On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:08 AM, Evan Huus <eapa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Hadriel Kaplan > <hadriel.kap...@oracle.com> wrote: > > > > On Feb 25, 2014, at 8:44 PM, Evan Huus <eapa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> I'm all for consolidating the above information - we just need to > >> decide which of the many places to consolidate *to*. We've been > >> playing musical chairs every few months moving things around from A to > >> B, B to C, and C to A, but never actually getting anywhere. > > > > Personally I think the wiki makes the most sense, because none of that > stuff is specific to the code version/branch/state; as opposed to the info > in most of the docs/READMEs, which are specific to the release. > > > > Also we can subscribe to changes of that wiki page, and thereby get > notified via email of changes instead of happening to notice a change in a > txt/asciidoc file in the code tree. > > > > It's really the kind of thing a wiki's for, imo. > > That makes sense to me. So more broadly, how about: > - user documentation in the user guide as asciidoc (currently in > docbook/ in git, though I guess that should be moved since it won't be > using docbook anymore) > - developer documentation on the wiki > - api documentation in doxygen > > If this makes sense to everyone, then: > - the wiki needs a major structural cleanup, much of it is quite > stale; I am half-tempted to wipe everything (or namespace it to old-* > or something) and start fresh > +1 no a bad idea... > - wireshark's doxygen output needs to be made more accessible (it's > already hosted publicly somewhere but I couldn't find a link to it) > - the developer guide and doc/README.* need to be parcelled up between > the wiki and doxygen comments, then removed > - the user's guide should be converted to asciidoc like the developers > guide, and then moved to doc/ > > Thoughts? > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org > ?subject=unsubscribe >
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe