In a controller I have got the following form function:
def create_form():
response.view='form.html'
form=SQLFORM.factory(
Field('bedrijfsnaam',length=54,requires=IS_NOT_EMPTY()),
Field('kvk_nummer',length=8),
Field('subdossiernummer',length=4,default=''),
Fi
Massimo,
> if isinstance(form,FORM):
> form[0][-1][1].append(...)
Thanks, a much better solution.
Kind regards,
Annet
I think there is another bug as well.
The _unlock function only unlocks the session file if it exists but leaves
response.session_file defined.
Later when the request cycle finishes the _try_store_on_disk function will
still see response.session_file as active and write it but this is now
dan
Oh crud, I didn't see the self._forget state variable test at the front of
_try-store_on_disk, sorry for the noise and response.session_file is a file
object so having it go out of scope will close it.
Ron
Thanks for the pointer.
Regards
Johann
--
May grace and peace be yours in abundance through the full knowledge of God
and of Jesus our Lord! His divine power has given us everything we need for
life and godliness through the full knowledge of the one who called us by
his own glory and excellen
When I extract the value of a form field, if I've written for example
"take helmet", I get the value of field `take_helmet, why?
The code is as follows:
form = FORM ('name risk',
INPUT (_name = 'name1', required = [IS_NOT_EMPTY (),
IS_UPPER ()]),
'preventive
If you look at form.vars.name1 before passing them via redirect you´ll
see that no replacing has been done, try with
if form.accepts (request.vars, session):
session.flash = "Form sent"
return form.vars.name1
the replacing happens in the redirect because you can´t have an URL with space
Thanks, I fixed it with the next code:
redirect(URL('modificar_obra',vars=dict(a=form.vars.nombre)))
On 19 ene, 11:19, Kenneth Lundström
wrote:
> If you look at form.vars.name1 before passing them via redirect you ll
> see that no replacing has been done, try with
>
> if form.accepts (request.var
Maybe the bookmarking networks are considerably explored. Yet, most
people don't even use the web for anything useful. All they want is
already on Facebook galleries and those "social" networks. Bookmarking
options are limited by its sources and most people sources are always
the same, you just see
Maybe the bookmarking networks are considerably explored. Yet, most
people don't even use the web for anything useful. All they want is
already on Facebook galleries and those "social" networks. Bookmarking
options are limited by its sources and most people sources are always
the same, you just see
Just a suggestion.
When I an incorrect url, for example:
http://web2py.com/layout (instead of http://web2py.com/layouts)
...appears an "invalid controller" error, as it's expected.
What if it instead is shown a nicer 404?
Regards.
Yes SQLAlchemy is exactly what I am looking for. Can anybody give me
pointers in extending SQLFORM to automatically build crud forms from
my sqlalchemy objects, I am using declarative_base to build my models.
On Jan 13, 2:23 pm, "Arun K.Rajeevan" wrote:
> May be you like SQLAlchemy and Elixir (it
On Jan 18, 11:21 pm, Anthony wrote:
> Am I missing something?
Yes. You're probably running web2py with the default number of
threads (30 I think?).
Your 2nd browser window's cookie is unlikely to get associated to the
same thread.
I have lots of users and when one thread takes a long time, som
> No, a cookie is associated with a session.
Agreed. I'm pretty much using 'cookie', 'user', 'session', and
'browser' as interchangeable for my purposes. A cookie is associated
to a session, but somehow a session is associated to a thread. Either
that or I'm seeing some other effect for which I
;-) Originellement oui...
I would tell you on the orther thread that I post this one... I will do it
just for the one that fall on the orther thread so they could keep track...
I continue today working on this.
Richard
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:30 AM, mart wrote:
> Hey, es-tu de Montreal?
>
So usefull thread!!
Thanks guys
Richard
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Anthony wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 18, 2011 10:38:03 PM UTC-5, rochacbruno wrote:
>>
>> It has a 2.0 version http://www.trilancer.com/jpolite2/
>>
>
> Yeah, the version at http://www.web2py.com/jpolite is actually a po
Excellent! je prends le train, direction MTL, a tous les quelques mois
pour me rendre au bureau (peut-etre un peu moins souvent l'hiver ;) )
SO, I have a question: Once, I use the button to add a field (which
does work well), what should be the expected back-end result? does one
of the tables get
On Jan 19, 9:17 am, Anthony wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 8:18:25 AM UTC-5, ae wrote:
>
> > I have lots of users and when one thread takes a long time, some users
> > can keep accessing controller functions and some can't. Once the long-
> > running controller finishes, everyone can a
Yeah, installed it last night too (I had always wondered what that was
about, 'jPolite' - I thought it was for displaying images, because of
the image of it on appliances :)). I think this could be the best kept
secret... jpolite for pod like applications would be a great thing
(and now i feel like
Hmm, this sounds contrary to what Massimo and Jonathan have been saying.
>From their explanations, it sounds like user A should not be blocking user B
(i.e., their requests should not be sharing a thread).
On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 9:50:35 AM UTC-5, ae wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 19, 9:17 am, Ant
On Jan 18, 11:21 pm, Anthony wrote:
> I tried this (the session.forget() version), and sayjunk is still being
> blocked for 30 seconds while waiting for blockme to finish (only when in the
> same browser -- I can load sayjunk in a different browser, which starts a
> different session). Am I miss
On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 1:35:09 AM UTC-5, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
>
> Actually, there's a bug in the documentation (or else in Session). You have
> to say:
>
> session.forget(response)
>
> or else the session doesn't get unlocked
>
There are at least four occurrences of session.forg
For now only adding and removing city input. I clone city input retag
id='city' to id='city2' for the first clone and so on. I change all the id
attribute of other tag cloned like divs. I had a garbage can icon and make
it mouseover. That it for now.
Since I change the id of input to city2, city3
If you move the script into the layout.html in the head it still works...
You can then remove the view /view/default/register.html_
So you get access to admin, request, session, response button to see what
going. You can see that city2 vars is store in session for example.
Richard
On Wed, Jan 19
On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 6:54:05 AM UTC-5, blackthorne wrote:
>
> Oddly enough, I can't find a good code snippet network.
> GitHub and alikes made a great step with code sharing for full
> projects. You can search for projects not code snippets.
> There are many snippet managers that help
To temporarily solve the problem described in this post I added
keepvalues=True, now when the records aren't inserted I just submit
the form again, which somehow works.
However, this causes the reset button to no longer work:
def create_form():
response.view='form.html'
form=SQLFORM.facto
Hello,
Try to interact in shell and in the browser at the same time to test form
input... Is it possible to start web2py in both mode at the same time??
Or is there a way to insert form input in shell mode?
Thanks
Richard
Please upgrade. 1.91.4 has known bugs. If you still have the problem,
we will look furtherinot this.
On Jan 18, 9:59 pm, Rupesh Pradhan wrote:
> My Computer Configuration:
> CPU: Intel
> Motheboard: ASUS
> OS: Windows XP Profession, SP2
>
> Web2Py version: 1.91.4 (2010-12-22)
>
> Why am I getting
No. You can only access the models.
On Jan 19, 12:31 am, walter wrote:
> Question about a shell. Can I interact to controllers and views as
> easy as a DB? If it is true, how?
Mind that is a veyr old app that uses something called jDiv which
later evolved into LOAD. It should be rewritten using jpolite 2 and
LOAD.
On Jan 18, 6:21 pm, Anthony wrote:
> Probably not quite what you're looking for, but maybe this could
> help:http://www.web2py.com/jpolite
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> O
Both may lock the DB in sqlite. That is the only problem I can think
of.
On Jan 19, 9:45 am, Richard Vézina
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Try to interact in shell and in the browser at the same time to test form
> input... Is it possible to start web2py in both mode at the same time??
>
> Or is there a way
Can't find the exast bash command to do it. (I have postgres)
With :
python web2py.py -a 'asdf' -i 127.0.0.1 -p 8001 -S appname -M auto'
I got the ipython, but when I go to 127.0.0.1:8001 nothing...
Richard
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Massimo Di Pierro <
massimo.dipie...@gmail.com> wrote
Richard,
python web2py.py -a 'asdf' -i 127.0.0.1 -p 8001 -S appname -M auto'
Starts only web2py interactive shell mode, not the webserver.
You have to open 2 consoles
in the first you do:
python web2py.py -S appname -M -P
in second you do:
python web2py.py -a 'asdf' -i 127.0.0.1 -p 8001'
Br
On Jan 19, 2011, at 6:50 AM, ae wrote:
>
>
>
> On Jan 19, 9:17 am, Anthony wrote:
>> On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 8:18:25 AM UTC-5, ae wrote:
>>
>>> I have lots of users and when one thread takes a long time, some users
>>> can keep accessing controller functions and some can't. Once the lo
On Jan 19, 2011, at 3:55 AM, Albert Abril wrote:
> Just a suggestion.
>
> When I an incorrect url, for example:
> http://web2py.com/layout (instead of http://web2py.com/layouts)
>
> ...appears an "invalid controller" error, as it's expected.
>
> What if it instead is shown a nicer 404?
>
Rig
Then I will be able to request.vars?
I go test.
Richard
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Bruno Rocha wrote:
> Richard,
>
> python web2py.py -a 'asdf' -i 127.0.0.1 -p 8001 -S appname -M auto'
>
> Starts only web2py interactive shell mode, not the webserver.
>
> You have to open 2 consoles
>
>
2011/1/19 Massimo Di Pierro
> No. You can only access the models.
I wonder if it is possible to start web2py in Shell mode, execute a
controller under the web2py environment.
inspect the controllers 'return' or use template.py to evaluate a view file
passing the controller return as argument.
The way you define the column names in the Jqgrid plugin is done,
according to the book, with the "columns" attribute is a list of
columns names to be displayed. However, in the plugin_wiki widget
builder interface that is done with the attribute "colnames".
In the code plugin_wiki controller, the
Nop!
In [2]: request.vars
Out[2]:
Samething with plain python shell (-P option)
Richard
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Richard Vézina <
ml.richard.vez...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Then I will be able to request.vars?
>
> I go test.
>
> Richard
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Bruno Rocha
hmmm, something say like:
def unittests():
"""
test the ability to run unittests
"""
import os
import sys
import glob
import cStringIO
from gluon.shell import env
#save stdout so we can capture data and reset it.
stdout = sys.stdout
stderr = sys.stder
It's definitely nicer (more professional) to have a customized page
for invalid request.
If the response is left off the session.forget() parameter list it defaults
to None. The end result then is the session._forget state variable is set
True but the session file is not unlocked in the _unlock function. This
would enhance performance by bypassing the writing of the session file at
So, I guess the question is, what should the book (and the 'call' function
in the scaffolding app) be recommending, session.forget()
or session.forget(response)? At the very least, the difference between the
two should be explained in the book.
On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 1:26:06 PM UTC-5,
Ok.
Thanks for the response.
On Jan 19, 8:59 pm, Massimo Di Pierro
wrote:
> Please upgrade. 1.91.4 has known bugs. If you still have the problem,
> we will look furtherinot this.
>
> On Jan 18, 9:59 pm, Rupesh Pradhan wrote:
>
>
>
> > My Computer Configuration:
> > CPU: Intel
> > Motheboard: AS
On Jan 19, 2011, at 10:26 AM, ron_m wrote:
> If the response is left off the session.forget() parameter list it defaults
> to None. The end result then is the session._forget state variable is set
> True but the session file is not unlocked in the _unlock function. This would
> enhance performan
UPDATE: I am able to reproduce this "Premature end of script headers:
wsgihandler.py" error with a slightly modified app based on the image
blog in the web2py book. I modified it so that images are shown in
the index page, instead of having just the titles listed.
Testing using: ab -kc 100 -t 2
I remember session.forget() documented as a performance enhancement - no
plans to alter session on this call, do this to save the write. I think this
would be the most common use. Adding the response parameter to unlock the
session file is only required if there is a need for concurrency in the
On Jan 19, 2011, at 10:32 AM, Anthony wrote:
> So, I guess the question is, what should the book (and the 'call' function in
> the scaffolding app) be recommending, session.forget() or
> session.forget(response)? At the very least, the difference between the two
> should be explained in the book
I saw that too last night but it was late. It would be better to set
response.session_file to None which will force a file close since the file
object goes out of scope. Adding a del in _unlock will cause AttributeError
in the _try_store_on_disk when the request-response cycle is finishing up.
What is curious is that RAM is still available, with this error.
Monitoring CPU (using top) shows CPU % is about 70% for apache2 (70%
is probably capped by my VPS host, given to each VPS slice).
And this occurs for a very simple app. I hope Massimo or someone else
can reproduce this error with th
I forgot to mention that in this imageblog app, I only have 10 images,
and no comment. I.e. a very small database.
Here are the 10 images:
http://imgur.com/u6gwul&kJNwj&DsjQx&HIIN9&9AqEI&I5Pvh&1gxag&EcoJr&u2ucY&3583C
It would be better to set response.session_file to None in _unlock because
the second _unlock call will generate an AttributeError when testing for
response.session_file at the top of _unlock.
On Jan 19, 2011, at 10:52 AM, ron_m wrote:
> I saw that too last night but it was late. It would be better to set
> response.session_file to None which will force a file close since the file
> object goes out of scope. Adding a del in _unlock will cause AttributeError
> in the _try_store_on_disk
There is another subtle problem. If the file close is not done after the
unlock which is how it works now then the file is still open. It is not
possible to get the exclusive lock in session.connect() until the file is
closed so the second request remains blocked.
On Jan 19, 2011, at 11:06 AM, ron_m wrote:
> There is another subtle problem. If the file close is not done after the
> unlock which is how it works now then the file is still open. It is not
> possible to get the exclusive lock in session.connect() until the file is
> closed so the second reque
On Jan 19, 10:14 am, ae wrote:
> Well, maybe not. I just downloaded 1.91.6 and I couldn't replicate
> the behavior. We use 1.67.1 in production and what I tested on might
> have been even older than that.
So I'm back to not sure again. When I tested earlier I used the --
maxthreads option, but
Maybe it is a Windows only issue, I was reviewing the flock(2) man page and
it isn't a problem in UNIX systems. I haven't looked at the Windows docs but
remember file access is more restrictive on that system. For now it is only
a suspicion, I don't use Windows so would have to do a lot to test
Thanks this is very helpful and I will try reproduce it.
Are you running the trunk version or which other version?
Massimo
On Jan 19, 12:45 pm, VP wrote:
> UPDATE: I am able to reproduce this "Premature end of script headers:
> wsgihandler.py" error with a slightly modified app based on the ima
Good catch. Thanks Jonathan.
On Jan 19, 12:45 pm, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
> On Jan 19, 2011, at 10:26 AM, ron_m wrote:
>
> > If the response is left off the session.forget() parameter list it defaults
> > to None. The end result then is the session._forget state variable is set
> > True but the
Yes, this echos my experiences exactly! Using apache ab benchmark
alone would NOT trigger the error. I had plenty of RAM available.
Seems to be a concurrency bug.
On Jan 19, 10:53 am, VP wrote:
> What is curious is that RAM is still available, with this error.
> Monitoring CPU (using top) shows
On Jan 19, 2011, at 11:23 AM, ron_m wrote:
> Maybe it is a Windows only issue, I was reviewing the flock(2) man page and
> it isn't a problem in UNIX systems. I haven't looked at the Windows docs but
> remember file access is more restrictive on that system. For now it is only a
> suspicion, I d
On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 2:33:55 PM UTC-5, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
>
> On Jan 19, 2011, at 11:23 AM, ron_m wrote:
> > Maybe it is a Windows only issue, I was reviewing the flock(2) man page
> and it isn't a problem in UNIX systems. I haven't looked at the Windows docs
> but remember file a
--maxthreads does nothing if you don't specify --minthreads, so that
should be fixed one way or another. I don't know if that problem is
in web2py or Rocket.
Now that I think about it, it seems likely that somewhere something's
doing:
if maxthreads < minthreads:
maxthreads = minthreads
On Jan 19, 2:48 pm, ae wrote:
> --maxthreads does nothing if you don't specify --minthreads, so that
> should be fixed one way or another. I don't know if that p
I am running the official version 1.91.6.
On Jan 19, 1:24 pm, Massimo Di Pierro
wrote:
> Thanks this is very helpful and I will try reproduce it.
> Are you running the trunk version or which other version?
>
> Massimo
>
> On Jan 19, 12:45 pm, VP wrote:
>
> > UPDATE: I am able to reproduce thi
On Jan 19, 2011, at 11:43 AM, Anthony wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 2:33:55 PM UTC-5, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
> On Jan 19, 2011, at 11:23 AM, ron_m wrote:
> > Maybe it is a Windows only issue, I was reviewing the flock(2) man page and
> > it isn't a problem in UNIX systems. I haven't loo
On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 2:51:25 PM UTC-5, ae wrote:
>
> Now that I think about it, it seems likely that somewhere something's
> doing:
>
> if maxthreads < minthreads:
> maxthreads = minthreads
I'm not sure about that, but I found this great Monty Python reference while
looking i
It seems the links to the images don't work anymore. You can just
picked any 10 images, but again the ones I used are:
http://i.imgur.com/u6gwu.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/kJNwj.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/DsjQx.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/HIIN9.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/9AqEI.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/I5Pvh.jpg
http
On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 2:58:33 PM UTC-5, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
>
> Also, I notice the command line options section of the book (
> http://web2py.com/book/default/chapter/04?search=shell#Command-Line-Options)
> still refers to the --numthreads option -- should that be replaced with the
On Jan 19, 2011, at 11:48 AM, ae wrote:
>
> --maxthreads does nothing if you don't specify --minthreads, so that
> should be fixed one way or another. I don't know if that problem is
> in web2py or Rocket.
I can't find a problem. How did it present itself?
One thing to keep in mind is that the
Would exec_environment() be useful here:
http://web2py.com/book/default/chapter/04#Execution-Environment
On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 11:47:26 AM UTC-5, rochacbruno wrote:
> 2011/1/19 Massimo Di Pierro
>
>> No. You can only access the models.
>
>
> I wonder if it is possible to start web2py
So, the answer is YES, you can interact with controllers within the shell, I
think web2py could have some helper to wrap that.
< file '/controllers/default.py'>
def sum():
n = request.vars.num
return 1+n
>>> from gluon.shell import exec_environment
>>> request.vars
>>> request.vars.num
I was talking about the _unlock call at the top of _try_store_on_disk
def _try_store_on_disk(self, request, response):
if not hasattr(os,'mkdir'): return
if response._dbtable_and_field \
or not response.session_id \
or self._forget:
s
I think the default minimum is 8 and it seems there are 3 other
'overhead' threads. (if I just start web2py without any thread
options, ps shows 11 threads.)
If I do --maxthreads=2, I get 11 threads total.
If I do --minthreads=2 --maxthreads=2, I get 5 total (3 + 2?)
So, since the default is 8 a
Simply:
>>>
exec_environment('applications/welcome/controllers/default.py',request=request).sum()
5
Bruno Rocha
http://about.me/rochacbruno/bio
On Jan 19, 2011, at 12:32 PM, ron_m wrote:
> I was talking about the _unlock call at the top of _try_store_on_disk
>
> def _try_store_on_disk(self, request, response):
> if not hasattr(os,'mkdir'): return
> if response._dbtable_and_field \
> or not response.sess
On Jan 19, 2011, at 12:32 PM, ae wrote:
>
> I think the default minimum is 8 and it seems there are 3 other
> 'overhead' threads. (if I just start web2py without any thread
> options, ps shows 11 threads.)
The default minimum is 10 (set in Rocket). I think you're seeing the main
thread plus the
Okay, I get it, Storage id a dict but adds a __getattr__ which returns None
on missing key. Nothing like learning in public -- blush.
I can say that using two different browsers (FF & Chrome) from the
same host does not exhibit the same behavior as two tabs/windows from
the same browser (same profile...).
On Jan 19, 1:46 pm, ron_m wrote:
> I remember session.forget() documented as a performance enhancement - no
> plans to alter
On Jan 19, 2011, at 12:49 PM, ae wrote:
>
> I can say that using two different browsers (FF & Chrome) from the
> same host does not exhibit the same behavior as two tabs/windows from
> the same browser (same profile...).
Yes, that's expected. Browsers don't share their cookie jars, so there's no
This would be a great contribution.
never tried but 2 possibilities arise:
- put all imports in the head of the code I personally use tips
from http://pierreth.blogspot.com/2010/10/web2py-eclipse-pydev-recipe.html
(search the section starting with "Avoiding warning and errors with
Pydev") with a few variations
- explore the ca
I understand getting a different session is expected. I'm talking
about different behavior in how requests are dispatched to threads.
The above scenarios for example which leads me to believe you can't
reliably use long running functions.
On Jan 19, 2011, at 1:45 PM, ae wrote:
>
> I understand getting a different session is expected. I'm talking
> about different behavior in how requests are dispatched to threads.
> The above scenarios for example which leads me to believe you can't
> reliably use long running functions.
Again, i
On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 1:14:28 AM UTC-5, cjrh wrote:
>
> There was a malfunction on my link to the module-level documentation
> that I was referring to (curse you Frames): first go here:
>
> http://www.web2py.com/examples/static/epydoc/index.html
>
> And then click on web2py.gluon.dal o
Perhaps I missed an important point;
I have an "api.py" which I loaded through the modules directory;
This "api.py" makes calls for data to external web services;
In my controller; I have
api = local_import('api')
def remote():
api_result = api.xml_request({'id':'123456'})
return
If you are editing the file in the modules directory then that is the
problem. A module gets pulled in and kept by the server until restart unless
you add a parameter to the local_import()
api = local_import('api', True) where the True says perform a module reload
on each request.
Great Thanks I will try;
At what cost am I doing this; Does it add tremendous overhead?
Thanks
On 1/19/11 5:24 PM, ron_m wrote:
If you are editing the file in the modules directory then that is the
problem. A module gets pulled in and kept by the server until restart
unless you add a parame
Yes. In production set the second argument to False
On Jan 19, 4:27 pm, "David J." wrote:
> Great Thanks I will try;
>
> At what cost am I doing this; Does it add tremendous overhead?
>
> Thanks
>
> On 1/19/11 5:24 PM, ron_m wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > If you are editing the file in the modules dire
As you said; It worked;
Thanks for the pointer; I appreciate it;
And will set to false in production.
Thanks again.
On 1/19/11 5:27 PM, Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
Yes. In production set the second argument to False
On Jan 19, 4:27 pm, "David J." wrote:
Great Thanks I will try;
At what cos
On Jan 19, 2011, at 2:32 PM, David J. wrote:
>
> As you said; It worked;
>
> Thanks for the pointer; I appreciate it;
>
> And will set to false in production.
I define a PRODUCTION flag in my model, and use it for this purpose as well as
setting different log levels and cache durations.
>
>
On Jan 19, 2011, at 7:15 AM, Anthony wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 1:35:09 AM UTC-5, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
> Actually, there's a bug in the documentation (or else in Session). You have
> to say:
>
> session.forget(response)
>
> or else the session doesn't get unlocked
>
> There
Hello guys,
I'm wanting an action returns a json like this:
{
"start": "2011-01-27",
"id": 4,
"title": "Fulano Silva"
}
Only to send to the view he is being rendered thus:
"{\n \"start\": \"2011-01-27\", \n
\"id\": 4, \n \"title\": \"Fulano
Silva\"\n}"
The code I made to ret
wow - sounds fantastic!
I use Komodo Edit, and to deal with the imports I made a plugin that
executed this implicitly in every Python file:
if 0:
from gluon.globals import *
from gluon.html import *
from gluon.http import *
from gluon.sqlhtml import SQLFORM, SQLTABLE, form_factory
session = Session()
Could this be configurable? I.e. have a setting in the router to
specify if we want a 400 or 404 when this occurs?
Matt
On Jan 20, 5:43 am, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
> On Jan 19, 2011, at 3:55 AM, Albert Abril wrote:
>
> > Just a suggestion.
>
> > When I an incorrect url, for example:
> >http://we
Anything? This is very discouraging.
How about this? Would it be possible to run geodjango and web2py on the
same server? I'd like my main site to be served by web2py. Then provide a
link on the webpage to http://mysite/geospatial/, at which point geodjango
takes over and starts serving pag
One year ago a user (do not recall his name) implemented something
like geodjango in web2py dal. This was a master thesis project. He was
not my student but I have the code somewhere.It was never merged to
trunk because the patch was for a very old version of web2py.
There is also this: https://la
This is a new setup of web2py using mod_wsgi on a shared host. Any
idea what is wrong?
.htaccess:
SetHandler wsgi-script
Options +ExecCGI
RewriteEngine On
RewriteRule ^((static|auth|admin|mycontroller).*)$ /wsgihandler.py/
myapp/$1 [QSA,PT,L]
Error logs:
[Wed Jan 19 17:52:06 2011] [error] [clien
On Jan 20, 12:39 am, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
> I define a PRODUCTION flag in my model, and use it for this purpose as well
> as setting different log levels and cache durations.
And for migration support, I'm guessing. I do the same thing.
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
