>-----Original Message----- >From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org >[mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Jaap Keuter >Sent: den 18 augusti 2010 11:02 >To: Developer support list for Wireshark >Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Remove old packet list code in trunk? > >Hi, > >Mind you that it would make back porting to trunk-1.4 of packet list related >code more difficult since the >source code will diverge. >That means more manual back porting, which is more laborious and error prone >(sorry Gerald). > >I would suggest holding off on stripping trunk of old packet list code, but >not to maintain it. After we put >1.4.1 'in the wild' and survives real user >scrutiny it time to start ripping it out IMHO. > >Thanks, >Jaap
I agree with you, just to be clear not having NEW_PACKET_LIST defined is not expected to Work in trunk any more. Perhapps adding comments about that and/or change it to #if 0 if edditing a file for Other reasons? Regards Anders > >On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 07:40:08 +0200, Anders Broman <a.bro...@telia.com> >wrote: >> Hi, >> In bug 5115 the question is raised if we should remove the "old packet >> list" code as it becomes cumbersome to write code for both branches in >> some cases. With the upcoming release of 1.4 I suppose we might as >> well remove the code in trunk. >> Regards >> Anders >> ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
