On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Gerald Combs <ger...@wireshark.org> wrote: > On 2/20/14 6:21 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote: >> 2014-02-20 14:36 GMT+01:00 Evan Huus <eapa...@gmail.com>: >>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Bálint Réczey <bal...@balintreczey.hu> >>> wrote: >>>> Hi All & Gerald, >>>> >>>> 2014-02-01 23:04 GMT+01:00 Evan Huus <eapa...@gmail.com>: >>>>> On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Toralf Förster <toralf.foers...@gmx.de> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> As a "follower" of the wireshark code I'm wondering if >>>>>> https://code.wireshark.org/review/wireshark or >>>>>> https://code.wireshark.org/git/wireshark is the right address to build >>>>>> the latest wireshark from source code. >>>>>> >>>>>> (If I understand it correctly this question is similar to "kernel" by >>>>>> Linus versus "kernel-next" by Stephen Rothwell - right ?) >>>>> >>>>> No, https://code.wireshark.org/git/wireshark was a read-only mirror of >>>>> the subversion repo and should be considered dead (I expect Gerald >>>>> will remove it at some point). >>>> I think it would be useful to keep it as a read-only mirror for >>>> browsing the code easily. >>> >>> Why? It will have exactly the same contents as the main repository, so >>> there will be no difference between browsing one or the other. >> There are probably many links pointing to >> https://code.wireshark.org/git/wireshark >> on the Internet and removing the repository will break them. >> Keeping it updated is trivial OTOH. > > I'd prefer to have as few repositories and repository URLs as possible. > This would hopefully make things less confusing for developers and is > one less thing to monitor and maintain on the server side. (On the other > hand I think there's a compelling argument for mirroring to GitHub, > especially if we can import pull requests into Gerrit.) > > For the time being I've redirected the following URL prefixes to Gerrit: > > http://anongit.wireshark.org/git > http://code.wireshark.org/git > https://code.wireshark.org/git > > I'm able to fetch using a couple of old test repositories here. If > anything isn't redirecting properly please let me know. > > > (It looks like people are still checking out from > anonsvn.wireshark.org/wireshark. I'm not sure what to do about that.)
Git allows the server to send back special messages for the client to display along with success/failure (Gerrit uses this to send you the URL when you upload a new review). I don't know if SVN has something similar, but if so we could add the migration message there as well. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
