Re: [Wireshark-dev] "right" git clone address

2014-02-20 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi All & Gerald, 2014-02-01 23:04 GMT+01:00 Evan Huus : > On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Toralf Förster wrote: >> As a "follower" of the wireshark code I'm wondering if >> https://code.wireshark.org/review/wireshark or >> https://code.wireshark.org/git/wireshark is the right address to build >>

Re: [Wireshark-dev] "right" git clone address

2014-02-20 Thread Evan Huus
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote: > Hi All & Gerald, > > 2014-02-01 23:04 GMT+01:00 Evan Huus : >> On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Toralf Förster >> wrote: >>> As a "follower" of the wireshark code I'm wondering if >>> https://code.wireshark.org/review/wireshark or >>> https:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] "right" git clone address

2014-02-20 Thread Bálint Réczey
2014-02-20 14:36 GMT+01:00 Evan Huus : > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote: >> Hi All & Gerald, >> >> 2014-02-01 23:04 GMT+01:00 Evan Huus : >>> On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Toralf Förster >>> wrote: As a "follower" of the wireshark code I'm wondering if https://c

Re: [Wireshark-dev] What clang analyzer version do the auto-bots use?

2014-02-20 Thread Alexis La Goutte
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:46 AM, Gerald Combs wrote: > On 2/19/14 12:55 PM, Alexis La Goutte wrote: > > > > > > Le mercredi 19 février 2014, Hadriel Kaplan > > a écrit : > > > > Howdy, > > Does anyone know what clang static analyzer checker-XXX version i

Re: [Wireshark-dev] displaying header field without filtering

2014-02-20 Thread John Dill
>Message: 2 >Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 19:03:57 -0500 >From: Evan Huus >To: Developer support list for Wireshark >Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] displaying header field without filtering >Message-ID: > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > >On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:57 PM, John Dill

Re: [Wireshark-dev] What clang analyzer version do the auto-bots use?

2014-02-20 Thread Hadriel Kaplan
On Feb 19, 2014, at 7:46 PM, Gerald Combs wrote: >> May be see with Gerald to update the analyzer > > It's now using Clang 3.3. Cool, that seems to have removed some previous (false-positive) errors. Thanks! -hadriel ___

[Wireshark-dev] duplicate field names (was: displaying header field without filtering)

2014-02-20 Thread Hadriel Kaplan
On Feb 19, 2014, at 7:03 PM, Evan Huus wrote: > You can reuse a single "spare" field for all of these bytes, and they > would only cause a single entry in the filter expression dialog. I > suspect this is the best answer. Speaking of duplicating field abbreviation names, I was going to "fix" bu

Re: [Wireshark-dev] duplicate field names (was: displaying header field without filtering)

2014-02-20 Thread Pascal Quantin
Le 20 févr. 2014 19:55, "Hadriel Kaplan" a écrit : > > > On Feb 19, 2014, at 7:03 PM, Evan Huus wrote: > > > You can reuse a single "spare" field for all of these bytes, and they > > would only cause a single entry in the filter expression dialog. I > > suspect this is the best answer. > > Speaki

Re: [Wireshark-dev] duplicate field names (was: displaying header field without filtering)

2014-02-20 Thread Hadriel Kaplan
On Feb 20, 2014, at 2:35 PM, Pascal Quantin wrote: > Hi, > It can create issues (as you can guess) and this is tracked by bug 2402. Huh. Well at least it's a recent problem. ;) -hadriel ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mail

Re: [Wireshark-dev] displaying header field without filtering

2014-02-20 Thread Guy Harris
On Feb 20, 2014, at 8:12 AM, John Dill wrote: > On 19 Feb 2014, Guy Harris wrote: > >> If it's deemed too-inconvenient to require that all spare >> fields/padding/etc. be given some named field or fields, perhaps >> we should have a >> >> proto_tree_add_spare(tree, tvb, offset, len); >>

Re: [Wireshark-dev] "right" git clone address

2014-02-20 Thread Gerald Combs
On 2/20/14 6:21 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote: > 2014-02-20 14:36 GMT+01:00 Evan Huus : >> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Bálint Réczey >> wrote: >>> Hi All & Gerald, >>> >>> 2014-02-01 23:04 GMT+01:00 Evan Huus : On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Toralf Förster wrote: > As a "follower"

Re: [Wireshark-dev] "right" git clone address

2014-02-20 Thread Evan Huus
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Gerald Combs wrote: > On 2/20/14 6:21 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote: >> 2014-02-20 14:36 GMT+01:00 Evan Huus : >>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Bálint Réczey >>> wrote: Hi All & Gerald, 2014-02-01 23:04 GMT+01:00 Evan Huus : > On Sat, Feb 1, 2014

Re: [Wireshark-dev] "right" git clone address

2014-02-20 Thread Guy Harris
On Feb 20, 2014, at 4:20 PM, Gerald Combs wrote: > I'd prefer to have as few repositories and repository URLs as possible. > This would hopefully make things less confusing for developers and is > one less thing to monitor and maintain on the server side. (On the other > hand I think there's a c