On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 05:01:55PM -0500, Evan Huus wrote: > It sets up so that "git review" does the correct push, as well as > setting the gerrit topic to the current branch name (if different from > "master") and a few other conveniences. So there's no particular > reason to set up git push. This lets admins differentiate between push > (which force-pushes to master for admin purposes) and review (which > goes to gerrit).
Ah, now I understand! So now that I have managed to get my first three commits into review, how do I proceed on the command line? The reason I need to ask is that intro-quick only explains the workflow via web browser - which is something that I'm not intending to use. If I understand things correctly I should be able to do the same thing using "git review", or am I wrong here somehow? Thanks Jörg -- Joerg Mayer <jma...@loplof.de> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
