Re: [Wireshark-dev] "right" git clone address

2014-02-21 Thread Gerald Combs
On 2/21/14 1:15 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote: > Hi Gerald, > > 2014-02-21 1:20 GMT+01:00 Gerald Combs : > ... >> For the time being I've redirected the following URL prefixes to Gerrit: >> >> http://anongit.wireshark.org/git >> http://code.wireshark.org/git >> https://code.wireshark.org/git >> >> I'm a

Re: [Wireshark-dev] "right" git clone address

2014-02-21 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi Gerald, 2014-02-21 1:20 GMT+01:00 Gerald Combs : ... > For the time being I've redirected the following URL prefixes to Gerrit: > > http://anongit.wireshark.org/git > http://code.wireshark.org/git > https://code.wireshark.org/git > > I'm able to fetch using a couple of old test repositories her

Re: [Wireshark-dev] "right" git clone address

2014-02-20 Thread Guy Harris
On Feb 20, 2014, at 4:20 PM, Gerald Combs wrote: > I'd prefer to have as few repositories and repository URLs as possible. > This would hopefully make things less confusing for developers and is > one less thing to monitor and maintain on the server side. (On the other > hand I think there's a c

Re: [Wireshark-dev] "right" git clone address

2014-02-20 Thread Evan Huus
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Gerald Combs wrote: > On 2/20/14 6:21 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote: >> 2014-02-20 14:36 GMT+01:00 Evan Huus : >>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Bálint Réczey >>> wrote: Hi All & Gerald, 2014-02-01 23:04 GMT+01:00 Evan Huus : > On Sat, Feb 1, 2014

Re: [Wireshark-dev] "right" git clone address

2014-02-20 Thread Gerald Combs
On 2/20/14 6:21 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote: > 2014-02-20 14:36 GMT+01:00 Evan Huus : >> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Bálint Réczey >> wrote: >>> Hi All & Gerald, >>> >>> 2014-02-01 23:04 GMT+01:00 Evan Huus : On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Toralf Förster wrote: > As a "follower"

Re: [Wireshark-dev] "right" git clone address

2014-02-20 Thread Bálint Réczey
2014-02-20 14:36 GMT+01:00 Evan Huus : > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote: >> Hi All & Gerald, >> >> 2014-02-01 23:04 GMT+01:00 Evan Huus : >>> On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Toralf Förster >>> wrote: As a "follower" of the wireshark code I'm wondering if https://c

Re: [Wireshark-dev] "right" git clone address

2014-02-20 Thread Evan Huus
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote: > Hi All & Gerald, > > 2014-02-01 23:04 GMT+01:00 Evan Huus : >> On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Toralf Förster >> wrote: >>> As a "follower" of the wireshark code I'm wondering if >>> https://code.wireshark.org/review/wireshark or >>> https:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] "right" git clone address

2014-02-20 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi All & Gerald, 2014-02-01 23:04 GMT+01:00 Evan Huus : > On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Toralf Förster wrote: >> As a "follower" of the wireshark code I'm wondering if >> https://code.wireshark.org/review/wireshark or >> https://code.wireshark.org/git/wireshark is the right address to build >>

Re: [Wireshark-dev] "right" git clone address

2014-02-01 Thread Evan Huus
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Toralf Förster wrote: > As a "follower" of the wireshark code I'm wondering if > https://code.wireshark.org/review/wireshark or > https://code.wireshark.org/git/wireshark is the right address to build > the latest wireshark from source code. > > (If I understand it

[Wireshark-dev] "right" git clone address

2014-02-01 Thread Toralf Förster
As a "follower" of the wireshark code I'm wondering if https://code.wireshark.org/review/wireshark or https://code.wireshark.org/git/wireshark is the right address to build the latest wireshark from source code. (If I understand it correctly this question is similar to "kernel" by Linus versus "ke