Re: [Wireshark-dev] Remove old packet list code in trunk?

2010-08-18 Thread Jaap Keuter
On 08/19/2010 02:15 AM, Gerald Combs wrote: > Jaap Keuter wrote: >> On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:14:43 +0200, Anders Broman >> wrote: -Original Message- From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Jaap Keuter Sent: den

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-XP-x86

2010-08-18 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-XP-x86 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-XP-x86/builds/893 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: windows-xp-x86 Build Reason:

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark 1.4 on Windows-7-x64

2010-08-18 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-7-x64 on Wireshark 1.4. Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk-1.4/builders/Windows-7-x64/builds/61 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk-1.4/ Buildslave for this Build: windows-7-x64 Build Reason: Build

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-7-x64

2010-08-18 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-7-x64 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-7-x64/builds/939 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: windows-7-x64 Build Reason: B

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Remove old packet list code in trunk?

2010-08-18 Thread Gerald Combs
Jaap Keuter wrote: > On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:14:43 +0200, Anders Broman > wrote: >>> -Original Message- >>> From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org >>> [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Jaap Keuter >>> Sent: den 18 augusti 2010 11:02 >>> To: Developer support list

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark-dev Digest, Vol 51, Issue 22

2010-08-18 Thread Mark Landriscina
Eloy, I found two references Python related projects. First embedded the Python interpreter into Wireshark, so that one could call Python scripts from with Wireshark. The other was a project that allowed one to write dissectors in Python. Really, the first effort is closest to what I was lookin

Re: [Wireshark-dev] libtshark + scripting language support

2010-08-18 Thread Mark Landriscina
Guy, Only need to link to libtshark.a. No need to link to libwireshark, etc. Tshark.c does actually contain a fair amount of other useful code that ties all the dissection stuff nicely together. My original approach was to just draw on libwireshark and libwiretap code directly but found that I

Re: [Wireshark-dev] libtshark + scripting language support

2010-08-18 Thread Eloy Paris
Hi Mark, On 08/18/2010 01:34 PM, Mark Landriscina wrote: [...] > My motivation was that I wanted to do some work with Scapy and needed > to access application layer protocol dissections within Python > without re-writing all the dissection code already available in > tshark/wireshark. I am not

Re: [Wireshark-dev] libtshark + scripting language support

2010-08-18 Thread Guy Harris
On Aug 18, 2010, at 10:34 AM, Mark Landriscina wrote: > I'd like to contribute some work that I've done to the wireshark community > and need some advice on the best way to do this, assuming there is interest. > If not, that would be good to know as well. I suspect that it might be best > to f

[Wireshark-dev] libtshark + scripting language support

2010-08-18 Thread Mark Landriscina
Hi, I'd like to contribute some work that I've done to the wireshark community and need some advice on the best way to do this, assuming there is interest. If not, that would be good to know as well. I suspect that it might be best to fork this off as a separate project vs. incorporating it dir

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wiki weirdness?

2010-08-18 Thread Gerald Combs
Bill Meier wrote: > Jeff Morriss wrote: >> The top part of the Wiki (that has a kind of tool bar with links to the >> page's Info, etc.) has gotten "weird" for me: instead of lining up >> nicely the links are in a vertical list. >> >> It looks the same on Firefox and IE and doesn't change if I'm

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wiki weirdness?

2010-08-18 Thread Bill Meier
Jeff Morriss wrote: > The top part of the Wiki (that has a kind of tool bar with links to the > page's Info, etc.) has gotten "weird" for me: instead of lining up > nicely the links are in a vertical list. > > It looks the same on Firefox and IE and doesn't change if I'm logged in > or not. An

[Wireshark-dev] Wiki weirdness?

2010-08-18 Thread Jeff Morriss
The top part of the Wiki (that has a kind of tool bar with links to the page's Info, etc.) has gotten "weird" for me: instead of lining up nicely the links are in a vertical list. It looks the same on Firefox and IE and doesn't change if I'm logged in or not. Anyone else seeing this?

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Remove old packet list code in trunk?

2010-08-18 Thread Jaap Keuter
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:14:43 +0200, Anders Broman wrote: >>-Original Message- >>From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org >>[mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Jaap Keuter >>Sent: den 18 augusti 2010 11:02 >>To: Developer support list for Wireshark >>Subject: Re: [Wi

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Remove old packet list code in trunk?

2010-08-18 Thread Anders Broman
>-Original Message- >From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org >[mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Jaap Keuter >Sent: den 18 augusti 2010 11:02 >To: Developer support list for Wireshark >Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Remove old packet list code in trunk? > >Hi, > >

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Remove old packet list code in trunk?

2010-08-18 Thread Jaap Keuter
Hi, Mind you that it would make back porting to trunk-1.4 of packet list related code more difficult since the source code will diverge. That means more manual back porting, which is more laborious and error prone (sorry Gerald). I would suggest holding off on stripping trunk of old packet list c

Re: [Wireshark-dev] data link type option in wireshark

2010-08-18 Thread Guy Harris
On Aug 18, 2010, at 12:30 AM, upendra.a...@wipro.com wrote: > Thanks a lot for you reply. > Let me put my question more clearly. > > In my current Wireshark, when decoding my own plug-ins, the order of > dissection is: > > Frame > Ethernet > Internet Protocol > User Datagram Protocol (UDP) > My