Re: [BAWUG] Re: Repeater compatibility -- was: WET11, meta issue

2005-02-25 Thread Brian Lloyd
Greg DesBrisay wrote: Note: this applies to Cisco Aironet gear, not Cisco Linksys gear. Thank you. I tend to think of them as being separate even tho' I know cisco acquired Linksys. Certainly they have a different code base so I would not lump them together. Sorry, I don't have the answer to

Re: [BAWUG] Re: Repeater compatibility -- was: WET11, meta issue

2005-02-25 Thread Greg DesBrisay
Note: this applies to Cisco Aironet gear, not Cisco Linksys gear. Sorry, I don't have the answer to your question regarding Linksys gear off the top of my head, Although I'm sure a little digging on the Linksys site will get you the answer. I recall that the user manuals for all the Linksy

[BAWUG] Re: Repeater compatibility -- was: WET11, meta issue

2005-02-23 Thread Stephen Ronan
Brian Lloyd wrote: "Repeater access points running Cisco IOS cannot associate to parent access points that do not run IOS." http://makeashorterlink.com/?V3F51358A That is what I was afraid of. So, at least with cisco I need to use all of the same flavor of AP. I can live with that but I need to

[BAWUG] Re: Repeater compatibility -- was: WET11, meta issue

2005-02-23 Thread Brian Lloyd
Stephen Ronan wrote: Brian Lloyd wrote: Someone just pointed out the repeater function in the WET11. My question is, will this work with any other AP or is this a proprietary extension of the 802.11 spec that requires another LinkSys device as the main AP? Don't know the answer to your question