.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] unsubscribe
The footer of each message sent has a link to
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-users which has the
unsubscribe method.
Chris
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Robert O'Brien <
robert.obr...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Been trying var
rom: Matti Hägerlund [mailto:matti.hagerl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 7:17 AM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] unsubscribe
Eh?
/M4tti
2009/11/18 Robert O'Brien
unsubscribe
--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover
My wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net subscription settings configured with Mail
Delivery = disabled . . . and yet I'm still getting list emails. Am I missing
something about how to make this subscription setting take effect?
-
in the wix 3.5 release work is a file | new | project | wix | patch project
template going to eventually get included?
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you
g but as long as the site id is set
correctly it will find the site.
I hope this helps.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Robert O'Brien [mailto:robert.obr...@microsoft.com]
Sent: 09 April 2009 17:50
To: 'General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.';
'tomtr...
e a duplicate site id in which case IIS adds one until it
finds a free number. See here for more details:
http://blogs.msdn.com/mpoulson/archive/2006/03/06/544893.aspx
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Robert O'Brien [mailto:robert.obr...@microsoft.com]
Sent: 09 April 2009 16:51
To: &
7;t matter whether or not at install time the default web
site is configured with a port 80 binding.
From: Thomas S. Trias [mailto:tomtr...@artizan.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 6:33 PM
To: Robert O'Brien
Cc: 'General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.'; Dmitr
the description is not actually being used.
Thanks,
Thomas S. Trias
Senior Developer
Artizan Internet Services
http://www.artizan.com/
Original Message
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] is it a bug that iis:WebSite doesn't locate
presence ofexisting website usin
with name "Default Web Site" known to be site 0
regardless of what port and/or host header and/or ip bindings an operator has
created on it for a given environment, e.g.
becomes just the following without the iis:WebAddress specifics?
-----Original Message-
From: Rober
. Trias
Senior Developer
Artizan Internet Services
http://www.artizan.com/
Original Message
Subject: [WiX-users] is it a bug that iis:WebSite doesn't locate
presence ofexisting website using just the Name attribute value
versus portsettings?
From: Robert O'Brien
To:
is setting sql:Database ConfirmOverwrite="no" expected
cause the db not being created if it already exists?
No. It removes the prompt when an overwrite will occur.
-Original Message-
From: Robert O'Brien [mailto:robert.obr...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 08:39
To
: "Typically the value should be 'yes', except when the custom
action needs elevated privileges to apply changes to the machine."
Be great if you could open a documentation bug to suggest that this be more
specific.
-Original Message-
From: Robert O'Brien [mailt
rchive/2007/09/01/column-types-cannot-be-changed-in-a-patch-or-transform.aspxfor
more information.
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Robert O'Brien wrote:
> Thanks that appears to be exactly what my issue was with my adminInstall
> output. I used orca to reconfigure the feature level settin
We have a service deliverable msi where optionally have some w08/iis70 "Default
Web Site" vdir settings we want to apply and some "Site1 Web Site" and "Site2
Web Site" settings we want to apply (see relevant excerpt below). We need to
allow for deployments where "Site1 Web Site" and "Site2 Web
Thanks for responses.
1. setting the SKIPCONFIGUREIIS property via an immediate CA (scheduled prior
to ConfigureIIs of course) to simply skip IIS configuration when the target
host already has the website installed would require us having some way to
determine if the target host already has
We are getting some unexpected and undesirable behavior from iis:WebAppPool and
iis:WebSite extensions, just checking to see if we are doing something wrong.
background
Specifically we have the following relevant snippet of wix that defines our
appPool setting and the WebSite we want created to
ning public property references are not working
What you are seeing is a limitation in the code. I'm not sure that there
is a real requirement behind the limitation but the code does expect
things to behave the way you list. If you think it should be different,
feel free to file a fea
Can I expect that a
entry without the Remove attribute specified just handles start/stop behavior
of an existing service and does not try and remove and/or install it?
--
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-
can I expect that a
entry without the Remove attribte specified just handles start/stop behavior of
an existing service and does not try and install and/or remove it?
--
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-
ect: Re: [WiX-users] is there a way to get a dll.config file deployed along
side a gac destined file, e.g. a entry with Assembly=".net" defined?
I don't believe there is any supported way, WiX or otherwise, to put a
config file in the GAC. I am curious why you would want to?
is there a way to get a dll.config file deployed along side a gac destined
file, e.g. a entry with Assembly=".net" defined?
--
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the
Both look
okay to me, but I have had fun in the past with getting exec('strings')
to do what I wanted.
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Robert O'Brien [mailto:robert.obr...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, 12 February 2009 5:48 AM
To: 'General discussion for Windows Inst
Any pointers on the syntax i should one use to enable deployment of a gac dll
required dll.config file, e.g. gac dll's that make use of the setting
designer/api runtime settings?
I tried the following two options and the first doesn't work because it seems
the file copy to the gac of the dll.co
in
the gac folder along side its parent dll?
!Sdk1=2 And
&Sdk1=3 And ?Sdk1Gac14=2 And $Sdk1Gac14=3
!Sdk1=2 And
&Sdk1=3 And ?Sdk1Gac14=2 And $Sdk1Gac14=3
From: Robert O'Brien
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 9:13 AM
To: 'wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net'
Subject: any p
Any pointers on the syntax i should one use to enable deployment of a gac dll
required dll.config file, e.g. gac dll's that make use if setting designer/api
runtime settings?
I tried the following two options and the first, currently commented out,
doesn't work because it doesn't drop the file
any pointers on the syntax i should one use to enable deployment of a gac dll
required dll.config file, e.g. gac dll's that make use if setting designer/api
runtime settings?
I tried the following two options and the first, currently commented out,
doesn't work because it doesn't drop the file
i need util:XmlFile associated SchedXmlFile action to happen before a specific
CAQuietExec deferred custom action .
Would using the following sequence entry for SchedXmlFile be the correct /
supported way to make that happen?
!Database1=2 And
&Database1=3 And ?Database1=2 And $Database1=3
!Da
Would !Database1=2 And
&Database1=3 And ?Database1=2 And $Database1=3
!Database1=2 And
&Database1=3 And ?Database1=2 And $Database1=3
!Database1=2 And
&Database1=3 And ?Database1=2 And $Database1=3
--
Open Source Busi
ollbacks?
q2 - is having the sql:String attribute pair ExecuteOnUninstall="yes"
RollbackOnInstall="yes" correct to control having the specific setting applied
during uninstalls and also during component install rollbacks?
From: Robert O'Brien
Sent: Wednesday, February 1
ollbacks?
q2 - is having the sql:String attribute pair ExecuteOnUninstall="yes"
RollbackOnInstall="yes" correct to control having the specific setting applied
during uninstalls and also during component install rollbacks?
From: Robert O'Brien
Sent: Wednesday, February 1
Any insights as to why the following sql extensions commands that create a sql
login and db user setting work
but the following similar sql extensions calls where I have the sql login and
db user statements making use of a public property value + the statements
configured to also ex
is setting sql:Database ConfirmOverwrite="no" expected cause the db not being
created if it already exists?
--
Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with Adobe(R)AIR(TM)
software. With Adobe AIR, Ajax de
is customaction impersonate attribute default when attribute is not specified
"yes" or "no" . . . the current chm details does not say which
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to
If a person wanted to create some form of wix support for installed .txt or
.xml file regular expression search and replace...
q1. What would you gain by taking on the effort of the native code
implementation work necessary to provide it as a wix extension versus creating
support for this using
I have a bindings.xml file that my wix component deploys that I then need to
roll through and just do a search and replace of all "localhost" hits before
this file gets processed by an After="InstallFiles" custom action.
Does http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmi
gh less optimal).
-Original Message-----
From: Robert O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 08:34
To: 'WiX-users'
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Announcement: WiX v3.0 beta exit release available
Great news and congratulations on reaching this mileston
Looking for some clarification on conditions to use for sequencing activities
to cover install | modify add feature | rollback | modify remove feature |
uninstall cases.
I usually end up having one type of custom actions that are feature or
component specific and intended to provision things du
is it possible for Installed to be set during rollback processing, e.g.
rollback custom actions should always have at least a "Not Installed" not a
"Installed" entry in their sequence condition?
--
SF.Net email is Sponsor
Great news and congratulations on reaching this milestone.
A while back I posted some questions to the forum about how to structure an msi
to automatically set REINSTALL and REINSTALLMODE property settings to necessary
values for patch and minor upgrade processing. There were working solutions
ce tables.
Otherwise, you could also use a CustomAction using the "Error" attribute and
you could sequence this after CostFinalize to achieve the same effect.
Robert O'Brien-2 wrote:
>
> Is it expected that prerequisite condition statements support checking
> feature s
Is it expected that prerequisite condition statements support checking feature
state and action values in order to determine if prerequisite should be checked
for, e.g. is the following valid given an msi that has a Feature named
"Databases" and a SQL08DIR property assignment using registry sear
neral discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] is there a canned way for authoring a prerequisite
that checks for the presence of another msi installed product, e.g. w/o using
registry or directory or file searches?
ComponentSearch.
-Original Message-
From: Robert O&
is there a canned way for authoring a prerequisite that checks for the presence
of another msi installed product, e.g. w/o using registry or directory or file
searches?
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move
Not sure I'm just using standard issue file | new | wix project template
generated wixproj to wrap build process with Build Configuration Platform=x64
enabled.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Mensching
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 7:40 PM
To: Robert O'Brien; General disc
, December 01, 2008 7:29 PM
To: Robert O'Brien; General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: RE: [WiX-users] any tips on why the following xmlfile machine.config
install changes are not working
No, the problem is that the RegistrySearch isn't set 64-bit. So it's al
)\Windows Installer XML
v3\bin\WixNetFxExtension.dll installed by the Wix3_x64.msi installer was built
with Target=x86 versus Target=x64?
-Original Message-
From: Rob Mensching
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 7:07 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.; Robert O'
e registry
search entry.
-Original Message-----
From: Robert O'Brien
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 4:17 PM
To: 'General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.'
Subject: RE: [WiX-users] any
Got this to work switching XmlFile entry for install pass to following
XmlConfig entry.
-Original Message-
From: Robert O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 11:39 AM
To: 'General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.'
Subject: [WiX-
Any tips on why the following xmlfile machine.config install changes are not
working?
I'm using the following component entries:
To try and get this new element created during install but finding that
no machine.config changes exist after setup completes.
e.g. is using wixproj | properties | settings | suppress specific ice
validation = ICE38;ICE43;ICE57 considered acceptable?
-Original Message-
From: Robert O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 3:37 PM
To: 'General discussion for Windows Installer X
Using the following vdir component setup
I get the following build ice57 warning which in my case is treated as an error
due to my wixproj "treat warnings as errors" setting.
Error 22 ICE57: Component 'Site1Vdir1' h
r CreateDatabase activities?
ConfigureSql is an old name. New names: InstallSqlData and UninstallSqlData.
-----Original Message-
From: Robert O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 12:29
To: 'General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.'
Sub
Up until a half hour ago when I started yanking no longer required feature
condition statements my WixUI_FeatureTree UI experience was displaying features
in the order that they were defined in the sources, e.g.
e.g. if this was the order I entered my features in my sources this was the
order t
to show up
in the tree or not.
-Original Message-
From: Robert O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 14:36
To: 'General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.'
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] correct way to enable commadn line support for
nable feature
action choices for both interactive and unattended installer passes. That
being the case could you provide a quick comment on what the primary intended
use case for conditionally setting feature levels to 1=enabled or 0=disabled?
-Original Message-
From: Robert O'Bri
AL and friends. That
might work better...
-Original Message-
From: Robert O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 14:05
To: 'General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.'
Subject: [WiX-users] correct way to enable commadn line support for d
before/after CreateDatabase activities?
Try ConfigureSql
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 9:24 PM, Robert O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> I have a custom action that I wanted to schedule to happen just before
> CreateDatase processing occurs. I tried the following custom action
>
I have a custom action that I wanted to schedule to happen just before
CreateDatase processing occurs. I tried the following custom action
sequencing statement
Not
Installed
and when I compile I get the following error
Error 1 Unresolved reference to symbol
'WixAction:InstallExecuteSequenc
If I use the following
my log output shows something other than what I'd expect
Property(S): DATABASESHOSTNAME = [%ComputerName]
and my CreateDatabase call that uses the public property DATABASESHOSTNAME fails
If I use the following
my log output shows what you'd expect
Property(S): DATABASESHOS
:36 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] using a variable for Component Win64 attribute value
still generating generic warning not uniquely suppressible in wixproj | build |
suppress specific warnings field
Robert O'Brien wrote:
> Any ins
I have the following logic in each of my feature/subfeature settings so that
from the command line users can easily define what features/subfeatures are
selected and unselected by default when they step into the interactive install
or run and unattended install.
When I run my msi in interactive
-Original Message-
From: Robert O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tu
what is the recommended way for setting the AppPool associated with a new
iis:WebSite? Lots of samples on this for the case of an iis:WebVirtualDir but
nothing that made sense in the case of an iis:WebSite where creating a child
iis:WebApplication doesn't make sense given that's typically a vd
the "How To: Generate a GUID" document (excerpt below) suggests that wix
supports compiling with PUT-GUID-HERE tokens vs actual Guid values or where
allowed "*" token autogenerated Guid values defined...but the PUT-GUID-HERE
tokens case isn't working with the latest install
"All examples in the
Background
--
A while ago I raised an issue to do with a warning being generated when using a
variable for the Component Win64 attribute value. Below you'll see the an
excerpt of the logic I'm using so that in the case of all managed code
deliverables I can create one set of wix so
C .Net assemblies the correct way?
Yeah, you have to search for "global assembly cache" in the WiX.chm to find it.
"GAC" only finds the NativeImage element. Probably should tweak the
documentation to catch both.
-Original Message-
From: Robert O'Brien [mailto:[
I looked under the current wix help file how to section and could only find
"How To: NGen Managed Assemblies During Installation".
This appears to cover having wix generated msi's install/uninstall to
%systemroot%\assembly\gac_32 & %systemroot%\assembly\gac_64 but does not appear
to have an opt
There are many msi based setups I've used in the past, office and vstudio for
example, where a custom command line is provided that allows you to run an
interactive .msi session and at the end of it capture to a .mst all the
settings you chose but not actually do the install.
Does current wix 3
I believe the default behavior of the and maintenance mode UI experience is that it provides
users the option of only selecting specific features currently installed that
they would like removed.
-Original Message-
From: Sandeep Gautam (HCL Technologies Ltd) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
S
entity settings when setting values?
You need to create a new element. Or you can switch to XmlConfig and insert a
document fragment.
-Original Message-
From: Robert O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 13:14
To: 'General discussion for Windows Insta
uppala
M-9908298419
From: Robert O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 24/09/2008 7:51 AM
To: 'General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.'
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] How to Keep the Property value along with MSI
Here is what I use to sa
Here is what I use to save off the databasehost name provided at install time
so it will be set automatically to the correct value during uninstall
processing.
For $(var.SoftwareKey) assignment I have the following in place.
Background:
-
I have a wix souce file with the following XmlFile entry
When I run my msi using "msiexec /I myServiceDeliverable.msi
SERVICEGATEWAYIDENTITY=""
/l*v myServiceDeliver
...also if you switch the account initially specified for services to run under
during setup of sql05 or sql08 to a different account sometime after setup
completes you need to remember to add that account to the appropriate
SqlServer local security groups in order for the
necessary security pe
In my v1.0 release I had shortcut settings in multiple components using start |
programs | "My Service Deliverable" menu folder.In my v1.1 release I
changed the wix sources to use "start | programs | "My Service Deliverable
v1.1". When I run a v1.0 to v1.1 msp patch or msi upgrade I end up
You need to launch the msp using the command line and the properties
REINSTALL=ALL REINSTALLMODE=omus. If you want to be able to use your msp by
double clicking on it you need to add something like the following to your wix
sources so that those property values will get assigned automatically
fyi - in my wix sources I'm able to successfully set/use util:xmlfile
elementpath values with attribute search qualifiers using the following
escaping syntax.
You can use alternatively:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Evans, J
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert O'Brien
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 1:15 AM
To: 'wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net'
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] create setup.exe
fyi - msi minor upgrade detection using QFEUpgrade=1 property setting condition
is no longer working for me, i.e. qfeupgr
it to show
up...its probably because when I was testing this I was still setting
REINSTALL=ALL and REINSTALLMODE=vomus on the command line.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert O'Brien
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 6:08 PM
To:
And ?Service1=3 And (QFEUpgrade=2 Or
QFEUpgrade=1)
Conversely when the msp is removed I ended up with the prior release copy of
that file w/o the mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert O'Brien
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 12:38 PM
To: 'General discussion for Windows Ins
That's was it. I had had one test build of my patch where it tested it doing
a v1.0 to v1.1 minor upgrade where the v1.1 wix had introduced a ServiceControl
entry. I used hyper-v snapshot to roll back to prior that msp patch minor
upgrade test pass and removed the v1.1 wix that had introduce
Here is what I'm now using to accomplish this w/o needing a setup.exe wrapper,
e.g. you can just double click the msp and/or msi. Initial knowledge share
for the double click msp property settings solution this came from John
Nannenga.
I have a msp patch and msi minor pgrade processing result where a specific
.config file setting which has underwent some miner content changes in the
v1.1 release is not getting updated.
If I diff my v1.0 target adminInstall and my v1.1 update adminInstall used to
by the old msimsp patch method
de [ or a v1.0 to v1.1 msi upgrade ] process
Found the MSIPATCHREMOVE property... Ref:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa370348(VS.85).aspx
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert O'Brien
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 1:03
Got answers to these. Would be interested if anyone already has a command line
utility wrapping MsiRemovePatches api that allows cmd.exe scripted removal of
patches.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert O'Brien
Sent: Monday, Sept
1. when I run a v1.0 to v1.1 msp patch upgrade [ or a v1.0 to v1.1 msi
upgrade ] am I expected to include the additional public property settings that
were needed/used when I ran the original v1.0 deployment, e.g. INSTALLDIR,
DATABASESHOSTNAME, DATABASESDOMAINLOGINGROUPNAME, etc.?
2. is t
discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] what setting causes current wix build output to land
in bin\$(Configuration)\en-us versus bin\$(Configuration) where it always used
to land
Robert O'Brien wrote:
> The syntax of the command is incorrect.
q1 - In the new wix3 way patch msp generation xml is there a way to specify the
element to cover get the msp patch generated to cover changes to
all components from v1.0 to v1.1 versus having what appears to be the need to
specify every component explicitly as the patch help document sample syn
$(TargetName).log" del
"$(TargetDir)en-us\$(TargetName).log"
pushd "$(TargetDir)en-us\" & "C:\Program Files\Microsoft
SDKs\Windows\v6.0A\Bin\MsiMsp.exe" -s
"$(ProjectDir)obj\$(Configuration)\$(TargetName).pcp" -p "$(TargetName).msp" -l
&q
$(Configuration)\$(TargetName).pcp" -p "$(TargetName).msp" -l
"$(TargetName).log" & popd
cmd /c echo end processing patch post-build event command lines
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Arnson
Sent: Satu
land
in bin\$(Configuration)\en-us versus bin\$(Configuration) where it always used
to land
You should be able to add it anywhere inside the postbuild Target. What error
did you get?
Neil
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert O'Brien
&Databases=3
And $Database1=3
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Arnson
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 9:39 AM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] getting working v1.0 -> v1.0 minor u
o succeed?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert O'Brien
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 11:29 AM
To: 'General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.'
Subject: [WiX-users] using torch.exe -ax to enable use of ad
does (or doesn't!) work.
Neil
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert O'Brien [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 7:43 PM
To: 'General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.'
Subject: Re:
The blog
http://blogs.msdn.com/pmarcu/archive/2008/05/30/Patching-something-you-didnt-build-with-WiX-using-WiX-.aspx
outlines using torch.exe -ax switch to enable use of admin install msi target
and update input parameter values.
When I try and do that using the torch command syntax:
torch.exe
Since I know that everything I'm installing is managed code anyCpu build output
I enabled this with my service deliverable wix sources using the following
syntax.
to give you the full paths to the built MSIs after
build, but a bit trickier prebuild).
Neil
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert O'Brien [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 2:27 PM
To: 'General disc
Thanks for all the responses to my recent questions associated with getting
working v1.0 -> v1.0 minor update using msp & msi solutions pulled together.
At this point I believe I have what should be working sources and build output
to carry out a minor upgrade using both the msp & msi approaches
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Arnson
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 10:45 AM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] is there a way to get current wix vs08 project
extensions to output a patch msp?
Robert O'Brien wrote
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
