I said, "I have no object to gradual rollover." but meant to say "I have
no objection to gradual rollover."
I mean that I'm misspelling words like you typically do. It was meant
in jest. ;-P
My mom was a stickler for proper pronunciation (being in Oklahoma you
can see how that might be impo
Not sure what than means. Hope it is good.
On Mar 22, 10:31 am, Timothy Farrell wrote:
> *objection
>
> Gosh Massimo, you're wearing off on me.
>
> On 3/22/2010 9:49 AM, Timothy Farrell wrote:
>
> > I have no object to gradual rollover. One way that could satisfy from
> > all angles is to have H
*objection
Gosh Massimo, you're wearing off on me.
On 3/22/2010 9:49 AM, Timothy Farrell wrote:
I have no object to gradual rollover. One way that could satisfy from
all angles is to have HTTPS configurations default to use Rocket while
regular connections use Cherrypy. This would accomplish
I have no object to gradual rollover. One way that could satisfy from
all angles is to have HTTPS configurations default to use Rocket while
regular connections use Cherrypy. This would accomplish:
- revealing it to a smaller portion of the web2py user-ship at first
- remove the requirement o
I have no objection to having an option and I would take a patch in
this direction but: 1) I prefer to have rocket as default (else we
will never know if there is some obscure problem with it) and, 2) they
should both use ssl and not openssl so I do not have to redo the re-
packaging.
Right now we
On Mar 22, 2010, at 5:55 AM, Timothy Farrell wrote:
> web2py could support both but the benefits get lost quickly. web2py is
> designed to be simple, asking the user to pick which bundled web server they
> would like to use is too much in my opinion.
No need to ask; there'd be a silent default
web2py could support both but the benefits get lost quickly. web2py is
designed to be simple, asking the user to pick which bundled web server
they would like to use is too much in my opinion.
Short or Tall?
Caf or Decaf?
Sugar?
Milk? (steamed?)
Cinnamon?
For here or To-go?
How would you like
because I'm
in the web2py community and there is still plenty of room for Rocket to be
optimized (which I noted).
Now you're up-to-date.
-tim
-Original Message-----
From: "mdipierro"
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 9:01pm
To: "web2p
There may be because of the extra logic for parsing http headers,
looking for models, controllers, views etc.
I do not know. It would be nice to quantify the web2py overhead.
Massimo
On Mar 20, 8:57 pm, Kuba Kucharski wrote:
> you expect overhead from this? ;)
>
> def benchmark2():
>
> retur
you expect overhead from this? ;)
def benchmark2():
return dict(data="test")
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web2py-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
web2py
oops. Sorry. It would be interesting to know how much overhead does
web2py add.
On Mar 20, 7:44 pm, Kuba Kucharski wrote:
> > I am assuming that in all your tests you did not use web2py. I
>
> wrong assumption. I even published my model&controller at the
> beginning of this thread.
--
You recei
> I am assuming that in all your tests you did not use web2py. I
wrong assumption. I even published my model&controller at the
beginning of this thread.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web2py-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to web...
I am assuming that in all your tests you did not use web2py. I am
assuming you just tested some "hello word" wsgi application. You can
find gluon/sneaky.py in the web2py source and there is a wsgi hello
world example in there.
Massimo
On Mar 20, 4:07 pm, Kuba Kucharski wrote:
> ALL POWER I CAN G
> ach! I meant to say: web2py.com
nice one.
yes. stability and funcionality over speed. I just wanted to learn
where are the borders(and how to benchmark properly).
--
Kuba
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web2py-users" group.
To post to
ral possible explanations
> > > for this. All of the explanations require more development on Rocket to
> > > work around. The difference in performance would not be a show-stopper
> > > for me, but others may disagree.
>
> > > I've asked Kuba to r
et vs. 4xCherrypy with the second test
> > configuration.
>
> > Vasile Ermicioi, put in a vote for Rocket to be included in web2py because
> > I'm in the web2py community and there is still plenty of room for Rocket to
> > be optimized (which I noted).
>
> &
ALL POWER I CAN GET FROM quad core Xeon @ 2.33GHz
ONLY SOME STABLE RECORDS HERE:
Request rate: 929.0 req/s (1.1 ms/req) QUAD CHERRYPY
Request rate: 877.6 req/s (1.1 ms/req) QUAD ROCKET
Request rate: 1478.0 req/s (0.7 ms/req) CHERRYPY SOLO
Request rate: 1544.2 req/s (0.6 ms/req) ROCKET SOLO
QUAD
On Mar 20, 2010, at 9:58 AM, Timothy Farrell wrote:
> Vasile Ermicioi, put in a vote for Rocket to be included in web2py because
> I'm in the web2py community and there is still plenty of room for Rocket to
> be optimized (which I noted).
I like the idea of built-in servers as plugins (not form
plenty of room for Rocket to
> be optimized (which I noted).
>
> Now you're up-to-date.
>
> -tim
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "mdipierro"
> Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 9:01pm
> To: "web2py-users"
> Subject: [web2py] Re: benc
zed (which I noted).
Now you're up-to-date.
-tim
-Original Message-
From: "mdipierro"
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 9:01pm
To: "web2py-users"
Subject: [web2py] Re: benchmarking: rocket vs pound with four rockets
had a long day, can somebody provide an execute summary
had a long day, can somebody provide an execute summary of all the
tests?
On Mar 19, 3:33 pm, Timothy Farrell wrote:
> Thank you Kuba. Would you mind re-running the 4x pound test like this also?
>
> On 3/19/2010 3:09 PM, Kuba Kucharski wrote:
>
> > One instance of each, with 10 calls in a connec
Thank you Kuba. Would you mind re-running the 4x pound test like this also?
On 3/19/2010 3:09 PM, Kuba Kucharski wrote:
One instance of each, with 10 calls in a connection as it is closer to
reallife scenario:
(numbers speak for themselves)
CHERRYPY:
r...@kubatron:/home/kuba/httperf-0.9.0/sr
One instance of each, with 10 calls in a connection as it is closer to
reallife scenario:
(numbers speak for themselves)
CHERRYPY:
r...@kubatron:/home/kuba/httperf-0.9.0/src# ./httperf --hog --server
192.168.0.1 --port=8000 ==uri=/vae/default/benchmark2
--num-conns=1 --num-calls=10
httperf -
I would add a vote for Rocket.
A few thoughts about:
- rocket is developed inside our community, that means more control over it:
feedback, contributions etc
- still young, that means it will be optimized :) I believe that Tim and
others will do so
- one file
And even if cherrypy is only a bit f
>
> My point here was about the general web2py population rather than your
> "thing". No offense intended, but you have a special case. web2py handles
> web-services but that is not it's primary function.
yes, true, I was just explaining my httperf thinking
>I think Massimo wishes
> to primari
In my own test, the difference (on Windows) between 1 and 10 yields a ~2.5x
increase in requests per second. I don't have a readily accessible Linux right
now. Kuba, please run these>numbers again with --num-calls=10.
my reality is a lot of concurrent connections with only one call.
I
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 2:48 PM, mdipierro wrote:
> Can you also do me a favor? Can you benchmark sneaky.py (in web2py/
> gluon/)? In my tests it was faster than cherryby and I thought rocket
> was an improvement over it.
ok, as soon as I get back to my testing environment again
--
You received
>Just looking over the httperf command, Kuba used --num-calls=1 This would not
>be an accurate real-world test because it creates a new connection for every
>request whereas most >browsers span requests over only a few connections.
>Nicholas Piel's test used --num-calls=10 for testing HTTP/1.1
Just looking over the httperf command, Kuba used --num-calls=1 This
would not be an accurate real-world test because it creates a new
connection for every request whereas most browsers span requests over
only a few connections. Nicholas Piel's test used --num-calls=10 for
testing HTTP/1.1 ser
Massimo, there is no possibility to keep both of two and select one?
anyway it's only a file isn't it?
Or maybe keep it as plugins to download?
alex
El 19/03/2010 14:24, mdipierro escribió:
Clearly we have conflicting benchmarks. I like Rocket because it is
cleaner but we need to go with the fa
This is a different test than the one I presented. The test I presented
was run on Windows with one instance and tested with ApacheBench. I've
looked at httperf a little and it seems to be a more realistic test than
ApacheBench.
Due to the nature of how Rocket handles listening sockets, it i
Can you also do me a favor? Can you benchmark sneaky.py (in web2py/
gluon/)? In my tests it was faster than cherryby and I thought rocket
was an improvement over it.
On Mar 19, 8:43 am, Kuba Kucharski wrote:
> I like Rocket too. I would like it to be better than Cherrypy
>
> --
> Kuba
--
You re
I like Rocket too. I would like it to be better than Cherrypy
--
Kuba
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web2py-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
web2py+unsubscr.
Clearly we have conflicting benchmarks. I like Rocket because it is
cleaner but we need to go with the fastest. Let's wait for Tim
response and we there is a disagreement I propose that a few more
people try reproduce the benchmarks (to make sure there is not
something weird in the setup) and then
>Are these numbers consistent with Tim numbers? Could this be dues to a
>different memory usage?
1. Tim?
2. I have a lot of free memory while testing
I wrote email to an author of the blog entry about wsgi webserver
benchmarks - Nicholas Piël
http://nichol.as/benchmark-of-python-web-servers
In
Are these numbers consistent with Tim numbers? Could this be dues to a
different memory usage?
On Mar 18, 8:51 pm, Kuba Kucharski wrote:
> I've changed methodics a bit so I repeat my measurments for ROCKET at
> the end of the file.
>
> Methodics: Increase rate till errors show
>
> @Massimo
> as y
the last one is doubled rocket solo w/o a header..
--
Kuba
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web2py-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
web2py+unsubscr...@googlegro
I've changed methodics a bit so I repeat my measurments for ROCKET at
the end of the file.
Methodics: Increase rate till errors show
@Massimo
as you can see quad cherrypy is faster than quad rocket. but when you
look closer to "SOLO" comparision you can see that both servers are
hitting SAME WALL
I've changed methodics a bit so I repeat my measurments for ROCKET at
the end of the file.
Methodics: Increase rate till errors show
@Massimo
as you can see quad cherrypy is faster than quad rocket. but when you
look closer to "SOLO" comparision you can see that both servers are
hitting SAME WALL
Because they are not pure python.
On Mar 18, 7:51 pm, Vasile Ermicioi wrote:
> just curious: why not using an existing (and fast) python web server like
> tornado or fapws ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web2py-users" group.
To post to this group
just curious: why not using an existing (and fast) python web server like
tornado or fapws ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web2py-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email
Did you try cherrypy? I think I have had this problem with it before
but never quantified.
On Mar 18, 6:03 pm, Kuba Kucharski wrote:
> with 4x Rocket via Pound all is ok, with Rocket Solo I get 4703
> addrunavail errors(in httperf this should never happened and it
> renders this benchmarks useles
with 4x Rocket via Pound all is ok, with Rocket Solo I get 4703
addrunavail errors(in httperf this should never happened and it
renders this benchmarks useless) per 1 connections. I think this
might be about linux tweaking. Do ANYONE have some more experience
with setting sysctl environment for
1.0.2 is out. Go get it!
On 3/18/2010 11:57 AM, mdipierro wrote:
from https://launchpad.net/rocket the second gree button on the right
is Rocket-mono-xxx.zip
Unzip it. You get rocket.py. Move it into web2py/gluon/
web2py trunk already uses 1.0.1 so we have wait for Tim to post the
new one.
Ma
from https://launchpad.net/rocket the second gree button on the right
is Rocket-mono-xxx.zip
Unzip it. You get rocket.py. Move it into web2py/gluon/
web2py trunk already uses 1.0.1 so we have wait for Tim to post the
new one.
Massimo
On Mar 18, 10:51 am, Kuba Kucharski wrote:
> @Tim
>
> do you
Yes.
We already have it in trunk and you can try it here:
http://web2py.com/examples/static/1.76.5.2.b/web2py_src.zip
http://web2py.com/examples/static/1.76.5.2.b/web2py_win.zip
http://web2py.com/examples/static/1.76.5.2.b/web2py_osx.zip
Massimo
On Mar 18, 8:43 am, Vasile Ermicioi wrote:
> Wh
I noticed that many vps hosting provide HAProxy these days.
On Mar 17, 9:26 pm, Kuba Kucharski wrote:
> http://web2py.com/book/default/section/11/12?search=poundhttp://www.apsis.ch/pound/
>
> kernel is 2.6.31-14-server not PAE of course.. sorry for mistakes.
> I didn't mentioned but I had also ex
> I was going to say "extend/include" not import
and even this is not true as I see now for small layout
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web2py-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this grou
> Did you "compile" the app before running the benchmarks?
yes
>
> Can you say more about "The most important thing: effects depend much
> on what you import. "
> imports should be cached and should not make a difference.
actually they don't, it is late, I was going to say "extend/include" not im
Did you "compile" the app before running the benchmarks?
Can you say more about "The most important thing: effects depend much
on what you import. "
imports should be cached and should not make a difference.
Massimo
On Mar 17, 8:20 pm, Kuba Kucharski wrote:
> This is probably obvious but I deci
50 matches
Mail list logo
