I have no objection to having an option and I would take a patch in
this direction but: 1) I prefer to have rocket as default (else we
will never know if there is some obscure problem with it) and, 2) they
should both use ssl and not openssl so I do not have to redo the re-
packaging.

Right now we have one problem that needs to be fixed first. web2py.exe
-h does not work for 1.76.5.3.b

On Mar 22, 9:28 am, Jonathan Lundell <jlund...@pobox.com> wrote:
> On Mar 22, 2010, at 5:55 AM, Timothy Farrell wrote:
>
> > web2py could support both but the benefits get lost quickly.  web2py is 
> > designed to be simple, asking the user to pick which bundled web server 
> > they would like to use is too much in my opinion.
>
> No need to ask; there'd be a silent default.
>
> I'm thinking mainly of an overlapped transition.
>
>
>
> > Short or Tall?
> > Caf or Decaf?
> > Sugar?
> > Milk? (steamed?)
> > Cinnamon?
> > For here or To-go?
>
> > How would you like your web2py today?
>
> > On 3/20/2010 12:39 PM, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
> >> On Mar 20, 2010, at 9:58 AM, Timothy Farrell wrote:
>
> >>> Vasile Ermicioi, put in a vote for Rocket to be included in web2py 
> >>> because I'm in the web2py community and there is still plenty of room for 
> >>> Rocket to be optimized (which I noted).
>
> >> I like the idea of built-in servers as plugins (not formally, but the 
> >> general idea of supporting more than one in a simply configured way). The 
> >> downside is that we won't have as focused testing of any one server, but 
> >> it's compensated for by how much easier it would be to include a new 
> >> server in the release without running the risk of breaking existing 
> >> installations.
>
> >> As I've said, I don't think that ultimate performance need be a high 
> >> priority for the built-in server; rather, ease of use and rock-solid 
> >> stability are the priorities. And I think I like relying on the SSL 
> >> package.
>
> >> My inclination: enable easy server switching. Keep CherryPy the default 
> >> for at least one more release, but make Rocket and sneaky easy to ask for 
> >> from at startup. That'll give those of us who are interested easy access 
> >> to Rocket in a low-risk way. And then at some point, possibly very soon, 
> >> switch the default to Rocket, retaining an easy option for the others as a 
> >> fallback.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "web2py-users" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group 
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web2py-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.

Reply via email to