark.
On 12/10/2010 08:20, zero51 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got the same problem. I am trying to harves by using heat a whole
> installation of SQL Server 20
Is it possible to unset a property, i.e. do the *opposite* of this:
setup.msi SOME_PROPERTY=1
Reason being, if I set SOME_PROPERTY=0, the checkbox that sets this
value in the installer remains ticked because it requires the property
to be unset, not set to 0.
Thanks,
Mark
Yep that worked, thanks :-)
Mark.
On 12/10/2010 21:41, Christopher Painter wrote:
> try:
>
> setup.msi SOME_PROPERTY=""
>
>
> Christopher Painter, Author of Deployment Engineering Blog
> Have a hot tip, know a secret or read a really good thread that
form would resolve to something like
Why wouldn't Web.config, etc get installed as a result? There
are no errors in the msi build...
Thanks
Mark
--
Beautiful is writing
Thanks for the reply...
I'm not adding any ComponentRef, so that's probably it. Just out of curiosity,
adding a under a is automatically included but file
references (bundled under a ) won't?
Thanks
Mark
-Original Message-
From: jhennessey [mailto:jack.hennes...@hy
I did make sure that the msi wix file did actually have a and
for the modules being produced...
Thanks
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Blair [mailto:os...@live.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 1:21 AM
To: 'General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.&#
or with as
a child of but it won't include it either...
I may just have to upgrade as you say...
Probably long overdue...
Thanks
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Blair [mailto:os...@live.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 8:00 PM
To: 'General discussion
I have a requirement where installation needs to proceed even if the exe
(actually any installable component) is running and loaded in the memory. The
installation should be silent and whenever currently running executable is
closed the next startup should proceed with the newly installed one.
T
a new
copy and runs that.
Of course you still need a core launcher app to deal with, but overall I
find this works reasonably well.
Andreas Mertens
NVision Ideas Inc.
- Original Message -
From: Mark Turek
Date: Friday, February 4, 2011 1:28 pm
Subject: [WiX-users] bypass fileinuse
>
oo, so I'm not sure if I have to declare what phase the custom action
will be executed in, etc.
Am I on the right track?
Thanks
Mark
--
The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio
syntax and function
and Wix would act on them pretty much the same way.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Painter [mailto:chr...@deploymentengineering.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 6:50 AM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [W
stalling our stuff across a farm of ~100
of our servers. We're not a re-seller or SDK vendor. We're just trying to
manage our farm.
Thanks
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Painter [mailto:chr...@deploymentengineering.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 8:50 AM
1 - 100 of 263 matches
Mail list logo
