On Feb 24, 2014, at 7:10 PM, "??" <237825...@qq.com> wrote:
> up is a snapshot of packet view.
> I want know where does the value of each column stored,such as Time,Source?
> do they stored in the edt->pi(epan_dissect->packet_info) or
> edt->pi->cinfo(column_info)?
Some are in edt->pi,
Howdy,
Has anyone gotten Wireshark to build with Qt 5.2.1 on MacOSX Mavericks? If so,
what magic pixie dust did you use to make it find the QDialog and QFrame header
files, when Qt 5.2 does not apparently install them? (yes, I've google'd to no
avail)
Using the macosx-setup.sh script I've gotte
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 04:47:09PM +0530, Venkatachalam S wrote:
> I'm writing a custom dissector for my internal project. I'm having a frame
> in the following format.
>
> 32 byte data + eth_hdr + payload
>
> So, there is a 32 byte internal header attached to every packet. All the
> packets comi
Wireshark has lots of reverse engineered protocols. So that should not stop you.
For example, the whole CIFS/SMB family of protocols used to be reverse
engineered, eventhough now in later times the documentation to those
protocols are now available so errors in the decoding can be fixed.
If the
> Without knowing the protocol, I'd say there's almost always room for
> improvement. Open a bug with a sample capture and see if someone can
> figure out how to strengthen the check.
Ok, thanks. I will open a bug request then.
> ps. you mentioned your dissector is hosted on sourceforge; woul
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 02:51:19PM +0100, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 01:14:50PM +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> > It is in the upper right corner.
> > The links are pretty small. You are not the first who missed them. :-)
>
> Can you please provide the URL? If the URL is
> https://
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 02:51:19PM +0100, Joerg Mayer wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 01:14:50PM +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>> > It is in the upper right corner.
>> > The links are pretty small. You are not the first who missed them. :-)
>>
On 2/25/14 9:20 AM, Evan Huus wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 02:51:19PM +0100, Joerg Mayer wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 01:14:50PM +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
It is in the upper right corner.
The links are pretty small. You
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:09:43AM -0800, Gerald Combs wrote:
> I haven't found anything obvious in the server logs that would explain
> the error, unfortunately.
>
> Since you were able to add your SSH key, does
>
> ssh your.usern...@code.wireshark.org:29418 gerrit --help
I had to use ssh jma..
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:09:43AM -0800, Gerald Combs wrote:
>> I haven't found anything obvious in the server logs that would explain
>> the error, unfortunately.
>>
>> Since you were able to add your SSH key, does
>>
>> ssh your.usern...@cod
Sorry, this was my mistake. I got it into my head that I'd landed the
smb-direct dissector for some reason, when I clearly hadn't.
That kind of day, I guess.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Wireshark code review
wrote:
> URL:
> https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git;a=commit;
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 01:48:22PM -0500, Evan Huus wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:09:43AM -0800, Gerald Combs wrote:
> >> I haven't found anything obvious in the server logs that would explain
> >> the error, unfortunately.
> >>
> >> Si
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 01:48:22PM -0500, Evan Huus wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
>> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:09:43AM -0800, Gerald Combs wrote:
>> >> I haven't found anything obvious in the server logs that
2014-02-25 22:57 GMT+01:00 Joerg Mayer :
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 01:48:22PM -0500, Evan Huus wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:09:43AM -0800, Gerald Combs wrote:
> > >> I haven't found anything obvious in the server logs that would e
On Feb 25, 2014, at 4:57 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> I just did that, and received the following message during push:
> jmayer@egg:~/work/wireshark/git/ui/qt(master)> git push
I believe you're supposed to do 'git review branchname', which does the 'git
push' for you and probably appends the "bran
On 2/25/14 10:39 AM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
>
> Once I've finished cloning the repo (somehow it's not my day: git clone
> is an atomic operation and I'm behind an unstable Wireless connection),
> how do I proceed? Is there a wiki page that I can follow to set all
> the required and recommented git vari
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 02:26:52PM -0800, Gerald Combs wrote:
> On 2/25/14 10:39 AM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> >
> > Once I've finished cloning the repo (somehow it's not my day: git clone
> > is an atomic operation and I'm behind an unstable Wireless connection),
> > how do I proceed? Is there a wiki p
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 05:01:55PM -0500, Evan Huus wrote:
> It sets up so that "git review" does the correct push, as well as
> setting the gerrit topic to the current branch name (if different from
> "master") and a few other conveniences. So there's no particular
> reason to set up git push. Thi
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 05:01:55PM -0500, Evan Huus wrote:
>> It sets up so that "git review" does the correct push, as well as
>> setting the gerrit topic to the current branch name (if different from
>> "master") and a few other conveniences.
a) Is there a reason why the reply to address is not set to something everyone
can see? The way this is setup up right now means that technical discussion
happens between private mail addresses and thus knowledge gets lost.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:39:42PM +, Alexis La Goutte (Code Rev
On 2/25/14 2:42 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 05:01:55PM -0500, Evan Huus wrote:
>> It sets up so that "git review" does the correct push, as well as
>> setting the gerrit topic to the current branch name (if different from
>> "master") and a few other conveniences. So there's no
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 03:02:24PM -0800, Gerald Combs wrote:
> You should be able to run something like
>
> ssh code.wireshark.org gerrit review --submit --code-review +2 \
>
>
> although I haven't tried it myself.
OK, a few attempts later I've done this successfully with the following
com
Hello,
I've just documented the workflow I used to update the NEWS file.
Please let me know what I missed and if you have ideas for improvement.
Thanks
Jörg
jmayer@egg:~/work/wireshark/git(master)> git branch newsupdate
jmayer@egg:~/work/wireshark/git(master)> git checkout newsupdate
Switched
On Feb 25, 2014, at 7:06 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> jmayer@egg:~/work/wireshark/git(master)> git branch newsupdate
> jmayer@egg:~/work/wireshark/git(master)> git checkout newsupdate
> Switched to branch 'newsupdate'
% git checkout -b newsupdate
would have created the branch and checked it out at
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Hadriel Kaplan
wrote:
>
> On Feb 25, 2014, at 7:06 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
>
>> jmayer@egg:~/work/wireshark/git(master)> git branch newsupdate
>> jmayer@egg:~/work/wireshark/git(master)> git checkout newsupdate
>> Switched to branch 'newsupdate'
>
> % git checkout
On 2/25/2014 7:50 PM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
On Feb 25, 2014, at 7:06 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote: gerrit
jmayer@egg:~/work/wireshark/git(master)> git branch newsupdate
jmayer@egg:~/work/wireshark/git(master)> git checkout newsupdate
Switched to branch 'newsupdate'
% git checkout -b newsupdate
wo
On Feb 25, 2014, at 8:14 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
> We also have the developer guide ([1] and friends). Ideally this
> information would only live in one place, though there doesn't seem to
> be a consensus as to where that is (wiki, README, developer guide).
>
> [1] https://www.wireshark.org/docs/
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Hadriel Kaplan
wrote:
>
> On Feb 25, 2014, at 8:14 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
>
>> We also have the developer guide ([1] and friends). Ideally this
>> information would only live in one place, though there doesn't seem to
>> be a consensus as to where that is (wiki, REA
The coverity build is failing again, but it's not at all clear to me
from reading the public log what the problem is.
Anybody know where to get more detailed information on the problem?
Evan
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Clang%20Code%20Analysis/builds/2603/steps/cov-build/logs/std
On Feb 25, 2014, at 8:44 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
> I'm all for consolidating the above information - we just need to
> decide which of the many places to consolidate *to*. We've been
> playing musical chairs every few months moving things around from A to
> B, B to C, and C to A, but never actually
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Hadriel Kaplan
wrote:
>
> On Feb 25, 2014, at 8:44 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
>
>> I'm all for consolidating the above information - we just need to
>> decide which of the many places to consolidate *to*. We've been
>> playing musical chairs every few months moving thin
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> a) Is there a reason why the reply to address is not set to something
> everyone
>can see? The way this is setup up right now means that technical
> discussion
>happens between private mail addresses and thus knowledge gets lost.
>
>
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:08 AM, Evan Huus wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Hadriel Kaplan
> wrote:
> >
> > On Feb 25, 2014, at 8:44 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
> >
> >> I'm all for consolidating the above information - we just need to
> >> decide which of the many places to consolidate *to*.
33 matches
Mail list logo
