On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Bálint Réczey <bal...@balintreczey.hu> wrote: > Hi All & Gerald, > > 2014-02-01 23:04 GMT+01:00 Evan Huus <eapa...@gmail.com>: >> On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Toralf Förster <toralf.foers...@gmx.de> >> wrote: >>> As a "follower" of the wireshark code I'm wondering if >>> https://code.wireshark.org/review/wireshark or >>> https://code.wireshark.org/git/wireshark is the right address to build >>> the latest wireshark from source code. >>> >>> (If I understand it correctly this question is similar to "kernel" by >>> Linus versus "kernel-next" by Stephen Rothwell - right ?) >> >> No, https://code.wireshark.org/git/wireshark was a read-only mirror of >> the subversion repo and should be considered dead (I expect Gerald >> will remove it at some point). > I think it would be useful to keep it as a read-only mirror for > browsing the code easily.
Why? It will have exactly the same contents as the main repository, so there will be no difference between browsing one or the other. > Gerald, could you please make it updated from Gerrit branches instead > of deleting it? > > Cheers, > Balint > >> >> Please use only https://code.wireshark.org/review/wireshark > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
