I get a 503 when I attempt to browse to wixtoolset.org, is it down for
maintenance?
--
Tony
--
Get your SQL database under version control now!
Version control is standard for application code, but databases havent
t; Subject: Re: [WiX-users] wixtoolset.org down?
>
> Should be back now. AppPool was dead, I'll ask why.
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Alain Forget wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tony [mailto:yellowjacketl...@gmail.
g to your build process (VS2012 using TFS2012)?
Thanks,
--
Tony
--
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profi
Software Platform Engineer
> T: +44 (0) 141 945 8500
> F: +44 (0) 141 945 8501
> http://www.iesve.com
>
> **Design, Simulate + Innovate with the **
> Integrated Environmental Solutions Limited. Registered in Scotland No.
> SC151456
> Registered Office - Helix Building, West
votive, I don't _need_ to use MSBUILD to have them exercised, correct?
I worked on a huge WiX project a few years ago, but all of our signing was
done through a manual post-build step, not via WiX .targets integration.
So, this is a bit new to me.
Thanks...
On Tue, Oct 22
ot; within the project file. Duh!
Now the signing attempt fails as expected. I'll go grab our signing cert
and give it try.
Thanks for listening
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Tony wrote:
> I built a "Hello World" C# console application to test the signing
> p
Signing the MSI now works, but I don't see the SignCabs target being
invoked. How does SignCabs get set to the list of my cab files?
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Tony wrote:
> Answering my own question...
>
> ".(though now I see it needs to be "property&q
magic
process does the retry for us.
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Bruce Cran wrote:
> On 10/22/2013 6:47 PM, Tony wrote:
> > Answering my own question...
> >
> > ".(though now I see it needs to be "property", so I'll give that a try)"
> >
a separate hidden sub-feature "Third
Party Stuff" and is manually maintained in one of the wixlib's .wxs files?
Or is there some other suggested method?
NOTE: We are using WiX3.7, VS2012 and TFS2012 for builds. Our build
template simply "runs" our "OneS
Nevermind, this appears to be broken until 4.0(?)
http://sourceforge.net/p/wix/bugs/2082/
I'll try making my own prebuild batch file to "emulate" this behavior for
now.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Tony wrote:
> I have a small window of time to "convert" o
the clean operation can't find
WixTargetsPath. Or for that matter why it is looking for it
in "...MSBuild\Microsoft\WiX..." rather than in "...\Dependencies\WiX..."
Any ideas?
VS2012, TFS2012, WiX 3.7
--
Tony
---
John Merryweather Cooper
> Build & Install Engineer -- ESA
> Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.(r)
> Shawnee Mission, KS 66227
> Office: 913-341-3434 x791011
> jocoo...@jackhenry.com
> www.jackhenry.com
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony [mailto:yell
awnee Mission, KS 66227
> Office: 913-341-3434 x791011
> jocoo...@jackhenry.com
> www.jackhenry.com
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony [mailto:yellowjacketl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 1:57 PM
> To: General discussion about the WiX toolset.
>
per
> Build & Install Engineer -- ESA
> Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.(r)
> Shawnee Mission, KS 66227
> Office: 913-341-3434 x791011
> jocoo...@jackhenry.com
> www.jackhenry.com
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony [mailto:yellowjacketl...@gma
build.
I'm going to try the above environment variable trick, but it seems odd
that this only happens with WiX.
--
Tony
--
Android is increasing in popularity, but the open development platform that
developers love is
g-lght1076-ice91-the-file-doc-code-file1-will-be-installed-to-the-per
>
> From Personal experience ICE91 can be ignored. Per User vs Per
> Machine always cause this. Lastly:
>
> ICE30:
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4595595/wix-multiple-copies-of-same-file-in-msi-but-o
ld-exe-in-vs11-when-using-custom-task
>
> Sounds like you may need a Service Pack
>
> Quoting Tony :
>
> > I guess I could disable those three ICE validators as they always seem to
> > be the ones that blow-up with the "ICE Internal Error 1002. API Returned:
> > 1
at 8:25 PM, Tony wrote:
> Interesting, I'm sure I have the updates. I think I just installed Update
> 3 4-6 weeks ago. But I'll check my work machine in the morning.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 1:22 PM, wrote:
>
>> See here:
>>
>> http://conne
Is there a reason why Control's property would be different than ComboBox's
property?
Also, any reason why we'd set the Control's ComboList to 'no' if the Type
is ComboBox?
--
Tony
--
Andro
oject and
then make the necessary changes.
Do I need to rename the copied file's UI Id element to something other than
WiXUI_Minimal in order to prevent a duplicate with the WixUIExtension's
version?
--
Tony
; Order="1">NOT Installed
>Value="MaintenanceTypeDlg" Order="2">Installed AND NOT PATCH
>Value="WelcomeDlg" Order="2">Installed AND PATCH
>
>Event="NewDialog" Value="MaintenanceTyp
>> > Value="LicenseAgreementDlg">NOT Installed
> > >> > Value="VerifyReadyDlg">Installed AND PATCH
> > >
> > >> > Event="NewDialog" Value="WelcomeDlg">1
> > >>
ewDialog" Value="MaintenanceTypeDlg">1
>
>Event="NewDialog" Value="VerifyReadyDlg">1
>Event="NewDialog" Value="VerifyReadyDlg">1
>Event="NewDialog" Value="MaintenanceWelcomeDlg"
"VerifyReadyDlg">1
>Event="NewDialog" Value="MaintenanceWelcomeDlg">1
>
>
>
>
>
> 2. Substitute your new dialog for LicenseAgreementDlg so you have a Next
> and Back action for it:
>Value="WelcomeDlg">
If you look at the duplicate id error messages, IMO, it is a conflict with
WixUIExtension as the file path for the conflict is from the WiX build
server, not my machine.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Tony wrote:
> It was never in my project.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:5
It was never in my project.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Steven Ogilvie wrote:
> Classification: Public
> Did you remove the WixUI_Minimal.wxs from your project?
> I have WixUIExtension referenced in my setup project...
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Tony [ma
Classification: Public
> This is from your post below:
>
> 3. copied WixUI_Minimal.wxs to the project folder and
> >> > renamed it to WiXUI_Minimal_Modified.wxs. Added
> >> > WiXUI_Minimal_Modified.wxs to the project.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: To
I should have said this in my last messsage...
Thanks for all of the help and patience.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Tony wrote:
> This works, but I have no idea why as most of the lines that had conflicts
> prior to the changes are still present
>
> 1. Setup virgin proj
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] InstallLocation (reg value) vs TARGETDIR vs
> Volume free space...
> >
> > Depends how you defined InstallLocation in your Directory tree. The
> TARGETDIR behavior you noted is the Windows Installer documented behavior.
> >
> > -Or
t have IntelliSense and/or syntax highlighting for C++/CLR, it was
very tedious to work on (thankfully vs2012 fixed the issue). I grew-up
pre-IntelliSense, but that's one aspect of the "good ole' days" I'd rather
not see again. Heck who likes working on C# without R#?
>
ch if you have a component using the parent-most directory
> you are using. You could use a registry search to retrieve
> ARPINSTALLLOCATION if you don’t have a component handy.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Blair
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Tony
> Sent: Friday, November 22, 20
you have a component using the parent-most directory
> you are using. You could use a registry search to retrieve
> ARPINSTALLLOCATION if you don’t have a component handy.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Blair
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Tony
> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013
Is it possible to set an AppPool's LogEventOnRecycle bitmask using WiX? I
don't see it, but maybe missed it.
--
Tony
--
Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription
Software experts and developers: Be at the
(no asterisk).
Any reason why this is happening? I haven't noticed anything not working,
but I've only performed the most basic of post install testing.
Here is IIS's config file for the two sites (site1 == WiX, site2=manual
binding setup)
ing is
> > ":80:header" (no asterisk).
> >
> > Any reason why this is happening? I haven't noticed anything not
> working,
> > but I've only performed the most basic of post install testing.
> >
> >
> > Here is IIS's config file for the two sites (site1 == WiX, site2=manual
> > bind
der and may be supported natively now, but some
> examples.
>
> Impersonate="no" Return="ignore" Directory="TARGETDIR"
> ExeCommand="[SystemFolder]inetsrv\appcmd set config
> "[SITE_ID]/Container"
> -section:system.webServer/security/
native WiX capabilities? You
> and the next person would benefit.
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Tony [mailto:yellowjacketl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 10:57 AM
> To: General discussion about the WiX toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Enable/Di
68
MSI (s) (D8!F4) [19:24:25:308]: Creating MSIHANDLE (53) of type 790531 for
thread 1268
SFXCA: Binding to CLR version v4.0.30319
...
19:24:25.464--MSI.Install -- Exception System.ComponentModel.Win32Exception
(0x80004005): Binding failed, see log file for details
...
--
Tony
--
MSI (s) (D8:88) [19:24:25:261]: Creating MSIHANDLE (51) of type 790536
> for
> > thread 4488
> > MSI (s) (D8:E8) [19:24:25:261]: Invoking remote custom action. DLL:
> > C:\Windows\Installer\MSIBD8F.tmp, Entrypoint: Install
> > MSI (s) (D8!F4) [19:24:25:277]: Creating MSIHANDLE (5
> > > > MSI (s) (D8:88) [19:24:24:310]: PROPERTY CHANGE: Adding
> > > MsiRunningElevated
> > > > property. Its value is '1'.
> > > > MSI (s) (D8:88) [19:24:24:310]: PROPERTY CHANGE: Adding Privileged
> > > > property. Its value is '1'.
> > > > ...
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Tony wrote:
> Thanks.
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Blair Murri wrote:
>
>> msidbCustomActionTypeNoImpersonate in the Type column of the CustomAction
>> table.
>>
>> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/aa368069.as
om an elevated process, and I suspect that some bundled installs
> such as SQL use that capability.
>
> Phil Wilson
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Tony wrote:
>
> > Is there something in the logs that would indicate that an action is
> being
> > executed w
ns in a
custom action?
Thanks,
--
Tony
--
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance
affects their revenue. With A
ize the revision (the fourth
> build version) in major upgrades.
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Tony [mailto:yellowjacketl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2014 7:36 AM
> To: WiX Users
> Subject: [WiX-users] Preventing 'v1.0.0.1' install when v1.0.0.0 is
t
let everyone "deal with it" as they have been for past couple of years with
daily builds.
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Rob Mensching wrote:
> Personally, I'd update the build to change the build number (3rd field).
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony [mailt
ach, right?
Also, I assume "the best" way to build this component is to create a tiny
wixlib that just contains this component. And, then, reference this
component in each of my applicati
t; http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> ___
> WiX-users mailing list
> WiX-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-users
>
--
Tony
--
ve install contains wixcomplusextension.dll and wixmsmqextension.dll
wix38-binaries contains retina.exe (and config)
The rest of the files appear to be the same or the difference is expected
(.targets in wix38-binaries, votive2010.dll and .ico in votive install,
etc.).
iX\bin\
$(WixToolPath)Wix.targets
$(WixToolPath)wixtasks.dll
$(WixToolPath)
$(WixToolPath)
$(WixToolPath)sdk\wix.ca.targets
$(WixToolPath)sdk\
Release
x86
3.8
9337d04d-5829-4f09-b0d9-9ba5d19c15cc
2.0
WiX38Tester
Package
bin\$(Confi
FWIW, if I edit the test project to use my wix37-binaries folder instead of
the wix38-binaries folder. The above test project builds without issue.
So, there must be something "different" in wix 3.8 that is causing the
build exception.
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Tony wrote
oft.com/en-us/library/ee890038(v=vs.100).aspx
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Tony wrote:
> FWIW, if I edit the test project to use my wix37-binaries folder instead
> of the wix38-binaries folder. The above test project builds without
> issue. So, there must be something "
? Links?
Thanks,
Tony
--
Return on Information:
Google Enterprise Search pays you back
Get the facts.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev
___
WiX-users mailing list
WiX-users
Is it possible to place a file version property (not to be confused
with Windows Installer properties) on the resulting msi from a WiX
build? Such that when you hover over the msi in explorer the version
is displayed?
Not a big deal, just wondering...
--
Tony
rvices are started, sql scripts run, etc.
Is it possible for the user account to get created during the
UISequence? Added to the security group during the UISequence?
--
Tony
--
Return on Information:
Google Enterprise Searc
Thanks for the complete response.
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Blair wrote:
> None of those actions should ever occur during the UI sequence. The UI
> sequence is intended exclusively for gathering information from the user to
> guide the installation.
ions should ever occur during the UI sequence. The UI
> sequence is intended exclusively for gathering information from the user to
> guide the installation.
--
Tony
--
Return on Information:
Google Enterprise Sea
Is there a Simplified Chinese version of the WiXUI available? If not,
will there be one soon?
--
Tony
--
Return on Information:
Google Enterprise Search pays you back
Get the facts.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev
; Deployment consultant
> E-Mail: sebast...@instyler.com
> Blog: www.sebastianbrand.com
>
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Tony [mailto:yellowjacketl...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 16:34
>> To: WiX Users
>> Subject: [WiX-user
Are language files available for both WiXUtil and WiXSql libraries? I
see one or two for both, but by no means an extensive list.
--
Tony
--
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take
Is it possible to specify the codepage value at build time based on
the build culture and/or build configuration name?
--
Tony
--
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of
-8
> (unlike the rest of the database) and I tend to force ASCII-7 (and thus NO
> localization) for the summary codepage myself (since I have usually had to
> deal with "unicode-only" languages).
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony [mailto:yellowjacketl...@gmail.co
es you will
> likely be fine but if you are contemplating targeting any of those languages
> you may want to consider how you will deal with the difference in support
> available from Windows Installer between summary information and the rest of
> the database.
>
> -Original
sform file using msitran.exe
7. Merge that transform file into our base msi using wisubstg.vbs
8. Repeat steps 5-7 for remaining 6 languages
9. Specify supported languages in the merged msi using wilangid.vbs
The entire process is repeated to generate a x64 version of the msi.
Does this seem correct
d, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Tony wrote:
>
>> I think we are doing this right, but I want to be sure as it seems
>> painfully tedious.
>>
>> Here is a high-level sequence of what we are currently doing to build
>> a single msi that supports 8 languages (en-us, 4 euro,
Is there some way we can "disable" (abort install action) if someone
were to launch our msi with the /a (administrative install) or /f
(repair) options? We can hide the actions in the UI, but when
launched via command-line they can still occur, we'd like to disable
them for
; Windows Installer can no longer repair them and your app would likely
> fail to launch. The 'repair' functionality of Windows Installer is
> part of why you would choose to use MSI in the first place. If you're
> trying to bypass the resiliency features then maybe a non-MSI set
o, if something really needs to be "fixed"
just uninstall/install.
I know that I personally never, ever do a repair. It just scares me
and I don't trust it. Way too many "what ifs".
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 6:51 PM, Sascha Beaumont
wrote:
> Tony, I'm echoing Phil and Bl
stall always occurs entirely in the c:\ folder. Any
ideas?
Once the admin execute sequence begins we don't see any type of
progress dialog, just the last UI dialog with the install button
depressed. Do we have to do something different with the
administrative install to make this happen
there a way to update the ExitDialog's text from a custom action
running in the execute sequence?
--
Tony
--
Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the
world's best and brightest in
cute sequence is run in a different process than the ui sequence and
> the properties don't "flow" back.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony [mailto:yellowjacketl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 10:50 AM
> To: WiX Users
> Subject: [WiX-use
22, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Blair wrote:
> Would a custom action that calls the MsiGetMode() api be acceptable?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony [mailto:yellowjacketl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 7:58 AM
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subj
ht-click on the .zip, and click "Unblock", and that should
> unblock all the files contained within the zip as well.
>
> -Dave
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 7:36 AM, Tony wrote:
>
> > I figured it out.
> >
> > It seems that whatever method I used to downlo
Bob do you want me to file a bug, or has this been done already?
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Bob Arnson wrote:
> On 04-Feb-14 07:40, Tony wrote:
> > votive install contains wixcomplusextension.dll and wixmsmqextension.dll
> > wix38-binaries contains retina.exe (and config)
Why is this condition 'true'?
According to MSDN (
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa368012(v=vs.85).aspx) the '<<'
should...
"TRUE if left string starts wi
ers to match and You'll get the Desired Behavior
>
> Quoting Tony :
>
> > Why is this condition 'true'?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > According to MSDN (
> > http://msdn.microso
to 3.6.1915.0 issue" (7/20/11) in which this bug
http://sourceforge.net/p/wix/bugs/2588/ is linked. But I can't tell if the
bug was fixed or just closed.
Any ideas?
VS/TFS2012, Wix 3.8
--
Tony
--
Time is money.
om/b/msbuild/archive/2010/12/21/incorrect-solution-build-ordering-when-using-msbuild-exe.aspx
>
> ___
> FireGiant | Dedicated support for the WiX toolset |
> http://www.firegiant.com/
>
> -Original Message-
> F
& Associates, Inc.®
> Shawnee Mission, KS 66227
> Office: 913-341-3434 x791011
> jocoo...@jackhenry.com
> www.jackhenry.com
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony [mailto:yellowjacketl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 7:20 AM
> To: General
ly with
> incredibly cryptic log formats.
>
> ___
> FireGiant | Dedicated support for the WiX toolset |
> http://www.firegiant.com/
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony [mailto:yellowjacketl...@gmail.com]
e all of the bracket characters?
--
Tony
--
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
"Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their
applications. Written by three accl
n the SQL script. We have been
burned by this logger's parsing before, so we make sure all of our log
statements do not make use of [] characters.
Guess I'll either need to live with it, or change the quotation syntax in
our SQL scripts.
Thanks for listening...
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 a
for the WiX toolset |
> http://www.firegiant.com/
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony [mailto:yellowjacketl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 1:56 PM
> To: WiX Users
> Subject: [WiX-users] Build order problems Votive vs MSBuild
>
> We've run in
ng the wixlib
that executes the Pre-Build Paraffin and the wixlib project builds without
issue.
I'm not sure how I'll fix this issue long-term. But it goes without saying
that I look forward to WiX 4.0's ability to leverage the now defunct
"Harvest" option on project refer
.®
> Shawnee Mission, KS 66227
> Office: 913-341-3434 x791011
> jocoo...@jackhenry.com
> www.jackhenry.com
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony [mailto:yellowjacketl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 9:32 AM
> To: General discussion about the W
pect this to happen first!
a.csproj
b.csproj
w.wixproj
That is not what I expected at all. I want the batch file to run before
w.wixproj starts compiling.
Any ideas, how I get batch file to run in the correct position?
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Tony wrote:
> Interesting, I wonder if Be
e sync
projects.
It works, but I really wish I understood the "right" way to do this...
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Tony wrote:
> I know this is an old thread, but I finally got around to testing my
> BeforeBuild vs PreBuild assumptions. In short, I was wrong.. BeforeBuild
his thread I described a foolish approach for
> reusing
> common code using batch scripts and copying wxs files between projects.
> Creating 'unbound' wixlibs
Associates, Inc.®
> Shawnee Mission, KS 66227
> Office: 913-341-3434 x791011
> jocoo...@jackhenry.com
> www.jackhenry.com
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony [mailto:yellowjacketl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 8:17 AM
> To: General discuss
ool-A for install, the
end result is *ALL* of the features are removed from *DISK*. Though
entering the Change a fourth time, it appears as though Windows thinks
Public and Tool-A are installed.
Full Feature code (though some of the fluff removed for brevity):
n Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Tony wrote:
> I'm updating one of our installers to support change/modify and I'm
> running into a few issues that I don't understand. I'm using the
> WixUI_FeatureTree sequence. And, for the first time installation, by
> default,
to '2')?
--
Tony
--
Want excitement?
Manually upgrade your production database.
When you want reliability, choose Perforce
Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick
, Sep 12, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Jeremiahf wrote:
> Change your level to 2
>
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Tony wrote:
>
> > Assuming we are using the WixUI_FeatureTree UI sequence, how can I define
> > my features (multi-level) such that none of them are selected for
>
er by reply email and delete all copies.
> >
> >
> >
> --
> > Want excitement?
> > Manually upgrade your production database.
> > When yo
___
> > > > WiX-users mailing list
> > > > WiX-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-users
> > >
bsite.
--
Tony
--
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer
Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports
Are you Audit-Ready fo
hich
makes sense as we never had modify enabled until now).
The custom action has been corrected and now the installer behaves as
expected.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Tony wrote:
> It should be noted that in the failure case the feature table reads like
> I'd expect...(f
e Service Applications | Continuing
> Development
> Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.® | Lenexa, KS 66214 | Ext: 431050 |
> jocoo...@jackhenry.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony [mailto:yellowjacketl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 7:46 AM
>
In the InstallExecuteSequence is it possible for Action-B's condition to
reference the enable/disable state of another action, Action-B?
--
Tony
--
Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
Mo
tall, the 'per feature'
properties don't seem to get evaluated.
Maybe &MyFeature<>-1 OR REMOVE=ALL would be a better option?
I don't need to support upgrades. But I do need to support Modify/Change.
--
Tony
t;>-1 AND
!MyFeature<>&MyFeature'
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Tony wrote:
> I have an action in the execute sequence that I want to run during full
> install, full uninstall and when 'MyFeature' is being installed or
> uninstalled.
>
> I thought...
1 - 100 of 410 matches
Mail list logo
