Per http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/windows/desktop/aa379570.aspx the owner
sid would be prefixed with an O: which I don't see in your string.
> From: sandi...@microsoft.com
> To: heath.stew...@microsoft.com; wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 21:32:14 +
> CC: vita...
There are ways but Major Version Patches are officially discouraged (see MSDN).
> Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2013 21:41:45 -0700
> From: nickra...@hotmail.com
> To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Patching multiple versions
>
> Actually, trying my idea didn't work for me. It ma
32-bit code finds HKLM\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Microsoft\DevDiv\vs\Servicing\11.0
at HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\DevDiv\vs\Servicing\11.0 (because
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\DevDiv\vs\Servicing\11.0 would be considered a 64-bit
registry area).
Start here to understand some of this:
http://msdn.microsof
I see. That's a good point.
So I wrote me a quick program to compare the two full MSIs (the 32-bit and
64-bit) and to search for the longest chunk that's common between the two.
It finds a piece that is about the size of the shared cab. It happens to be
at the same offset in both files, which was
On 24-Jun-13 23:32, Ivo Beltchev wrote:
> Which part is the problem? The embedding of the CAB or the mucking with the
> Media table?
Any change invalidates the signature.
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/
--
This SF.n
Which part is the problem? The embedding of the CAB or the mucking with the
Media table?
If it is the second part, maybe I can build the MSIs initially with embedded
CABs, then delete them from the streams. This way the Media table will stay
unchanged.
-Original Message-
From: Bob Arnson [
On 24-Jun-13 14:44, Ivo Beltchev wrote:
> When the installer runs it extracts one of the MSIs and the shared cab. Then
> with some database voodoo from msi.dll I embed the shared cab into the MSI
> and change the Cabinet field in the Media table to start with #. This marks
> it as internal.
That br
On 24-Jun-13 14:17, Lukas Haase wrote:
>
Custom actions after InstallFinalize cannot run elevated.
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://
I'm reading my installer log, there are error lines (bolded) that steal my
attention :
Action start 11:45:30: UnpublishFeatures.
Action ended 11:45:30: UnpublishFeatures. Return value 1.
MSI (s) (94:08) [11:45:30:823]: Doing action: SchedSecureObjectsRollback
Action start 11:45:30: SchedSecureObje
Hey thanks for this information!
Here is the sdshow result for the service i.e. if I am reading it right
localsystem, built-in admins, interactive users, service logon user has
permissions on it, right? Don't see the SID trusted installer (please correct
me if I am missing anything here).
D:(
Is the CA immediate or deferred? A quick test (printf("%d\n",
IsUserAnAdmin());) on my Win7 system shows IsUserAnAdmin (I am) returns false
in a normal cmd shell. But if I elevate, then it's true. (This implies your CA
is immediate).
Dave
From: Lukas Haase
No, my bootstrapper is an EXE, not MSI. If you call it directly it will
create the correct MSI and then launch it. You can also call it with
"extract32" or "extract64", which will just extract the correct MSI and you
can do whatever you want with it.
The EXE does other things as well, like calculat
You're embedding an MSI inside an MSI? Wouldn't Burn work out better? A Burn
bundle can embed all of its resources into a setup executable. Will upgrades
still function correctly using an embedded MSI?
--
View this message in context:
http://windows-installer-xml-wix-toolset.687559.n2.nabble.co
I think I found a solution that works. For both MSIs I split the files into
2 media elements - one embedded and one external (for the shared files).
Then I build both MSIs and compare the external CABs to verify they are
identical.
When the installer runs it extracts one of the MSIs and the shared
Hello,
I need to install an ExePackage in my bundle with many payloads, like 200.
This package is a program that I need to install, like a dependence for my
product.
But the setup of this program is just an .exe file very small, the files
that will be install isn't compressed in a container like .
Hi,
I have a custom action in a DLL. If I check admin rights in the DLL with
IsUserAnAdmin it returns FALSE!
The wxs file makes sure that installation can only run with admin privs:
Privileged
The custom action is included via:
NOT
Installed
The UpdateInstall.dll exports UpdateInstal
Thank you so much, Philippe and Blair. I've changed "-gg" to "-ag", per your
prompt suggestion, and I've created a new solution configuration that seems to
put everything into one folder and the resulting installation package looks
like it now includes every necessary file.
Best Regards,
Tom
Hi,
I want set permissions to Folder.Ex:- user installed ,Apache software,But we
don't know the Path Where the user installed Tomcat.
I need to fetch the information from registry and assign permissions to Tomcat
folder.
Any suggestions are acceptable
thanks & Regards,
Chaitanya.
--
Hi,
For my application, I use software activation. However, in case they
activation fails, the software should work for 14 days after
installation (grace period).
While I know it is difficult to protect this it should at least not be
circumvented by simple re-installation.
What is the best proce
19 matches
Mail list logo
