On Mar 24, 2014, at 11:26 AM, Bill Meier wrote:
> On 3/24/2014 9:21 AM, Evan Huus wrote:
>>
>> In summary: the diff is computed locally in javascript, and seems to
>> be worse than O(n) on the size of the underlying file; viewing the
>> diff for any file >1k lines may be slow, but if you just l
On 3/24/2014 12:03 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
IOW: The 2 versions being diff'd are downloaded in total before doing a
local compare ?
It seems so; however it doesn't appear to be the bandwidth that's the
problem, but the actual diff algorithm. The bottleneck is definitely
CPU.
For those of us who
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Bill Meier wrote:
> On 3/24/2014 9:21 AM, Evan Huus wrote:
>>
>>
>> In summary: the diff is computed locally in javascript, and seems to
>> be worse than O(n) on the size of the underlying file; viewing the
>> diff for any file >1k lines may be slow, but if you ju
On 3/24/2014 9:21 AM, Evan Huus wrote:
In summary: the diff is computed locally in javascript, and seems to
be worse than O(n) on the size of the underlying file; viewing the
diff for any file >1k lines may be slow, but if you just let it run it
will finish eventually. Avoid epan/enterprise-numb
On Mar 24, 2014, at 9:21 AM, Evan Huus wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 8:55 AM, wrote:
>> I can't consistently view the code of patches submitted to Gerrit (the
>> Side-by-Side or Unified links). I've tried on IE8 and 9 as well as Firefox
>> v28 (all on Windows) and get the same consistentl
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 8:55 AM, wrote:
> I can't consistently view the code of patches submitted to Gerrit (the
> Side-by-Side or Unified links). I've tried on IE8 and 9 as well as Firefox
> v28 (all on Windows) and get the same consistently inconsistent results
> (some patches work, some don't
I can't consistently view the code of patches submitted to Gerrit (the
Side-by-Side or Unified links). I've tried on IE8 and 9 as well as Firefox v28
(all on Windows) and get the same consistently inconsistent results (some
patches work, some don't. Some files within a particular patch are vi
Hi Evan,
we use it in proprietary protocol which transports encrypted master keys for
tracing purposes.
I guess it is general enough that it could be used also from other "tracing"
protocols transferring master key although it is not used now.
Best regards,
Tomas
-Original Message-
I was just poking through packet-ssl.[ch] for change [1] and noticed
that ssl_set_master_secret isn't used. The compiler's not flagging it
because it's in a header file, but I don't see it showing up anywhere
else in the code base.
Remove it? Or is it exposed for 3rd-party plugins that need it? In
