Hello,
what is the purpose of HAVE_AIRPDCAP macro?
It is always defined in all makefile.nmake files regardless AirPcap is
available or not.
Unfortunately I can not compile packet-ieee80211.c file on Windows
without AirPcap.
Any suggestions?
___
Wiresha
Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a new dissector for STUN v2, that is currently in WGLC at the IETF.
>
> The packet-stun.c file must be copied into packet-stun2.c before
> applying this patch.
>
> I also attached a capture file that contains various STUN and STUN v2
> packets.
An
On Dec 5, 2006, at 1:57 PM, Ulf Lamping wrote:
> As a Windows user I don't know what an "epoch time" is.
Not all Unix users know what it is, either.
> Would it be
> better to use "Seconds Since Unix Epoch" or even better "Seconds Since
> 1.1.1970"?
Or "since 1970-01-01 00:00:00 GMT", to use so
Douglas Pratley wrote:
> That's great. Now that I've demonstrated to our management that we can
> get changes into the Wireshark code (so long as they're useful to
> everybody), I'll be sitting down with the guys who use Wireshark a lot
> here and looking at the Wireshark wishlist; hopefully I'll b
I am seeing ptvcursor as an encapsulation allowing to forget about
proto_* structures/functions and helps to simplify the code generated
(in general). But for now, it is not possible to write all without
knowing any proto_* functions. I will present here a way to get rid of
some code and forget a
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 10:03:57AM +0100, Francesco Fondelli wrote:
> So I defined a range_string struct. It's like value_string
> but stores range <-> string pairs.
> Moreover I wrote rval_to_str(), match_strrval_idx()
> match_strrval() which are behaving exactly as
> val_to_str(), match_strval_i
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 12:16:11PM -0500, Mark Price wrote:
> It would be quite convenient if the Go menu had an entry for "jump to
> the next toggled packet". I.e. if you right click on several packets
> and toggle them as checkpoints, you should be able to navigate between
> those packets.
T
It would be quite convenient if the Go menu had an entry for "jump to the
next toggled packet".
I.e. if you right click on several packets and toggle them as checkpoints,
you should be able to navigate between those packets.
Mark
___
Wireshark-dev maili
You cannot make big returns on an oil company AFTER huge
profits are reported. You also can't make them by getting
in AFTER successful drilling results. Everyone needs a
helping hand at getting in BEFORE the big events, and
that's what we are giving you here.
Great product, great sector, tigh
Hi,
As long as it's packet based Wireshark can be made to handle it.
But since the serial port is a 'stream' not all communications are
suitable to be captured.
Thanx,
Jaap
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Miguel Angel Alvarez wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am a newbie in WireShark, so perhaps this question has been ma
Hi,
Best thing you can do is collect all the captures you can get your hands
on from this application and then use them to fuzztest your dissector.
Thanx,
Jaap
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello ,
>
> I've developed a plug-in based upon a proprietary protocol , but testing
>
Marcelo Jedi wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> After I learned how to write simple dissectors (without conversation
> or any advanced feature) I started to look for some dissector
> generators. I tested idl2wrs, asn2wrs and Pidl. They work fine, but
> generate code related to specific protocols, not for
Hi
I am a newbie in WireShark, so perhaps this question has been made
before (although I have not found anything in the archives).
I was wondering if there is a method to use WireShark to analyse traffic
in an RS232 (serial) interface. That is... not SLIP or PPP traffic over
it, but non-IP tra
Hello ,
I've developed a plug-in based upon a proprietary protocol , but testing
it has become an issue for me as I don't have the live setup to generate
the packets for that protocol . Can anyone suggest me whether there is
any tool which would generate packets for my proprietary protocol .
N
Hi everybody,
After I learned how to write simple dissectors (without conversation
or any advanced feature) I started to look for some dissector
generators. I tested idl2wrs, asn2wrs and Pidl. They work fine, but
generate code related to specific protocols, not for a generic one.
I think ASN.1 la
That's great. Now that I've demonstrated to our management that we can
get changes into the Wireshark code (so long as they're useful to
everybody), I'll be sitting down with the guys who use Wireshark a lot
here and looking at the Wireshark wishlist; hopefully I'll be given the
time to do more stu
Hi,
Not any more, see wireshark-setup-0.99.5-SVN-20043.exe
Thanx,
Jaap
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Stephen Fisher wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 12:25:02AM +0100, Jaap Keuter wrote:
>
> > As a sample I've added a version resource to the Win32 plugin
> > h223.dll. This way it becomes very simple to ch
17 matches
Mail list logo
